Burchell, Andrew, (born 26 March 1955), Associate Hospital Manager, South West London and St George’s Mental Health Trust, 2011; Chairman, Sutton Citizens Advice Bureau, since 2010

2011 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Alice Lomax ◽  
Frances Raphael ◽  
James Pagliero ◽  
Rupal Patel

This re-audit assessed whether wards at South West London and St Georges’ mental health trust (SWLSTG) met agreed standards regarding informing inpatients about their legal status in hospital and rights, following an initial audit in 2009. Three general adult wards were re-audited, and other general and specialist wards (addictions, eating disorders, deaf services and obsessive compulsive disorder) were added. One hundred and five people (61 informal, 44 detained under the Mental Health Act 1983, revised 2007) on 10 wards were interviewed using an agreed proforma. The re-audit of wards A–C showed improvement: 81.3% of informal inpatients were aware of their legal status, versus 54.2% in 2009 ( P = 0.101). Including new wards D–K, 90.2% knew their status ( P = 0.0002). Of the informal patients, 65.6% knew they could refuse treatment ( P = 0.0184) (on wards A–C, 68.8%, P = 0.105) versus 37.5% in 2009. Despite some improvement, the patient experience of informal admission or detention in hospital still sometimes crosses legal boundaries. This audit highlights the need to improve awareness of patient rights and demonstrated how local presentation of audit improves practice.


BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S329-S329
Author(s):  
Saima Jehanzeb ◽  
Muhammad Suleman ◽  
Ella Tumelty ◽  
Joanne Okusanya ◽  
Laxsan Karunanithy ◽  
...  

AimsBased on recommendations from the Royal College of Psychiatrists, this project aimed to evaluate the impact of the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic on referral patterns to the Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (QEHB) Liaison Psychiatry (LP) service. Additionally, we aimed to explore staff experiences in LP services across Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Trust (BSMHFT) in order to generate Trust recommendations promoting optimal healthcare provision amidst the on-going pandemic.MethodA mixed method service evaluation was conducted using quantitative and qualitative analysis. Quantitative methods involved reviewing referrals made to the QEHB LP service from March to June 2020, compared with the equivalent time period in 2019. Data were retrospectively extracted from the electronic clinical databases RIO and PICS, and subsequently analysed using Microsoft Office. The number of, and reasons for referrals to LP were identified, whilst focus groups were conducted to explore the subjective experiences of staff working across BSMHFT LP services.ResultBetween 1st March and 30th June 2020, 984 referrals were made to the QEHB LP service, compared to 1020 referrals in 2019, representing a 3.5% reduction. From 2019 to 2020, referrals due to psychotic symptoms and deliberate self-harm rose by 12.8% and 14.1% respectively, whilst referrals for drug and alcohol-related causes reduced by 28.3%. A significant increase (150%) in referrals for medication or management advice was seen. Focus groups indicated that staff perceived an initial reduction in number of referrals, but an increase in the acuity of patient presentations.Staff reported anxiety around contracting and transmitting SARS-Cov-2, exacerbated by uncertainty around patients’ COVID-19 status. In QEHB, sixty-five of the 984 referrals (7%) had a positive SARS-Cov-2 PCR swab, with the remaining 919 referrals being either negative (68%) or unknown (25%). Ninety-six percent of consultations were conducted face-to-face in QEHB. There were conflicting views amongst staff regarding whether more consultations could have been conducted remotely. Furthermore, varying perceptions of support and communication from both the physical and mental health trust were reported.ConclusionQuantitative data indicates that COVID-19 impacted LP healthcare provision in BSMHFT. Whilst referral numbers remained similar between the equivalent period in 2019 and 2020, a change in the nature of referrals to LP at QEHB was seen. This was corroborated by qualitative data which highlighted a perceived change in acuity of referrals. These findings have been disseminated across the Trust and subsequent recommendations are being implemented during the on-going pandemic.


2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-211
Author(s):  
Stephen Curran ◽  
Rebecca Spencer ◽  
Sonja Kruger ◽  
Andrew Byrne ◽  
Vijayalakshmi Saravanan ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 86-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.A. Verlinde ◽  
E.O. Noorthoorn ◽  
W. Snelleman ◽  
H. van den Berg ◽  
M. Snelleman – van der Plas ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundIn the Netherlands, seclusion is historically the measure of first choice in dealing with aggressive incidents. In 2010, the Mediant Mental Health Trust in Eastern Netherlands introduced a policy prioritising the use of enforced medication to manage aggressive incidents over seclusion. The main goal of the study was to investigate whether prioritising enforced medication over seclusion leads to a change of aggressive incidents and coercive measures.MethodsThe study was carried out with data from 2764 patients admitted between 2007 and 2013 to the hospital locations of the Mediant Mental Health Trust in Eastern Netherlands, with a catchment area of 500,000 inhabitants. Seclusion, restraint and enforced medications as well as other coercive measures were gathered systematically. Aggressive incidents were assessed with the SOAS-R. An event sequence analysis was preformed, to assess the whether seclusion, restraint or enforced medication were used or not before or after aggressive incidents.ResultsEnforced medication use went up by 363% from a very low baseline. There was a marked reduction of overall coercive measures by 44%. Seclusion hours went down by 62%. Aggression against staff or patients was reduced by 40%.ConclusionsWhen dealing with aggression, prioritising medication significantly reduces other coercive measures and aggression against staff, while within principles of subsidiarity, proportionality and expediency.


2022 ◽  
pp. 026988112110589
Author(s):  
Shubhra Mace ◽  
Olubanke Dzahini ◽  
Victoria Cornelius ◽  
Hadar Langerman ◽  
Ebenezer Oloyede ◽  
...  

Background: To examine the risk of infection in patients prescribed clozapine compared with patients prescribed paliperidone palmitate long-acting injection (PPLAI). Method: A retrospective, 1-year, cohort study conducted on events occurring in eligible patients beginning treatment for the first time with clozapine or PPLAI between June 2017 and June 2019 in a UK mental health trust providing in-patient and out-patient services. Results: The study included 64 patients starting clozapine and 120 patients starting PPLAI. Incidence of infection was greater in clozapine starters than in PPLAI starters (28% vs 6%; p = 0.001; adjusted odds ratio 5.82 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.15–15.76, p = 0.001). Infectious episodes in clozapine patients were not related to changes in neutrophil counts. Incident infection in the clozapine group was highest in the first 3 months of treatment. The most commonly reported infection in the clozapine group was chest infection; however, the majority of infections were non-chest-related. Conclusion: Patients starting clozapine showed a substantially increased likelihood of infection compared with patients starting PPLAI.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document