Effect of social distance on outcome evaluation in self–other decision-making

Neuroreport ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (17) ◽  
pp. 1499-1503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi He ◽  
Qingzhou Sun ◽  
Zuoli Shi ◽  
Xiaoning Zhang ◽  
Fengpei Hu
2015 ◽  
Vol 47 (8) ◽  
pp. 1028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiwen WANG ◽  
Zhen ZHANG ◽  
Sheng YUAN ◽  
Fengbo GUO ◽  
Shaoying HE ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 217 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja S. Euser ◽  
Catharina S. van Meel ◽  
Michelle Snelleman ◽  
Ingmar H. A. Franken

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Liu ◽  
Xiaoxuan Huang ◽  
Chong Liao ◽  
Fang Cui

AbstractThe present study combined a novel hypothetical investment game with functional magnetic resonance imaging systemtically examined how morality modulates economic decision making in decision phase and outcome phase. We manipulated the morality of the investments by choosing each investment project based on subjective ratings on their moral valence and social benefits. There were three categories of investment morality: Green (moral), Red (immoral), and Neutral. The behavioral and neural responses during the investment decision and outcome phases were recorded and compared. Results showed that: behaviorally, people are willing to invest a larger amount of money into a moral project that may benefit society than they are into an immoral project that they think will harm society. They also rate gains in moral investments as more pleasant and losses as the most unpleasant. In the brain, we found that the reward system, especially the bilateral striatum, was involved in modulating functional connectivity during both phases, but in different ways. During decision making, the functional connectivity between fusiform gyrus and striatum might underlie the observed investing bias (Green over Red projects), while the covariation of BOLD signals in bilateral striatum with the behavioral tendency might explain the effect observed during the outcome evaluations. Our study provides evidence that morality modulates both the decision making and the outcome evaluation in economic situations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas Martins ◽  
Lucas Rangel ◽  
Marcilene Vianna ◽  
Dalessandro Vianna

Abstract Background In December 2019 in China, the COVID-19 pandemic process began. From this milestone, it is clear the relevance of the analysis of control and prevention measures used to combat this disease in a work environment. The objective of this study is to evaluate the main precautionary measures in COVID-19 administrative services, using three techniques of multi-criteria decision making. Methods This study was conducted in four stages. In the first stage, there was the characterization of an administrative services company as an analytical model. In the second stage, some prevention measures were defined as choices and their evaluation criteria. The alternatives were: use of masks; use of gel alcohol; handwashing; hygiene of workstations and bathrooms; use of individual utensils; physical-social distance; and education (training on prevention). The criteria were: reduction of the probability of transmission by contact; practicality of behavioral adaptation; and monthly cost. In the third stage, a decision matrix was constructed relating the selected choices and criteria. In the fourth stage there was the application of the techniques PROMETHEE I, PROMETHEE II and ELECTRE III to prioritize the selected prevention measures. Results After the comparative analysis of the results of the applied techniques, it was possible to strongly advise four of the seven measures chosen: use of masks; use of gel alcohol; physical-social distance and education. Conclusions The methodology used in this study can support decision-making with the selection of more efficient actions in the preservation of the health and work capacity of workers, and in the optimization of corporate financial resources.


2014 ◽  
Vol 46 (11) ◽  
pp. 1760
Author(s):  
Liying BAI ◽  
Bo YUAN ◽  
Wei ZHANG ◽  
Zhen ZHANG ◽  
Jiao Lan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (OCE2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathrin Kohlenberg-Müller ◽  
Christina Gast ◽  
Alexandra Kolm ◽  
Andrea M. Werkman ◽  
Koen Vanherle ◽  
...  

AbstractIntroduction:Different models of frameworks for dietetic care are used in Europe. There is a substantial need for a consistent framework to compare research results and to cooperate on an international level. Therefore, one of the goals of the EU-funded project IMPECD was the development of a unified framework Dietetic Care Process (DCP) in order to foster a shared understanding of process-driven dietetic counselling.Materials and Methods:Based on a literature review and in-depth analysis of different frameworks an iterative and incremental development process of finding solutions for decision-making within the consortium consisting of dietetic experts from 5 European HEI was passed. The developed DCP model was integrated in an online training course including 9 clinical cases (MOOC) to train students. The draft versions and the concluding final version DCP model were evaluated and re-evaluated by teachers and 25 students at two Intensive Study Programmes.Results:The DCP model consists of five distinct, interrelated steps which the consortium agreed on: Dietetic Assessment, Dietetic Diagnosis, Planning Dietetic Intervention, Implementing Dietetic Intervention, Dietetic Outcome Evaluation. A standardized scheme was developed to define the process steps: dedication, central statement, aim and principles, and operationalization.For example, Dietetic Assessment is the first step of the DCP (dedication). It is a systematic process to gather dietetically adequate and relevant information about the client by using state-of-the-art methods (central statement). The aim is to identify nature and cause of dietetic related problems of the client (aim and principles). The gathered information are documented in types of categories (client history, diet history, behavioural-environmental, clinical status) or following the ICF-model (operationalization). The clinical cases used within the MOOC proved that the DCP model is suitable to be put into practice.Discussion:Existing different process models were analyzed to create a new and consistent concept of a unified framework DCP. The variety within the European countries represented by the consortium proved to be both a challenge in decision-making and an opportunity to integrate multinational perspectives and intensify the scientific discourse. The development of a standardized scheme with precise definitions is a prerequisite for planning study designs in health services research. Besides, clarification is essential for establishing process-guided work in practice. The evaluated MOOC is now implemented in study programmes used by 5 European HEI in order to keep approaches and process-driven action comparable. The MOOC promotes the exchange of ideas between future professionals on an international level.


2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 489-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Schmidthuber ◽  
Simone Stütz ◽  
Dennis Hilgers

Purpose Governments all over the world have implemented citizensourcing initiatives to integrate citizens into decision-making processes. A more participative decision-making process is associated with an open government and assumed to benefit public service quality and interactive value creation. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the outcomes of open government initiatives and ask to what extent open government participation is related to perceived outcomes of open government. Design/methodology/approach Data conducted from a survey among users of a citizensourcing platform and platform data are used to perform non-parametric analyses and examine the relationship between platform participation and perceived outcomes of open government. Findings The findings of this paper suggest that active platform usage positively relates to several outcomes perceived by citizens, such as improved information flow, increased trust in and satisfaction with local government. In contrast, repetitive participation does not significantly relate to users’ outcome evaluation. Practical implications This study suggests public managers to provide possibilities for citizen participation and interaction with government such as citizensourcing initiatives. In particular, it recommends promoting participants’ platform activity, as proactive platform participation has positive effects on perceived outcomes of open government. Originality/value Previous literature discussed what it needs to realize a transparent and participatory government. First empirical studies deal with government institutions’ reasons to promote exchange with citizens, and investigate citizens’ motivation to participate in citizensourcing activities, but have disregarded the consequences of open government so far. This study thus provides first insights into the outcomes of open government, as perceived by the users.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document