First Report of Resistance to Boscalid in Podosphaera xanthii, Cucurbit Powdery Mildew, in South Carolina

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 220-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony P. Keinath ◽  
Gabriel Rennberger ◽  
Chandrasekar S. Kousik

Resistance to boscalid, one of the older succinate-dehydrogenase inhibitors (SHDI) in Fungicide Resistance Action Committee (FRAC) code 7, was detected in Podosphaera xanthii, the cucurbit powdery mildew fungus, in South Carolina in July 2017. Resistance to the field rate (682 ppm) of boscalid was confirmed in greenhouse experiments and laboratory bioassays conducted on summer squash plants and cotyledons, respectively, that had been treated with a range of boscalid concentrations. This report is the first documentation of resistance to boscalid in P. xanthii in the southern United States.

Plant Disease ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 98 (11) ◽  
pp. 1581-1581 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Pirondi ◽  
I. M. Nanni ◽  
A. Brunelli ◽  
M. Collina

The fungicide cyflufenamid (phenyl-acetamide, Fungicide Resistance Action Committee [FRAC] code U6) was approved for use in Italy in 2011 as Takumi (Certis Europe, Utrecht, The Netherlands) to control Podosphaera xanthii (Castagne) U. Braun. & N. Shishkoff, the main causal agent of cucurbit powdery mildew. Considering that strains of this pathogen have developed resistance to strobilurin (5) and demethylation inhibitor (DMI) (4) fungicides, cyflufenamid represented a viable alternative to control this disease. However, this fungicide is also prone to resistance development as illustrated by resistance of P. xanthii in Japan (3). In the 2012 and 2013 growing seasons, significant declines in cyflufenamid efficacy were observed in two experimental fields in the Apulia (AP) and Emilia-Romagna (ER) regions of Italy on Cucumis melo and Cucurbita pepo, respectively. Takumi had been applied four times at the recommended field rate of 0.15 liter/ha (15 μg/ml of active ingredient [a.i.]) each growing season since 2010 in each field. Powdery mildew-infected leaf samples were collected in 2012 from both fields (25 isolates from AP and 19 from ER), and from five gardens (one isolate per garden); while in 2013, samples were collected only from the ER field (two polyconidial isolates). Isolates were maintained on detached zucchini cotyledons (1). Sensitivity of the isolates to cyflufenamid was determined by leaf disk bioassays (4) using Takumi at 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 20, and 50 μg a.i./ml. The 50% effective concentration (EC50) and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were calculated (2). Isolates collected in ER and the gardens in 2012 all had an EC50< 0.01 μg/ml, and the MIC ranged from <0.01 to <1 μg/ml. Isolates from AP in 2012 had elevated EC50 values, from 0.230 to >50 μg/ml, and MIC values from <10 to >50 μg/ml; by 2013, the EC50 values of ER isolates ranged from 3.35 to >50 μg/ml. Based on the mean EC50 value of 0.0019 μg/ml for sensitive isolates of P. xanthii in Japan (2), isolates from both the ER field and gardens in 2012 were considered sensitive to cyflufenamid. Additionally, EC50 values of AP isolates from 2012 and ER isolates from 2013 were greater than those of sensitive isolates, indicating a shift in sensitivity toward resistance to cyflufenamid (resistance factor >100 [2]). Consequently, poor control of powdery mildew with cyflufenamid applications in the AP and ER trials was most likely a result of fungicide resistance. Isolates from these fields were exposed to selection pressure for fungicide resistance because cyflufenamid was applied more times than permitted in the label instructions. However, control of powdery mildew in 2013 was not as effective as in previous years in commercial fields in AP (C. Dongiovanni, personal communication). This observation, combined with proof of reduced sensitivity of some P. xanthii strains in Italy to cyflufenamid, highlights the need for implementing resistance management strategies to minimize the risk of fungicide resistant strains developing in cucurbit fields. References: (1) B. Álvarez and J. A. Torés. Bol. San. Veg. Plagas 23:283, 1997. (2) M. Haramoto et al. J. Pest. Sci. 31:397, 2006. (3) H. Hosokawa et al. Jpn. J. Phytopathol. 72:260, 2006. (4) M. T. McGrath et al. Plant Dis. 80:697, 1996. (5) M. T. McGrath and N. Shishkoff. Plant. Dis. 87:1007, 2003.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 272-277
Author(s):  
Mohammad Babadoost ◽  
Salisu Sulley ◽  
Yiwen Xiang

This study was conducted to evaluate the sensitivity of cucurbit powdery mildew fungus (Podosphaera xanthii) to major fungicides used for managing this pathogen in the Midwestern United States. Fungicides azoxystrobin from the quinone outside inhibitors group, cyflufenamid from the phenylacetamide group, penthiopyrad from the succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors group, quinoxyfen from the quinolines group, and triflumizole from the demethylation inhibitors group were tested for their effectiveness for preventing infection of cucurbits by P. xanthii. In 2015 and 2016, 37 isolates of P. xanthii were evaluated for their sensitivity to azoxystrobin (Quadris 2.08SC), cyflufenamid (Torino 0.85SC), penthiopyrad (Fontelis 1.67SC), and triflumizole (Procure 480SC) on cucumber ‘Bush Crop’ cotyledon leaves. The number of isolates sensitive to tested concentrations of Quadris 2.08SC, Torino 0.85SC, Fontelis 1.67SC, and Procure 480SC was 8 (22%), 21 (57%), 20 (54%), and 23 (62%), respectively. During 2015 to 2018, Quadris 2.08SC, Torino 0.85SC, Fontelis 1.67SC, quinoxyfen (Quintec 250SC), and Procure 480SC were tested for their effectiveness for managing powdery mildew on pumpkin ‘Howden’ in the field. The results showed that powdery mildew was effectively managed in the plots treated with Procure 480SC and Quintec 250SC. However, management of the disease was less successful in the plots treated with Quadris 2.08SC, Torino 0.85SC, and Fontelis 1.67SC.


HortScience ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 1838-1845 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian A. Wyenandt ◽  
Nancy Maxwell ◽  
Daniel L. Ward

The effects of two pumpkin cultivars and five fungicide programs on cucurbit powdery mildew development and yield were evaluated in southern New Jersey from 2005 to 2007. Each year, five separate fungicide programs were applied to powdery mildew-tolerant cv. Magic Lantern or powdery mildew-susceptible cv. Howden pumpkin. The five fungicide programs applied season-long (10 applications per program) included: 1) protectant fungicides only: manzate + sulfur [Fungicide Resistance Action Committee (FRAC) codes M3 + M2] alternated weekly with maneb + copper hydroxide (FRAC codes M3 + M1); 2) standard program: chlorothalonil + myclobutanil (FRAC codes M5 + 3) alternated with azoxystrobin (FRAC code 11); 3) intensive program: maneb + myclobutanil (FRAC codes M3 + 3) alternated with [famoxadone + cymoxanil] (FRAC codes 11 + 27); 4) FRAC code 3 weekly: chlorothalonil + myclobutanil (FRAC codes M5 + 3) alternated with myclobutanil (FRAC code 3); and 5) FRAC code 11 weekly: chlorothalonil + azoxystrobin (FRAC codes M5 + 11) alternated with azoxystrobin (FRAC code 11). In each year, there were no significant interactions between the fungicide program and cultivar. In each year, area under disease progress curve values were highest when a FRAC code 11 fungicide was applied weekly compared with a FRAC code 11 fungicide applied in a weekly rotation with a FRAC code 3 fungicide or a FRAC code 3 fungicide applied weekly. Visual examination of leaves at the end of each production season revealed there were no significant differences in powdery mildew development on the top (adaxial) or bottom (abaxial) sides of leaves in untreated subplots. Powdery mildew development was lower on the bottom sides of leaves when a Fungicide Resistance Action Committee (FRAC) code 3 fungicide was applied weekly compared with a FRAC code 11 fungicide applied weekly or when a FRAC code 3 fungicide was rotated weekly with a FRAC code 11 fungicide in each year of the study. There were no significant differences in total number of harvested fruit, number of harvested orange fruit, average weight of orange fruit, or percentage of harvested orange fruit between fungicide programs in each year of the study. Results of this study, based on arcsine-transformed area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) values and top and bottom leaf surface ratings, suggest that the weekly use of the FRAC code 11 fungicide lead to the development of practical resistance in the field population of cucurbit powdery mildew. Rotating a FRAC code 11 and FRAC code 3 fungicide weekly resulted in lower AUDPC values and powdery mildew development on the bottom side of leaves in 2 of 3 years of this study. However, based on AUPDC values and leaf rating values, the level of control obtained with the high-risk FRAC code 3 fungicide was less during each consecutive year. The immediate erosion of control (i.e., qualitative resistance) as observed with the FRAC code 11 fungicide or the gradual decline of control (quantitative resistance) as observed with the FRAC code 3 fungicide over three growing seasons shows the importance of being able to detect and understand the mechanisms of practical resistance development. This understanding will allow appropriate fungicide control recommendations to be made in a timely (i.e., real-time) manner. Importantly, fungicide resistance is most likely to develop on the bottom side (abaxial) of pumpkin leaves when effective, low-risk (nonmobile) fungicides (FRAC code M numbers) are tank-mixed with high-risk fungicides in cucurbit powdery mildew control programs. Tank-mixing fungicides that have a high risk for resistance development with protectant fungicides that have a low risk for resistance development remains critically important when controlling cucurbit powdery mildew and reducing the potential for fungicide resistance development. This is the first report of cucurbit powdery mildew developing practical resistance to a FRAC code 11 and FRAC code 3 fungicide in New Jersey.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. e0163379 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Vela-Corcía ◽  
Rocío Bautista ◽  
Antonio de Vicente ◽  
Pietro D. Spanu ◽  
Alejandro Pérez-García

2016 ◽  
Vol 213 (4) ◽  
pp. 1961-1973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesús Martínez‐Cruz ◽  
Diego Romero ◽  
Antonio Vicente ◽  
Alejandro Pérez‐García

Plant Disease ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 103 (7) ◽  
pp. 1515-1524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandra Vielba-Fernández ◽  
Antonio de Vicente ◽  
Alejandro Pérez-García ◽  
Dolores Fernández-Ortuño

Powdery mildew, caused by the fungus Podosphaera xanthii, is one of the most economically important diseases affecting cucurbit crops in Spain. Currently, chemical control offers the most efficient management of the disease; however, P. xanthii isolates resistant to multiple classes of site-specific fungicides have been reported in the Spanish cucurbit powdery mildew population. In previous studies, resistance to the fungicides known as methyl benzimidazole carbamates (MBCs) was found to be caused by the amino acid substitution E198A on β-tubulin. To detect MBC-resistant isolates in a faster, more efficient, and more specific way than the traditional methods used to date, a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) system was developed. In this study, three sets of LAMP primers were designed. One set was designed for the detection of the wild-type allele and two sets were designed for the E198A amino acid change. Positive results were only obtained with both mutant sets; however, LAMP reaction conditions were only optimized with primer set 2, which was selected for optimal detection of the E198A amino acid change in P. xanthii-resistant isolates, along with the optimal temperature and duration parameters of 65°C for 75 min, respectively. The hydroxynaphthol blue (HNB) metal indicator was used for quick visualization of results through the color change from violet to sky blue when the amplification was positive. HNB was added before the amplification to avoid opening the lids, thus decreasing the probability of contamination. To confirm that the amplified product corresponded to the β-tubulin gene, the LAMP product was digested with the enzyme LweI and sequenced. Our results show that the LAMP technique is a specific and reproducible method that could be used for monitoring MBC resistance of P. xanthii directly in the field.


Plant Disease ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 93 (10) ◽  
pp. 1073-1073 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Torés ◽  
J. M. Sánchez-Pulido ◽  
F. López-Ruiz ◽  
A. de Vicente ◽  
A. Pérez-García

A new race of cucurbit powdery mildew was observed for the first time on melon (Cucumis melo) in three research greenhouses in the Axarquia area of southern Spain during the spring of 2008. Fungal growth appeared as white powdery colonies initially restricted to the upper leaf surfaces. Morphological characteristics of colonies, conidiophores, conidia, germ tubes, and appressoria indicated that the powdery mildew fungus was Podosphaera fusca (also known as P. xanthii) (3), a fungal pathogen extensively reported in the area (1). However, the fungus developed on plants of melon cv. PMR 6, which is resistant to races 1 and 2 of P. fusca, suggesting that the fungus could belong to race 3, a race of P. fusca not yet reported in Spain. Race determination was carried out by inoculating the third true leaf of a set of differential melon genotypes that were maintained in a greenhouse. Symptoms and colonization observed on cvs. Rochet, PMR 45, PMR 6, and Edisto 47 indicated that the isolates belonged to race 3-5 of P. fusca. Fungal strains of races 1, 2, and 5 of P. fusca (all present in Spain) were used as controls. Pathotype designation was determined by inoculating different cucurbit genera and species (2). In addition to melon, the isolates were pathogenic on zucchini (Cucurbita pepo) cv. Diamant F1, but failed to infect cucumber (C. sativus) cv. Marketer and watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) cv. Sugar Baby; therefore, the isolates were pathotype BC (2). Races 1, 2, 4, and 5 of P. fusca have been previously reported in the area (1). The occurrence of race 3-5 represents another challenge in the management of cucurbit powdery mildew in Spain. References: (1) D. del Pino et al. Phytoparasitica 30:459, 2002. (2) E. Křístková et al. Sci. Hortic. 99:257, 2004. (3) A. Pérez-García et al. Mol. Plant Pathol. 10:153, 2009.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document