Are collaborative care models in the primary care environment effective for improving depression outcomes and reducing mortality in elderly patients with depression?

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. E4-E5
Author(s):  
Bret T. Howrey ◽  
Rebecca V. Burke ◽  
Tove M. Goldson ◽  
Nida A. Sajan
2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 148-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly Burkhart ◽  
Kenneth Asogwa ◽  
Nida Muzaffar ◽  
Mary Gabriel

Psychiatric disorders are becoming more frequently diagnosed within the pediatric primary care setting. Despite increased diagnosis within primary care, only a minority of patients receive further psychiatric or specialty care. The integrated/collaborative care treatment model was designed to improve access within primary care. The purpose of this review is to identify randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies that have investigated whether increased access improves treatment engagement, satisfaction, and improved mental health outcomes. Six studies met inclusion criteria. Studies reviewed indicated increased access to behavioral health treatment through use of the integrated/collaborative care model and improved mental health outcomes. Recommendations for screening and treatment are provided. Limitations of the reviewed studies include lack of generalizability to urban populations, minority youth, and youth younger than 4 years of age. Practice recommendations to address these limitations are identified.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 320-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah Heintz ◽  
Patrick Monette ◽  
Gary Epstein-Lubow ◽  
Lorie Smith ◽  
Susan Rowlett ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Catherine Donnelly ◽  
Rachelle Ashcroft ◽  
Amanda Mofina ◽  
Nicole Bobbette ◽  
Carol Mulder

Abstract Aim: The aim of the study was to describe practices that support collaboration in interprofessional primary health care teams, and identify performance indicators perceived to measure the impact of this collaboration from the perspective of interprofessional health providers. Background: Despite the surge of interprofessional primary health care models implemented across Canada, there is little evidence as to whether or not the intended outcomes of primary health care teams have been achieved. Part of the challenge is determining the most appropriate measures that can demonstrate the value of collaborative care. To date, little remains known about performance measurement from the providers contributing to the collaborative care process in interprofessional primary care teams. Having providers from a range of disciplinary backgrounds assist in the development of performance measures can help identify measures most relevant to demonstrate the value of collaborative care on the intended outcomes of interprofessional primary care models. Methods: A qualitative study; part of a larger mixed methods developmental evaluation to examine performance measurement in interprofessional primary health care teams. A stakeholder workshop was conducted at an annual association meeting of interprofessional primary health care teams in the province of Ontario, Canada. Six questions guided the workshop groups and participant responses were documented on worksheets and flip charts. All responses were collected and entered verbatim into a word document. Qualitative analytic strategies were applied to each question. Findings: A total of 283 primary health care providers from 14 health professions working in interprofessional primary health care teams participated. Top three elements of interprofessional collaboration (total n = 628) were communication (n = 146), co-treatment (n = 112) and patient-based conferences (n = 81). Top three performance indicators currently used to demonstrate the value of interprofessional collaboration (total n = 241) were patient experience (n = 71), patient health status (n = 35) and within team referrals (n = 30).


CNS Spectrums ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (S13) ◽  
pp. 3-3
Author(s):  
Madhukar Trivedi

AbstractMajor depressive disorder (MDD) is often a chronic, recurrent, and debilitating disorder with a lifetime prevalence of 16.2% and a 12-month prevalence of 6.6% in the United States. The disorder is associated with high rates of comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders and general medical illnesses, lower rates of adherence to medication regimens, and poorer outcomes for chronic physical illness. While 51.6% of cases reporting MDD received health care treatment for the illness, only 21.7% of all MDD cases received minimal guideline-level treatment. Because the overwhelming majority of patients with depressive disorders are seen annually by their primary care physicians, the opportunity to diagnose and treat patients early in the course of their illness in the primary care setting is substantial, though largely unfulfilled by our current health care system. The goal of treatment is 2-fold: early and complete remission of symptoms of depression and eventual recovery to premorbid levels of functioning in response to acute-phase treatment, and prevention of relapse during the continuation phase or recurrence during the maintenance phase. However, only 25% to 50% of patients with MDD adhere to their antidepressant regimen for the length of time recommended by depression guidelines, and nearly 50% of depressed patients referred from primary care to specialty care treatment fail to complete the referral. Patients with chronic or treatment-resistant depression often require multiple trials using an algorithm-based approach involving more than one treatment strategy. Under conditions of usual care, 40% to 44% of patients with MDD treated with antidepressants in the primary care setting show a >50% improvement in depression scores at 4-month follow-up, compared with 70% to 75% of those treated using collaborative care models. This demonstrates the importance of factors other than antidepressant medication per se for achieving treatment effectiveness. Additional research is needed to evaluate longer-term outcomes of algorithm-based, stepped, collaborative care models that incorporate patient self-management in conjunction with usual care. Furthermore, the health care system must undergo major transformation to effectively treat depression, along with other chronic illnesses. The use of evidence-based treatment algorithms are discussed and recommendations are provided for patients and physicians based on collaborative care interventions that may be useful for improving the current management of depressive disorders.


2006 ◽  
Vol 189 (6) ◽  
pp. 484-493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Bower ◽  
Simon Gilbody ◽  
David Richards ◽  
Janine Fletcher ◽  
Alex Sutton

BackgroundThe management of depression in primary care is a significant issue for health services worldwide. ‘Collaborative care’ interventions are effective, but little is known about which aspects of these complex interventions are essential.AimsTo use meta-regression to identify ‘active ingredients' in collaborative care models for depression in primary care.MethodStudies were identified using systematic searches of electronic databases. The content of collaborative care interventions was coded, together with outcome data on antidepressant use and depressive symptoms. Meta-regression was used to examine relationships between intervention content and outcomes.ResultsThere was no significant predictor of the effect of collaborative care on antidepressant use. Key predictors of depressive symptom outcomes included systematic identification of patients, professional background of staff and specialist supervision.ConclusionsMeta-regression may be useful in examining ‘active ingredients' in complex interventions in mental health.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document