Clifford Dobell 1886-1949

1950 ◽  
Vol 7 (19) ◽  
pp. 35-61 ◽  

The sudden and premature death of Clifford Dobell on 23 December 1949, in London, deprived the scientific world of one of the outstanding protozoologists of all time—a man who had made important and lasting contributions to biology, medicine and the history of science. Clifford Dobell (though christened Cecil Clifford, he never used the first of these names) was born on 22 February 1886 at Birkenhead, in Cheshire. He was the eldest son and the second of the five children of William Blount Dobell (1859-1927), and his wife Agnes née Thornely (1852-1942). The Dobells are an ancient English family, probably descended from Angles who settled in Kent and Sussex before the Norman Conquest. Their name is in Domesday Book but its derivation is not certainly known; in the older records it is spelt variously, but since about 1600 the present form has been usual in the main branch of the family, to which Clifford belonged. Clifford’s father, William Blount, was left motherless when only three years old. At the age of seventeen, when his father emigrated to America with his second family, he went to Birkenhead, where he worked in the office of the Lancashire Coal Company for a few years, until he set up as a coal merchant on his own account. In his twenty-fourth year (1883) he married Agnes Thornely, who also early became an orphan and was brought up by her grandfather, Samuel Thornely of Liverpool, and a spinster aunt, Caroline Thornely. Agnes had a good education for a girl of her generation—at school she learnt German, French and some Italian, and had excellent instruction in music. She was very musical indeed, and could play the piano, the violin and the organ well enough to make her wish to take up music professionally after leaving school: but her grandfather would not hear of it. Clifford’s love and appreciation of music were undoubtedly inherited from his mother: his father was quite unmusical.

2007 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 589-595
Author(s):  
Ian Anderson

Daniel Martin B.Sc., M.A., Ph.D., F.R.S.E. was born in Carluke on 16 April 1915, the only child of William and Rose Martin (née Macpherson). The family home in which he was born, Cygnetbank in Clyde Street, had been remodelled and extended by his father, and it was to be Dan's home all his life. His father, who was a carpenter and joiner, had a business based in School Lane, but died as a result of a tragic accident when Dan was only six. Thereafter Dan was brought up single handedly by his mother.After attending primary school in Carluke from 1920 to 1927, Dan entered the High School of Glasgow. It was during his third year there that he started studying calculus on his own. He became so enthused by the subject that he set his sights on a career teaching mathematics, at university if at all possible. On leaving school in 1932, he embarked on the M.A. honours course in Mathematics and Natural Philosophy at the University of Glasgow. At that time the Mathematics Department was under the leadership of Professor Thomas MacRobert; the honours course in Mathematics consisted mainly of geometry, calculus and analysis, and the combined honours M.A. with Natural Philosophy was the standard course for mathematicians. A highlight of his first session at university was attending a lecture on the origins of the general theory of relativity, given on 20th June 1933 by Albert Einstein. This was the first of a series of occasional lectures on the history of mathematics funded by the George A. Gibson Foundation which had been set up inmemory of the previous head of the Mathematics Department. From then on, relativity was to be one of Dan's great interests, lasting a lifetime; indeed, on holiday in Iona the year before he died, Dan's choice of holiday reading included three of Einstein's papers.


TODAY we celebrate the tercentenary of Edmond Halley. The reputed date of his birth is 29 October (Old Style), 8 November (New Style) 1656, but I think it likely that our celebration is a year too soon. An uncertainty of one year in 300 is of little importance, but the later date implies a still more remarkable precocity in the youthful Halley. Only a tiny minority of men are remembered three centuries after their birth. Halley’s claims to such remembrance are strong and numerous. He was a scientist of singular ability, enthusiasm and versatility. The range of his achievements during his long life, of over 85 years, far surpasses that of most men of science. They made him an outstanding figure in the scientific world of his time, and assure him a place in any comprehensive history of science.


Author(s):  
Admink Admink ◽  
Людмила Белінська

У культурному просторі Львова першої пол. ХХ ст. відомим був катехит о. Леонід Лужницький. Належність до духовного стану, шляхетне походження, високі студії, культурні зацікавлення, добірне товариство колег-однодумців утворило специфічну когорту української шляхетної греко-католицької еліти. Свої знання, культуру, досвід Лужницькі передали наступним поколінням. У різких соціальних змінах зуміли зберегти засади доброго виховання, толерантності, розуміння власних дітей, що допомогло зберегти родинний генофонд сповненим людської гідності, впевненості, високої культури. Яскравим прикладом цього є постать Григора Лужницького, який обрав світський шлях, досліджував історію Греко-католицької церкви, мав неабиякий літературний талант, присвятив життя театру та науковій діяльності. In the educational and cultural space of Lviv in the first half of the twentieth century. the catechite of pr. Leonid Luzhnitsky Spiritual affiliation, noble backgrounds, high-level studios, cultural interests, an associate group of like-minded colleagues formed a specific cohort of the Ukrainian noble Greek Catholic elite. Luzhnytsky passed on their knowledge, culture and experience to the next generations. In sharp social changes they managed to keep the principles of good education, tolerance, understanding of their own children, which helped to keep the family gene pool full of human dignity, confidence and high culture. A striking example of this is the figure of Gregor Luzhnytsky, who deeply chose the secular path, researched the history of the Greek Catholic Church, had remarkable literary talent, devoted his life to theater and scientific activity.


2003 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. 164-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia L. Shear

AbstractRe-examination of the well-known Atarbos base in the Akropolis Museum shows that the monument had two distinct phases which have generally been ignored in previous discussions: it originally consisted of a pillar supported by the extant right block decorated with the relief ofpurrhikhistai; subsequently, the pillar was removed, the base was doubled in size, and three bronze statues were erected. Close examination of the remains and the style of the reliefs indicates that the original period dates to 323/2 BC with the second phase following within a year. In light of this chronology, the prosopography of the family is reviewed and new restorations are suggested for the base's inscriptions. In its first phase, the monument belonged to a newly identified series of memorials consisting of rectangular bases with pillars supporting either a relief or a Panathenaic amphora. Such structures commemorated victories in various tribal events of the Panathenaia and were set up both by individuals and by tribes. The earliest known example appears in a vase painting ofc.430-420 and the type continued to be used until at least 323/2. The identification of this series also provides further evidence for history of thepurrhikhē, the cyclic chorus, theanthippasia, and the apobatic race at the Panathenaia, as well as the identities of specific victors in these contests.


Author(s):  
O.N. Soldatova ◽  

The study of the history of science and technology is impossible without the involvement of scientific and technical documentation reflecting the results of scientific and technical activities, both of individual representatives of science and technology who have contributed to the development of social, natural and technical sciences, and of specialized organizations. This group of documents has been little studied by researchers and is only still being introduced to the scientific world, while it contains information that is absent in other types of sources. Using the example of the documents of the Regional State Administration in Samara, the author of the article reveals the specifics of the composition and content of documents belonged to one of the types of scientific and technical documentation, namely, research work.


1997 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. 785-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven J. Dick

AbstractThe recent discoveries of planets around Sun-like stars, possible primitive Martian fossil life, and conditions on Europa conducive to microbial life, render more urgent the question of the place of bioastronomy in the history of science. This paper argues that the tenets of bioastronomy constitute a «biophysical cosmology», a scientific world view that holds that life is common throughout the universe. Many of the activities of the field of bioastronomy are tests of this cosmology. Like other cosmologies, the biophysical cosmology bears strongly on humanity’s place in the universe. Cosmological status may also be useful in discussing die implications of contact, when one considers the response to other cosmologies as partial, if imperfect, analogues.


1944 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. M. Stenton

There can be no question that the redistribution of land after the Norman Conquest amounted to a tenurial revolution of the most far-reaching kind. It affected the lower classes of society less than their superiors. The Normans possessed no clear-cut system of manorial economy which could be applied as a whole to a conquered country. The later history of England proves that no attempt was ever made to apply a uniform method of estate-management to the various forms assumed by English rural life. The social differences between Anglo-Danish and Anglo-Saxon England were as strongly marked in 1150 as in 1066. But it is equally clear that the Conquest had come to the higher orders of English society as a catastrophe from which they never fully recovered. It was completed within twenty years from the landing of Duke William, and Domesday Book, which is its record, gives conclusive evidence of its intensity and range. In 1086, although many Englishmen were still in possession of considerable estates, it was the rarest of exceptions for an Englishman to hold a position which entitled him to political influence or gave him military power. Two Englishmen only, Thurkill of Arden and Colswein of Lincoln, held tenancies of the first order under the king himself. The English lords of 1086 are clearly survivals from a society which had been shattered by foreign conquest and their place in the new order which had superseded it was obviously insecure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document