scholarly journals First Report of Powdery Mildew in Greenhouse-Grown Tomatoes in New Jersey

Plant Disease ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. White ◽  
S. A. Johnston ◽  
C.-L. Wang ◽  
C.-K. Chin

Powdery mildew of tomatoes caused by an Erysiphe sp. has been reported to occur in greenhouses in New York (2). In March and April of 1996, outbreaks of this disease were found in greenhouse-grown tomato plants of cv. PSR55809 at the Cook College campus in New Brunswick, NJ, and in cv. Match in commercial greenhouses in Burlington County, NJ. Identification of an Erysiphe sp. was made by comparative morphology of the conidial state since the perfect stage was not observed. Symptoms included development of patches of white mycelium predominantly on upper surfaces of older leaves followed by chlorosis of tissues colonized by the fungus. Microscopic examination of mycelium revealed the presence of typical Oidium conidiogenous cells and conidia. Conidiogenous cells were short and cylindrical and produce conidia in chains apically. Conidia were hyaline, cylindrical to ellipsoidal, and measured 36 + 4.9 × 16.7 + 2.2 μm (n = 20). Both conidia and symptoms of this powdery mildew are comparable to those previously given for the Erysiphe sp. described in New York (2). Another powdery mildew of tomato, caused by Oidiopsis sicula Scalia, occurs in the western U.S., Mediterranean Basin, Africa, and Asia. However, the conidia of O. sicula are of two types, pyriform and cylindrical, and they are larger than those of an Erysiphe sp. (1). To verify pathogenicity of this Erysiphe sp. to tomatoes, conidia washed from leaves were misted onto uninfected leaves of young tomato plants. After 1 week in a growth chamber (25°C; 80% relative humidity; 12 h of light), typical powdery mildew symptoms were evident on inoculated plants, while unmisted plants remained free of symptoms. Microscopic examination of the fungus on surfaces of leaves confirmed it to be an Erysiphe sp. References: (1) R. N. Campbell and R. W. Scheuerman. Plant Dis. Rep. 63:1087, 1979. (2) D. M. Karasevicz and T. A. Zitter. Plant Dis. 80:709, 1996.

Plant Disease ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 91 (5) ◽  
pp. 636-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Stanosz ◽  
D. Smith ◽  
J. Stanosz

Box elder leaves affected by powdery mildew were collected from a single tree in an urban yard in the fall of 2006 in Madison, WI. As much as half of the area of the leaf blades, when viewed from above or below, was pale green-to-tan and necrotic. Mycelium was not visible to the eye on either the upper or lower leaf surfaces, but very sparse white mycelium was observed on the lower surface of leaves with the aid of a dissecting microscope. Chasmothecia were present singly or in groups of a few on the lower surface of leaves. Morphology of the chasmothecia, including simple and bifid appendages with uncinate to circinate apices, was sufficient to identify the pathogen to the genus Sawadaea (1). Other characters were not sufficiently distinct to make an identification of the species. However, DNA was extracted from the chasmothecia, and analysis of a 542-bp sequence of nuclear rDNA ITS (GenBank Accession No. EF122238) revealed a 100% match with the respective sequence obtained from Genbank for S. bicornis (Accession No. AB193380). A specimen from which these chasmothecia were obtained has been deposited in the U.S. National Fungus Collections (BPI 877328). S. bicornis is a European pathogen of maples, including box elder when grown there (1). Knowledge of the geographic distribution and hosts of Sawadaea powdery mildews in North America is extremely limited. S. bicornis was first reported in North America only recently, occurring in the states of Idaho and Washington on Norway maple (Acer platanoides) (3). The morphologically very similar European powdery mildew pathogen of maples, S. tulasnei, is known only from New York, Ohio, and Montreal, Canada (4), and an unidentified Sawadaea species on box elder has been reported from California (2). References (1) U. Braun. The Powdery Mildews (Erysiphales) of Europe. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena-Stuttgart-New York, 1995. (2) S. Hirose et al. Mycol. Res. 109:912, 2005. (3) C. Nischwitz and G. Newcombe. Plant Dis. 87:451, 2003. (4) J. Weiland and G. Stanosz. Plant Dis. 90:830, 2006.


Plant Disease ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 85 (12) ◽  
pp. 1292-1292 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. Marois ◽  
M. T. Momol ◽  
J. W. Kimbrough ◽  
R. C. Hochmuth ◽  
W. Dankers

In December 1999, typical signs of powdery mildew-dense white mycelium in irregular patterns often covering almost the entire upper surface of leaves-were observed in production greenhouses on tomato cv. Tradiro. Microscopic observations revealed mycelium with lobed appressoria and large, approximately cylindrical conidia that measured 38 to 45 × 16 to18 μm. Short germ tubes were at one end of the conidium and ended in a lobed appressorium. Conidiophores were straight with cylindrical foot-cells (≈40 to 42 μm), followed by two short cells (14 to18 μm). Based on these characteristics the fungus was identified as 0idium neolycopersici Kiss et al. (2) (formerly O. lycopersicum Braun [1]). Disease-free tomato cv. FL47 plants were inoculated at the fourth true-leaf stage with conidia by transferring fungal colonies collected from plants in production greenhouses with a single-edged razor blade to the adaxial surface of the test plants (six plants and three leaves per plant). Plants were grown in the greenhouse at 20 to 25°C. Powdery mildew, exhibiting the same morphological features, was observed 12 days later on inoculated tomato leaves. Powdery mildew on tomatoes in Suwannee Valley area greenhouses in Florida was quite common and severe in 1999 to 2000. Secondary cycles of the disease were observed, resulting in disease incidence up to 50 to 60% in some greenhouses, requiring repeated applications of sulfur for its management. This disease is expected to become a significant problem in greenhouse tomatoes, requiring regular disease control measures. This powdery mildew has not yet been observed in field-grown tomatoes in Florida. The pathogen has been reported in Connecticut on tomatoes grown under greenhouse and field conditions (3). To our knowledge, this is the first report of O. neolycopersici on greenhouse-grown tomatoes in Florida. References: (1) U. Braun. The Powdery Mildews (Erysiphales) of Europe. Gustav Fisher Verlag, New York, 1995. (2) L. Kiss et al. Mycol. Res. 105:684, 2001. (3) J. A. LaMondia et al. Plant Dis. 83:341, 1999.


Plant Disease ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. 262-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Pernezny ◽  
R. M. Sonoda

Powdery mildew was observed affecting mature, field-grown, fresh-market tomatoes in southeastern Florida (St. Lucie, Martin, Palm Beach, and Broward counties). Outbreaks were noted in May of 1996 and throughout the spring of 1997. Affected leaves were generally yellow and, in some cases, developed a purplish cast. Whitish areas of fungal growth were often seen in the middle of lesions, but were less prominent than that reported for powdery mildew of field tomato in Hungary (2). Microscopic examination revealed that conidia were produced in chains, contained no fibrosin bodies, and were not dimorphic. Conidial measurements were 33.2 × 15.6 μm, based on 21 samples of five conidia taken from five different fields. These measurements were similar to those for an Erysiphe sp. causing powdery mildew of greenhouse tomato in New York (1). Greenhouse-grown tomato plants, cv. Sunny, in the fourth-true-leaf stage were inoculated with conidia scraped from lesions gathered in commercial fields. A single-edged razor blade was used to transfer the fungus to the adaxial surface of the test plants. Powdery mildew symptoms were observed within 10 days of inoculation. Morphology and size of conidia taken from greenhouse plants were similar to those for original field samples. This is the first report of powdery mildew of field-grown tomato in Florida. References: (1) D. M. Karasevicz and T. A. Zitter. Plant Dis. 80:709, 1996. (2) L. Kiss. Plant Dis. 80:224, 1996.


Plant Disease ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
pp. 485-485
Author(s):  
B. Hudelson ◽  
D. Smith ◽  
G. Stanosz ◽  
M. Hanson

Leaves affected by powdery mildew were collected from a Norway maple tree in early October 2007 in Beaver Dam, WI (Dodge County). Diseased leaves were present throughout the crown of this tree, with white mycelium in irregular and often vein-associated spots and often covering as much as 50% of the upper surfaces of leaves. Examination of the lower surfaces revealed necrosis of the areas underlying mycelium. Blades of samaras also bore white mycelium. Chasmothecia were present singly or in groups on the mycelium. Morphology of chasmothecia, including simple and bifid appendages with uncinate to circinate apices, was sufficient to identify the pathogen to the genus Sawadaea (1). Data for nuclear rDNA ITS sequence (546 bp) obtained for a specimen (GenBank Accession No. EU247884) exactly matched sequences for Sawadea tulasnei (GenBank Accession Nos. AB 193363, 478 bp; AB193385, 490 bp; AB193390 and AB193391, 546 bp). This data was 96% similar (528 of 552 nucleotides) to that of another European powdery mildew pathogen, S. bicornis (GenBank Accession No. AB193380), which is also reported to occur on maples in Idaho, Washington, and Wisconsin (2,3). A further survey revealed the same fungus on several additional nearby Norway maples along streets and in yards (including varieties with both darkly colored and variegated leaves), but on these trees very few leaves were affected and usually less than 5% of the upper leaf surfaces bore mycelium. This pathogen was not observed on leaves of either red (A. rubrum) or silver maples (A. saccharinum) examined in the same area. S. tulasnei was previously known in North America only by collections in New York, Ohio, and Montreal, Canada (4), but our observation indicates that the geographic distribution of this pathogen is probably much broader and overlaps with that of S. bicornis. Specimens from Beaver Dam, WI have been deposited in the U.S. National Fungus Collections (BPI 878273). References: (1) U. Braun. The Powdery Mildews (Erysiphales) of Europe. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena-Stuttgart, New York, 1995. (2) C. Nischwitz and G. Newcombe. Plant Dis. 87:451, 2003. (3) G. Stanosz et al. Plant Dis. 91:636, 2007. (4) J. Weiland and G. Stanosz. Plant Dis. 90:830, 2006.


Author(s):  

Abstract A new distribution map is provided for Chrysomyxa arctostaphyli Dietel Fungi: Basidiomycota: Uredinales Hosts: Picea spp. and Arctostaphylos uva-ursi. Information is given on the geographical distribution in NORTH AMERICA, Canada, Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Newfoundland, Northwest, Territories, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec, Saskatchewan, Yukon, USA, Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Maine, Michigan, Montana, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin, Wyoming.


Author(s):  

Abstract A new distribution map is provided for Apiosporina morbosa (Schwein.) v. Arx Fungi: Ascomycota: Dothideales Hosts: Stone fruit (Prunus spp.). Information is given on the geographical distribution in NORTH AMERICA, Canada, Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Newfoundland, Northwest, Territories, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Prince Edward Island, Quebec, Saskatchewan, Mexico, USA, Alabama, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin.


Author(s):  
D. W. Minter

Abstract A description is provided for Arthrinium sphaerospermum, which is most frequently encountered as a saprobe on decaying leaves and stems of plants, but is also known to live as an endophyte, for example in stems of Eucalyptus, and in the phyllosphere, for example of Iris. This fungus has also been reported as the cause of poisoning through contamination of sugarcane and the causal agent of a dermatomycosis in humans. Some information on its associated organisms and substrata, habitat, dispersal and transmission, economic impacts (positive and negative), and conservation status is given, along with details of its geographical distribution (North America (Canada (British Columbia, New Brunswick, Ontario), Mexico, USA (Georgia, Iowa, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, South Carolina, Texas)), South America (Argentina, Uruguay), Asia (Armenia, China, India (Chhattisgarh, Meghalaya, Uttarakhand), Iran, Pakistan, Russia (Sakhalin Oblast), Uzbekistan), Europe (Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Latvia, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Russia (Leningrad Oblast), Switzerland, Ukraine, UK)).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document