Citizens’ Assemblies and Republican Democracy

2020 ◽  
pp. 81-100
Author(s):  
Stuart White

There has been growing interest in citizens’ assemblies (CAs) as institutions to enhance democratic politics: assemblies that consist wholly or mainly of individuals drawn at random from the general public so as to be representative of the population, which have the responsibility to deliberate over an issue and make recommendations or decisions. But exactly what kind of role should CAs have in a republican model of democracy, distinguished by commitment to the values of deliberation to the common good; political equality and resilience to oligarchy; and active popular sovereignty? The chapter argues against the view that CAs should replace elected assemblies. However, it also argues against seeing CAs as wholly subordinate to elected assemblies. It sets out a specific institutional mechanism in which CAs are integrated with a power to initiate referendums (the petition-assembly-referendum scheme) and shows how this is supported by the distinctive values of a republican democracy.

2015 ◽  
Vol 771 ◽  
pp. 187-190
Author(s):  
Aloysius Rusli

Advances in science and technology have encompassed ever larger and ever smaller scales of time, distance, mass, electrical and electronic devices, temperature, pressure. However, scientific and science awareness have not developed in step in the general population. Many people still regard science and technology as wizardy and magic, incomprehensible and unattainable for the common person. This could be called a cultural time bomb, as the widening divide between scientist’s and technologist’s views with the common lay person’s views will cause a divide between their culture as well. And when the people's legal representatives become differently cultured compared with scientists and technologists, this will cause legal decisions getting disconnected with the common good, due to the incomprehension about science and the scientific way in the representative's way of thinking. This increasing disconnect will not help improving the common good: the nuclear power plant issue is a clear example. A not-so-recent issue of 'shall we signal our presence to extraterrestrial intelligence, or would that attract evil beings towards us?' is also a timely example. Fundamental metrology, with its concern and endeavour to improve and develop appropriate definitions of units and its standards, can decrease uncertainties and increase precision and levels of confidence in its measurements. This can and should play a significant role to improve critical thinking and reflection through improving scientific and science awareness of the general public, to be more able to comprehend some basics in science and technology, and so to recognize relevant ethical issues, realize the sometimes difficult choices between competing technologies, which need critical reflection to be able to discern proper and just choices. This report describes initiation and development of a classroom effort in this direction during these past 15 years, usually receiving appreciation from students, both at the undergraduate and postgraduate level, with an oft-expressed comment, "This should be introduced at secondary level, to become earlier aware of the role and importance of units and standards, and the human aspects of its origins and history". It is proposed that leaders in fundamental metrology of the various units, standards, processes, and history, should enhance efforts and publications to improve scientific and science awareness of the general public, by introducing metrological issues in a popular and interesting way to secondary and university level students.


2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 110-127
Author(s):  
Abdoulaye Sounaye

Unexpectedly, one of the marking features of democratization in Niger has been the rise of a variety of Islamic discourses. They focus on the separation between religion and the state and, more precisely, the way it is manifested through the French model of laïcité, which democratization has adopted in Niger. For many Muslim actors, laïcité amounts to a marginalization of Islamic values and a negation of Islam. This article present three voices: the Collaborators, the Moderates, and the Despisers. Each represents a trend that seeks to influence the state’s political and ideological makeup. Although the ulama in general remain critical vis-à-vis the state’s political and institutional transformation, not all of them reject the principle of the separation between religion and state. The Collaborators suggest cooperation between the religious authority and the political one, the Moderates insist on the necessity for governance to accommodate the people’s will and visions, and the Despisers reject the underpinning liberalism that voids religious authority and demand a total re-Islamization. I argue that what is at stake here is less the separation between state and religion than the modality of this separation and its impact on religious authority. The targets, tones, and justifications of the discourses I explore are evidence of the limitations of a democratization project grounded in laïcité. Thus in place of a secular democratization, they propose a conservative democracy based on Islam and its demands for the realization of the common good.


Author(s):  
Mary L. Hirschfeld

There are two ways to answer the question, What can Catholic social thought learn from the social sciences about the common good? A more modern form of Catholic social thought, which primarily thinks of the common good in terms of the equitable distribution of goods like health, education, and opportunity, could benefit from the extensive literature in public policy, economics, and political science, which study the role of institutions and policies in generating desirable social outcomes. A second approach, rooted in pre-Machiavellian Catholic thought, would expand on this modern notion to include concerns about the way the culture shapes our understanding of what genuine human flourishing entails. On that account, the social sciences offer a valuable description of human life; but because they underestimate how human behavior is shaped by institutions, policies, and the discourse of social science itself, their insights need to be treated with caution.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document