Corporate Strategists

2019 ◽  
pp. 58-89
Author(s):  
Richard Whittington

This chapter examines corporate strategists—in-house strategy staffs—as a major part of the Strategy profession. It examines their growth since the beginning of the twentieth century, and especially since the 1960s. It demonstrates that corporate strategists remain a significant professional group, long after Mintzberg’s (1994) description of a ‘fall’ of strategic planning. The chapter identifies important continuities in the nature of corporate strategists’ work, including analysis and support for senior management, especially the chief executive officer. Further continuities for corporate strategists include the permeable and precarious nature of their profession. At the same time, the chapter identifies attractive features of the corporate strategy role, such as intellectual stimulus, broad perspectives, career progression, and closeness to top management decision-making.

Author(s):  
Ernesto A. Lagarda-Leyva ◽  
Ernesto A. Vega-Telles

The objective was to build a graphical interface based on quantitative scenarios to track and show the performance of the main productivity indicators to support senior management decision-making. The problems detected within the organization was related to the number of productivity indicators that were independently analyzed without considering the causes and effects that indicators have over one another. The research was carried out by following the proposed system dynamics methodology. The proposal presented to senior management supports decision-making improving efficiency in three respects: 1) service times, 2) responsiveness, and 3) savings and income for the company. Competitiveness is measured in terms of the company's productivity and positioning when improving its operating efficiency. The contribution to the state of the art is the inclusion of an additional phase to the system dynamics methodology related to the development of the graphic user interface for decision-making.


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Tekieli ◽  
Marion Festing ◽  
Xavier Baeten

Abstract. Based on responses from 158 reward managers located at the headquarters or subsidiaries of multinational enterprises, the present study examines the relationship between the centralization of reward management decision making and its perceived effectiveness in multinational enterprises. Our results show that headquarters managers perceive a centralized approach as being more effective, while for subsidiary managers this relationship is moderated by the manager’s role identity. Referring to social identity theory, the present study enriches the standardization versus localization debate through a new perspective focusing on psychological processes, thereby indicating the importance of in-group favoritism in headquarters and the influence of subsidiary managers’ role identities on reward management decision making.


2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leigh A. Baumgart ◽  
Ellen J. Bass ◽  
Brenda Philips ◽  
Kevin Kloesel

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Dunn ◽  
David E. Calkin ◽  
Matthew P. Thompson

Wildfire’s economic, ecological and social impacts are on the rise, fostering the realisation that business-as-usual fire management in the United States is not sustainable. Current response strategies may be inefficient and contributing to unnecessary responder exposure to hazardous conditions, but significant knowledge gaps constrain clear and comprehensive descriptions of how changes in response strategies and tactics may improve outcomes. As such, we convened a special session at an international wildfire conference to synthesise ongoing research focused on obtaining a better understanding of wildfire response decisions and actions. This special issue provides a collection of research that builds on those discussions. Four papers focus on strategic planning and decision making, three papers on use and effectiveness of suppression resources and two papers on allocation and movement of suppression resources. Here we summarise some of the key findings from these papers in the context of risk-informed decision making. This collection illustrates the value of a risk management framework for improving wildfire response safety and effectiveness, for enhancing fire management decision making and for ushering in a new fire management paradigm.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document