Introductory remarks concerning duality

At the time when this Discussion Meeting was proposed, it was clear that for many systems, such as the pion-nucleon system or the pion-pion system, there exist many resonance states, perhaps even increasing exponentially in number as the mass range explored moves to higher values (Barash-Schmidt et al. 1969). It was also clear that many high-energy reaction processes which are peripheral in character are mediated by simple processes of reggeon exchange. An outstanding example was the process of pion-nucleon charge-exchange, π - + p → π 0 + n, which Hohler, Baacke, Schlaile & Sonderegger (1966) found to be well described over the momentum range p lab = 4 to 18 GeV/ c as due to exchange of a reggeon of the ρ trajectory, and from which they determined the parameters of the ρ trajectory over the range 0 to 1 (GeV/ c ) 2 for the momentum transfer variable - t . It had generally been conventional to analyse the differential cross-section and polarization data on meson-baryon scattering in terms of independent partial wave amplitudes. This was certainly appropriate for those partial waves for which there occurred resonance states in the energy range considered, and for which the partial wave amplitudes were therefore rapidly varying; scattering in the other partial waves (as well as the non-resonant scattering in the resonating partial waves) was then termed ‘background scattering’.

The concept of duality, discussed in the previous paper by Dr C. Schmid, refers to the notion that the analysis of an S matrix amplitude in terms of s channel resonances and its analysis in terms of t channel (and u channel) reggeon exchanges are not independent, but represent alternative descriptions, the former being the more appropriate in the low energy domain and the latter being the more appropriate in the low t (or low u ) domain for high energy interactions. Hence, at the time when this Discussion meeting was planned, it appeared necessary to attempt to clarify the notion of resonance , since there was then a good deal of discussion about how partial wave analyses of scattering data should be interpreted in terms of resonance states (Bransden, O’Donnell & Moorhouse 1965; Lovelace 1968; Donnachie 1968), and even whether such an interpretation was necessarily the case at all (Schmid 1968 a,b ; Collins, Johnson & Squires 1968; Alessandrini & Squires 1968; Alessandrini, Freund, Oehme & Squires 1968; Collins, Johnson & Ross 1968; Kreps & Logan 1969). However, in the actual use of duality in this meeting and in the model amplitudes which have been discussed thus far for the illustration of duality, there is really no controversy about the nature of resonance, since these models are still confined to the cases of resonances with zero width, characterized by poles on the real s axis, and there is essentially no ambiguity about the relation between resonances and poles in this limiting case. All the same, it still seems worthwhile to take a few moments to draw attention to a number of points about the description of resonance, which deserve to be more widely known.


2021 ◽  
Vol 126 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Pérez-Callejo ◽  
E. V. Marley ◽  
D. A. Liedahl ◽  
L. C. Jarrott ◽  
G. E. Kemp ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (08n09) ◽  
pp. 1810-1813
Author(s):  
PEKKO PIIROLA ◽  
M. E. SAINIO

The πN scattering measurements from last couple of decades are not in very good agreement with each other. In fact, using the different data sets one finds different values for the pion-nucleon coupling constant. An analysis with theoretical constraints is the only way to produce accurate partial waves. In this analysis, the fixed-t dispersion relations are used to ensure analyticity in the invariant amplitudes and to decrease the effects of inaccuracies in the data base. Pietarinen's expansion is the method used to enforce the dispersion constraints. The strength of the analyticity constraints is illustrated with C± amplitudes in the forward direction.


1968 ◽  
Vol 175 (5) ◽  
pp. 1757-1761 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. G. Antoniou ◽  
S. R. Komy ◽  
C. D. Palev ◽  
M. Samiullah

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 507-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. S. Chang ◽  
B. B. Ni ◽  
J. Bortnik ◽  
C. Zhou ◽  
Z. Y. Zhao ◽  
...  

Abstract. Modulated high-frequency (HF) heating of the ionosphere provides a feasible means of artificially generating extremely low-frequency (ELF)/very low-frequency (VLF) whistler waves, which can leak into the inner magnetosphere and contribute to resonant interactions with high-energy electrons in the plasmasphere. By ray tracing the magnetospheric propagation of ELF/VLF emissions artificially generated at low-invariant latitudes, we evaluate the relativistic electron resonant energies along the ray paths and show that propagating artificial ELF/VLF waves can resonate with electrons from ~ 100 keV to ~ 10 MeV. We further implement test particle simulations to investigate the effects of resonant scattering of energetic electrons due to triggered monotonic/single-frequency ELF/VLF waves. The results indicate that within the period of a resonance timescale, changes in electron pitch angle and kinetic energy are stochastic, and the overall effect is cumulative, that is, the changes averaged over all test electrons increase monotonically with time. The localized rates of wave-induced pitch-angle scattering and momentum diffusion in the plasmasphere are analyzed in detail for artificially generated ELF/VLF whistlers with an observable in situ amplitude of ~ 10 pT. While the local momentum diffusion of relativistic electrons is small, with a rate of < 10−7 s−1, the local pitch-angle scattering can be intense near the loss cone with a rate of ~ 10−4 s−1. Our investigation further supports the feasibility of artificial triggering of ELF/VLF whistler waves for removal of high-energy electrons at lower L shells within the plasmasphere. Moreover, our test particle simulation results show quantitatively good agreement with quasi-linear diffusion coefficients, confirming the applicability of both methods to evaluate the resonant diffusion effect of artificial generated ELF/VLF whistlers.


1979 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 2839-2853 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. Cutkosky ◽  
C. P. Forsyth ◽  
R. E. Hendrick ◽  
R. L. Kelly
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document