scholarly journals Topoisomerase IIα prevents ultrafine anaphase bridges by two mechanisms

Open Biology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 190259
Author(s):  
Simon Gemble ◽  
Géraldine Buhagiar-Labarchède ◽  
Rosine Onclercq-Delic ◽  
Gaëlle Fontaine ◽  
Sarah Lambert ◽  
...  

Topoisomerase IIα (Topo IIα), a well-conserved double-stranded DNA (dsDNA)-specific decatenase, processes dsDNA catenanes resulting from DNA replication during mitosis. Topo IIα defects lead to an accumulation of ultrafine anaphase bridges (UFBs), a type of chromosome non-disjunction. Topo IIα has been reported to resolve DNA anaphase threads, possibly accounting for the increase in UFB frequency upon Topo IIα inhibition. We hypothesized that the excess UFBs might also result, at least in part, from an impairment of the prevention of UFB formation by Topo IIα. We found that Topo IIα inhibition promotes UFB formation without affecting the global disappearance of UFBs during mitosis, but leads to an aberrant UFB resolution generating DNA damage within the next G1. Moreover, we demonstrated that Topo IIα inhibition promotes the formation of two types of UFBs depending on cell cycle phase. Topo IIα inhibition during S-phase compromises complete DNA replication, leading to the formation of UFB-containing unreplicated DNA, whereas Topo IIα inhibition during mitosis impedes DNA decatenation at metaphase–anaphase transition, leading to the formation of UFB-containing DNA catenanes. Thus, Topo IIα activity is essential to prevent UFB formation in a cell-cycle-dependent manner and to promote DNA damage-free resolution of UFBs.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Gemble ◽  
Géraldine Buhagiar-Labarchède ◽  
Rosine Onclercq-Delic ◽  
Sarah Lambert ◽  
Mounira Amor-Guéret

AbstractTopoisomerase IIα (Topo IIα), a well-conserved double-stranded DNA (dsDNA)-specific decatenase, processes dsDNA catenanes resulting from DNA replication during mitosis. Topo IIα defects lead to an accumulation of ultrafine anaphase bridges (UFBs), a type of chromosome non-disjunction. Topo IIα has been reported to resolve DNA anaphase threads, possibly accounting for the increase in UFB frequency upon Topo IIα inhibition. We hypothesized that the excess UFBs might also result, at least in part, from an impairment of the prevention of UFB formation by Topo IIα. We found that Topo IIα inhibition promotes UFB formation without affecting UFB resolution during anaphase. Moreover, we showed that Topo IIα inhibition promotes the formation of two types of UFBs depending on cell-cycle phase. Topo IIα inhibition during S-phase compromises complete DNA replication, leading to the formation of UFB-containing unreplicated DNA, whereas Topo IIα inhibition during mitosis impedes DNA decatenation at metaphase-anaphase transition, leading to the formation of UFB-containing DNA catenanes. Thus, Topo IIα activity is essential to prevent UFB formation in a cell-cycle dependent manner, but dispensable for UFB resolution during anaphase.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asmita Sharda ◽  
Tripti Verma ◽  
Nikhil Gadewal ◽  
Sanjay Gupta

Abstract Background - Histone Post Translational Modifications (PTMs) change in a cell cycle dependent manner and also orchestrate the DNA repair process for radiation induced DNA damage. Mitosis is the most radiosensitive phase of the cell cycle but the epigenetic events that regulate its radiosensitivity remain elusive.Results - This study explored the dynamics between histone marks H3S10/S28ph, H3K9ac and γH2AX during mitotic DNA damage response. The presence of a mononucleosome level association between γH2AX and H3S10ph was observed only during mitosis. This association was abrogated upon cell cycle progression and chromatin de-condensation, concomitant with chromatin recruitment of DNA repair proteins Ku70 and Rad51. Moreover, the levels of H3S10/28ph remained unchanged upon DNA damage during mitosis, but decreased in a cell cycle dependent manner upon mitotic exit. However, the population that arose after mitotic progression of damaged cells comprised of binucleated tetraploid cells. This population was epigenetically distinct from interphase cells, characterized by reduced H3S10/S28ph, increased H3K9ac and more open chromatin configuration. These epigenetic features correlated with decreased survival potential of this population. The low levels of H3S10/28ph were attributed to decreased protein translation and chromatin recruitment of histone kinase Mitogen and Stress-activated Kinase 1 (MSK1) along with persistent levels of Protein phosphatase1 catalytic subunit α (PP1α). Conclusions – This study suggests that a unique epigenetic landscape attained during and after mitotic DNA damage collectively contributed to mitotic radiosensitivity. The findings of this study have potential clinical significance in terms of tackling resistance against anti-mitotic chemotherapeutic agents.


Cell Cycle ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 1513-1523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Remko Prevo ◽  
Giacomo Pirovano ◽  
Rathi Puliyadi ◽  
Katharine J. Herbert ◽  
Gonzalo Rodriguez-Berriguete ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Schneikert ◽  
Annette Grohmann ◽  
Jürgen Behrens

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuting Liu ◽  
Kehui Wang ◽  
Li Huang ◽  
Jicheng Zhao ◽  
Xinpeng Chen ◽  
...  

Centromere identity is defined by nucleosomes containing CENP-A, a histone H3 variant. The deposition of CENP-A at centromeres is tightly regulated in a cell-cycle-dependent manner. We previously reported that the spatiotemporal control of centromeric CENP-A incorporation is mediated by the phosphorylation of CENP-A Ser68. However, a recent report argued that Ser68 phosphoregulation is dispensable for accurate CENP-A loading. Here, we report that the substitution of Ser68 of endogenous CENP-A with either Gln68 or Glu68 severely impairs CENP-A deposition and cell viability. We also find that mice harboring the corresponding mutations are lethal. Together, these results indicate that the dynamic phosphorylation of Ser68 ensures cell-cycle-dependent CENP-A deposition and cell viability.


2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (16) ◽  
pp. 8439-8451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto González-Medina ◽  
Elena Hidalgo ◽  
José Ayté

Abstract In fission yeast, MBF-dependent transcription is inactivated at the end of S phase through a negative feedback loop that involves the co-repressors, Yox1 and Nrm1. Although this repression system is well known, the molecular mechanisms involved in MBF activation remain largely unknown. Compacted chromatin constitutes a barrier to activators accessing promoters. Here, we show that chromatin regulation plays a key role in activating MBF-dependent transcription. Gcn5, a part of the SAGA complex, binds to MBF-regulated promoters through the MBF co-activator Rep2 in a cell cycle-dependent manner and in a reverse correlation to the binding of the MBF co-repressors, Nrm1 or Yox1. We propose that the co-repressors function as physical barriers to SAGA recruitment onto MBF promoters. We also show that Gcn5 acetylates specific lysine residues on histone H3 in a cell cycle-regulated manner. Furthermore, either in a gcn5 mutant or in a strain in which histone H3 is kept in an unacetylated form, MBF-dependent transcription is downregulated. In summary, Gcn5 is required for the full activation and correct timing of MBF-regulated gene transcription.


2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e1004971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Génin ◽  
Frédérique Cuvelier ◽  
Sandrine Lambin ◽  
Josina Côrte-Real Filipe ◽  
Elodie Autrusseau ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 708-720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Heon Kim ◽  
Ki Young Paek ◽  
Kobong Choi ◽  
Tae-Don Kim ◽  
Bumsuk Hahm ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The c-myc proto-oncogene plays a key role in the proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and regulation of the cell cycle. Recently, it was demonstrated that the 5′ nontranslated region (5′ NTR) of human c-myc mRNA contains an internal ribosomal entry site (IRES). In this study, we investigated cellular proteins interacting with the IRES element of c-myc mRNA. Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein C (hnRNP C) was identified as a cellular protein that interacts specifically with a heptameric U sequence in the c-myc IRES located between two alternative translation initiation codons CUG and AUG. Moreover, the addition of hnRNP C1 in an in vitro translation system enhanced translation of c-myc mRNA. Interestingly, hnRNP C was partially relocalized from the nucleus, where most of the hnRNP C resides at interphase, to the cytoplasm at the G2/M phase of the cell cycle. Coincidently, translation mediated through the c-myc IRES was increased at the G2/M phase when cap-dependent translation was partially inhibited. On the other hand, a mutant c-myc mRNA lacking the hnRNP C-binding site, showed a decreased level of translation at the G2/M phase compared to that of the wild-type message. Taken together, these findings suggest that hnRNP C, via IRES binding, modulates translation of c-myc mRNA in a cell cycle phase-dependent manner.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document