The middle atmosphere after the Middle Atmosphere Programme (MAP)

The Middle Atmosphere Programme (MAP) took place in the period 1 January 1982-31 December 1985. It was a period designated by the International Council of Scientific Unions (ICSU) for an international cooperative programme of study of the atmospheric region from about 10 to 100 km above the Earth’s surface. It was administered by a steering committee under the Scientific Committee on Solar Terrestrial Physics (SCOSTEP), made up of representatives of ten international scientific unions and committees. The main work of MAP was done by 17 projects, each proposed, developed and coordinated by an individual scientist. In this paper, the main achievements of these projects are outlined, and the status of our understanding of the middle atmosphere in 1986 is compared with that in 1976, when the original planning conference of MAP was held.

1980 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Vallentyne ◽  
J. R. Strickler ◽  
Nicholas Polunin

‘The time is ripe to step up and expand current efforts to understand the great interlocking systems of air, water, and minerals, that nourish the Earth’, wrote Gilbert F. White (President of the International Council of Scientific Unions' Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment) and Mostafa K. Tolba (Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Programme) in Environmental Conservation (Vol. 6, No. 2, p. 88,1979).


2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 680-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison Hutton ◽  
Tener Goodwin Veenema ◽  
Kristine Gebbie

AbstractThe International Council of Nurses (ICN; Geneva, Switzerland) and the World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine (WADEM; Madison, Wisconsin USA) joined together in 2014 to review the use of the ICN Framework of Disaster Nursing Competencies. The existing ICN Framework (version 1.10; dated 2009) formed the starting point for this review. The key target audiences for this process were members of the disaster nursing community concerned with pre-service education for professional nursing and the continuing education of practicing professional nurses. To minimize risk in the disaster nursing practice, competencies have been identified as the foundation of evidence-based practice and standard development. A Steering Committee was established by the WADEM Nursing Section to discuss how to initiate a review of the ICN Framework of Disaster Nursing Competencies. The Steering Committee then worked via email to develop a survey to send out to disaster/emergency groups that may have nurse members who work/respond in disasters. Thirty-five invitations were sent out with 20 responses (57%) received. Ninety-five percent of respondents knew of the ICN Framework of Disaster Nursing Competencies, with the majority accessing these competencies via the Internet. The majority of those who responded said that they make use of the ICN Framework of Disaster Nursing Competencies with the most common use being for educational purposes. Education was done at a local, national, and international level. The competencies were held in high esteem and valued by these organizations as the cornerstone of their disaster education, and also were used for the continued professional development of disaster nursing. However, respondents stated that five years on from their development, the competencies also should include the psychosocial elements of nurses caring for themselves and their colleagues. Additionally, further studies should explore if there are other areas related to the disaster nursing practice (in addition to psychosocial concerns) that may be missing or not fully developed. Finally, the authors of this report recommend that future research explore how the ICN Framework of Disaster Nursing Competencies do or do not assist in maintaining best practices in this field and improve outcomes for victims of disaster.HuttonA, VeenemaTG, GebbieK. Review of the International Council of Nurses (ICN) Framework of Disaster Nursing Competencies. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(6):680–683.


2006 ◽  
Vol 48 (03) ◽  
pp. 125-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Alemán

Abstract Legislators who control the congressional agenda have a significant advantage over the membership at large. Policy gatekeepers can restrict change to outcomes they prefer over the status quo and can use this prerogative to keep a legislative party or coalition unified. This article examines agenda-setting rules in 26 Latin American chambers, shows why the institutional structure is theoretically relevant, and reveals some implications for policymaking with evidence from Argentina, Chile, and Mexico. Majority leaders in the Argentine and Chilean lower chambers have successfully blocked passage of legislation opposed by most of their fellow partisans despite the lack of codified gatekeeping rights. Since 1997, none of the major Mexican parties has benefited from the gatekeeping rights established in the rules. Instead, the benefits have come from the parties' advantageous position with respect to the other parties on the steering committee setting the plenary agenda.


2021 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 140
Author(s):  
Vera Sequeira ◽  
Elsa Couto ◽  
Ana Neves ◽  
Ana Rita Vieira ◽  
Adelino Canario ◽  
...  

The boarfish Capros aper is one of the most commonly discarded non-commercial species in the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) Subdivision VIII in the Atlantic. An increasing interest in this fishery and an incomplete knowledge on the status of the stock justified the present investigation focused on the determination of fecundity type and its estimation, supported by sex steroid profiles for 17β-oestradiol (E2), 11-ketotestosterone and 17,20β-dihydroxypregn-4-en-3-one (17,20β-P). C. aper was found to have indeterminate fecundity with a mean relative batch fecundity during the spawning peak of 50 oocytes g−1 eviscerated weight (WE) and a mean relative annual fecundity of 4020 oocytes g−1 WE. E2 variations throughout the year indicated the existence of at least two important spawning events, one in winter (January–February) and the other in summer (June–August), with concentrations in females increasing from those with growing oocytes in the developing phase to those in the spawning capable phase. Higher E2 concentrations were also found from 2000 to 2400 hours and from 0800 to 1200 hours suggesting more intense vitellogenesis activity during the night and in the morning, in contrast to 17,20β-P concentrations, which were higher between 1200 and 2000 hours, suggesting a more intense spawning activity during this period.


1955 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 455-455

The International Whaling Commission held its sixth meeting in Tokyo, Japan, from July 19 to 23, 1954. Represented were all of the seventeen member governments except Iceland. Observers were present from Argentina, Chile, Italy, Portugal, the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, and the Food and Agriculture Organization. Mr. A. T. A. Dobson (United Kingdom) acted as secretary of the meeting. The Commission approved its expenditure of £1,854 for financial year 1953/1954, and adopted a budget of £2,580 for 1954/1955. Attention was called to the great waste of resources represented by lost whales; the Commission accepted various suggestions from its technical committee for tightening up the present procedure with a view to reducing the number of infractions in the future. It was decided that the use of helicopters and other aircraft for the killing of whales should be brought within the scope of the Convention. A large number of recommendations emanating from the scientific committee were dealt with. The scientific committee's recommendation prompted a large number of proposals for the amendment of the regulations in force. At the invitation of the Soviet Union, the next meeting of the Commission was to be held in Moscow on July 18, 1955.


2021 ◽  
Vol 896 (1) ◽  
pp. 011001

The International Conference on Environment, Sustainability Issues, and Community Development (INCRID) 2021 is the third annual international conference hosted by the Department of Environmental Engineering, Diponegoro University. With the theme of “Research and Innovation in Environment Towards Sustainability in Disruptive and Post-global Pandemic Situation”, this forum will promote all factors that related to environmental technology, science, education and innovation to achieve the desired sustainable development goals during this disruptive and pandemic situation. The INCRID 2021 was successfully held on 9th September 2021 in an online system where the 3rd floor of GKU, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro was used as conference host venue. The INCRID 2021 committees are concerned and take precautions regarding the transmission of COVID-19 (coronavirus). To maintain the health, safety, and security of the participants, the committee hold this conference through oral presentations remotely in live-streaming meetings using Zoom Application and youtube as the virtual platform (Please see this link for seeing how the virtual conference is going: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVBfCbLzVsA). This meeting is important because the dissemination of research findings especially in the environmental science topics should be done annually, even in an virtual setting. The conference was attended by 255 participants came from 49 academic universities and institutions across the world which include as follows. 1) Universitas Diponegoro – Indonesia 2) Universitas Sebelas Maret – Indonesia 3) Universitas Negeri Semarang – Indonesia 4) Universitas Gadjah Mada – Indonesia 5) UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya – Indonesia 6) Universitas Kebangsaan – Indonesia 7) Universitas Syiah Kuala – Indonesia 8) Universitas Andalas – Indonesia 9) Institute Teknologi Bandung – Indonesia 10) Universitas Sumatera Utara – Indonesia 11) Universitas Surabaya – Indonesia 12) Universitas Islam Agung (UNISSULA) – Indonesia 13) Universitas Negeri Padang – Indonesia 14) Universitas Indonesia – Indonesia 15) Institut Teknologi Kalimantan – Indonesia 16) Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya – Indonesia 17) Centre of Industrial Pollution Prevention Technology (BBTPPI) – Indonesia 18) Center for Pulp and Paper, Ministry of Industry of the Republic of Indonesia – Indonesia 19) National Research and Innovation Agency Republic of Indonesia – Indonesia 20) Universitas Trisakti – Indonesia 21) Universitas IPB – Indonesia 22) Universitas Pendidikan Sultan Idris – Indonesia 23) Universitas Pasundan – Indonesia 24) Universitas Jenderal Soedirman – Indonesia 25) Institute Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember – Indonesia 26) Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar – Indonesia 27) Politeknik Indonesia Venezuela – Indonesia 28) Universitas Abulyatama – Indonesia 29) Insan Cendekia Mandiri Univeristy – Indonesia 30) Balai Besar Teknologi Pencegahan Pencemaran Industri – Indonesia 31) Visvesvaraya Technological University – India 32) University of Hyderabad – India 33) Makere University – Uganda 34) Ndejje University – Uganda 35) Frères Mentouri Constantine 1 University – Algeria 36) Skikda University – Algeria 37) Khenchela University – Algeria 38) HSE Department, Cooperation Petroleum – Egypt 39) University of Antananarivo – Madagaskar 40) Hassan II Institute of Agronomic and Veterinary Medicine – Morocco 41) Department of Public Health Services, Ministry of Health – Gambia 42) Toyohashi University of Technology – Japan 43) Keio University – Japan 44) Kansai University – Japan 45) The University of Kitakyushu - Japan 46) National Central University – Taiwan 47) National Taiwan University – Taiwan 48) Queensland University of Technology – Australia 49) Sultan Idris Education University – Malaysia The invited speakers for plenary sessions are as follows: Prof. Majeti Naramsiha Vara Prasad (University of Hyderabad, India), Prof. Takanobu Inoue (Toyohashi University of Technology, Japan), Prof. Ashanta Goonetileke (Queensland University of Technology, Australia), Prof. Hsin-Hsin Tung (National Taiwan University, Taiwan), Prof. Dr. Ir. Purwanto, DEA (Diponegoro University, Indonesia), and A. Suko Widigdo, S.T., M. Eng. (Director of Operations I PT Adhi Karya (Persero) Tbk). Each of them are given 25 minutes to talk and 10 minutes to discussion. During the presentation, the committee share the link for collecting the questions from the audiences which can be seen from this link: https://app.sli.do/event/lzwhmoea/live/questions. In the parallel sessions, there are 10 breakout rooms where 10-13 presenters were delivering their speech. The presenters were given 10 minutes of research presentation and 5 minutes of question and answer session. The participants could join the rooms by confirming to the committee which rooms they like. During the online meeting, the forum were still interactive where each of the presenter and audience have a nice discussion and exchange their knowledge. The parallel session also attract many potential research collaboration especially in the environmental science, engineering, education, and health research field. Most of the papers are sent to IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science for publication. The proceeding includes some topics of environmental science and system. The manuscripts are peer-reviewed by some researchers who are coming from many countries and expert in the environmental research field. The committe wants to acknowledge the participants including the keynote speakers, presenters, reviewers, moderators, and also viewers who coming to this conference. The committee also acknowledge to the IOPP as the main publisher of our conference proceedings. We hope that the readers can gain many new and interesting scientific knowledge from the manuscripts which are published. The committee also wants to apologize for all of the mistakes that make unpleasant situation during the conference and also the published papers. Scientific Committee of INCRID 2021 List of INCRID 2021 Committees Steering Committee, Steering Committee, Scientific Committee, Organizing Committee are available in the pdf.


Sir Harrie Massey opened the discussion meeting by stating that although the British National Committee was no longer responsible for the planning of the British space research programme it still had important functions. One was the link it provided with the Scientific Committee on Space Research (COSPAR) of the International Council of Scientific Unions (ICSU), and another was in the arranging of discussion meetings on various subjects related to space science. He stated that the discussion meeting on space science and technology was the first of such meetings arranged by the British National Committee on Space Research to be held at the Royal Society’s new headquarters, and that this meeting would deal with a wider range of subjects related to space research than had the two previous meetings, i.e. on orbital analysis and infrared astronomy. Sir Harrie said that it was unsatisfactory that space research had necessarily developed in various directions without much coherence, and it was most suitable that the National Committee should organize a discussion meeting between those concerned with both the technological and scientific aspects of space research, so that both sides could be brought together to outline their skills on the one hand and their scientific requirements on the other.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document