Guideline-oriented ambulatory lipid-lowering therapy of patients at high risk for cardiovascular events by cardiologists in clinical practice: the 2L cardio registry

2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 438-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anselm K. Gitt ◽  
Claus Juenger ◽  
Christina Jannowitz ◽  
Barbara Karmann ◽  
Juergen Senges ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Cholesterol Absorption ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Target Level ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Total Cohort ◽  
Cholesterol Absorption Inhibitor ◽  
Risk Patients

Background Lipid-lowering treatment has been proven to decrease the rate of cardiovascular events in high-risk patients with manifest coronary artery disease (CAD) or CAD equivalent risk profile. Current treatment guidelines recommend low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) less than 100 mg/dl (optional < 70 mg/dl) as the target level for this high-risk population. Little is known about the ambulatory treatment of high-risk patients in clinical practice and the achievement of guideline recommended target values. Methods and results In the ‘2L cardio’ registry in Germany, 295 cardiologists enrolled 6711 consecutive patients with known CAD, and/or diabetes mellitus, peripheral arterial disease (summarized as ‘coronary risk equivalent’, CE), on chronic statin treatment. They recorded actual LDL-C values at entry, probable changes in therapy, and the expected LDL-C values using a lipid calculator based on an earlier observational study in a similar setting. The three groups comprised 2618 patients with CAD plus CE (39.0%; median LDL-C 112 mg/dl), 3436 patients with CAD only (51.2%; median LDL-C 108 mg/dl), and 657 with CE only (9.8%; median LDL-C 124 mg/dl). They had LDL-C levels less than 100 mg/dl in 36.2% [95% confidence intervals (CI): 34.3–38.1], 39.7% (CI: 38.0–41.4), and 27.2% (CI: 23.7–30.7), respectively. Statin doses at entry were usually in the lower to intermediate range (e.g. simvastatin median 25 mg/day). Cardiologists switched to another statin in 10.1% (9.4–10.8), increased the dose of statins (if same drug) in 22.2% (CI: 21.1–23.2) and/or added a cholesterol absorption inhibitor in 23.7% (CI: 22.7–24.7) of the patients. The cardiologists’ intervention improved expected LDL-C levels in the total cohort by a mean of 9.0 mg/dl, but the 100 mg/dl LDL-C target was only reached in 51.3% (CI: 50.0–52.5) of the total cohort. CE patients appeared undertreated in terms of antiplatelet drugs. Discussion Through infrequent increases in statin doses and mainly through add-on of a cholesterol absorption inhibitor, cardiologists improved target level attainment. Compared with earlier studies in the outpatient setting, the treatment to target for LDL-C of high-risk CAD patients has improved, but is not satisfactory.

Abstract 18396: Low Rate of LDL-Goal-Attainment in 57,855 High-Risk-Patients in Europe, Canada, South-Africa, Middle East and China - Results of DYSIS

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anselm K Gitt ◽  
Dominik Lautsch ◽  
Martin Horack ◽  
Baishali Ambegaonkar ◽  
Jean Ferrieres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Goal Attainment ◽  
Ldl Cholesterol ◽  
Statin Treatment ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Very High

Background: Statin treatment is routinely used for secondary prevention world-wide. Little is known about the prevalence of persistent lipid abnormalities under chronic statin treatment for secondary prevention and possible differences in LDL-Cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment in clinical practice between countries in different parts of the world. Methods: Between 2008 and 2012, consecutive statin-treated outpatients were enrolled in 26 countries worldwide, (DYSIS = Dyslipidemia International Study; list of countries in table) to assess LDL-C goal attainment for secondary prevention. European Society of Cardiology recommendations were used to classify patient risk, and to define LDL-cholesterol treatment goals. Data were collected under real life conditions in physicians’ offices and hospital outpatient wards. Results: Serum lipid values of 57,885 consecutive statin-treated outpatients were studied in the context of their cardiovascular risk factors, and the potency and composition of their lipid-lowering treatment. In the very-high risk patients only 21.7% did reach the currently recommended LDL-Chol target <70mg/dl with large differences between the countries varying from 9.2% to 44.3%. In the high-risk population the LDL-Chol target <100mg/dl was achieved in 38.0% oft he patients, varying between 16.6% and 66.7% between countries Conclusion: Despite chronic statin treatment, only 21.7% of the very-high-risk patients reached the current recommended LDL-Chol target <70mg/dl in this large multinational cross-sectional trial, highlighting the persistent large gap between guideline recommendations and clinical practice. Further treatment escalations are necessary to reduce the risk of subsequent cardiovascular events.

scholarly journals Management of high and very high-risk patients — how to achieve the best advantage?

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-27
Author(s):  
D. V. Nebieridze
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Large Group ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Very High

Patients with high and very-high risk of cardiovascular events make up a large group of patients. In this regard, the timely identification of such patients and the correct management can significantly reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events. Potential of antihypertensive, lipid-lowering and antiplatelet therapy are considered.

2-OR: Impact of N Terminal Pro B-Type Natriuretic Peptide and High Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin on the Prediction of Death and Cardiovascular Events in High-Risk Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2-OR
Author(s):  
MARCUS V.B. MALACHIAS ◽  
PARDEEP JHUND ◽  
BRIAN CLAGGETT ◽  
MAGNUS O. WIJKMAN ◽  
RHONDA BENTLEY-LEWIS ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

scholarly journals Prevention of Hypotension following Spinal Anaesthesia in Caesarean Section - then and now

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 415-419
Author(s):  
J K Mitra
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
First Line ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Poor Efficacy

Hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section remains a common scenario in our clinical practice. Certain risk factors play a role in altering the incidence of hypotension. Aortocaval compression counteraction does not help to prevent hypotension. Intravenous crystalloid prehydration has poor efficacy; thus, the focus has changed toward co-hydration and use of colloids. Phenylephrine is established as a first- line vasopressor, although there are limited data from high-risk patients. Ephedrine crosses the placenta more than phenylephrine and cause possible alterations in the foetal physiology.http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v8i4.6242 Kathmandu Univ Med J 2010;8(4):415-19   

Abstract P275: Demographic and Clinical Profile of Patients with Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) Defined by National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III Guidelines

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 129 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David M Kern ◽  
Sanjeev Balu ◽  
Ozgur Tunceli ◽  
Swetha Raparla ◽  
Deborah Anzalone
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Low Hdl ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Very High ◽  
Statin Use

Introduction: This study aimed to compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with different risk factors for CHD as defined by NCEP ATP III guidelines. Methods: Dyslipidemia patients (≥1 medical claim for dyslipidemia, ≥1 pharmacy claim for a statin, or ≥1 LDL-C value ≥100 mg/dL [index date]) aged ≥18 y were identified from the HealthCore Integrated Research Environment from 1/1/2007-7/31/2012. Patients were classified as low risk (0 or 1 risk factor): hypertension, age ≥45 y [men] or ≥55 y [women], or low HDL-C), moderate/moderately high risk (≥2 risk factors), high risk (having CHD or CHD risk equivalent), or very high risk (having ACS or other established cardiovascular disease plus diabetes or metabolic syndrome). Demographics, comorbidities, medication use and lipid levels during the 12 months prior, and statin use during the 6 months post-index date were compared across risk groups (very high vs each other risk group). Results: There were 1,524,351 low-risk (mean age: 47 y; 45% men), 242,357 moderate-risk (mean age: 58 y; 59% men), 188,222 high-risk (mean age: 57 y; 52% men), and 57,469 very-high-risk (mean age: 63 y; 61% men) patients identified. Mean Deyo-Charlson comorbidity score differed greatly across risk strata: 0.20, 0.33, 1.26, and 2.22 from low to very high risk (p<.0001 for each). Compared with high-risk patients, very-high-risk patients had a higher rate of ischemic stroke: 5.4% vs 4.1%; peripheral artery disease: 17.1% vs 11.6%; coronary artery disease: 8.5% vs 8.2%; and abdominal aortic aneurysm: 2.3% vs 2.0% (p<.05 for each). Less than 1% of the total population had a prior prescription for each non-statin lipid-lowering medication (bile acid sequestrants, fibrates, ezetimibe, niacin, and omega-3). Very-high-risk patients had lower total cholesterol (very-high-risk mean: 194 mg/dL vs 207, 205, and 198 mg/dL for low-, moderate-/moderately-high-, and high-risk patients, respectively) and LDL-C (very-high-risk mean: 110 mg/dL vs 126, 126, and 116 mg/dL for the other risk groups; p<.0001 for each); higher triglycerides (TG) (very-high-risk mean: 206 mg/dL vs 123, 177, and 167 mg/dL for the other groups; p<.0001 for each); and lower HDL-C (very-high-risk mean: 45 mg/dL vs 57 [p<.0001], 45 [p=.006], and 51 mg/dL [p<.0001]). Statin use was low overall (15%), but higher in the very-high-risk group (45%) vs the high- (29%), moderate-/moderately-high- (18%), and low- (12%) risk groups (p<.0001 for each). Conclusions: Despite a large proportion of patients having high lipid levels, statin use after a dyslipidemia diagnosis was low: ≥80% of all patients (and more than half at very high risk) failed to receive a statin, indicating a potentially large population of patients who could benefit from statin treatment. Prior use of non-statin lipid-lowering medications was also low considering the high TG and low HDL-C levels among high-risk patients.

P3609Temporal trends of the management and outcomes of patients after myocardial infarction according to the risk for recurrent cardiovascular events

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Grinberg ◽  
T Bental ◽  
Y Hammer ◽  
A R Assali ◽  
H Vaknin-Assa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Temporal Trends ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Background Following Myocardial Infarction (MI), patients are at increased risk for recurrent cardiovascular events, particularly during the immediate period. Yet some patients are at higher risk than others, owing to their clinical characteristics and comorbidities, these high-risk patients are less often treated with guideline-recommended therapies. Aim To examine temporal trends in treatment and outcomes of patients with MI according to the TIMI risk score for secondary prevention (TRS2°P), a recently validated risk stratification tool. Methods A retrospective cohort study of patients with an acute MI, who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and were discharged alive between 2004–2016. Temporal trends were examined in the early (2004–2010) and late (2011–2016) time-periods. Patients were stratified by the TRS2°P to a low (≤1), intermediate (2) or high-risk group (≥3). Clinical outcomes included 30-day MACE (death, MI, target vessel revascularization, coronary artery bypass grafting, unstable angina or stroke) and 1-year mortality. Results Among 4921 patients, 31% were low-risk, 27% intermediate-risk and 42% high-risk. Compared to low and intermediate-risk patients, high-risk patients were older, more commonly female, and had more comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and chronic kidney disease. They presented more often with non ST elevation MI and 3-vessel disease. High-risk patients were less likely to receive drug eluting stents and potent anti-platelet drugs, among other guideline-recommended therapies. Evidently, they experienced higher 30-day MACE (8.1% vs. 3.9% and 2.1% in intermediate and low-risk, respectively, P<0.001) and 1-year mortality (10.4% vs. 3.9% and 1.1% in intermediate and low-risk, respectively, P<0.001). During time, comparing the early to the late-period, the use of potent antiplatelets and statins increased among the entire cohort (P<0.001). However, only the high-risk group demonstrated a significantly lower 30-day MACE (P=0.001). During time, there were no differences in 1-year mortality rate among all risk categories. Temporal trends in 30-day MACE by TRS2°P Conclusion Despite a better application of guideline-recommended therapies, high-risk patients after MI are still relatively undertreated. Nevertheless, they demonstrated the most notable improvement in outcomes over time.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document