Cholesterol as a Risk Factor for Dementia and Cognitive Decline: A Systematic Review of Prospective Studies With Meta-Analysis

2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 343-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaarin J. Anstey ◽  
Darren M. Lipnicki ◽  
Lee-Fay Low
2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 607-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger C.M. Ho ◽  
Mike W.L. Cheung ◽  
Erin Fu ◽  
Hlaing H. Win ◽  
Min Htet Zaw ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 781-794 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chenbo Zhang ◽  
Jianfeng Luo ◽  
Changzheng Yuan ◽  
Ding Ding

Background: Previous studies have indicated that B vitamin deficiencies are an essential cause of neurological pathology. There is a need to provide evidence of the benefit of B vitamins for the prevention of cognitive decline in community-dwelling older adults. Objective: To examine the association between intake and plasma levels of vitamins B12, B6, and folate and cognitive function in older populations through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Medline (PubMed), EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were used to search the literature though August 8, 2019. We included observational population-based studies evaluating the association between concentrations or intake levels of vitamins B6, B12, or folate and cognition in older adults aged ≥45 years. The quality of all studies was assessed by the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were analyzed by the random-effects model. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by excluding the studies with significant heterogeneity. Results: Twenty-one observational studies with sample sizes ranging from 155–7030 were included in the meta-analysis. Higher levels of vitamin B12 (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61–0.97) and folate concentration (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.51–0.90) were associated with better cognition in cross-sectional studies, but not in sensitivity analyses or prospective studies. High vitamin B6 concentrations showed no significant benefit on cognition and dementia risk. Prospective studies did not provide substantial evidence for the relationship. Conclusion: The results from our meta-analysis suggest that vitamins B12, B6, and folate may not be modifiable risk factors for slowing cognitive decline among community-dwelling older individuals.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 158-158
Author(s):  
Xiang Qi ◽  
Zheng Zhu ◽  
Bei Wu

Abstract Increasing evidence suggests that there is a linkage between cognitive function and oral health. However, there are few systematic reviews with meta-analysis have been conducted to evaluate the strength of this association. Moreover, existing studies usually focused on unidirectional associations between cognitive function and oral health; no research has demonstrated this inter-relationship in a longitudinal study. This study aims to systematically assess the magnitude of the bidirectional association between oral health and cognitive decline for studies using longitudinal data. Six international databases were searched up until December 31, 2019. Random-effects pooled Risk Ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) system was used to assess the quality of evidence. From 13,251 potentially eligible articles, 54 longitudinal studies were included in the systematic review and 18 were in meta-analysis. Meta-analysis was performed for tooth loss and periodontitis disease. Random effects analysis showed, with statistically low heterogeneity, Risks of cognitive decline included suboptimal dentition (<20 teeth) (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.03-3.65) and periodontitis diseases (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.22-1.81). Cognitive decline was a risk factor for tooth loss (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.23-9.69). The overall quality of evidence, however, was rated as very low. The result of this review highlights that cognitive decline is a risk factor for poor oral health, and older adults with suboptimal oral health appear to have an increased risk of cognitive impairment. More studies with rigorous designs are needed to further examine this association.


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e022846 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Peters ◽  
Andrew Booth ◽  
Kenneth Rockwood ◽  
Jean Peters ◽  
Catherine D’Este ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo systematically review the literature relating to the impact of multiple co-occurring modifiable risk factors for cognitive decline and dementia.DesignA systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature relating to the impact of co-occurring key risk factors for incident cognitive decline and dementia. All abstracts and full text were screened independently by two reviewers and each article assessed for bias using a standard checklist. A fixed effects meta-analysis was undertaken.Data sourcesDatabases Medline, Embase and PsycINFO were searched from 1999 to 2017.Eligibility criteriaFor inclusion articles were required to report longitudinal data from participants free of cognitive decline at baseline, with formal assessment of cognitive function or dementia during follow-up, and an aim to examine the impact of additive or clustered comorbid risk factor burden in with two or more core modifiable risk factors.ResultsSeventy-nine full-text articles were examined. Twenty-two articles (18 studies) were included reporting data on >40 000 participants. Included studies consistently reported an increased risk associated with greater numbers of intraindividual risk factors or unhealthy behaviours and the opposite for healthy or protective behaviours. A meta-analysis of studies with dementia outcomes resulted in a pooled relative risk for dementia of 1.20 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.39) for one risk factor, 1.65 (95% CI 1.40 to 1.94) for two and 2.21 (95% CI 1.78 to 2.73) for three or more, relative to no risk factors. Limitations include dependence on published results and variations in study outcome, cognitive assessment, length of follow-up and definition of risk factor exposure.ConclusionsThe strength of the reported associations, the consistency across studies and the suggestion of a dose response supports a need to keep modifiable risk factor exposure to a minimum and to avoid exposure to additional modifiable risks. Further research is needed to establish whether particular combinations of risk factors confer greater risk than others.PROSPERO registration number42016052914.


2007 ◽  
Vol 166 (4) ◽  
pp. 367-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. J. Anstey ◽  
C. von Sanden ◽  
A. Salim ◽  
R. O'Kearney

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document