From Genesis to Revelation

2019 ◽  
pp. 75-83
Author(s):  
Nicholas Mee

The expanding universe model was first championed by the Belgian priest Georges Lemaître, who does not always receive as much credit as he deserves. Lemaître showed how the equations of general relativity predict the universe is expanding, but Einstein was sceptical. Lemaître realized this idea could be tested because spectral lines in light from distant galaxies should be redshifted in an expanding universe and this redshift should be proportional to the distance to the galaxies. Henrietta Leavitt discovered that it is possible to determine the distance to Cepheid variables by measuring the period of their variability. Hubble used this technique to determine the distance to various nearby galaxies and compared this to their redshift data and showed that the universe is indeed expanding.

Author(s):  
P. J. E. Peebles

This chapter examines the behavior of a given mass distribution in the Newtonian approximation. Discussion of how irregularities in the matter distribution behave in an expanding universe is greatly simplified by the fact that a limiting approximation of general relativity, Newtonian mechanics, applies in a region small compared to the Hubble length. The rest of the universe can affect the region only through a tidal field. Though the point was clearly made by Georges Lemaître, it has not always been recognized that the Newtonian approximation is not a model but a limiting case valid no matter what is happening in the distant parts of the universe. Because of the importance of this result, the chapter discusses it at some length.


Author(s):  
P. J. E. Peebles

This chapter traces the history of the development of ideas on the large-scale structure of the universe. Modern discussions of the nature of the large-scale matter distribution can be traced back to three central ideas. In 1917, Albert Einstein argued that a closed homogeneous world model fits very well into general relativity theory and the requirements of Mach's principle. In 1926, Edwin Hubble showed that the large-scale distribution of galaxies is close to uniform with no indication of an edge or boundary. In 1927, Georges Lemaître showed that the uniform distribution of galaxies fits very well with the pattern of galaxy redshifts. The chapter then assesses several questions. The first is whether the universe really is homogeneous. Could the homogeneity of the universe have been deduced ahead of time from general principles? Or might it be a useful guide to new principles? It also asks how clustering evolves in an expanding universe, what its origin is, and what this reveals about the nature of the universe.


Author(s):  
Hanoch Gutfreund ◽  
Jürgen Renn

This chapter deals with the early exploration of observational and experimental consequences of general relativity. It explores Erwin Freundlich's failed attempts to verify gravitational light bending and the redshift. The long collaboration between Einstein and Freundlich suffered a setback caused by personal tensions and disagreements around the end of 1921. Nevertheless, they continued to collaborate until both of them had to leave Germany when the Nazis came to power. The chapter also focuses on the triumphal confirmation of light bending during a solar eclipse by Arthur Eddington's expedition. Finally, this chapter considers the Hubble's discovery of the redshift of distant galaxies, which established the notion of an expanding universe.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Chun-Xuan Jiang ◽  

Using space-time ring we establish the mathematical theory of space-time with subluminal and superluminal coexistence(SASC) and ILS [1]. Using two methods we deduce the new gravitational formula. Tardyonic rotating motion produces the centrifugal force ,but tachyonic rotating motion produces the centripetal force, that is gravity. Using it we establish the expansion theory of the universe and suggest the new universe model. We prove that in the universe there are no dark matter and no dark energy. New gravitational formula changes all that. Multiverse and gravitational waves do not exist. Theory of everything has the two forces: (1) the subluminal force (electromagnetism and weak force) and (2) superluminal force(gravity and strong force).We prove that equivalence principle does not exist.Therefore we prove that general relativity is the biggest wrong theory [2]


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  

Cosmologists present clear observational evidences that stellar objects like stars and galaxies do carry out pronounced proper motions, and the question may be raising how these peculiar motions might evolve in time. In this article we study these peculiar motions of single objects, independent whether of microscopic or macroscopic nature, embedded in a globally homogeneous, static, massive universe with inherent gravity. Aims: We show that these objects at their motions, even in a homogeneous universe around them, are permanently subject to net gravitational forces due to the fact that in a post-Newtonian relativistic treatment the sources of cosmic masses are seen under retarded positions, retarded by the time it takes to communicate via gravitons the positions of these masses to the moving object. Methods: This “aberrational” recognition of massive source points on the one hand leads to a braking power permanently decelerating the peculiar motion of any cosmic object, on the other hand it also effects the wave lengths of all photons freely propagating through cosmic space under the action of cosmic gravity. Photons, even in a static homogeneous universe, undergo a permanent red-shifting, since working permanently against a net gravitational force from the direction opposite to the photon’s propagation direction. Results: We do show that the observationally confirmed redshifts of photons from distant galaxies under the new auspices appear as a pure measure of the distance which the photons passed from its galactic emitter to us. In this view redshifts have nothing to do with the Hubble dynamics of the universe and its emitters. Since, however, the existence of Hubble-induced redshifts cannot be excluded, we also look into a combination of both, gravitationally induced redshifts zg and Hubble-induced redshifts zH. We show that gravitationally induced redshifts zg of course also appear in an expanding universe, and it can be demonstrated that for instance in a “coasting universe” with a constant expansion rate R˙ and with R α t both these redshifts zg and zH would lead to similar results.


1998 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Robert Williams

Great progress has been made in recent years in understanding the large-scale structure of the universe. Recall that it is only within this century that we have even come to realize the existence of other galaxies as separate entities. Until the 1920’s the universe did not extend beyond the Milky Way. Novae and Cepheid variables changed that picture, and for the past 75 years extragalactic astronomy has been one of the most active and fertile areas of science. The concept of an expanding universe and its beginning in a Big Bang all derive from the discovery of external galaxies. Distant galaxies are faint and have small angular sizes, therefore their study has remained the province of the largest telescopes. Before the launch of Hubble Space Telescope, ground-based telescopes had succeeded in detecting distant galaxies out to redshifts of z ~ 1, and in establishing certain of their characteristics. But, there was uncertainty as to how much further HST could push the study of distant galaxies given its modest 2.4m diameter mirror and the fact that the surface brightnesses of cosmologically distant objects decrease as (1 + z)4. For this reason, one of the early observations that was scheduled immediately after the first servicing mission of HST in December 1993 to repair spherical aberration was the re-imaging of the cluster of galaxies 0939+4713 at z = 0.4 that had been observed previously by Dressier et al. (1994) from both the ground and with the aberrated HST. The ten-orbit WFPC2 image demonstrated HST’s ability to resolve structure in distant galaxies, showing spiral and elliptical galaxies with a clarity approaching that achieved for the Coma cluster from the ground. Spirals are seen to be relatively abundant in 0939+4713, although they generally show an anomalous morphology.


2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1976-1981
Author(s):  
Casey McMahon

The principle postulate of general relativity appears to be that curved space or curved spacetime is gravitational, in that mass curves the spacetime around it, and that this curved spacetime acts on mass in a manner we call gravity. Here, I use the theory of special relativity to show that curved spacetime can be non-gravitational, by showing that curve-linear space or curved spacetime can be observed without exerting a gravitational force on mass to induce motion- as well as showing gravity can be observed without spacetime curvature. This is done using the principles of special relativity in accordance with Einstein to satisfy the reader, using a gravitational equivalence model. Curved spacetime may appear to affect the apparent relative position and dimensions of a mass, as well as the relative time experienced by a mass, but it does not exert gravitational force (gravity) on mass. Thus, this paper explains why there appears to be more gravity in the universe than mass to account for it, because gravity is not the resultant of the curvature of spacetime on mass, thus the “dark matter” and “dark energy” we are looking for to explain this excess gravity doesn’t exist.


2016 ◽  
pp. 3507-3519
Author(s):  
Mr Casey Ray McMahon

Einsteins theory of General relativity is a popular theory, but unfortunately it cannot account for all the observable gravity in the universe. This paper presents a new force predicted through the McMahon field theory (2010) [1], which is refered to in McMahon field theory (2010) [1] as Mahona (pronounced “Maa-naa”), which appears to be gravitational. In this paper, I draw upon the McMahon field theory (2010) [1], and use it to explain why mass appears gravitational, as well as the source of the excess gravity that General relativity cannot account for. I will do this in simplistic terms for the benefit of the reader. Thus with the understanding presented here, any vechicle utilising this new force called “Mahona” shall have gravitational capability.


Author(s):  
David M. Wittman

General relativity explains much more than the spacetime around static spherical masses.We briefly assess general relativity in the larger context of physical theories, then explore various general relativistic effects that have no Newtonian analog. First, source massmotion gives rise to gravitomagnetic effects on test particles.These effects also depend on the velocity of the test particle, which has substantial implications for orbits around black holes to be further explored in Chapter 20. Second, any changes in the sourcemass ripple outward as gravitational waves, and we tell the century‐long story from the prediction of gravitational waves to their first direct detection in 2015. Third, the deflection of light by galaxies and clusters of galaxies allows us to map the amount and distribution of mass in the universe in astonishing detail. Finally, general relativity enables modeling the universe as a whole, and we explore the resulting Big Bang cosmology.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (03n04) ◽  
pp. 1950011 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Aktaş

In this study, we obtain Einstein, Bergmann–Thomson (BT), Landau–Lifshitz (LL), Møller, Papapetrou (PP) and Tolman energy–momentum (EM) distributions for Ruban universe model in general relativity (GR) and teleparallel gravity (TG). We obtain same results for Einstein, Bergmann–Thomson and Landau–Lifshitz energy–momentum distributions in GR and TG. Also, we get same results for Einstein and Tolman energy–momentum distributions in GR. The Møller energy–momentum results are different in GR and TG. Also, using Ruban universe model, we obtain LRS Bianchi type I solutions and we get zero energy–momentum results for this universe model in GR and TG. These results of LRS Bianchi type I universe model agree with Aygün et al., Taşer et al., Doğru et al., Banerjee–Sen, Tryon and Xulu in different gravitation theories.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document