Hearing thresholds of small native Australian mammals – red-tailed phascogale (Phascogale calura), kultarr (Antechinomys laniger) and spinifex hopping-mouse (Notomys alexis)

2020 ◽  
Vol 190 (1) ◽  
pp. 342-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie M Old ◽  
Carl Parsons ◽  
Melissa L Tulk
Keyword(s):  
Sound Pressure ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Natural Environments ◽  
Predator Detection ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Hearing Thresholds ◽  
Brainstem Response ◽  
Hearing Range ◽  
High Range

Abstract Hearing is essential for communication, to locate prey and to avoid predators. We addressed the paucity of information regarding hearing in Australian native mammals by specifically assessing the hearing range and sensitivity of the red-tailed phascogale (Phascogale calura), the kultarr (Antechinomys laniger) and the spinifex hopping-mouse (Notomys alexis). Auditory brainstem response (ABR) audiograms were used to estimate hearing thresholds within the range of 1–84 kHz, over a dynamic range of 0–80 dB sound pressure level (SPL). Phascogales had a hearing range of 1–40 kHz, kultarrs 1–35 kHz and hopping-mice 1–35 kHz, with a dynamic range of 17–59 dB SPL, 20–80 dB SPL and 30–73 dB SPL, respectively. Hearing for all species was most sensitive at 8 kHz. Age showed no influence on optimal hearing, but younger animals had more diverse optimal hearing frequencies. There was a relationship between males and their optimal hearing frequency, and greater interaural distances of individual males may be related to optimal hearing frequency. Because nocturnal animals use high-range hearing for prey or predator detection, our study suggests this may also be the case for the species examined in this study. Future studies should investigate their vocalizations and behaviour in their natural environments, and by exposing them to different auditory stimuli.

scholarly journals Comparison of auditory brainstem response and auditory steady state response audiometry by evaluating the hearing thresholds obtained in children with different severity of hearing loss

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Azeem Aslam ◽  
Adeela Javed ◽  
Abdul Moiz
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Response ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Steady State Response ◽  
State Response ◽  
Hearing Thresholds ◽  
Auditory Steady State Response ◽  
Brainstem Response ◽  
The Mean

Objectives: To compare the hearing thresholds obtained with auditory brainstem response (ABR) and auditory steady state response (ASSR) audiometry in children with hearing loss. Methods: Hearing thresholds were obtained by ABR and ASSR in children who presented with suspicion of deafness at Ear, nose & throat department of Al-Nafees Medical College Hospital Islamabad, between January to August 2018. The mean hearing thresholds obtained by two tests were compared within each category of severity of deafness. Time taken by both tests was also compared. Results: A total of 57 patients (114 ears) were included in the study. Among them 27 (47.4%) were male and 30 (52.6%) were female. The mean age of patients at presentation was 42 months (±30.9) with age range from one to 12 years. Mean hearing thresholds obtained by click ABR, chirp ABR, ASSR (1, 2, 4 kHz) & ASSR (0.5, 1, 2, 4 kHz) was 56.25 (±27.61), 58.88 (±27.44), 58.03 (±21.26) & 56.35 (±22.86) respectively. Mean thresholds were comparable between click ABR & ASSR (1, 2, 4 kHz) and between chirp ABR & ASSR (0.5, 1, 2, 4 kHz) in all degrees of hearing loss categories except in those patients with normal hearing thresholds. The mean time taken by clicks ABR, chirp ABR and ASSR were four minutes seven seconds, three minutes 15 seconds and 16 minutes and 7 seconds respectively. Conclusions: Hearing thresholds obtained by ABR and ASSR are comparable in all categories of severity of hearing loss. The time taken by ABR is less as compared to ASSR. How to cite this:Aslam MA, Javed A, Moiz A. Comparison of auditory brainstem response and auditory steady state response audiometry by evaluating the hearing thresholds obtained in children with different severity of hearing loss. Pak J Med Sci. 2019;35(2):---------.   doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.2.688 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

scholarly journals Comparison of auditory steady state response (ASSR) & auditory brainstem response (ABR) hearing thresholds in young children.

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-21
Author(s):  
Adil Munir ◽  
Nazia Mumtaz ◽  
Ghulam Saqulain ◽  
Munir Ahmad
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Hearing Threshold ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Responses ◽  
Steady State Response ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
State Response ◽  
Hearing Thresholds ◽  
Auditory Steady State Response ◽  
Brainstem Response

Objective: Hearing loss (HL) with a local prevalence of 5.7%, is the commonest childhood disability, requiring Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) programs to reduce the disability burden. Knowing the degree, type and configuration of HL is prerequisite for appropriate amplification, with Automated Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR) being commonly used for this purpose, however Auditory Steady State Response (ASSR) has been recently introduced in the region. This study was conducted to compare ABR to ASSR, as an early diagnostic tool in children under five years of age. Methodology: This cross-sectional comparative study was performed at the Auditory Verbal Institute of Audiology and Speech (AVIAS) clinics in Rawalpindi and Islamabad, from December 2016 to September 2017. It included thirty-two cases (n=32) who visited AVIAS clinics for hearing assessment and conformed to the investigative protocol using non probability convenient sampling technique, and subjected to both ABR and ASSR for comparative purposes. Correlations were calculated between the thresholds obtained by ABR and ASSR. Results: N=32 children (64 ears) with male female ratio of 2.2:1 and mean age of 33.50±17.73 months were tested with ABR and ASSR for hearing thresholds and correlation coefficient between 2KHz, 4KHz ASSR and average of both with ABR was calculated to be 0.92 and 0.90 and 0.94 respectively. Conclusion: ASSR provides additional frequency specific hearing threshold estimation compared to C-ABR, essentially required for proper setting of amplification devices. 

Unraveling the Mystery of Auditory Brainstem Response Corrections: The Need for Universal Standards

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 950-960 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda W. Norrix ◽  
David Velenovsky
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Brainstem Response ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Behavioral Thresholds ◽  
Hearing Thresholds ◽  
Brainstem Response ◽  
Two Measures ◽  
Impaired Children ◽  
Universal Standard

Background: The auditory brainstem response (ABR) is used to estimate behavioral hearing thresholds in infants and difficult-to-test populations. Differences between the toneburst ABR and behavioral thresholds exist making the correspondence between the two measures less than perfect. Some authors have suggested that corrections be applied to ABR thresholds to account for these differences. However, because there is no agreed upon universal standard, confusion regarding the use of corrections exists. Purpose: The primary purpose of this article is to review the reasoning behind and use of corrections when the toneburst ABR is employed to estimate behavioral hearing thresholds. We also discuss other considerations that all audiologists should be aware of when obtaining and reporting ABR test results. Results: A review of the purpose and use of corrections reveals no consensus as to whether they should be applied or which should be used. Additionally, when ABR results are adjusted, there is no agreement as to whether additional corrections for hearing loss or the age of the client are necessary. This lack of consensus can be confusing for all individuals working with hearing-impaired children and their families. Conclusions: Toneburst ABR thresholds do not perfectly align with behavioral hearing thresholds. Universal protocols for the use of corrections are needed. Additionally, evidence-based procedures must be employed to obtain valid ABRs that will accurately estimate hearing thresholds.

scholarly journals The Parallel Auditory Brainstem Response

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 233121651987139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa J. Polonenko ◽  
Ross K. Maddox
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Brainstem Response ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Test Duration ◽  
Recording Time ◽  
Low Frequencies ◽  
Periodic Sequences ◽  
Hearing Thresholds ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Brainstem Response ◽  
Indispensable Tool

The frequency-specific tone-evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) is an indispensable tool in both the audiology clinic and research laboratory. Most frequently, the toneburst ABR is used to estimate hearing thresholds in infants, toddlers, and other patients for whom behavioral testing is not feasible. Therefore, results of the ABR exam form the basis for decisions regarding interventions and hearing habilitation with implications extending far into the child’s future. Currently, responses are elicited by periodic sequences of toneburst stimuli presented serially to one ear at a time, which take a long time to measure multiple frequencies and intensities, and provide incomplete information if the infant wakes up early. Here, we describe a new method, the parallel ABR (pABR), which uses randomly timed toneburst stimuli to simultaneously acquire ABR waveforms to five frequencies in both ears. Here, we describe the pABR and quantify its effectiveness in addressing the greatest drawback of current methods: test duration. We show that in adults with normal hearing the pABR yields high-quality waveforms over a range of intensities, with similar morphology to the standard ABR in a fraction of the recording time. Furthermore, longer latencies and smaller amplitudes for low frequencies at a high intensity evoked by the pABR versus serial ABR suggest that responses may have better place specificity due to the masking provided by the other simultaneous toneburst sequences. Thus, the pABR has substantial potential for facilitating faster accumulation of more diagnostic information that is important for timely identification and treatment of hearing loss.

scholarly journals Seismic sensitivity and bone conduction mechanisms enable extratympanic hearing in salamanders

2020 ◽  
Vol 223 (24) ◽  
pp. jeb236489
Author(s):  
G. Capshaw ◽  
D. Soares ◽  
J. Christensen-Dalsgaard ◽  
C. E. Carr
Keyword(s):  
Sound Pressure ◽  
Bone Conduction ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Threshold Level ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Common Mechanism ◽  
Experimental Conditions ◽  
Airborne Sound ◽  
Sound Detection ◽  
Brainstem Response

ABSTRACTThe tympanic middle ear is an adaptive sensory novelty that evolved multiple times in all the major terrestrial tetrapod groups to overcome the impedance mismatch generated when aerial sound encounters the air–skin boundary. Many extant tetrapod species have lost their tympanic middle ears, yet they retain the ability to detect airborne sound. In the absence of a functional tympanic ear, extratympanic hearing may occur via the resonant qualities of air-filled body cavities, sensitivity to seismic vibration, and/or bone conduction pathways to transmit sound from the environment to the ear. We used auditory brainstem response recording and laser vibrometry to assess the contributions of these extratympanic pathways for airborne sound in atympanic salamanders. We measured auditory sensitivity thresholds in eight species and observed sensitivity to low-frequency sound and vibration from 0.05–1.2 kHz and 0.02–1.2 kHz, respectively. We determined that sensitivity to airborne sound is not facilitated by the vibrational responsiveness of the lungs or mouth cavity. We further observed that, although seismic sensitivity probably contributes to sound detection under naturalistic scenarios, airborne sound stimuli presented under experimental conditions did not produce vibrations detectable to the salamander ear. Instead, threshold-level sound pressure is sufficient to generate translational movements in the salamander head, and these sound-induced head vibrations are detectable by the acoustic sensors of the inner ear. This extratympanic hearing mechanism mediates low-frequency sensitivity in vertebrate ears that are unspecialized for the detection of aerial sound pressure, and may represent a common mechanism for terrestrial hearing across atympanic tetrapods.

scholarly journals ACEMg Diet Supplement Modifies Progression of Hereditary Deafness

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kari L. Green ◽  
Donald L. Swiderski ◽  
Diane M. Prieskorn ◽  
Susan J. DeRemer ◽  
Lisa A. Beyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Control Diet ◽  
Beta Carotene ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Diet Group ◽  
Auditory Neuropathy ◽  
Childhood Deafness ◽  
Hearing Thresholds ◽  
Genetic Hearing Loss ◽  
Brainstem Response

Abstract Dietary supplements consisting of beta-carotene (precursor to vitamin A), vitamins C and E and the mineral magnesium (ACEMg) can be beneficial for reducing hearing loss due to aminoglycosides and overstimulation. This regimen also slowed progression of deafness for a boy with GJB2 (CONNEXIN 26) mutations. To assess the potential for treating GJB2 and other forms of hereditary hearing loss with ACEMg, we tested the influence of ACEMg on the cochlea and hearing of mouse models for two human mutations: GJB2, the leading cause of childhood deafness, and DIAPH3, a cause of auditory neuropathy. One group of mice modeling GJB2 (Gjb2-CKO) received ACEMg diet starting shortly after they were weaned (4 weeks) until 16 weeks of age. Another group of Gjb2-CKO mice received ACEMg in utero and after weaning. The ACEMg diet was given to mice modeling DIAPH3 (Diap3-Tg) after weaning (4 weeks) until 12 weeks of age. Control groups received food pellets without the ACEMg supplement. Hearing thresholds measured by auditory brainstem response were significantly better for Gjb2-CKO mice fed ACEMg than for the control diet group. In contrast, Diap3-Tg mice displayed worse thresholds than controls. These results indicate that ACEMg supplementation can influence the progression of genetic hearing loss.

scholarly journals Hearing, echolocation, and beam steering from day 0 in tongue-clicking bats

2021 ◽  
Vol 288 (1961) ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace C. Smarsh ◽  
Yifat Tarnovsky ◽  
Yossi Yovel
Keyword(s):  
Auditory Brainstem Response ◽  
Beam Steering ◽  
Sensory System ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Acoustic Stimuli ◽  
Fruit Bat ◽  
Brainstem Response ◽  
Tongue Movements ◽  
Hearing Range ◽  
Pure Tones

Little is known about the ontogeny of lingual echolocation. We examined the echolocation development of Rousettus aegyptiacus , the Egyptian fruit bat, which uses rapid tongue movements to produce hyper-short clicks and steer the beam's direction. We recorded from day 0 to day 35 postbirth and assessed hearing and beam-steering abilities. On day 0, R. aegyptiacus pups emit isolation calls and hyper-short clicks in response to acoustic stimuli, demonstrating hearing. Auditory brainstem response recordings show that pups are sensitive to pure tones of the main hearing range of adult Rousettus and to brief clicks. Newborn pups produced clicks in the adult paired pattern and were able to use their tongues to steer the sonar beam. As they aged, pups produced click pairs faster, converging with adult intervals by age of first flights (7–8 weeks). In contrast with laryngeal bats, Rousettus echolocation frequency and duration are stable through to day 35, but shift by the time pups begin to fly, possibly owing to tongue-diet maturation effects. Furthermore, frequency and duration shift in the opposite direction of mammalian laryngeal vocalizations. Rousettus lingual echolocation thus appears to be a highly functional sensory system from birth and follows a different ontogeny from that of laryngeal bats.

scholarly journals Protection of cochlear synapses from noise-induced excitotoxic trauma by blockade of Ca2+-permeable AMPA receptors

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (7) ◽  
pp. 3828-3838 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ning Hu ◽  
Mark A. Rutherford ◽  
Steven H. Green
Keyword(s):  
Ampa Receptors ◽  
Spiral Ganglion ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Spiral Ganglion Neurons ◽  
Loud Sound ◽  
Selective Blockade ◽  
Hearing Thresholds ◽  
Brainstem Response ◽  
Low Threshold ◽  
Ganglion Neurons

Exposure to loud sound damages the postsynaptic terminals of spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) on cochlear inner hair cells (IHCs), resulting in loss of synapses, a process termed synaptopathy. Glutamatergic neurotransmission via α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid (AMPA)-type receptors is required for synaptopathy, and here we identify a possible involvement of GluA2-lacking Ca2+-permeable AMPA receptors (CP-AMPARs) using IEM-1460, which has been shown to block GluA2-lacking AMPARs. In CBA/CaJ mice, a 2-h exposure to 100-dB sound pressure level octave band (8 to 16 kHz) noise results in no permanent threshold shift but does cause significant synaptopathy and a reduction in auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave-I amplitude. Chronic intracochlear perfusion of IEM-1460 in artificial perilymph (AP) into adult CBA/CaJ mice prevented the decrease in ABR wave-I amplitude and the synaptopathy relative to intracochlear perfusion of AP alone. Interestingly, IEM-1460 itself did not affect the ABR threshold, presumably because GluA2-containing AMPARs can sustain sufficient synaptic transmission to evoke low-threshold responses during blockade of GluA2-lacking AMPARs. On individual postsynaptic densities, we observed GluA2-lacking nanodomains alongside regions with robust GluA2 expression, consistent with the idea that individual synapses have both CP-AMPARs and Ca2+-impermeable AMPARs. SGNs innervating the same IHC differ in their relative vulnerability to noise. We found local heterogeneity among synapses in the relative abundance of GluA2 subunits that may underlie such differences in vulnerability. We propose a role for GluA2-lacking CP-AMPARs in noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy whereby differences among synapses account for differences in excitotoxic susceptibility. These data suggest a means of maintaining normal hearing thresholds while protecting against noise-induced synaptopathy, via selective blockade of CP-AMPARs.

Bone conduction auditory brainstem responses in infants

2004 ◽  
Vol 118 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. E. Campbell ◽  
C. M. Harris ◽  
S. Hendricks ◽  
T. Sirimanna
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Bone Conduction ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Paediatric Population ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Responses ◽  
Brainstem Response ◽  
Narrow Dynamic Range

The contribution of air conduction auditory brainstem response (AC-ABR) testing in the paediatric population is widely accepted in clinical audiology. However, this does not allow for differentiation between conductive and sensorineural hearing loss. The purpose ofthis paper is to review the role of bone conduction auditory brainstem responses (BC-ABR). It is argued that despite such technical difficulties as a narrow dynamic range, masking dilemmas, stimulus artifact and low frequency underestimation of hearing loss, considerable evidence exists to suggest that BC-ABR testing provides an important contribution in the accurate assessmentof hearing loss in infants. Modification of the BC-ABR protocol is discussed and the technical difficulties that may arise are addressed, permitting BC-ABR to be used as a tool in the differential diagnosis between conductive and sensorineural hearing. Two relevant case studies are presented to highlight the growing importance of appropriate management in early identification of hearing loss. It can be concluded that BC-ABR should be adopted as a routine clinical diagnostic tool.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document