PORCINE INTENSIVE CARE MODEL

2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. A42
Author(s):  
Sandra K Hanneman
Keyword(s):  
PEDIATRICS ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 165-165
Author(s):  
Margery Franklin ◽  
Ruth M. Heyn ◽  
Dietric W. Roloff

A recent experience made us aware of a potential hazard from equipment used in the care of newborn infants. A newborn boy who weighed 1,585 gm after 36 weeks' gestation and thus was small for date, was cared for in an Air-Shields C-86 Isolette, Intensive Care Model. He became very active and was able to change position inside the incubator. On several occasions he was seen with his head or feet pressed against the sides of the incubator.


Critical Care ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. P4 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Chapman ◽  
M Maiden ◽  
J Fraser ◽  
C Nash ◽  
F Crichton ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 17-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Prentice ◽  
Colleen Stainton

Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of implementation of a developmental care model in an Australian tertiary NICU.Study Design: A retrospective chart audit was used to determine the differences between predevelopmental and developmental care outcomes for infants, parents, the unit, and nursing.Sample: Two subsets of infants were selected for comparison: one of infants receiving predevelopmental care (n = 42) and another of infants receiving developmental care (n = 42).Results: Infants receiving developmental care required less time on total parenteral nutrition, required less exogenous surfactant, and had less documented feeding intolerance. Changes were observed in ambience and in the use of space for providing parent-infant care. Also observed was the individualized expertise of nursing staff and of parents.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazunari Azuma ◽  
Shiro Mishima ◽  
Keiichiro Shimoyama ◽  
Yuri Ishii ◽  
Yasuhiro Ueda ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. e0242127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siegbert Rieg ◽  
Maja von Cube ◽  
Johannes Kalbhenn ◽  
Stefan Utzolino ◽  
Katharina Pernice ◽  
...  

Background Reported mortality of hospitalised Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) patients varies substantially, particularly in critically ill patients. So far COVID-19 in-hospital mortality and modes of death under state of the art care have not been systematically studied. Methods This retrospective observational monocenter cohort study was performed after implementation of a non-restricted, dynamic tertiary care model at the University Medical Center Freiburg, an experienced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and extracorporeal membrane-oxygenation (ECMO) referral center. All hospitalised patients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality, secondary endpoints included major complications and modes of death. A multistate analysis and a Cox regression analysis for competing risk models were performed. Modes of death were determined by two independent reviewers. Results Between February 25, and May 8, 213 patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 65 years, 129 patients (61%) were male. 70 patients (33%) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), of which 57 patients (81%) received mechanical ventilation and 23 patients (33%) ECMO support. Using multistate methodology, the estimated probability to die within 90 days after COVID-19 onset was 24% in the whole cohort. If the levels of care at time of study entry were accounted for, the probabilities to die were 16% if the patient was initially on a regular ward, 47% if in the intensive care unit (ICU) and 57% if mechanical ventilation was required at study entry. Age ≥65 years and male sex were predictors for in-hospital death. Predominant complications–as judged by two independent reviewers–determining modes of death were multi-organ failure, septic shock and thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications. Conclusion In a dynamic care model COVID-19-related in-hospital mortality remained very high. In the absence of potent antiviral agents, strategies to alleviate or prevent the identified complications should be investigated. In this context, multistate analyses enable comparison of models-of-care and treatment strategies and allow estimation and allocation of health care resources.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document