scholarly journals T032 (0130) RELAPSE AFTER EARLY-STAGE FAVORABLE HODGKIN LYMPHOMA: DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS, TREATMENT STRATEGIES AND THEIR OUTCOME

HemaSphere ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (S3) ◽  
pp. 44
2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8550-8550
Author(s):  
Shihab Ali ◽  
Adam J. Olszewski

8550 Background: Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a heterogeneous disease, but differences between nodular lymphocyte predominant (NLPHL) and classical (CHL) subtypes were previously studied in small cohorts preventing adjustment for confounders. We studied those differences based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program data. Methods: We analyzed SEER HL cases aged 16 years and over, diagnosed between 1995 and 2009. We studied the following endpoints: crude probability of HL-related death (HLRD), relative survival (using individual data in multivariate flexible parametric models) and risk of secondary malignancies (using competing risk regression). We studied the impact of radiotherapy (RT) in early-stage disease using a propensity score, adjusting for treatment selection and immortal time bias. Results: We identified 25,903 patients, with disparate age, race and stage distributions between subtypes. In a multivariate model, NLPHL demonstrated significantly better crude and net survival outcomes (Table), but in contrast to all CHL subtypes, it showed a steady increase in mortality rate after 2 years. The risk of secondary non-Hodgkin lymphoma was significantly higher in both NLPHL (hazard ratio, HR, 2.28, P=0.002) and lymphocyte-rich (LR) CHL (HR 2.08, P=0.01) than in nodular sclerosis (NS). The risk of other secondary malignancies did not differ between subtypes. After balancing confounding factors in treatment arms, RT in stage I/II was associated with improved survival in NS (HR, 0.78, P=0.001) and LR-CHL (HR 0.36, P<0.001), but not in NLPHL (HR 0.98, P=0.94) or in the remaining CHL subtypes. Conclusions: Studies of NLPHL and CHL subtypes should account for their disparate biology and clinical course. Prospective evaluation of NLPHL treatment strategies without RT is justified. [Table: see text]


2006 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Yahalom

The category of favorable early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) includes patients with Ann Arbor stages I or II disease with no bulky disease or B symptoms. The precise definition of favorable versus unfavorable early-stage disease may vary among American and European cooperative groups. The overall 10-year survival rate of patients with favorable early-stage HL exceeds 90%. Indeed, effective treatments for this group of patients have been available for more than 4 decades. However, treatment strategies have radically changed over the past 15 years and focus now on maintaining the high cure rate while reducing the risk of treatment-related long-term morbidity. The optimal treatment is still evolving, and more recently, reduction in the total amount of chemotherapy and in radiation field and dose has shown excellent results. Combined modality therapy is the preferred treatment for patients with classical favorable early-stage HL (nodular sclerosis or mixed cellularity histology). Patients with early-stage lymphocyte predominance HL are highly curable using involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT) alone and do not require chemotherapy. Classical favorable HL is also curable with radiotherapy alone or with chemotherapy alone, but larger fields and higher-dose radiation or longer chemotherapy is required compared with combined modality. The freedom from treatment failure rate is significantly better with a combination of short chemotherapy and IFRT than with either chemotherapy or radiotherapy alone. Although combined modality is the standard preferred treatment for favorable disease, radiation therapy alone or chemotherapy alone could be considered under special circumstances or as part of an investigational protocol.


2017 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simonetta Viviani ◽  
Valentina Tabanelli ◽  
Stefano A. Pileri

This article reviews the evolution of the diagnosis and treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) since its discovery in 1832. The morphological, phenotypic and molecular characteristics of both nodular lymphocyte-predominant HL and classical HL are revised in the light of recent molecular information and possible impact on the identification of risk groups as well as the use of targeted therapies. The seminal contribution of Gianni Bonadonna to developing new treatment strategies for both advanced and early-stage HL is highlighted.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-115
Author(s):  
Paul J. Bröckelmann ◽  
Horst Müller ◽  
Teresa Guhl ◽  
Karolin Behringer ◽  
Michael Fuchs ◽  
...  

PURPOSE We evaluated disease and treatment characteristics of patients with relapse after risk-adapted first-line treatment of early-stage, favorable, classic Hodgkin lymphoma (ES-HL). We compared second-line therapy with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or conventional chemotherapy (CTx). METHODS We analyzed patients with relapse after ES-HL treated within the German Hodgkin Study Group HD10+HD13 trials. We compared, by Cox proportional hazards regression, progression-free survival (PFS) after relapse (second PFS) treated with either ASCT or CTx and performed sensitivity analyses with overall survival (OS) from relapse and Kaplan-Meier statistics. RESULTS A total of 174 patients’ disease relapsed after treatment in the HD10 (n = 53) and HD13 (n = 121) trials. Relapse mostly occurred > 12 months after first diagnosis, predominantly with stage I-II disease. Of 172 patients with known second-line therapy, 85 received CTx (49%); 70, ASCT (41%); 11, radiotherapy only (6%); and 4, palliative single agent therapies (2%). CTx was predominantly bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP [68%]), followed by the combination regimen of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (19%), or other regimens (13%). Patients aged > 60 years at relapse had shorter second PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 3.0; P = .0029) and were mostly treated with CTx (n = 33 of 49; 67%) and rarely with ASCT (n = 8; 16%). After adjustment for age and a disadvantage of ASCT after the more historic HD10 trial, we did not observe a significant difference in the efficacy of CTx versus ASCT for second PFS (HR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.3 to 1.6; P = .39). In patients in the HD13 trial who were aged ≤ 60 years, the 2-year, second PFS rate was 94.0% with CTx (95% CI, 85.7% to 100%) versus 83.3% with ASCT (95% CI, 71.8% to 94.8%). Additional sensitivity analyses including OS confirmed these observations. CONCLUSION After contemporary treatment of ES-HL, relapse mostly occurred > 12 months after first diagnosis. Polychemotherapy regimens such as BEACOPP are frequently administered and may constitute a reasonable treatment option for selected patients with relapse after ES-HL.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Borchmann ◽  
Annette Plütschow ◽  
Carsten Kobe ◽  
Richard Greil ◽  
Julia Meissner ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document