Quantitative Sensory Testing in Patients with Multisomatoform Disorder with Chronic Pain as the Leading Bodily Symptom—a Matched Case–Control Study

Pain Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Achenbach ◽  
Anh-Thu Tran ◽  
Burkhardt Jaeger ◽  
Karl Kapitza ◽  
Michael Bernateck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Quantitative Sensory Testing ◽  
Pain Threshold ◽  
Somatoform Disorders ◽  
Detection Threshold ◽  
Pressure Pain Threshold ◽  
Sensory Profile ◽  
Sensory Loss ◽  
Sensory Testing ◽  
Presenting Symptoms

Abstract Objective Chronic pain is a debilitating condition of multifactorial origin, often without physical findings to explain the presenting symptoms. Of the possible etiologies of persisting painful symptoms, somatoform disorders and functional somatic syndromes (FSS) are among the most challenging, with a prevalence of 8–20%. Many different somatoform disorders and FSS have overlapping symptoms, with pain being the most prevalent one. The concept of multisomatoform disorder (MSD) has been developed to acknowledge that fact. We hypothesized that the concept of MSD will be reflected in a distinct sensory profile of patients compared with healthy controls and possibly provide insight into the type and pathophysiology of the pain commonly experienced by patients. Design We performed comprehensive quantitative sensory testing (QST) in 151 patients and 149 matched controls. Results There were significant differences in the sensory profiles of patients compared with controls. Patients with MSD showed a combination of tactile and thermal hypesthesia combined with mechanical and cold hyperalgesia. This was true for measurements at test and control sites, with the exception of vibration detection threshold and mechanical pain threshold. Among the observed changes, a marked sensory loss of function, as evidenced by an increase in cold detection threshold, and a marked gain of function, as evidenced by a decrease of pressure pain threshold, were most notable. There was no evidence of concurrent medication influencing QST results. Conclusions The observed somatosensory profile of patients with MSD resembles that of patients suffering from neuropathic pain with evidence of central sensitization.

scholarly journals Ejaculatory Pain

2007 ◽  
Vol 107 (2) ◽  
pp. 298-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eske K. Aasvang ◽  
Bo Møhl ◽  
Henrik Kehlet
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Sexual Dysfunction ◽  
Quantitative Sensory Testing ◽  
Groin Hernia ◽  
Pain Treatment ◽  
Detection Threshold ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Sensory Testing ◽  
Detection Thresholds ◽  
Pain Detection

Background Sexual dysfunction due to ejaculatory and genital pain after groin hernia surgery may occur in approximately 2.5% of patients. However, the specific psychosexological and neurophysiologic characteristics have not been described, thereby precluding assessment of pathogenic mechanisms and treatment strategies. Methods Ten patients with severe pain-related sexual dysfunction and ejaculatory pain were assessed in detail by quantitative sensory testing and interviewed by a psychologist specialized in evaluating sexual functional disorders and were compared with a control group of 20 patients with chronic pain after groin hernia repair but without sexual dysfunction, to identify sensory changes associated with ejaculatory pain. Results Quantitative sensory testing showed significantly higher thermal and mechanical detection thresholds and lowered mechanical pain detection thresholds in both groups compared with the nonpainful side. Pressure pain detection threshold and tolerance were significantly lower in the ejaculatory pain group compared with the control group. 'The maximum pain was specifically located at the external inguinal annulus in all ejaculatory pain patients, but not in controls. The psychosexual interview revealed no major psychosexual disturbances and concluded that the pain was of somatic origin. All patients with ejaculatory pain had experienced major negative life changes and deterioration in their overall quality of life and sexual function as a result of the hernia operation. Conclusions Postherniotomy ejaculatory pain and pain-related sexual dysfunction is a specific chronic pain state that may be caused by pathology involving the vas deferens and/or nerve damage. Therapeutic strategies should therefore include neuropathic pain treatment and/or surgical exploration.

scholarly journals Quantitative sensory testing predicts histological small fiber neuropathy in postural tachycardia syndrome

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 428-434
Author(s):  
Sophia C.I. Billig ◽  
Joana C. Schauermann ◽  
Roman Rolke ◽  
Istvan Katona ◽  
Jörg B. Schulz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skin Biopsy ◽  
Quantitative Sensory Testing ◽  
Pain Threshold ◽  
Detection Threshold ◽  
Small Fiber Neuropathy ◽  
Sensory Testing ◽  
Cold Pain ◽  
Noninvasive Test ◽  
Small Fiber ◽  
Heat Pain Threshold

BackgroundRetrospective investigation of the somatosensory profile and prediction of histologic small fiber neuropathy (SFN) in postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) was performed using quantitative sensory testing (QST) as a standardized noninvasive test.MethodsIn this investigation, full data sets from 30 patients (age: 34.03 ± 10.82 years, n = 6 males), including results of autonomic function testing, norepinephrine values, skin biopsy, and QST, were retrospectively analyzed. The QST data were compared with healthy controls (HCs) (age: 34.20 ± 10.5 years, n = 6 males, t test: 0.95).ResultsThe evaluation of all QST parameters in POTS compared with HCs yielded differences in all thermal parameters (cold detection threshold: p < 0.05, warm detection threshold: p < 0.001, thermal sensory limen: p < 0.001, cold pain threshold: p < 0.05, and heat pain threshold: p < 0.001) and in paradoxical heat sensations (p < 0.05). Differences in nonpainful stimuli (mechanical detection threshold: p < 0.05 and vibration detection threshold: p < 0.001) were also detected. All patients who had clinical signs of SFN in combination with impairment of small fibers in QST also had SFN on skin biopsy.ConclusionThese results suggest that a non–region-specific SFN in POTS compared with controls can be detected by noninvasive QST that predicts histologic small fiber pathology.

Treatment of neuropathic pain with the capsaicin 8% patch: Quantitative sensory testing (QST) in a prospective observational study identifies potential predictors of response to capsaicin 8% patch treatment

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 138-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Burkhard Gustorff ◽  
Chris Poole ◽  
Herwig Kloimstein ◽  
Nicole Hacker ◽  
Rudolf Likar
Keyword(s):  
Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Quantitative Sensory Testing ◽  
Pain Threshold ◽  
Pressure Pain Threshold ◽  
Control Area ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Cotton Wool ◽  
Sensory Testing ◽  
Predictors Of Response ◽  
Painful Area

AbstractBackground and aimsPeripheral neuropathic pain (PNeP) is a chronic and disabling condition for which no predictors of response to treatment have yet been identified. Clinical studies show that while many patients with PNeP respond positively to treatment with the capsaicin 8% patch, others do not. This study used quantitative sensory testing (QST) to determine whether any patient characteristics can predict response to treatment with the capsaicin 8% patch.MethodsThis was a prospective, non-placebo-controlled, observational study. Patients used the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to assess their pain at baseline and then on Days 1, 7–10 (from here referred to as Day 7/10), 28 and 84 following treatment with the capsaicin 8% patch. QST was undertaken at the same timepoints on the painful area at the region of maximum PNeP and on a contralateral, control area. In addition, the size of the painful area was assessed at baseline and Days 7/10, 28 and 84.ResultsA total of 57 patients were treated. Among 54 evaluable patients, 19 (35.2%) achieved a ≥30% reduction in VAS pain score at Day 7/10 post-treatment compared with baseline — these were defined as ‘responders’. Analysis of the QST data showed that the PNeP area in responders, but not in non-responders, had a significantly lower pressure pain threshold compared with the control area at baseline (median 320 kPa vs. 480 kPa, respectively; p = .004). Furthermore, non-responders had approximately three times greater degree of allodynia at baseline compared with responders across tests using brush, cotton wool and Q-tip. These differences were significant for tests using brush and cotton wool (p = .024 and p = .046, respectively) and approached significance in the test using Q-tip (p = .066). Following treatment with the capsaicin 8% patch, responders showed a trend towards a reduction in warm perception and also appeared to show normalization of the pinprick hyperalgesia at some stimulus levels. Responders to therapy had significantly greater reductions than non-responders in the size of the painful area at Day 28 (p = .011) and Day 84 (p = .005) following treatment. However, both responders and non-responders had meaningful reductions in the size of the painful area compared with baseline values.ConclusionsThis study suggests that differences can be identified in the sensory profiles of patients with PNeP who respond to the capsaicin 8% patch and those who do not, specifically pressure pain threshold and degree of allodynia. Notably, both responders and non-responders experienced meaningful reductions in the size of the painful area following treatment.ImplicationsThe findings warrant further investigation in a larger number of patients and in prospective trials.

scholarly journals Quantitative Sensory Testing in Adolescents with Co-Occurring Chronic Pain and Obesity: A Pilot Study

Children ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Keri R. Hainsworth ◽  
Pippa M. Simpson ◽  
Omar Ali ◽  
Jaya Varadarajan ◽  
Lynn Rusy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Sensory Processing ◽  
Quantitative Sensory Testing ◽  
Pain Threshold ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Pain Clinic ◽  
Pain Processing ◽  
Sensory Testing ◽  
Heat Pain Threshold

Factors such as gender, ethnicity, and age affect pain processing in children and adolescents with chronic pain. Although obesity has been shown to affect pain processing in adults, almost nothing is known about pediatric populations. The aim of this pilot study was to explore whether obesity alters sensory processing in adolescents with chronic pain. Participants were recruited from a chronic pain clinic (Chronic Pain (CP), n = 12 normal weight; Chronic Pain + Obesity (CPO), n = 19 overweight/obesity) and from an obesity clinic (Obesity alone (O), n = 14). The quantitative sensory testing protocol included assessments of thermal and mechanical pain thresholds and perceptual sensitization at two sites with little adiposity. The heat pain threshold at the hand was significantly higher in the CPO group than in either the CP or O groups. Mechanical pain threshold (foot) was significantly higher in the CPO group than the CP group. No differences were found on tests of perceptual sensitization. Correlations between experimental pain and clinical pain parameters were found for the CPO group, but not for the CP group. This preliminary study provides important lessons learned for subsequent, larger-scale studies of sensory processing for youth with co-occurring chronic pain and obesity.

Quantitative Sensory Testing in Animal Models of Chronic Pain: A Pilot Study

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Monteiro ◽  
M. Moreau ◽  
C. Otis ◽  
L. De Lorimier ◽  
J. Pelletier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Animal Models ◽  
Quantitative Sensory Testing ◽  
Sensory Testing

scholarly journals Quantitative Sensory Testing of Spinal Cord and Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation in Chronic Pain Patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian ◽  
Srinivas Chiravuri ◽  
Ehsan Mirzakhalili ◽  
Carlos J. Anaya ◽  
John Ryan Scott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Dorsal Root Ganglion ◽  
Dorsal Root ◽  
Quantitative Sensory Testing ◽  
Sensory Testing ◽  
Chronic Pain Patients ◽  
Pain Patients

scholarly journals Central Sensıtızatıon ın Axıal Spondyloarthrıtıs: An Exploratıve Study wıth Quantıtatıve Sensory Testıng and Clınıcal Scales

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feyza Nur Yücel ◽  
Mehmet Tuncay Duruöz
Keyword(s):  
Central Sensitization ◽  
Quantitative Sensory Testing ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Pressure Pain Threshold ◽  
Female Gender ◽  
Pain Modulation ◽  
Sensory Testing ◽  
Clinical Scales ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
And Control

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the central sensitization (CS) and the related parameters in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Methods Quantitative sensory testing (QST) which consists of pressure pain threshold (PPT), temporal summation (TS), and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) were applied to the participants. Disease activity, functional status, sleep quality, pain, depression, and fatigue were assessed. Patients were divided as the ones with and without CS according to the central sensitization inventory (CSI) and the results were compared. Results One hundred patients and fifty controls were recruited. Sixty axSpA patients had CS. When QST results were compared between the patient and control groups, all PPT scores were found lower (p&lt;0.05) in patients. Regarding the comparison of the patients with and without CS, sacroiliac, and trapezius PPT scores were found lower in the patients with CS (p&lt;0.05). On the other hand, there was no significant difference in the mean TS scores (p&gt;0.05) between patients and controls, and in patients with and without CS. All investigated comorbidities were found to be significantly more frequent (p&lt;0.001) in the patients with CS. In regression analysis female gender, morning stiffness duration, CPM, depression, and fatigue were detected as related parameters with CSI scores. Conclusion CS and related comorbidities were found to be increased in axSpA patients. This increase should be taken into consideration in the management of these patients.

Differences in sensory processing between chronic cervical zygapophysial joint pain patients with and without cervicogenic headache

Cephalalgia ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 953-963 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas H L Chua ◽  
Hans A van Suijlekom ◽  
Kris C Vissers ◽  
Lars Arendt-Nielsen ◽  
Oliver H Wilder-Smith
Keyword(s):  
Joint Pain ◽  
Pain Threshold ◽  
Detection Threshold ◽  
Pressure Pain Threshold ◽  
Cervicogenic Headache ◽  
Pain Modulation ◽  
Zygapophysial Joint ◽  
Testing And Measurement ◽  
Threshold Testing ◽  
Pain Patients

Background: It is not known why some patients with underlying chronic nociceptive sources in the neck develop cervicogenic headache (CEH) and why others do not. This quantitative sensory testing (QST) study systematically explores the differences in sensory pain processing in 17 CEH patients with underlying chronic cervical zygapophysial joint pain compared to 10 patients with chronic cervical zygapophysial joint pain but without CEH. Methods: The QST protocol comprises pressure pain threshold testing, thermal detection threshold testing, electrical pain threshold testing and measurement of descending inhibitory modulation using the conditioned pain modulation (CPM) paradigm. Results: The main difference between patients with or without CEH was the lateralization of pressure hyperalgesia to the painful side of the head of CEH patients, accompanied by cold as well as warm relative hyperesthesia on the painful side of the head and neck. Discussion: From this hypothesis-generating study, our results suggest that rostral neuraxial spread of central sensitization, probably to the trigeminal spinal nucleus, plays a major role in the development of CEH.

Development of a novel brief quantitative sensory testing protocol that integrates static and dynamic pain assessments: Test-retest performance in healthy adults

Pain Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin J De Vita ◽  
Katherine Buckheit ◽  
Christina E Gilmour ◽  
Dezarie Moskal ◽  
Stephen A Maisto
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Sensory Testing ◽  
Temporal Summation ◽  
Pain Threshold ◽  
Pain Modulation ◽  
Healthy Adults ◽  
Dynamic Responses ◽  
Conditioned Pain Modulation ◽  
Sensory Testing ◽  
Contact Heat ◽  
Intraclass Correlations

Abstract Objective Quantitative sensory testing is an expanding pain research domain with numerous clinical and research applications. There is a recognized need for brief reliable quantitative sensory testing protocols that enhance assessment feasibility. This study aimed to integrate static (pain threshold, tolerance, suprathreshold) and dynamic (conditioned pain modulation, offset analgesia, temporal summation) pain reactivity measures into a brief 20-minute protocol that uses a single portable device. The test-retest performance of this optimized protocol was evaluated. Design Using a test-retest design, the brief quantitative sensory testing assessment was administered to participants on two occasions separated by exactly 7 days. Setting A clinical psychology research laboratory at Syracuse University. Subjects Participants were 33 healthy adults recruited from Syracuse University’s online research participation pool. Methods A portable computerized quantitative sensory testing device delivered contact-heat pain to assess static and dynamic pain measures in participants. Dynamic responses were continuously recorded using a computerized visual analog scale. Results Pain threshold, tolerance, and suprathreshold exhibited excellent reliability (intraclass correlations ranged from 0.80 to 0.83). Conditioned pain modulation, offset analgesia, temporal summation yielded reliability in the good to excellent range (intraclass correlations ranged from 0.66 to 0.71). Conclusions Findings suggested that this brief integrated QST protocol may reliably monitor human pain reactivity over brief periods. This protocol may enhance quantitative sensory testing feasibility in clinical and research settings.

scholarly journals Association between quantitative sensory testing and pain or disability in paediatric chronic pain: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. e031861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Eric Schoth ◽  
Markus Blankenburg ◽  
Julia Wager ◽  
Philippa Broadbent ◽  
Jin Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Quantitative Sensory Testing ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Anatomical Site ◽  
Thermal Stimulus ◽  
Sensory Testing ◽  
Pain Mechanisms

IntroductionThis protocol describes the objective and methods of a systematic review of the association between quantitative sensory testing (QST) measures and pain intensity or disability in paediatric chronic pain (PCP). The review will also assess whether the relationship strength is moderated by variables related to the QST method and pain condition; the use of QST in PCP (modalities, outcome measures and anatomical test sites as well as differentiating between pain mechanisms (eg, neuropathic vs nociceptive) and in selecting analgesics); the reliability of QST across the paediatric age range; the ability of QST to differentiate patients with chronic pain from healthy controls; and differences between anatomical test sites.Methods and analysisMedline, PsycINFO, CINHAL, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library and OpenGrey will be searched. English language studies will be eligible if they recruit a sample aged 6–24 (inclusive) with chronic pain, including primary and secondary pain; apply at least one of the following QST modalities: chemical, electrical, mechanical (subgroups include pressure, punctate/brush and vibratory) or thermal stimulus to measure perception of noxious or innocuous stimuli applied to skin, muscle or joint; use a testing protocol to control for stimulus properties: modality, anatomical site, intensity, duration and sequence. Following title and abstract screening, the full texts of relevant records will be independently assessed by two reviewers. For eligible studies, one reviewer will extract study characteristics and data, and another will check for accuracy. Both will undertake independent quality assessments using the Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies. A qualitative synthesis will be presented with discussion centred around different QST modalities. Where eligible data permit, meta-analyses will be performed separately for different QST modalities using comprehensive meta-analysis.Ethics and disseminationReview findings will be reported in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences. The study raises no ethical issues.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019134069.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document