Update on fertility preservation in young women undergoing breast cancer and ovarian cancer therapy

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Lambertini ◽  
Elizabeth S. Ginsburg ◽  
Ann H. Partridge
Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (11) ◽  
pp. e19566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hikmat N. Abdel-Razeq ◽  
Razan A. Mansour ◽  
Khawla S. Ammar ◽  
Rashid H. Abdel-Razeq ◽  
Hadil Y. Zureigat ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. e257
Author(s):  
Alex Robles ◽  
Brittany Noel Robles ◽  
Laura C. Gemmell ◽  
Paula C. Brady

2010 ◽  
Vol 63 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 657-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milena Veljkovic ◽  
Slavimir Veljkovic

Introduction. Oral contraceptives, mainly combined monophasic pills, are widely used by young women who expect their physicians to prescribe them safe drugs which will not harm their health and which will simplify their life. Numerous epidemiologic studies have been performed to determine the relation between oral contraceptive use and the development of neoplasms. Breast cancer. An increased incidence of breast cancer has occurred simultaneously with the growing use of oral contraceptives. The possibility of a link between the oral contraceptive use and breast cancer has led to intensive research, but studies have provided inconsistent results causing confusion among clinicians. It was noticed that the risk of breast cancer was slightly elevated in current and recent young oral contraceptives users. That finding could be influenced by a detection bias or could be due to the biologic effect of the pills. The absolute number of additional breast cancer cases will be very small because of low baseline incidence of the disease in young women. Oral contraceptives probably promote growth of the already existing cancer, they are probably promoters not initiators of breast cancer. The available data do not provide a conclusive answer that is need. Cervical cancer. Numerous factors may influence the development of cervical cancer. The evidence suggests that current and recent oral contraceptive users have an increased risk of cervical cancer which decline after discontinuation of the application of medication. Oral contraceptives might increase the biological vulnerability of the cervix. Cervical cancer develops slowly over a long time period and can be effectively prevented by periodic cervical screening. Fortunately, oral contraceptives do not mask abnormal cervical citology. Conclusions regarding invasive cervical cancer and oral contraceptive use are not definitive but if there is any increased risk, it is low. Endometrial cancer. In oral contraceptive users the endometrium is almost under the influence of progestin component which suppresses endometrial mitotic activity and its proliferation. Most epidemiologic studies show that oral contraceptives reduce the risk of endometrial cancer and that this protective effect exists many years after the discontinuation of medication. Ovarian cancer. It has been long known that the oral contraceptive use causes protective an ovulation and reduces the risk of ovarian cancer. This powerful reduction is the best demonstrated major benefit of oral contraception. This protection is especially observed in nulliparous and seems to persist for many years after the discontinuation of medication.


Author(s):  
Hugo Nunes ◽  
Fátima Vaz ◽  
Margarida Brito ◽  
Cláudia Melo ◽  
Ana Teresa Almeida Santos ◽  
...  

1983 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
J F Holland

Breaking the cure barrier is a biologic and a conceptual problem that has already been accomplished for several tumors. It is helpful to consider neoplasms in mathematical terms as many-celled tumors (polycytomas: kilocytomas, megacytomas, gigacytomas, and teracytomas). A new chemotherapeutic taxonomy recognizes curable, subcurable, and precurable cancers each with definable characteristics. A simplified technique of recognizing early cures is described by calculating the probability that an interruption in an exponential failure slope occurred by chance. Examples of cures of acute myelocytic leukemia, of superior chemotherapy for Hodgkin's disease in young adults, and of superior adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer are given. The interaction of surgery with chemotherapy is illustrated in pure form in acute myelocytic leukemia and in ovarian cancer. Curative chemotherapy is closer at hand than is generally believed. Nomograms for cure prediction are presented as inducements to contemplate curative approaches to cancer therapy.


Cancer ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 115 (18) ◽  
pp. 4118-4126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason D. Wright ◽  
Monjri Shah ◽  
Leny Mathew ◽  
William M. Burke ◽  
Jennifer Culhane ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 21093-21093
Author(s):  
J. A. Shin ◽  
S. Gelber ◽  
J. Garber ◽  
R. Rosenberg ◽  
M. Przypyszny ◽  
...  

21093 Background: Young women with breast cancer have an increased risk of harboring a BRCA1/2 mutation. The frequency of genetic testing in this population is not well described. We evaluated the reported frequency and factors associated with genetic testing among young breast cancer survivors identified through the Young Survival Coalition (YSC), an international advocacy group for young women with breast cancer. Methods: Items regarding family history and genetic testing were included in a large web-based survey addressing quality of life and fertility issues for young women with breast cancer. All YSC members were invited by email in March 2003 (N= 1,703 women) to participate in this cross-sectional survey. Results: 657 women completed the on-line survey; 622 were eligible for this analysis (age <40, no metastatic or recurrent disease). Mean age at breast cancer diagnosis was 33 years; mean age when surveyed 35.5 years. Stages included: 0 (10%), I (27%), II (49%), III (12%), missing (3%). 90% of women were white; 64% married; 49% with children; 78% had at least a college education; 42% of women reported a 1st or 2nd degree relative with breast or ovarian cancer, and 13% considered themselves high-risk for harboring a genetic mutation at the time of diagnosis. At the time of the survey, 23% of women had undergone genetic testing, and 26% of those tested reported that a mutation was found. In a multivariate model, women who were younger (age 36–40 vs. age =30, O.R. 2.26, p=0.004), more educated (< college vs. > college education, O.R. 2.62, p=0.0009), had a family history of breast or ovarian cancer (O.R. 3.15, p<0.0001), and had had a mastectomy (O.R. 1.99, p=0.001) were more likely to have undergone genetic testing. Non-significant covariates included: age at survey, stage, time since diagnosis, race, marital status, employment, finances, insurance, number of children, comorbidities, baseline anxiety and depression, and fear of recurrence. Conclusion: The majority of women diagnosed with breast cancer age 40 and younger do not undergo genetic testing. Younger, more educated women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer are more likely to get tested. Further research to define the appropriateness of genetic testing in this relatively high-risk population is warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19599-e19599
Author(s):  
K. Zaman ◽  
M. Bellavia ◽  
A. Ambrosetti ◽  
M. Primi ◽  
A. Ifticene Treboux ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document