scholarly journals S4. IDENTIFYING HETEROGENEITY IN SYMPTOM NETWORKS IN THE GENERAL POPULATION: A RECURSIVE PARTITIONING APPROACH

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S31-S31
Author(s):  
Linda Betz ◽  
Nora Penzel ◽  
Joseph Kambeitz

Abstract Background Network models of psychopathology have gained increasing ground recently. It is suggested that psychopathology arises from the reciprocal associations between symptoms and other psycho-biological factors. Given the heterogeneity in psychopathological phenomena, it seems likely that subgroups with distinct network structures may emerge given different demographic and environmental risk factors. Thus, the identification of heterogeneity in symptom networks associated with specific variables may promote an understanding of the mechanisms that underlie the relation between environmental factors and psychopathology. Methods We took a recursive partitioning approach based on conditional inference trees that iteratively splits the sample of interest based on a predefined set of covariates to detect subgroups with significantly different network structures, resulting in a network tree. We used general population data from the 2000 and 2007 English National Survey of Psychiatric Morbidity, with a combined sample size of n = 15,983 (age range: 16–95 years, 55.9% female), to model networks of psychotic experiences (hallucinations, persecutory ideation) and affective symptoms (worry, mood instability, depression, anxiety, sleep problems). Split variables explored as sources of heterogeneity in networks were sex, age, and exposure to environmental risk factors (cannabis use in past month, lifetime sexual abuse, lifetime experience of bullying). We used a stop-splitting rule based on Bonferroni-adjusted p-values to determine the final tree size (α = .01). Results Environmental factors were the primary sources of heterogeneity in network structures, with exposure to these factors being linked to more densely connected networks. Globally, cannabis use was associated with particularly strong connections between hallucinations and persecutory ideation, depression and persecutory ideation, and depression and mood instability. In those participants with cannabis use and experiences of sexual abuse, the association between depression and persecutory ideation was particularly strong, and further, strong connections were present between the affective symptoms. Similarly, those with exposure to both cannabis and bullying showed stronger associations involving sleep problems than participants exposed to either bullying or cannabis alone. Exposure to either bullying or sexual abuse without concurrent cannabis use was linked to a strongly connected cluster of worry, anxiety, and depression, with only weak associations to other symptoms. Lastly, the sample was split at 60 years of age. The younger group was divided further by age, with participants younger than 26 years showing stronger associations between hallucinations and persecutory ideation and worry and depression than those older than 26 years. In participants older than 60 years, another split was made by gender: women showed a more densely connected network than men. Discussion Findings from this exploratory analysis document substantial heterogeneity in symptom network structures in a large general population sample. Exposure to risk factors is linked to more strongly connected, probably less resilient symptom networks, with evidence for additive vulnerability given the presence of several risk factors. Exposure to sexual abuse or bullying mainly seems to relate to higher connectivity of affective symptoms, while cannabis use links to higher connection of psychotic symptoms with each other, but also with affective symptoms. The analysis also highlights demographic variables as sources of heterogeneity in symptom networks, pointing to specifically relevant symptom interactions in subgroups of age and gender.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Betz ◽  
Nora Penzel ◽  
Marlene Rosen ◽  
Kamaldeep Bhui ◽  
Rachel Upthegrove ◽  
...  

Background: Psychosis expression in the general population, which may reflect a behavioral manifestation of risk for psychotic disorder, can be conceptualized as an interconnected system of psychotic and affective experiences; a so-called symptom network. Differences in demographics, as well as exposure to adversities and risk factors, may produce substantial heterogeneity in symptom networks, highlighting potential etiological divergence in psychosis risk. Methods: To explore this idea in a data-driven way, we employed a novel recursive partitioning approach in the 2007 English National Survey of Psychiatric Morbidity survey (n = 7,242). We sought to identify network phenotypes by explaining heterogeneity in symptom networks through potential moderators, including age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation, childhood abuse, separation from parents, bullying, domestic violence, cannabis use, and alcohol. Results: Sex was the primary source of heterogeneity in symptom networks. Additional heterogeneity was explained by interpersonal trauma (childhood abuse, domestic violence) in women and domestic violence, cannabis use, and ethnicity in men. Among women, especially those exposed to early interpersonal trauma, an affective loading within psychosis may have distinct relevance. Men, particularly those from minority ethnic groups, demonstrated a strong network connection between hallucinatory experiences and persecutory ideation. Conclusion: Symptom networks of psychosis expression in the general population are highly heterogeneous. The structure of symptom networks seems to reflect distinct sex-related adversities, etiologies, and mechanisms of symptom-expression. Disentangling the complex interplay of sex, minority ethnic group status, and other risk factors may help optimize early intervention and prevention strategies in psychosis.


2020 ◽  
pp. 136346152090602
Author(s):  
Essi Salama ◽  
Anu E. Castaneda ◽  
Jaana Suvisaari ◽  
Shadia Rask ◽  
Tiina Laatikainen ◽  
...  

Comorbidity of substance use with affective symptoms and suicidality has been well documented in the general population. However, population-based migrant studies about this association are scarce. We examined the association of affective symptoms and suicidal ideation with binge drinking, daily smoking, and lifetime cannabis use among Russian, Somali, and Kurdish migrants in comparison with the Finnish general population. Cross-sectional data from the Finnish Migrant Health and Wellbeing Study (Maamu, n = 1307) and comparison group data of the general Finnish population ( n = 860) from the Health 2011 Survey were used. Substance use included self-reported current binge drinking, daily smoking, and lifetime cannabis use. Affective symptoms and suicidal ideation were measured using the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 (HSCL-25). We performed multivariate logistic regression analyses, including age, gender, and additional socio-demographic and migration-related factors. Suicidal ideation (OR 2.4 95% CI 1.3–4.3) was associated with binge drinking among Kurds and lifetime cannabis use among Russians (OR 5.6, 95% CI 1.9–17.0) and Kurds (OR 5.5, 95% CI 1.9–15.6). Affective symptoms were associated with daily smoking (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.02–2.6) and lifetime cannabis use (OR 6.1, 95% CI 2.6–14.5) among Kurdish migrants. Our results draw attention to the co-occurrence of suicidal ideation, affective symptoms, and substance use, especially among Kurdish migrants. These results highlight the variation of comorbidity of substance use and affective symptoms between the different populations. This implies that screening for substance use in mental healthcare cannot be neglected based on presumed habits of substance use.


2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (8) ◽  
pp. 822-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keltie C McDonald ◽  
Kate EA Saunders ◽  
John R Geddes

Objective: Mood instability is common in the general population. Mood instability is a precursor to mental illness and associated with a range of negative health outcomes. Sleep disturbance appears to be closely linked with mood instability. This study assesses the association between mood instability and sleep disturbance and the link with suicidal ideation and behaviour in a general population sample in England. Method: The Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey, 2007 collected detailed information about mental health symptoms and correlates in a representative sample of adult household residents living in England ( n = 7303). Mood instability was assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis-II. Sleep problems were defined as sleeping more than usual or less than usual during the past month. Other dependent variables included medication use and suicidal ideation and behaviour (response rate 57%). Generalized linear modelling was used to estimate the prevalence of mood instability and sleep problems. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios. All estimates were weighted. Results: The prevalence of mood instability was 14.7% (95% confidence interval [13.6%, 15.7%]). Sleep problems occurred in 69.8% (95% confidence interval: [66.6%, 73.1%]) of those with mood instability versus 37.6% (95% confidence interval: [36.2%, 39.1%]) of those without mood instability. The use of sedating and non-sedating medications did not influence the association. Sleep problems were significantly associated with suicidal ideation and behaviour even after adjusting for mood instability. Conclusion: Sleep problems are highly prevalent in the general population, particularly among those with mood instability. Sleep problems are strongly associated with suicidal ideation and behaviour. Treatments that target risk and maintenance factors that transcend diagnostic boundaries, such as therapies that target sleep disturbance, may be particularly valuable for preventing and addressing complications related to mood instability such as suicide.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Linda T. Betz ◽  
Nora Penzel ◽  
Marlene Rosen ◽  
Kamaldeep Bhui ◽  
Rachel Upthegrove ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Psychosis expression in the general population may reflect a behavioral manifestation of the risk for psychotic disorder. It can be conceptualized as an interconnected system of psychotic and affective experiences; a so-called ‘symptom network’. Differences in demographics, as well as exposure to adversities and risk factors, may produce substantial heterogeneity in symptom networks, highlighting potential etiological divergence in psychosis risk. Methods To explore this idea in a data-driven way, we employed a novel recursive partitioning approach in the 2007 English National Survey of Psychiatric Morbidity (N = 7242). We sought to identify ‘network phenotypes’ by explaining heterogeneity in symptom networks through potential moderators, including age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation, childhood abuse, separation from parents, bullying, domestic violence, cannabis use, and alcohol. Results Sex was the primary source of heterogeneity in symptom networks. Additional heterogeneity was explained by interpersonal trauma (childhood abuse and domestic violence) in women and domestic violence, cannabis use, ethnicity in men. Among women, especially those exposed to early interpersonal trauma, an affective loading within psychosis may have distinct relevance. Men, particularly those from minority ethnic groups, demonstrated a strong network connection between hallucinatory experiences and persecutory ideation. Conclusion Symptom networks of psychosis expression in the general population are highly heterogeneous. The structure of symptom networks seems to reflect distinct sex-related adversities, etiologies, and mechanisms of symptom-expression. Disentangling the complex interplay of sex, minority ethnic group status, and other risk factors may help optimize early intervention and prevention strategies in psychosis.


Author(s):  
K. . Togawa

Agricultural workers can be exposed to a wide variety of agents (e.g. pesticides), some of which may have adverse health effects, such as cancer. To study the health effects of agricultural exposures, an international consortium of agricultural cohort studies, AGRICOH, was established. The present analysis compared cancer incidence between the AGRICOH cohorts and the general population and found lower overall cancer incidence in the AGRICOH cohorts, with some variation across cohorts for specific cancer types. The observed lower cancer incidence may be due to healthy worker bias or lower prevalence of risk factors in the agricultural populations. Further analysis is underway.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document