scholarly journals The role of third-line chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer

Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (39) ◽  
pp. e12588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Won Choi ◽  
Mi Sun Ahn ◽  
Geum Sook Jeong ◽  
Hyun Woo Lee ◽  
Seong Hyun Jeong ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 82-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroko Hasegawa ◽  
Tetsuya Iwasaki ◽  
Akio Ishihara ◽  
Yuko Sakakibara ◽  
Tomohumi Akasaka ◽  
...  

82 Background: Recently, the proportion of elderly patients (pts) with metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) has increased in Japan. Survival benefits of salvage treatment after second-line chemotherapy (CTX) for mGC were shown in several prospective studies. However, the role of salvage treatment in elderly pts remains controversial. Methods: We reviewed 185 pts with mGC who received palliative CTX aged ≥ 70 years at our institution between April 2007 and March 2018. Eligibility criteria were as follows: PS 0-2, refractory to first-line and second-line CTX. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathologic factors that affected overall survival for elderly pts with mGC, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on the baseline factors at the beginning of third-line CTX. Results: Of all, 71 pts were eligible. Median age was 75 years (71-85). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for third-line CTX were 3.2 and 7.5 months, respectively and an overall response rate and disease control rate were 4.2% and 43.7%, respectively. In univariate analysis, the following four factors were identified to have prognostic significance: performance status (PS) (ECOG 0–1 or 2), serum albumin level (< 3.5 or ≥ 3.5 g/dl), serum LDH level (≤ 240 or > 240 IU/l), PFS under second-line CTX (< 3 or ≥ 3 months). Multivariate analysis found three prognostic factors affecting poor survival following third-line CTX: PS of 2 (hazard ratio (HR) 8.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.99–20.2; P = 0.001), serum LDH level > 240 IU/l (HR 2.75, 95% CI 1.48–5.05; P = 0.002) and median PFS under second-line CTX of < 3 months (HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.01–3.43; P = 0.045). A prognostic index was constructed, dividing pts into low- (0 factor), intermediate- (1-2 risk factors), or high- (3 risk factors) risk groups. Median OS for each group were 12.6, 6.0 and 3.0 months, respectively ( P < 0.001). Conclusions: This analysis suggests that some clinicopathologic factors might be helpful in identifying the subgroup of elderly pts most likely to benefit from third-line CTX for metastatic gastric cancer.


Oncology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 311-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia Pasquini ◽  
Enrico Vasile ◽  
Chiara Caparello ◽  
Caterina Vivaldi ◽  
Gianna Musettini ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15558-e15558
Author(s):  
Hyun Woo Lee ◽  
Yong Won Choi ◽  
Mi Sun Ahn ◽  
Seok Yun Kang ◽  
Jin-Hyuk Choi

e15558 Background: Patients (pts) with recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer eventually experience disease progression during or after completion of first-line chemotherapy. Second-line therapy is generally recommended in the current guidelines. Although third-line therapy is often performed in daily practice in some countries, there are few reports about the benefit of third-line therapy. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 683 pts who underwent at least first-line palliative chemotherapy for recurrent (n = 297) or primary metastatic (n = 386) gastric cancer. Clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival (OS) were analyzed according to the lines of chemotherapy as well as for all study pts. Results: One hundred and forty-nine pts (21.8%) underwent third- or further-line therapy. Third- or further-line therapy was more frequently performed in pts with young age ( < 70) (p < 0.0001), ECOG PS 0 or 1 (p < 0.0001) at the initiation of first-line therapy, first-line combination regimen (p = 0.006), and palliative surgical resection before first-line therapy (p = 0.029). The median follow-up duration was 62 months (24-151 months) for the survivors. The median OS for pts after first- and third-line therapy was 10 and 6 months, respectively. The median OS of pts who received third-line therapy was significantly longer than that of pts who received second- or lesser-line therapy (18 vs. 8 months, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that third- or further-line therapy was independently associated with favorable OS (hazard ratio = 0.56, p < 0.0001) along with surgical resection (p < 0.0001) and first-line combination regimen (p = 0.008), whereas signet ring cell histology (p = 0.002) and peritoneal metastasis (p = 0.027) were independent prognostic factors of poor OS. Conclusions: This study suggests that recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer pts may benefit from third-line chemotherapy, although careful selection is essential.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. e0198544 ◽  
Author(s):  
In Sil Choi ◽  
Mihong Choi ◽  
Ju Hyun Lee ◽  
Jee Hyun Kim ◽  
Koung Jin Suh ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document