scholarly journals Immunobridging efficacy of a tetravalent dengue vaccine against dengue and against hospitalized dengue from children/adolescents to adults in highly endemic countries

Author(s):  
Ying Huang ◽  
Zoe Moodie ◽  
Michal Juraska ◽  
Youyi Fong ◽  
Lindsay N Carpp ◽  
...  

Abstract Background CYD-TDV demonstrated vaccine efficacy (VE) against symptomatic, virologically confirmed dengue of any serotype from month 13 to month 25 (VCD-DENV-AnyM13→M25) in the CYD14 (2–14-y-olds) and CYD15 (9–16-y-olds) phase 3 trials. Fifty percent plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT50) titers are a potential surrogate for immunobridging VE to adults. Methods Using PRNT50 calibration datasets, we applied immunobridging approaches using baseline and/or M13 PRNT50 titers to estimate VE against VCD-DENV-AnyM0→M25 and against hospitalized VCD (HVCD)-DENV-AnyM0→M72 in hypothetical 18–45-y-old and 46–50-y-old CYD14 and CYD15 cohorts. Results Baseline and M13 geometric mean PRNT50 titers were greater in 18–45-y-olds and in 46–50-y-olds vs 9–16-y-olds for most comparisons. Estimated VE (95% CIs against VCD-DENV-AnyM0→M25 ranged from 75.3% to 90.9% (52.5% to 100%) for 18–45-y-olds and 74.8% to 92.0% (53.4% to 100%) for 46–50-y-olds. Estimated VE (95% CIs) against HVCD-DENV-AnyM0→M72 ranged from 58.8% to 78.1% (40.9 to 98.9%) for 18–45-y-olds and 57.2% to 78.4% (40.5 to 97.6%) for 46–50-y-olds. Corresponding predictions among baseline-seropositive individuals yielded comparable or higher VE estimates. Conclusions VE M0→M25 against DENV-Any and VE against HVCD-DENV-AnyM0→M72 are both expected to be higher in 18–45 and 46–50-y-olds vs CYD14 and CYD15 9–16-y-olds.

Author(s):  
Carlos A DiazGranados ◽  
Edith Langevin ◽  
Matthew Bonaparte ◽  
Saranya Sridhar ◽  
Tifany Machabert ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The immune profile of dengue-experienced individuals is a determinant of dengue reinfection severity risk. Individuals with a single prior dengue infection (monotypic) are at highest risk for severe disease, while individuals with ≥ 2 prior dengue infections (multitypic) are at lower risk. The tetravalent dengue vaccine (CYD-TDV) has shown efficacy in the prevention of dengue in individuals with prior dengue infection. We estimated efficacy in individuals with monotypic or multitypic immune profiles. Methods Participants enrolled in the immunogenicity subsets of 2 randomized placebo-controlled phase 3 studies (CYD14, NCT01373281; CYD15, NCT01374516) were classified as either monotypic or multitypic, based on measured baseline dengue plaque reduction neutralization test. Vaccine efficacy (VE) against symptomatic virologically confirmed dengue (VCD) was assessed over 25 months and against VCD hospitalization over 6 years. Results Of 3927 participants in the immunogenicity subsets, 496 and 257 in the CYD-TDV and placebo groups, respectively, were classified as monotypic immune, and 1227 and 612, respectively, as multitypic immune. VE against symptomatic VCD was 77.4% (95% CI, 56.4%–88.2%) for monotypic and 89.2% (95% CI, 71.5%–95.9%) for multitypic profiles, with corresponding absolute risk reductions (ARRs) of 4.48% (95% CI, 2.32%–6.65%) for monotypics and 1.67% (95% CI, .89%–2.46%) for multitypics. VE against hospitalized VCD was 75.3% (95% CI, 42.7%–90.2%) in monotypics and 81.2% (95% CI, 21.7%–96.8%) in multitypics, with ARRs of 0.95% (95% CI, .37%–1.53%) for monotypics and 0.18% (95% CI, .02%–.34%) for multitypics. Conclusions CYD-TDV benefits individuals with monotypic and multitypic immune profiles. Larger public health benefit is expected to derive from the protection of individuals with a monotypic immune profile.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 144-145
Author(s):  
S. Siebert ◽  
I. Mcinnes ◽  
M. J. Loza ◽  
K. MA ◽  
K. Leander ◽  
...  

Background:Guselkumab (GUS), an IL-23 inhibitor monoclonal antibody (Mab) that specifically binds to the IL-23p19 subunit, demonstrated efficacy compared to placebo (PBO) in reducing skin and musculoskeletal signs and symptoms in patients (pts) with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in two phase-3 studies, DISCOVER 1 & 2.1,2Previous results from a GUS PsA Phase-2 trial3and Ustekinumab (UST, anti-IL12/23p40 MAb) PsA Phase-3 trials (PSUMMIT 1 & 2)4showed associations of baseline IL-17A, IL-17F, and CRP with baseline disease characteristics, and associations of GUS-induced cytokine reductions with clinical responses.Objectives:To investigate plausible cytokine expression in PsA and alterations after exposure to GUS therapy.Methods:In DISCOVER 1 & 2, pts were treated with GUS 100 mg at Wk 0, 4, then every 8Wks (q8w); GUS 100mg q4w; or matching PBO. 21 serum biomarkers were measured in a random subset of 300 PsA pts from the DISCOVER program at Weeks (Wks) 0, 4, & 24 and in 34 healthy controls matched for age, sex, and ethnicity. Serum proteins measured were acute phase reactants CRP & SAA (Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) Platform) and inflammatory cytokines/chemokines: Th17 effector cytokines IL-17A, IL-17F, & IL-22 (Single Molecule Counting Erenna® Immunoassay Platform) and soluble ICAM-1, soluble VCAM-1, IL-6, CXCL-8, IL-10, IL-13, IL-12p70, CCL22, IFN-γ, CCL2, CCL4, TNFα, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4 (MSD), & YKL-40 (Quantikine Immunoassay). Serum IL-17A, IL-17B, & CRP measured in the Phase-3 PSUMMIT trials of UST for PsA4were included for comparison with GUS.Results:At baseline, serum levels of acute phase proteins CRP, SAA, & IL-6, and Th17-effector cytokines IL-17A & IL-17F were elevated in pts with PsA compared with healthy controls (p<0.05, geometric mean ≥ 40% higher, FIG 1). There was no significant dysregulation in the other cytokines measured in PsA pts compared to healthy controls. Baseline IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-22, & CCL22 were significantly associated with baseline psoriasis disease activity (Body Surface Area & Psoriatic Area and Severity Index, Spearman Signed Rank p<0.05, r>0.25). Baseline CRP, SAA, IL-6, & YKL40 were significantly associated with baseline joint disease (Disease Activity Score 28-CRP, Spearman p<0.05, r>0.25). Baseline SAA, IL-6, IL-17A, & IL-17F were higher in pts with prior TNF inhibitor exposure than without (p<0.05, geometric mean ≥ 40% higher), although pts with PsA both with and without prior TNF inhibitor had higher levels than the healthy control set.GUS treatment resulted in decreases in serum CRP, SAA, IL-6, IL-17A, IL-17F, & IL-22 that were significantly greater than PBO as early as Week 4 (FIG 1). These protein levels continued to decrease through Wk 24 in GUS-treated pts with both dosing regimens (p<0.05, geometric mean decrease from baseline ≥ 33%). Further, Wk 24 IL-17A & IL-17F levels for pts treated with either dose of GUS were not significantly different from healthy controls, suggesting a normalization of peripheral effector cytokines associated with the IL-23/Th17 axis following treatment with GUS. Effects on IL-17A/IL-17F were greater in GUS treated pts than UST treated pts, while CRP levels were similar in both programs (FIG 2).Conclusion:Comprising a strong pharmacodynamic effect, GUS treatment reduced serum protein levels of acute phase and Th17-effector cytokines (whose elevations at baseline were associated with PsA disease characteristics) and achieved comparable levels to those in healthy controls. In pts with PsA, reductions of IL-17A and IL-17F by GUS were of greater magnitude than those by UST.References:[1]Deodhar et al. ACR 2019, abs #807. Arth Rheumatol. 2019;71 S10: 1386[2]Mease et al. ACR 2019, abs #L13. Arth Rheumatol. 2019;71 S10:5247[3]Siebert et al. EULAR 2019, abs #479. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78 S2:293[4]Siebert et al. Arth Rheumatol. 2019;71:1660Acknowledgments:NoneDisclosure of Interests:Stefan Siebert Grant/research support from: BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Iain McInnes Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Matthew J Loza Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Keying Ma Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Karen Leander, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Vani Lakshminarayanan Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Carol Franks Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Philip Cooper Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Kristen Sweet Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC


Transfusion ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven J. Drews ◽  
Dana V. Devine ◽  
Janet McManus ◽  
Emelissa Mendoza ◽  
Kathy Manguiat ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Glenn M. Chertow ◽  
Gerald B. Appel ◽  
Sharon Andreoli ◽  
Sripal Bangalore ◽  
Geoffrey A. Block ◽  
...  

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Alport syndrome is a rare genetic disorder that affects as many as 60,000 persons in the USA and a total of 103,000 persons (&#x3c;5 per 10,000) in the European Union [1, 2]. It is the second most common inherited cause of kidney failure and is characterized by progressive loss of kidney function that often leads to end-stage kidney disease. Currently, there are no approved disease-specific agents for therapeutic use. We designed a phase 3 study (CARDINAL; NCT03019185) to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of bardoxolone methyl in patients with Alport syndrome. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The CARDINAL phase 3 study is an international, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized registrational trial. Eligible patients were of ages 12–70 years with confirmed genetic or histologic diagnosis of Alport syndrome, eGFR 30–90 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, and urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) ≤3,500 mg/g. Patients with B-type natriuretic peptide values &#x3e;200 pg/mL at baseline or with significant cardiovascular histories were excluded. Patients were randomized 1:1 to bardoxolone methyl or placebo, with stratification by baseline UACR. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 371 patients were screened, and 157 patients were randomly assigned to receive bardoxolone methyl (<i>n</i> = 77) or placebo (<i>n</i> = 80). The average age at screening was 39.2 years, and 23 (15%) were &#x3c;18 years of age. Of the randomized population, 146 (93%) had confirmed genetic diagnosis of Alport syndrome, and 62% of patients had X-linked mode of inheritance. Mean baseline eGFR was 62.7 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>, and the geometric mean UACR was 141.0 mg/g. The average annual rate of eGFR decline prior to enrollment in the study was −4.9 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup> despite 78% of the patient population receiving ACE inhibitor (ACEi) or ARB therapy. <b><i>Discussion/Conclusion:</i></b> CARDINAL is one of the largest interventional, randomized controlled trials in Alport syndrome conducted to date. Despite the use of ACEi or ARB, patients were experiencing significant loss of kidney function prior to study entry.


2014 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 435-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hee-Jung Lee ◽  
Kyung-Il Min ◽  
Ki Hoon Park ◽  
Hyo Jung Choi ◽  
Min-Kyoung Kim ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maíra Aguiar ◽  
Luís Mateus ◽  
Nico Stollenwerk

1976 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 437-442
Author(s):  
G Gerna ◽  
R W Chambers

A new plaque assay for the quantitation of varicella-zoster virus and a plaque reduction neutralization test for the determination of neutralizing antibody titer have been developed using the indirect immunoperoxidase technique. As compared with the classical plaque assay using a solid overlay, the test gives earlier results since plaque counting can be performed on day 3 after the inoculation of cell cultures. In six patients with zoster infection, neutralizing antibody titers ranged from 1:20 to 1:40 before the onset of infection and reached high levels (1:320 to 1:5,120) during the convalescent phase of the disease. Complement-fixing (CF) titers were all negative (less than 1:8) in prezoster serum samples from the same patients and ranged from 1:128 to 1:2,048 in the convalescent-phase sera. In the two cases in which late serum samples were available, neutralizing antibody titers matched the preillness levels, whereas CF titers dropped to undetectable levels. Neither neutralizing nor CF antibody was detected in two sera from individuals with no history of varicella-zoster infection. No differences in virus titers or neutralizing antibody titers were observed between the immunoperoxidase and the classical plaque assays. The appropriate characterization of reagent specificity is required before routine application of the test.


Author(s):  
Kevinkumar Kansagra ◽  
Deven Parmar ◽  
Sanjeev Kumar Mendiratta ◽  
Jatin Patel ◽  
Shuchi Joshi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Limited supply, cost and potential for severe adverse effects observed with the blood derived rabies immunoglobulin products has led to search for alternative therapies. This issue has been addressed by developing an anti-rabies monoclonal antibody cocktail. Methods This is a phase 3, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial conducted in patients with World Health Organization (WHO) category III exposure with suspected rabid animal. Eligible patients were assigned to either the test arm, TwinrabTM (docaravimab and miromavimab) or the reference arm, human rabies immunoglobulin (HRIG; Imogam® Rabies-HT), in a ratio of 1:1. The primary endpoint was the comparison of responder rates between the 2 arms assessed as percentage of those with rabies virus neutralizing antibodies titers ≥0.5 IU/mL on day 14. Results A total of 308 patients were equally randomized into the 2 arms. In the per-protocol (PP) population, there were 90.21% responders in the TwinrabTM arm and 94.37% in the HRIG arm. The geometric mean of rapid fluorescent foci inhibition test titers in the PP on day 14 were 4.38 and 4.85 IU/mL, for the TwinrabTM and HRIG arms, respectively. There were no deaths or serious adverse events reported. Conclusions This study confirmed that TwinrabTM is noninferior to HRIG in terms of providing an unbroken window of protection up to day 84. This trial in healthy adults with WHO category III exposure from suspected rabid animal also establishes the safety of TwinrabTM in patients with 1 WHO approved vaccine regimen (Essen). Clinical Trials Registration CTRI/2017/07/009038.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document