Association of inherited thrombophilia with embryonic and postembryonic recurrent pregnancy loss

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petar D Ivanov ◽  
Regina S Komsa-Penkova ◽  
Emiliana I Konova ◽  
Katia S Kovacheva ◽  
Maria N Simeonova ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 186 (3) ◽  
pp. 707-713 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Karadağ ◽  
T. Yoldemir ◽  
S. D. Karadağ ◽  
C. İnan ◽  
Z. N. Dolgun ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4056-4056
Author(s):  
Serguei A. Castaneda ◽  
Henry Cardona ◽  
Walter Cardona ◽  
Leonor Alvarez ◽  
Joaquin Gomez ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Several genetic defects of coagulation factors have been implicated as a possible cause of recurrent pregnancy loss in Caucasians. The role of inherited thrombophilia as a risk factor in populations of Hispanic origin affected with this clinical condition is unknown. To our knowledge, this is the first study conducted to evaluate this genetic predisposition in Hispanics. Objective: To assess association between recurrent pregnancy loss and inherited thrombophilias: factor V G1691A (FV Leiden), prothrombin G20210A (FII G20210A), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T (MTHFR C677T), activated protein C resistance (APC resistance), and deficiencies of antithrombin III (AT-III) and protein C (PC). Patients and methods: This ongoing case-control study investigates a tri-ethnic population of Hispanic origin from Medellin, Colombia. Inherited thrombophilia was studied in 76 recurrent pregnancy loss patients according to Sixth ACCP Consensus Conference on Antithrombotic Therapy (three or more miscarriages, and either second-trimester losses or gestational vascular complications). The control group included 117 healthy women (two or more children, and no more than one miscarriage). Polymorphisms were genotyped by PCR-RFLP. APC resistance and deficiencies of AT-III, and PC were evaluated using commercial kits (IL Test™ APC™ Resistance V, Antithrombin™, and Proclot™). Sample size of 100 patients and 200 controls was determined to have 80% statistical power to discriminate association. Results: The prevalence of any inherited thrombophilia in this patient cohort was 17%, and 25% in controls (OR 1.16, CI 0.6–2.29). No statistically significant differences in any genetic thrombophilia frequency between patients and healthy controls were observed. FV Leiden and FII G20210A were both positive in one patient and one control (OR 1.55, CI 0–57.5, for both thrombophilic defects). In the patient group 13.2% homozygous carriers with MTHFR 677T were found, as compared to 22.2% among controls (OR 0.53, CI 0.22–1.25). The odds ratio for the association between recurrent pregnancy loss and APC resistance was 0.77 (CI 0.32–4.2). The inheritance of AT-III deficiency or PC deficiency was not associated with recurrent pregnancy loss. AT-III deficiency was not detected in patients and was found in only one control. Furthermore, one patient was defined as PC deficiency carrier while none were found in the control group. Conclusion: Our preliminary results found no association between recurrent pregnancy loss and inherited thrombophilia in this population originated by admixture of Amerinds, Europeans, and Africans, such as the American population denominated Hispanic. Base on our current data analysis, we do not expect to find any association even with the planned larger sample size. This suggests that inherited thrombophilia might not play a main role in Hispanic populations affected with this clinical condition. Given these results, appears to be insufficient evidence to include inherited thrombophilia in the initial evaluation of recurrent pregnancy loss in this population group, and possibly Hispanic patients in America. We suggest it is important to look for other, more common, causes of recurrent miscarriage in the evaluation of this group of patients. These data suggest an important ethnic difference between this population and Caucasians.


2009 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. S140
Author(s):  
M. Karimi ◽  
J. Zolghadri ◽  
M. Nezam ◽  
A. Afrasiabi

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 356-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myrthe M van Dijk ◽  
Astrid M Kolte ◽  
Jacqueline Limpens ◽  
Emma Kirk ◽  
Siobhan Quenby ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) occurs in 1–3% of all couples trying to conceive. No consensus exists regarding when to perform testing for risk factors in couples with RPL. Some guidelines recommend testing if a patient has had two pregnancy losses whereas others advise to test after three losses. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current evidence on the prevalence of abnormal test results for RPL amongst patients with two versus three or more pregnancy losses. We also aimed to contribute to the debate regarding whether the investigations for RPL should take place after two or three or more pregnancy losses. SEARCH METHODS Relevant studies were identified by a systematic search in OVID Medline and EMBASE from inception to March 2019. A search for RPL was combined with a broad search for terms indicative of number of pregnancy losses, screening/testing for pregnancy loss or the prevalence of known risk factors. Meta-analyses were performed in case of adequate clinical and statistical homogeneity. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. OUTCOMES From a total of 1985 identified publications, 21 were included in this systematic review and 19 were suitable for meta-analyses. For uterine abnormalities (seven studies, odds ratio (OR) 1.00, 95% CI 0.79–1.27, I2 = 0%) and for antiphospholipid syndrome (three studies, OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.86–1.25, I2 = 0%) we found low quality evidence for a lack of a difference in prevalence of abnormal test results between couples with two versus three or more pregnancy losses. We found insufficient evidence of a difference in prevalence of abnormal test results between couples with two versus three or more pregnancy losses for chromosomal abnormalities (10 studies, OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.55–1.10), inherited thrombophilia (five studies) and thyroid disorders (two studies, OR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.06–4.56). WIDER IMPLICATIONS A difference in prevalence in uterine abnormalities and antiphospholipid syndrome is unlikely in women with two versus three pregnancy losses. We cannot exclude a difference in prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities, inherited thrombophilia and thyroid disorders following testing after two versus three pregnancy losses. The results of this systematic review may support investigations after two pregnancy losses in couples with RPL, but it should be stressed that additional studies of the prognostic value of test results used in the RPL population are urgently needed. An evidenced-based treatment is not currently available in the majority of cases when abnormal test results are present.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 5124-5124
Author(s):  
Khalil Al Farsi ◽  
Shoaib Al Zadjali ◽  
Karima Al Falahi ◽  
Murtadha K. Al-Khabori ◽  
Anil Pathare ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 5124 Background: Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is a common clinical problem. Inherited thrombophilia has been reported to be associated with RPL by different groups. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of women who had thrombophilia testing for RPL, defined as 2 or more pregnancy losses, between the period of June 2006 and June 2010. The following thrombophilic disorders were included: protein C deficiency (PC), protein S deficiency (PS), anti-thrombin deficiency (AT), activated protein C resistance (APCR) and more recently, as molecular testing became available at our institution, factor V G1691A (FVL), prothrombin G20210A (PTG) and Methyl tetrahydrofolate reductase C677T (MTHRF) mutations. Women were excluded if testing was only done during pregnancy or in the immediate post-partum period. Results: A total of 136 women were identified. Median age was 32 (range: 18–44) with a median number of RPL of 3 (range: 2–11). Median number of first trimester losses was 2 (range 0–11). Two women had only second trimester losses and one had only third trimester losses. PS deficiency was identified in 8 women (5.8%), PC deficiency in 3 (2.2%), AT deficiency in 1 (0.7%) and APCR in 1 (0.7%). Of 30 women who had genetic analysis by PCR, 8 had abnormal results (MTHFR: 4 heterozygous, 1 homozygous; FVL: 2 heterozygous and PTG: 1 heterozygous). We did not find any correlation between the number of RPLs and the finding of a positive thrombophilia screen in the overall group or in the group of women who had molecular testing. Conclusion: Inherited thrombophilia is not as common in our patient population as described in other groups. However, a prospective study with a control group and a full panel of thrombophilia testing is needed to assess the prevalence and significance of such defects in women with RPL. Disclosures: Pathare: Sultan Qaboos University: Employment, Research Funding. Alkindi:Sultan Qaboos University: Employment, Research Funding.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilhem Nassour-Mokhtari ◽  
Bouchra Loukidi ◽  
Abdellatif Moussouni ◽  
Reda Bettioui ◽  
Riad Benhabib ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (11) ◽  
pp. 3122-3125
Author(s):  
Dragos Erdelean ◽  
Simona Sorina Farcas ◽  
Vladimir Poroch ◽  
Nicoleta Ioana Andreescu ◽  
Izabella Erdelean ◽  
...  

Spontaneous miscarriage is reported in approximately 15% of the clinically recognized pregnancies. Several reports have showed an increased risk of miscarriage in patients with thrombophilia, but due to the heterogeneity of study design the role thrombophilic factors and the use of anticoagulant therapy in prevention of pregnancy loss is still unclear. The current study includes 55 patients for which we ran a screening of the most commonly inherited thrombophilia mutations (FVL, FII, MTHFR C677T/A1298, PAI 4G/5G mutations). We found that most of the patients (92.72%) associated mutation in at least 2 of the genes evaluated. Only a small number of patients (7.27%) had a single variant identified. We have found high prevalence of the studied variants in the pregnant patients that experience pregnancy loss, with risk allele frequencies increased from 2 to 11 times as compared to the general population. We consider that evaluation of the trombophilic variants should be indicated for patients with pregnancy loss in order to establish a possible cause for the miscarriage.


2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laudelino Lopes ◽  
George P. Jacob

AbstractThe value of testing for inherited thrombophilia in pregnancy has been debated in literature with regard to its utility in preventing adverse obstetrical outcomes or identifying women at risk for it. In this commentary, an evidence based approach is used to investigate the strength of association between thrombophilias and recurrent pregnancy loss and stillbirth. Several studies and meta-analyses have shown that there is only a weak association with recurrent pregnancy loss. However, many of these studies were underpowered, and there was significant heterogeneity-issues that are addressed in this paper. The evidence for association with stillbirth is lacking, but the few studies that are available seem to suggest a stronger correlation than for recurrent pregnancy loss. Further, the benefit of treating thrombophilias with anticoagulation in order to prevent these outcomes is discussed. While there is a lack of evidence looking at whether anticoagulation prevents stillbirth, there is strong evidence to show that anticoagulation does not prevent recurrent pregnancy loss. Finally, guidelines put out by various obstetrical and hematological societies regarding this topic are summarized.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 402-408
Author(s):  
Priyanka Krishnaswamy ◽  
Rohit Arora

Miscarriage is defined as the spontaneous loss of a pregnancy before the fetus reaches viability; it includes all pregnancy losses from the time of conception until 24 weeks of gestation. Early miscarriages are common, occurring in 10–20% of all pregnancies, with 2% of second-trimester pregnancies being miscarried before 24 weeks of gestation. Recurrent miscarriage, defined as the loss of three or more consecutive pregnancies, affects 1% of couples trying to conceive with the chance of having two consecutive miscarriages being 5%. Clinical studies show that 3 in 4 women will have a successful pregnancy with supportive care alone. Therefore, couples should be given reassurance about their chances of a successful pregnancy in the future. In this review we look at the epidemiological factors influencing rates of miscarriage, acquired and inherited thrombophilia, genetic, anatomical, endocrine, immune, infective and male factors for recurrent miscarriage. Despite these potential causes, the majority (around 50%) of recurrent pregnancy losses remain unexplained.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document