Assessment of the Patient-Centered and Family-Centered Care Experience of Total Joint Replacement Patients Using a Shadowing Technique

2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 269-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulanda Marcus-Aiyeku ◽  
Margaret DeBari ◽  
Susan Salmond
2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith J. Mann ◽  
Amber Hoffman ◽  
DeeJo Miller ◽  
Sheryl Chadwick ◽  
Denise Bratcher

Abstract Background Patient- and family-centered care (PFCC) approaches to care are important in enhancing the patient-centeredness of the health care experience, yet little is known about the effectiveness of formal approaches for teaching patient-centeredness in residency. Intervention We developed and implemented a PFCC curriculum and assessed its impact on residents' self-perceptions of patient-centered behavior and practices. Methods We used a quasi-experimental, nonrandomized approach with a pretest-posttest design. An experimental group of 24 interns filled out the Patient Practitioner Orientation Scale (PPOS) before residency, and a control group of 18 graduating residents who had not been exposed to a PFCC curriculum also completed the PPOS. After 2 years of residency and exposure to a PFCC curriculum, interns in the experimental group repeated the PPOS. We compared mean total and subscale PPOS scores. Results There was no difference in baseline total or subscale PPOS scores between the experimental and control group. The mean total PPOS score for the experimental group after exposure to the curriculum was 4.55 (P  =  .45), reflecting no change in patient-centeredness. The 17 female interns in the intervention group were more patient centered (4.8 ± 0.36) than the 6 male interns (4.2 ± 0.38) (P  =  .005), scoring significantly higher (4.6 ± 0.39 versus 4.0 ± 0.38) in the sharing domain (P  =  .001). Conclusion Interns' exposure to a PFCC curriculum did not result in a change in their perceived patient-centeredness. Most pediatrics residents at our children's hospital perceive themselves as patient and family centered at the start of residency and remain so throughout.


2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 587-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Byrne ◽  
Barbara K. Chang ◽  
Stuart C. Gilman ◽  
Sheri A. Keitz ◽  
Catherine P. Kaminetzky ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In 2010, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) implemented a national patient-centered care initiative that organized primary care into interdisciplinary teams of health care professionals to provide patient-centered, continuous, and coordinated care. Objective We assessed the discriminate validity of the Learners' Perceptions Survey—Primary Care (LPS-PC), a tool designed to measure residents' perceptions about their primary and patient-centered care experiences. Methods Between October 2010 and June 2011, the LPS-PC was administered to Loma Linda University Medical Center internal medicine residents assigned to continuity clinics at the VA Loma Linda Healthcare System (VALLHCS), a university setting, or the county hospital. Adjusted differences in satisfaction ratings across settings and over domains (patient- and family-centered care, faculty and preceptors, learning, clinical, work and physical environments, and personal experience) were computed using a generalized linear model. Results Our response rate was 86% (77 of 90). Residents were more satisfied with patient- and family-centered care at the VALLHCS than at either the university or county (P < .001). However, faculty and preceptors (odds ratio [OR]  =  1.53), physical (OR  =  1.29), and learning (OR  =  1.28) environments had more impact on overall resident satisfaction than patient- and family-centered care (OR  =  1.08). Conclusions The LPS-PC demonstrated discriminate validity to assess residents' perceptions of their patient-centered clinical training experience across outpatient primary care settings at an internal medicine residency program. The largest difference in scores was the patient- and family-centered care domain, in which residents rated the VALLHCS much higher than the university or county sites.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (02) ◽  
pp. 30-31
Author(s):  
Adi Utarini

Situasi pandemi memberikan ancaman serius dalam pemberian pelayanan individual, terutama bagi pasien dengan infeksi virus Corona yang dirawat inap di rumah sakit. Aspek medis (diagnosis dan pengobatan) yang merupakan subtansi utama pelayanan masih menimbulkan tantangan dalam penatalaksanaan pasien dengan infeksi virus Corona. Namun pada situasi yang kompleks ini, pemberian pelayanan kesehatan yang berorientasi pada kebutuhan individual setiap manusia-pasien justru menjadi semakin penting. Setiap orang (termasuk pasien) membutuhkan dukungan yang lebih besar dan berarti dari keluarga dan masyarakat, serta tenaga kesehatan. Beberapa istilah sering digunakan dan memiliki makna, prinsip dan aktivitas yang berbeda, namun tumpang tindih atau merupakan suatu kontinum: person-centered care, patient-centered care dan family-centered care.


2019 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 016-020
Author(s):  
Haydeh Heidari ◽  
Marjan Mardani-Hamooleh

AbstractFamily-centered care (FCC) is one of the important elements of care in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). The aim of this study was to understand the nurses' perception of FCC in NICUs. This qualitative study was performed using conventional content analysis. Participants in this study included 18 nurses who were selected by a purposeful method. Semistructured, in-depth and face-to-face interviews were conducted with the participants. All interviews were written down, reviewed, and analyzed. Two categories were identified after the data analysis: (1) prerequisite for providing FCC and (2) parents' participation. Prerequisite for providing FCC consisted of two subcategories namely suitable facilities and adequate personnel. Parents' participation included subcategories of parents: neonate's attachment and parents' training. Nurses' perception of FCC in NICUs can facilitate an appropriate condition for the participation of family members in the care of neonates.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document