scholarly journals Student focus groups

1995 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. 430 ◽  
Author(s):  
J E Perez ◽  
J L Peel
Keyword(s):  
2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 96-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Dale T. Fitzgerald

Abstract Clinical supervision is a multi-faceted process involving changing interactions between clinical mentors and supervisees. This paper presents a reflection on students' perspectives from a series of focus groups, surveys, and rating scales completed by students enrolled in residential and distance delivery programs. Qualitative themes which emerged from student focus groups regarding self-identified needs within the clinical education process are examined. Self-assessment surveys and rating scales constructed from focus group data were administered to different cohorts of students during on-campus practica. Participants completed a 5-point rating scale indicating agreement-disagreement with statements of the importance of specific supervisory behaviors and rankings of their five highest priority supervisory needs. Comparisons between students' perceived needs across the developmental continuum and across both delivery modes were examined for differences in the thematic focus of student-identified needs. While the overall patterns of needs were basically similar for the distance education cohort and the beginning, intermediate, and advanced level clinicians in traditional cohorts, differences were observed among the cohorts in terms of patterns of self-identified needs and priorities for emotional support, technical assistance, and collegiality. Implications for accommodating student-identified priority needs for technical knowledge and skills as well as relational interactions with clinical educators are addressed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 516-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Skender Najibi ◽  
Patricia A. Carney ◽  
Erin K. Thayer ◽  
Nicole M. Deiorio

Background and Objectives: Little is known about how the academic coaching needs of medical students differ between those who are racially, ethnically, and socially underrepresented minority (RES-URM) and those who represent the majority. This single-site exploratory study investigated student perceptions and coaching needs associated with a mandatory academic coaching program, and coaches’ understanding of and preparedness to address these potentially differing needs. Methods: Coaching needs of second- and third-year medical students were assessed using two initial focus groups and two validation focus groups, one consisting of RES-URM students and the other majority medical students. Coaches were assessed using a cross-sectional self-administered survey designed to determine their perceptions of differing coaching needs of students Results: Seven themes emerged from the student focus groups. Three of these reflected the coaching relationship, and four reflected the coaching process. RES-URM students expressed stress around sharing vulnerability that was not expressed among majority students. Sixty-eight percent of coaches expressed that RES-URM students would not have differing needs of their coaches. Coaches self-rated as being somewhat (45%), moderately (29%), or very (13%) skilled at coaching RES-URM students. Conclusions: RES-URM students cite different coaching needs than majority students that most coaches do not recognize. Faculty and program development regarding these unique needs is warranted.


2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 395-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip Young P. Hong ◽  
Rana Hong ◽  
Dara Lewis ◽  
Diane Williams

This study explores the experiences and perspectives of service providers with regard to the process of psychological self-sufficiency (PSS) among students in the Health Profession Opportunity Grants (HPOG) program. Based on a social work theory of PSS as our organizing framework, combined qualitative content analysis (inductive to deductive) was conducted with two service provider focus groups ( n = 16) and three student focus groups ( n = 27). The overarching theme of nontraditional, student-centered, holistic staff approaches which lead to the pathway from uncovering perceived employment barriers to discovering employment hope emerged with four phenomenological categories. The findings supported the adaptations of service providers’ different roles when providing student-centered approach in service delivery to reach maximal PSS for a better outcome in case management.


2005 ◽  
Vol 12 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa L. Becher ◽  
Janice L. Flug
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 94 (1108) ◽  
pp. 97-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason L Walsh ◽  
Benjamin H L Harris ◽  
Paul Denny ◽  
Phil Smith

Purpose of the studyThere are few studies on the value of authoring questions as a study method, the quality of the questions produced by students and student perceptions of student-authored question banks. Here we evaluate PeerWise, a widely used and free online resource that allows students to author, answer and discuss multiple-choice questions.Study designWe introduced two undergraduate medical student cohorts to PeerWise (n=603). We looked at their patterns of PeerWise usage; identified associations between student engagement and summative exam performance; and used focus groups to assess student perceptions of the value of PeerWise for learning. We undertook item analysis to assess question difficulty and quality.ResultsOver two academic years, the two cohorts wrote 4671 questions, answered questions 606 658 times and posted 7735 comments. Question writing frequency correlated most strongly with summative performance (Spearman’s rank: 0.24, p=<0.001). Student focus groups found that: (1) students valued curriculum specificity; and (2) students were concerned about student-authored question quality. Only two questions of the 300 ’most-answered' questions analysed had an unacceptable discriminatory value (point-biserial correlation <0.2).ConclusionsItem analysis suggested acceptable question quality despite student concerns. Quantitative and qualitative methods indicated that PeerWise is a valuable study tool.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Poggiali

Purpose This paper reports on a grant-funded project to create a hand-drawn, custom-made animated character named Jasmyn. Drawing on animation theory, the purpose of this paper is to use qualitative research to investigate student responses to the medium of animation, the character’s design, and three presentation strategies. Design/methodology/approach The researchers held three student focus groups to investigate the following research questions: Will students endorse animation as a medium for library instructional videos on the grounds of its entertaining, subversive, or playful qualities? Is Jasmyn designed and written in a way that engages students and compels them to respond to her as a character? How will students respond to three presentation strategies: a lecture-style video, a video with supplemental animations, and a real-time, interactive lesson? Findings The researchers found that students expressed broad enthusiasm for animation as a medium, though responses to Jasmyn’s personality were mixed. The only presentation strategy that prompted unique responses was the interactive session, although all three focus groups provided revealing commentary about online learning. Students also identified aspects of the animation and character that could be improved, and reflected on ways Jasmyn might be integrated into online learning. Research limitations/implications This study, performed as part of a pilot project, was deliberately small in scale. Clearer implications would emerge from repetition with a larger group of students. Originality/value Jasmyn may be the only hand-drawn, custom-made animated character created for library instruction. No research studies on the use of animation in libraries have been published to date.


1993 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Hendershott ◽  
Sheila Wright
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document