Teaching and Explanation: Aligning Priors between Machines and Humans

2021 ◽  
pp. 171-196
Author(s):  
José Hernández-Orallo ◽  
Cèsar Ferri

Machine intelligence differs signficantly from human intelligence. While human perception has similarities to the way machine perception works, human learning is mostly a directed process, guided by other people: parents, teachers, ... The area of machine teaching is becoming increasingly popular as a different paradigm for making machines learn. In this chapter, we start from recent results in machine teaching that show the relevance of prior alignment between humans and machines. From here, we focus on the scenario when a machine has to teach humans, a situation more and more common in the future. Specifically, we analyse how machine teaching relates to explainable artificial intelligence, and how simplicity priors play a role beyond intelligibility. We illustrate this with a general teaching protocol and a few examples in several representation languages: feature-value vectors and sequences. Some straightforward experiments with humans indicate when a strong simplicity prior is --and is not-- sufficient.

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-24
Author(s):  
Thomas Bolander

To be able to predict the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on the required human competences of the future, it is firstand foremost necessary to get an overview of what AI at all is and how it differs from human intelligence. The main goalof this paper is to provide such an overview to readers who are not experts in the area. The focus of the paper is on thesimilarities and differences between human and machine intelligence, since understanding that is of essential importanceto be able to predict which human tasks and jobs are likely to be automatised by AI - and what consequences it will have.


Author(s):  
Mahesh K. Joshi ◽  
J.R. Klein

The world of work has been impacted by technology. Work is different than it was in the past due to digital innovation. Labor market opportunities are becoming polarized between high-end and low-end skilled jobs. Migration and its effects on employment have become a sensitive political issue. From Buffalo to Beijing public debates are raging about the future of work. Developments like artificial intelligence and machine intelligence are contributing to productivity, efficiency, safety, and convenience but are also having an impact on jobs, skills, wages, and the nature of work. The “undiscovered country” of the workplace today is the combination of the changing landscape of work itself and the availability of ill-fitting tools, platforms, and knowledge to train for the requirements, skills, and structure of this new age.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-153
Author(s):  
Jenny Bunn

Purpose This paper aims to introduce the topic of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) and reports on the outcomes of an interdisciplinary workshop exploring it. It reflects on XAI through the frame and concerns of the recordkeeping profession. Design/methodology/approach This paper takes a reflective approach. The origins of XAI are outlined as a way of exploring how it can be viewed and how it is currently taking shape. The workshop and its outcomes are briefly described and reflections on the process of investigating and taking part in conversations about XAI are offered. Findings The article reinforces the value of undertaking interdisciplinary and exploratory conversations with others. It offers new perspectives on XAI and suggests ways in which recordkeeping can productively engage with it, as both a disruptive force on its thinking and a set of newly emerging record forms to be created and managed. Originality/value The value of this paper comes from the way in which the introduction it provides will allow recordkeepers to gain a sense of what XAI is and the different ways in which they are both already engaging and can continue to engage with it.


1997 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 758-763
Author(s):  
Dana H. Ballard ◽  
Mary M. Hayhoe ◽  
Polly K. Pook ◽  
Rajesh P. N. Rao

The majority of commentators agree that the time to focus on embodiment has arrived and that the disembodied approach that was taken from the birth of artificial intelligence is unlikely to provide a satisfactory account of the special features of human intelligence. In our Response, we begin by addressing the general comments and criticisms directed at the emerging enterprise of deictic and embodied cognition. In subsequent sections we examine the topics that constitute the core of the commentaries: embodiment mechanisms, dorsal and ventral visual processing, eye movements, and learning.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5555-5555
Author(s):  
Okyaz Eminaga ◽  
Andreas Loening ◽  
Andrew Lu ◽  
James D Brooks ◽  
Daniel Rubin

5555 Background: The variation of the human perception has limited the potential of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate in determining prostate cancer and identifying significant prostate cancer. The current study aims to overcome this limitation and utilizes an explainable artificial intelligence to leverage the diagnostic potential of mpMRI in detecting prostate cancer (PCa) and determining its significance. Methods: A total of 6,020 MR images from 1,498 cases were considered (1,785 T2 images, 2,719 DWI images, and 1,516 ADC maps). The treatment determined the significance of PCa. Cases who received radical prostatectomy were considered significant, whereas cases with active surveillance and followed for at least two years were considered insignificant. The negative biopsy cases have either a single biopsy setting or multiple biopsy settings with the PCa exclusion. The images were randomly divided into development (80%) and test sets (20%) after stratifying according to the case in each image type. The development set was then divided into a training set (90%) and a validation set (10%). We developed deep learning models for PCa detection and the determination of significant PCa based on the PlexusNet architecture that supports explainable deep learning and volumetric input data. The input data for PCa detection was T2-weighted images, whereas the input data for determining significant PCa include all images types. The performance of PCa detection and determination of significant PCa was measured using the area under receiving characteristic operating curve (AUROC) and compared to the maximum PiRAD score (version 2) at the case level. The 10,000 times bootstrapping resampling was applied to measure the 95% confidence interval (CI) of AUROC. Results: The AUROC for the PCa detection was 0.833 (95% CI: 0.788-0.879) compared to the PiRAD score with 0.75 (0.718-0.764). The DL models to detect significant PCa using the ADC map or DWI images achieved the highest AUROC [ADC: 0.945 (95% CI: 0.913-0.982; DWI: 0.912 (95% CI: 0.871-0.954)] compared to a DL model using T2 weighted (0.850; 95% CI: 0.791-0.908) or PiRAD scores (0.604; 95% CI: 0.544-0.663). Finally, the attention map of PlexusNet from mpMRI with PCa correctly showed areas that contain PCa after matching with corresponding prostatectomy slice. Conclusions: We found that explainable deep learning is feasible on mpMRI and achieves high accuracy in determining cases with PCa and identifying cases with significant PCa.


Author(s):  
Yosra Sobeih ◽  
El Taieb EL Sadek

Modern communication means have imposed many changes on the media work in the different stages of content production, starting from gathering news, visual and editorial processing, verification and verification of the truthfulness of what was stated in it until its publication, so the changes that were stimulated by modern means and technologies and artificial intelligence tools have affected all stages of news and media production, since the beginning of the emergence of rooms. Smart news that depends on human intelligence and then machine intelligence, which has become forced to keep pace with the development in communication means, which has withdrawn in the various stages of production, and perhaps the most important of which is the process of investigation and scrutiny and the detection of false news and rumors in our current era, which has become the spread of information very quickly through the Internet and websites Social media and various media platforms


2021 ◽  
pp. 325-334
Author(s):  
Laszlo Solymar

The claims of artificial intelligence are criticized. Most of the claims are regarded as hype or simple examples of automation. The progress of machines in playing games and beating world champions is described, but the artificial intelligence is still thought not to represent human intelligence. It is concluded that the programs are intelligent but not the machines. A 1921 play by Capek coining the word and introducing the modern interpretation of robots is analysed. Examples of robots and of virtual assistants in service at the moment are provided. The future of driverless cars is discussed, and it is concluded that fully autonomous cars are still many decades, rather than years, away.


2020 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 04025
Author(s):  
Danila Kirpichnikov ◽  
Albert Pavlyuk ◽  
Yulia Grebneva ◽  
Hilary Okagbue

Today, artificial intelligence (hereinafter – AI) becomes an integral part of almost all branches of science. The ability of AI to self-learning and self-development are properties that allow this new formation to compete with the human intelligence and perform actions that put it on a par with humans. In this regard, the author aims to determine whether it is possible to apply criminal liability to AI, since the latter is likely to be recognized as a subject of legal relations in the future. Based on a number of examinations and practical examples, the author makes the following conclusion: AI is fundamentally capable of being criminally liable; in addition, it is capable of correcting its own behavior under the influence of coercive measures.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sana Khanam ◽  
Safdar Tanweer ◽  
Syed Khalid

Abstract Artificial intelligence is one of the most trending topics in the field of Computer Science which aims to make machines and computers ‘smart’. There are multiple diverse technical and specialized research associated with it. Due to the accelerating rate of technological changes, artificial intelligence has taken over a lot of human jobs and is giving excellent results that are more efficient and effective, than humans. However, a lot of time there has been a concern about the following: will artificial intelligence surpass human intelligence in the near future? Are computers’ ever accelerating abilities to outpace human jobs and skills a matter of concern? The different views and myths on the subject have made it even a more than just a topic of discussion. In this research paper, we will study the existing facts and literature to understand the true definitions of artificial intelligence (AI) and human intelligence (HI) by classifying each of its types separately and analyzing the extent of their full capabilities. Later, we will discuss the possibilities if AI eventually can replace human jobs in the market. Finally, we will synthesize and summarize results and findings of why artificial intelligence cannot surpass human intelligence completely in the future.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document