P57 Risk factors associated with large size of squamous cell carcinoma of the skin

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. e68
Author(s):  
C. Renzi ◽  
S. Mastroeni ◽  
T.J. Mannooranparampil ◽  
F. Passarelli ◽  
A. Caggiati ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 3693-3700
Author(s):  
Bing Hu ◽  
Feng Jia ◽  
Haiyan Zhou ◽  
Tao Zhou ◽  
Qian Zhao ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 152 (6) ◽  
pp. 1053-1060 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takumi Hasegawa ◽  
Makiko Tanakura ◽  
Daisuke Takeda ◽  
Akiko Sakakibara ◽  
Masaya Akashi ◽  
...  

Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (36) ◽  
pp. e27127
Author(s):  
Paras Ahmad ◽  
Rubbia Nawaz ◽  
Maria Qurban ◽  
Gul Muhammad Shaikh ◽  
Roshan Noor Mohamed ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1009
Author(s):  
Munir Tarazi ◽  
Swathikan Chidambaram ◽  
Sheraz R. Markar

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the sixth most common cause of death worldwide. Incidence rates vary internationally, with the highest rates found in Southern and Eastern Africa, and central Asia. Initial observational studies identified multiple factors associated with an increased risk of ESCC, with subsequent work then focused on developing plausible biological mechanistic associations. The aim of this review is to summarize the role of risk factors in the development of ESCC and propose future directions for further research. A systematic search of the literature was conducted by screening EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed, and CENTRAL for relevant publications. In total, 73 studies were included that sought to identify risk factors associated with the development of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Risk factors were divided into seven subcategories: genetic, dietary and nutrition, gastric atrophy, infection and microbiome, metabolic, epidemiological and environmental and other risk factors. Risk factors from each subcategory were summarized and explored with mechanistic explanations for these associations. This review highlights several current risk factors of ESCC. These risk factors were explored, and explanations dissected. Most studies focused on investigating genetic and dietary and nutritional factors, whereas this review identified other potential risk factors that have yet to be fully explored. Furthermore, there is a lack of literature on the association of these risk factors with tumor factors and disease prognosis. Further research to validate these results and their effects on tumor biology is absolutely necessary.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Cyril Bouland ◽  
Didier Dequanter ◽  
Jérôme R. Lechien ◽  
Charlotte Hanssens ◽  
Nicolas De Saint Aubain ◽  
...  

Background. Tobacco and alcohol are two main risk factors associated with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Studies showed that human papillomavirus (HPV) plays a role in the etiology of this cancer. HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients present in general a better response to conventional therapy and better overall survival (OS). However, OSCC is a heterogeneous disease regarding treatment. This study aimed to identify more effective prognostic factors associated with a poor clinical outcome for OSCC patients to improve treatment selection. Materials and Methods. OSCC patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2017, in two Belgian hospitals, were included. Demographic and clinicopathologic data were extracted from medical records. HPV status was determined through p16 immunohistochemistry. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analyses allowed to identify variables prognostic for OS and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Kaplan–Meier survival curves have been assessed for survival. Results. The study included 131 patients. Statistics showed that monotherapies were significantly associated with a shorter OS; p16 overexpression was significantly associated with a weak consumption of tobacco or alcohol, and a high p16 expression was significantly associated with both longer RFS and OS. The study validated that tobacco and alcohol consumption were significantly correlated with poorer RFS and poorer OS. Only p16 expression trended to be significant for RFS when compared to smoking and drinking habits, while p16 upregulation and alcohol use were both vital for OS indicating that p16 is an independent and significant prognostic factor in OSCC patients. Finally, a scoring system combining p16, tobacco, and alcohol status was defined and was significantly associated with longer RFS and longer OS for nonsmoker and nondrinker p16-positive OSCC patients. Conclusions. This study confirmed that the overexpression of the p16 protein could be viewed as a factor of good prognosis for RFS and OS of OSCC patients. The prognostic significance of a scoring system combining p16 expression, smoking, and drinking status was evaluated and concluded to be a more effective tool to determine therapeutic orientations based on the risk factors for better treatment relevance and survival.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document