scholarly journals The Revised 2009 FIGO Staging System for Endometrial Cancer: Should the 1988 FIGO Stages IA and IB Be Altered?

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 511-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum ◽  
Qin Zhou ◽  
Alexia Iasonos ◽  
Kaled M. Alektiar ◽  
Mario M. Leitao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Predictive Ability ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes ◽  
Figo Staging ◽  
Primary Surgery ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics ◽  
Stage Ia

ObjectivesThe revised 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for endometrial cancer included many changes over the 1988 system, particularly for stage I subgroups. We sought to describe the overall survival (OS) of women with stage I endometrial cancer and examine how the estimated stage-specific OS is altered in the 2009 system.MethodsA prospectively maintained institutional endometrial database was analyzed. All patients underwent primary surgery between January 1993 and June 2009.ResultsData from 1658 women were analyzed, including 1307 patients with FIGO 1988 stage I disease. The 5-year OS for the 1988 stages IA (92.4%), IB (87.3%), and IC (75.7%) significantly differed (P < 0.001). When patients were restaged using the 2009 system, we identified 1411 stage I patients with 5-year OS for 2009 stage IA of 89.2%, versus OS of 75.1% for IB (P = 0.001). The adjusted concordance probabilities for the 1988 stage I group and 2009 stage I group were 0.612 (SD, 0.0014) and 0.536 (SD, 0.0111), respectively.ConclusionsThe 1988 FIGO classification of stage I endometrial cancer correctly identified 3 subgroups of patients who had significantly different OS. Specifically, 1988 FIGO stages IA and IB had distinct oncologic outcomes. The revised 2009 system eliminates the most favorable group from the new classification system, and estimates of stage-specific OS for stage IB are substantially altered by the changes made in 2009. The revised system for stage I did not improve its predictive ability over the 1988 system. These data highlight the importance of developing individualized risk-prediction models and nomograms in endometrial cancer.

Staging early cervical cancer in China: data from a multicenter collaborative

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 869-873 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weifeng Zhang ◽  
Chunlin Chen ◽  
Ping Liu ◽  
Weili Li ◽  
Min Hao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Clinical Staging ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Figo Staging ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics ◽  
Stage Ia ◽  
Early Cervical Cancer

BackgroundIn 2018 the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) revised the staging system of cervical cancer. This study aimed to assess the quality of staging early cervical cancer in China before the revision.MethodsThis multicenter retrospective study included 34 tertiary hospitals in China. Medical records of patients with cervical cancer who underwent primary surgical treatment between January 2010 and December 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. All patients were clinically staged according to the 2009 FIGO staging system. Eligibility criteria included: histopathologically confirmed cervical cancer; 2009 FIGO stage IA–IIA2 based on 2009 FIGO staging system; primary surgical treatment including extrafascial, type II or type III radical hysterectomy; radical trachelectomy; with or without pelvic lymphadenectomy; regardless of surgical route via laparotomy or laparoscopy; and complete clinical and pathological data. Patients who received non-surgical treatment, neoadjuvant treatment, or those with incomplete data were excluded. The accuracy of clinical staging was assessed by comparison between clinical and pathologic stage using the latter as the reference standard.ResultsA total of 23 933 cases of cervical cancer were identified and 12 681 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 69.6% were staged accurately, 9.4% were clinically understaged, and 21.0% were clinically overstaged. The accuracy of stage IA, IB1, IB2, IIA1, and IIA2 was 90.0%, 87.5%, 57.4%, 20.3%, and 25.5%, respectively. The causes of stage inaccuracy were as follows: vaginal involvement (62.3%), maximal tumor diameter (24.6%), extent of cervical stromal invasion (7.1%), parametrial invasion (5.8%), bladder or rectal infiltration (0.1%), and distant metastases (0.1%).ConclusionThe accuracy of staging early cervical cancer in China was suboptimal before the revision of the staging system, especially for IIA1 and IIA2. The most common reasons for staging inaccuracy were vaginal involvement and tumor diameter.

scholarly journals Redefining Stage I Endometrial Cancer: Incorporating Histology, a Binary Grading System, Myometrial Invasion, and Lymph Node Assessment

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 1620-1628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce N. Barlin ◽  
Robert A. Soslow ◽  
Megan Lutz ◽  
Qin C. Zhou ◽  
Caryn M. St. Clair ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Myometrial Invasion ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
List Type ◽  
High Grade ◽  
High Grade Carcinoma ◽  
Concordance Probability ◽  
Grade 3

ObjectiveWe propose a new staging system for stage I endometrial cancer and compare its performance to the 1988 and 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) systems.MethodsWe analyzed patients with 1988 FIGO stage I endometrial cancer from January 1993 to August 2011. Low-grade carcinoma consisted of endometrioid grade 1 to grade 2 lesions. High-grade carcinoma consisted of endometrioid grade 3 or nonendometrioid carcinomas (serous, clear cell, and carcinosarcoma). The proposed system is as follows:IA. Low-grade carcinoma with less than half myometrial invasionIA1: Negative nodesIA2: No nodes removedIB. High-grade carcinoma with no myometrial invasionIB1: Negative nodesIB2: No nodes removedIC. Low-grade carcinoma with half or greater myometrial invasionIC1: Negative nodesIC2: No nodes removedID. High-grade carcinoma with any myometrial invasionID1: Negative nodesID2: No nodes removedResultsData from 1843 patients were analyzed. When patients were restaged with our proposed system, the 5-year overall survival significantly differed (P < 0.001): IA1, 96.7%; IA2, 92.2%; IB1, 92.2%; IB2, 76.4%; IC1, 83.9%; IC2, 78.6%; ID1, 81.1%; and ID2, 68.8%. The bootstrap-corrected concordance probability estimate for the proposed system was 0.627 (95% confidence interval, 0.590–0.664) and was superior to the concordance probability estimate of 0.530 (95% confidence interval, 0.516–0.544) for the 2009 FIGO system.ConclusionsBy incorporating histological subtype, grade, myometrial invasion, and whether lymph nodes were removed, our proposed system for stage I endometrial cancer has a superior predictive ability over the 2009 FIGO staging system and provides a novel binary grading system (low-grade including endometrioid grade 1–2 lesions; high-grade carcinoma consisting of endometrioid grade 3 carcinomas and nonendometrioid carcinomas).

Stage I Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors: An interim report from the International PPB/DICER1 & OTST Registry.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5547-5547
Author(s):  
Alexander Nelson ◽  
Anne Harris ◽  
Dave Watson ◽  
Sean Robin Pyper ◽  
Nathan Hall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Leydig Cell ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Molecular Testing ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics ◽  
Stage Ia ◽  
Poorly Differentiated ◽  
Leydig Cell Tumors

5547 Background: Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors (SLCT) are rare ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors which occur primarily in adolescents and young adults and are associated with DICER1 pathogenic variants. Methods: Informed consent for participation in the International PPB/ DICER1 or OTST Registry was obtained. When available, pathology was centrally reviewed. Staging was evaluated by Registry review using the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification system. Results: Eighty-three patients with stage I SLCT were enrolled. Median age at diagnosis was 15 (range 1-60) years. Most (57/83) patients had germline DICER1 testing; 35/57 (61%) had germline pathogenic variants. Fifty-six patients had Ia and 27 had Ic SLCT. The distribution of patients receiving chemo based on histology and stage is displayed in Table. One patient with poorly differentiated stage Ia SLCT with sarcomatous elements and no chemo at diagnosis recurred 6 months after surgery and died of disease. Three patients with local diagnosis of stage Ia SLCT, with data unavailable for Registry confirmation of stage, developed a subsequent SLCT 33 to 74 months after diagnosis; of these, 2 died, and 1 remains in treatment for recurrence. Available records and molecular testing in these 3 cases have not provided a distinction between recurrent and metachronous disease. Excluding the latter 3 patients, 3-year overall survival was 97.3% for stage Ia SLCT. Six patients with stage Ic SLCT recurred (Stage Ic1=5 and Stage Ic2=1) with a median time to recurrence of 25 (range 3-53) months. In stage Ic1, 18% (2/11) recurred after upfront chemo compared to 33% (3/9) after surgery alone. Of the 5 patients with stage Ic1 disease that recurred, 4 had intermediate and 1 had poorly differentiated SLCT. One patient had sarcomatous elements and 2 received upfront chemo. Two of the 5 patients are alive, neither received upfront chemo. One patient with poorly differentiated stage Ic2 SLCT with sarcomatous elements and no upfront chemo recurred and died of disease. Three-year event free and overall survival were 86.9 and 88.6% for stage Ic SLCT. Four patients had metachronous SLCT in the contralateral ovary confirmed by clinical review or somatic testing at a median time from diagnosis of 33 (range 28-104) months. All 4 have germline pathogenic variants and no evidence of disease at last follow-up. Conclusions: Individuals with early stage SLCT generally fare well, however, ongoing surveillance for recurrence and metachronous disease is indicated. Novel therapies are needed to address recurrent SLCT.[Table: see text]

Endometrial Cancer Lymphadenectomy Trial (ECLAT) (pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I or II endometrial cancer with high risk of recurrence; AGO-OP.6)

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 1075-1079
Author(s):  
Günter Emons ◽  
Jae-Weon Kim ◽  
Karin Weide ◽  
Nikolaus de Gregorio ◽  
Pauline Wimberger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Left Renal Vein ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Risk Of Recurrence ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundThe impact of comprehensive pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy on survival in patients with stage I or II endometrial cancer with a high risk of recurrence is not reliably documented. The side effects of this procedure, including lymphedema and lymph cysts, are evident.Primary ObjectiveEvaluation of the effect of comprehensive pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the absence of bulky nodes on 5 year overall survival of patients with endometrial cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages I and II) and a high risk of recurrence.Study HypothesisComprehensive pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy will increase 5 year overall survival from 75% (no lymphadenectomy) to 83%, corresponding to a hazard ratio of 0.65.Trial DesignOpen label, randomized, controlled trial. In arm A, a total hysterectomy plus bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is performed. In arm B, in addition, a systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy up to the level of the left renal vein is performed. For all patients, vaginal brachytherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy (carboplatin/paclitaxel) are recommended.Major Inclusion CriteriaPatients with histologically confirmed endometrial cancer stages pT1b–pT2, all histological subtypes, and pT1a endometrioid G3, serous, clear cell, or carcinosarcomas can be included when bulky nodes are absent. When hysterectomy has already been performed (eg, for presumed low risk endometrial cancer), study participation is also possible.Exclusion CriteriaPatients with pT1a, G1 or 2 of type 1 histology or uterine sarcomas (except for carcinosarcomas), endometrial cancers of FIGO stage III or IV (except for microscopic lymph node metastases) or visual extrauterine disease.Primary EndpointOverall survival calculated from the date of randomization until death.Sample Size640 patients will be enrolled in the study.Estimated Dates for Completing Accrual and Presenting ResultsAt present, 252 patients have been recruited. Based on this, accrual should be completed in 2025. Results should be presented in 2031.Trial RegistrationNCT03438474.

Impact of vaginal brachytherapy on survival in stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 789-796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariam AlHilli ◽  
Sudha Amarnath ◽  
Paul Elson ◽  
Lisa Rybicki ◽  
Sean Dowdy
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
External Beam Radiation Therapy ◽  
Stage I ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
External Beam ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Stage Ib ◽  
Stage Ia

ObjectiveTo evaluate trends in use of radiation therapy and its impact on overall survival in low- and high-grade stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.MethodsPatients with stage I endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomy from 2004 to 2013 were identified through the National Cancer Database and classified as: stage IA G1/2, stage IA G3, stage IB G1/2, and stage IB G3. Trends in use of vaginal brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy were assessed. Overall survival was measured from surgery and estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The effect of radiation therapy on overall survival was assessed within each stage/grade group using Cox proportional hazards analysis in propensity-matched treatment groups.ResultsA total of 132 393 patients met inclusion criteria, and 81% of patients had stage IA and 19% had stage IB endometrial cancer. Adjuvant therapy was administered in 18% of patients: 52% received vaginal brachytherapy, 30% external beam radiation therapy, and 18% chemotherapy ±radiation therapy. External beam radiation therapy use decreased from 9% in 2004 to 4% in 2012, while vaginal brachytherapy use increased from 8% to 14%. Stage IA G1/2 patients did not benefit from either external beam radiation therapy or vaginal brachytherapy, while administration of vaginal brachytherapy improved overall survival in stage IB G1/2 compared with no treatment (p<0.0001). In stage IB G1/2 and stage IA G3, vaginal brachytherapy was superior to external beam radiation therapy (p=0.0004 and p=0.004, respectively). Stage IB G3 patients had improved overall survival with either vaginal brachytherapy or external beam radiation therapy versus no treatment but no difference in overall survival was seen between vaginal brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy (p=0.94).ConclusionsThe delivery of adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with stage IA G1/2 endometrial carcinoma is not associated with improvement in overall survival. Patients with stage IB G1/2 and G3 as well as stage IA G3 are shown to benefit from improved overall survival when adjuvant radiation therapy is administered. These findings demonstrate potential opportunities to reduce both overtreatment and undertreatment in stage I endometrial cancer patients.

scholarly journals A comparison of disease recurrence between robotic versus laparotomy approach in patients with intermediate-risk endometrial cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiheon Song ◽  
Tien Le ◽  
Laura Hopkins ◽  
Michael Fung-Kee-Fung ◽  
Krystine Lupe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Surgery Group ◽  
Laparotomy Group

ObjectiveAdvances in minimally invasive surgery, particularly with robotic surgery, have resulted in improved peri-operative outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer. In addition, randomized trials have shown that addition of adjuvant radiotherapy following surgery improves loco-regional disease control among stage I intermediate-risk endometrial cancer patients. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of combined treatment of robotic surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy in this patient population.MethodsA single-center retrospective study was conducted on stage I endometrioid-type endometrial cancer patients with intermediate-risk features (<50% myometrial involvement and grade 2–3 histopathology, or >50% myometrial involvement and grade 1–2 histopathology) treated with hysterectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy between January 2010 and December 2015. Data on surgery and radiotherapy were collected and correlated with clinical and surgical outcomes using log-rank. Oncologic outcomes were then compared between robotic surgery and laparotomy.ResultsA total of 179 intermediate-risk endometrial cancer patients were identified, of whom 135 (75.4%) received adjuvant radiotherapy and were included in the final analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 63 years (range 40–89) and median follow-up was 4.7 years (range 1.1–8.8). Seventy-seven patients (57%) underwent robotic surgery and 58 patients (43%) underwent laparotomy. Surgical staging with lymph node dissection was performed on 79.3% of the patients. The majority of patients (79.3%) received vaginal brachytherapy as part of adjuvant radiotherapy, while 20.7% received external-beam radiotherapy. Among the entire cohort, eight (5.9%) patients recurred and all eight recurrences occurred in the robotic surgery group; no recurrence was found in the laparotomy group. This translated into 5 year disease-free survival of 100% in the laparotomy group, compared with 91.8% in the robotic surgery group (p=0.005). No difference in overall survival was found between the two groups (p=0.51).ConclusionOncologic outcomes for stage I intermediate-risk endometrial cancer treated with hysterectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy at our institution are comparable to the previously published literature. The higher recurrence rate observed with robotic surgery at our institution has not been observed previously and requires further investigation.

The role of extensive lymphadenectomy in stage I ovarian cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5069-5069
Author(s):  
E. G. Munro ◽  
N. Karnik Lee ◽  
M. K. Cheung ◽  
K. Osann ◽  
A. Husain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Extensive Lymphadenectomy ◽  
Stage Ib ◽  
Primary Surgery ◽  
Stage Ia

5069 Background: To determine if extent of lymphadenectomy affects the survival of women with stage I ovarian cancer. Methods: Demographic and clinico-pathologic information were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program from 1988–2001 and analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: Of the 6,686 women diagnosed with stage I ovarian cancer, 4,092 (61.2%) had stage IA, 392 (5.9%) had stage IB, 1,840 (27.5%) had stage IC, and 362 (5.4%) had unspecified stage I disease. The median age was 53 (range: 1–99). 5,625 (84.1%) were White, 388 (5.8%) Black, 488 (7.3%) Asian, and 185 (2.8%) were Other. All patients underwent primary surgery; of which, 3,824 women had no nodes, 1,533 had <10 nodes, and 1,329 had ≥10 nodes resected. Of the patients who underwent a lymphadenectomy, the median number of nodes resected was 9 (range: 1–84). The extent of lymphadenectomy (0, <10, and ≥10 nodes) increased the survival of patients with stage IC disease from 72.8%, 86.7%, to 90.1% (p < 0.0001), but not in those with stage IA (p = 0.07) or stage IB (p = 0.04) disease. In patients with non-clear cell epithelial carcinoma, the extent of lymphadenectomy was associated with improved 5-year disease-specific survivals of 85.6%, 93.3%, and 93.5%, respectively (p < 0.0001). However, the benefit associated with an extensive lymphadenectomy was not evident in clear cell (p = 0.09), sarcoma (p = 0.33), germ cell (p = 0.55), or sex cord stromal tumors of the ovary (p = 0.99). Similarly, patients with grade 3 disease had an improved survival associated with the extent of lymph node resection, 74.4%, 87.5%, to 90.5% (p < 0.0001), but not in those with grade 1 (p = 0.18) or grade 2 (p = 0.27) disease. In multivariate analysis, a more extensive lymphadenectomy remained significant as an independent prognostic factor for improved survival after adjusting for all other independent prognostic factors including age, surgery, histology, stage, and grade. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the extent of lymphadenectomy was associated with an improvement in the survival of women with stage IC ovarian cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document