Split face comparative study of microneedling with platelet rich plasma versus Fractional carbon dioxide laser with platelet rich plasma in treatment of atrophic post acne scars

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Abd Elnaeem Sallam ◽  
Khaled El Zawahry ◽  
Abdul Rahman Muhammed Ali Mustafa
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Co2 Laser ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Laser ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Fractional Co2 Laser ◽  
Acne Scars ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Face ◽  
Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser

Abstract Background Acne scars, is a challenge for dermatologists, despite having multiple treatment modalities like microneedling, dermabrasion, Fractional CO2 Laser, dermal fillers, etc. However, monotherapy has been hardly satisfactory because of the polymorphism seen with the scars. Objective Comparison between microneedling with platelet rich plasma versus Fractional carbon dioxide laser with platelet rich plasma in treatment of atrophic post acne scars. Patients and methods This study was carried out in department of dermatology, venereology and andrology, in Kobry El-Kobba Military complex during the period (from September 2018 to July 2020 ) on 20 patients of both sexes aged from 20 to 60 years old presenting with Goodman and Baron Grade II, III, IV acne scars . Results The study revealed a statistically significant difference (p = 0.017) between Goodman and Baron scar grades on the right side of the face before and after treatment indicating that microneedling with platelet rich plasma was effective in improving acne scars. Also, there is a statistically significant difference (p = 0.010) between Goodman and Baron scar grades on the left side of the face before and after treatment, indicating that fractional CO2 laser with platelet rich plasma was effective in improving acne scars. Conclusion and recommendation Further controlled and randomized studies are needed to validate our findings in a larger cohort of patients and longer follow up. Also, number of sessions might be more than 3 sessions.

scholarly journals Efficiency of Carbon Dioxide Fractional Laser in Skin Resurfacing

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrej Petrov
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Co2 Laser ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Laser ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Combined Therapy ◽  
Local Therapy ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Fractional Co2 Laser ◽  
Patients Satisfaction ◽  
Significant Difference

AIM: The aim of the study was to confirm the efficiency and safety of the fractional CO2 laser in skin renewal and to check the possibility of having a synergistic effect in patients who besides carbon dioxide laser are treated with PRP (platelet-rich plasma) too.MATERIAL AND METHODS: The first group (Examined Group 1 or EG1) included 107 patients treated with fractional CO2 laser (Lutronic eCO2) as mono-therapy. The second group (Control Group or CG) covered 100 patients treated with neither laser nor plasma in the same period but subjected to local therapy with drugs or other physio-procedures under the existing protocols for treatment of certain diseases. The third group (Examined Group 2 or EG2) treated 25 patients with combined therapy of CO2 laser and PRP in the treatment of facial rejuvenation or treatment of acne scars.RESULTS: Patient’s satisfaction, in general, is significantly greater in both examined groups (EG1 and EG2) (p < 0.001). It was found the significant difference between control and examined group from the treatment in acne scar (Fisher exact two tailed p < 0.001). Patients satisfaction with the treatment effect in rejuvenation of the skin is significant (χ2 = 39.41; df = 4; p < 0.001). But, patients satisfaction from the treatment with HPV on the skin was significantly lower in examined group (treated with laser), p = 0.0002.CONCLUSION: Multifunctional fractional carbon dioxide laser used in treatment of patients with acne and pigmentation from acne, as well as in the treatment of scars from different backgrounds, is an effective and safe method that causes statistically significant better effect of the treatment, greater patients’ satisfaction, minimal side effects and statistically better response to the therapy, according to assessments by the patient and the therapist.

scholarly journals Comparison of the efficacy of Subcision with Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser versus Subcision with Microneedling Fractional Radiofrequency in the Treatment of Atrophic Post acne Scars

2021 ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Co2 Laser ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Laser ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Percentage Reduction ◽  
Acne Scars ◽  
Group A ◽  
Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser ◽  
Group B ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Co2

Background: Many interventions have been used to treat post-acne scars, with various degrees of efficacy and adverse reactions. Multimodal approach can achieve better results for improving the physical appearance that even if minor may result in significant distress and reduced quality of life. Objective: To compare the efficacy of subcision with fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser and subcision with microneedling fractional radiofrequency (RF) in treating post-acne scars and to study their adverse effects. Methods: In this prospective, interventional clinical study, a total of 64 patients with post-acne scars were enrolled. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups of 32 patients each, in which group A was treated with subcision plus fractional carbon dioxide laser (CO2) and group B was treated with subcision plus microneedling fractional radiofrequency (RF) every 6 weeks for a total of four sittings. An objective score was calculated for each patient using the Goodman and Baron scale to evaluate the outcome every visit during treatment and then 3 months after completion of therapy. Results: In group A, the percentage reduction in the mean objective scores was found to be 64%. In group B, the percentage reduction in mean objective scores was found to be 42%. Most of the changes were seen in the boxcar and rolling types of scars. Conclusions: Subcision and fractional CO2 laser were considered superior over subcision with microneedling fractional (RF) technique for the treatment of post-acne scars. Boxcar and rolling types of scars showed a high response to treatment than icepick scars

Comparative study of the efficacy of Platelet‐rich plasma combined with carboxytherapy vs its use with fractional carbon dioxide laser in atrophic acne scars

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 150-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul‐Aziz Ibrahim Al Taweel ◽  
Abdul‐Aziz Abdul‐Salam Al Refae ◽  
Ahmed Mohamed Hamed ◽  
Asmaa Mostafa Kamal
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Laser ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Acne Scars ◽  
Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser

scholarly journals Efficacy and Side Effects of Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser for Acne Scars, Keloids, and Striae Albae in the Dermatovenereology Clinic of Tertiary Hospital: A Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Riezky Januar Pramitha ◽  
Iskandar Zulkarnain ◽  
Evy Ervianti ◽  
Rahmadewi Rahmadewi ◽  
Afif Nurul Hidayati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Co2 Laser ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Laser ◽  
Scar Tissue ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Fractional Co2 Laser ◽  
Acne Scars ◽  
Laser Treatments ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Co2

Background: Fractional Carbon Dioxide (CO2) LASER has better efficacy compared to conventional LASER in treating scar tissue such as acne scars, keloids, and striae albae. However, a population with darker skin has a higher risk of side effects, especially in post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and side effects of fractional CO2 LASER in new patients with acne scars, keloids, and striae albae in the Dermatovenereology outpatient clinic. Methods: Retrospective analysis was done on 42 medical records of patients who met the inclusion criterion, which was those who have undergone fractional CO2 LASER treatments. The efficacy and side effects of the therapy were identified and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17 program. Result: A total of 42.9% of patients underwent fractional CO2 LASER treatments for acne scars, while 31% and 26.1% of patients received treatments for keloids and striae albae, respectively. There was a statistically significant decrease in the degree of acne scar (2.72 ± 0.83), keloid height (2.2 ± 0.405), and striae width (0.39 ± 0.02). The statistically significant side effects were hyperpigmentation (59.5%), crustae (26.2%), erythema ≥ for 4 days (19%), and new acne (19%). Conclusion: Fractional CO2 LASER was effective for treating scar tissue (acne scars, keloids, and striae albae) with a higher incidence of side effects in population with darker skin and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation.

Evaluation of autologous adipose‐derived stem cells vs. fractional carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of post acne scars: a split‐face study

2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (10) ◽  
pp. 1212-1222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rania S. Abou Eitta ◽  
Aisha A. Ismail ◽  
Rania A. Abdelmaksoud ◽  
Naser A. Ghezlan ◽  
Radwa A. Mehanna
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Stem Cells ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Laser ◽  
Adipose Derived Stem Cells ◽  
Acne Scars ◽  
Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser ◽  
Split Face
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document