scholarly journals Regulation of the mitosis/meiosis decision in the Caenorhabditis elegans germline

2003 ◽  
Vol 358 (1436) ◽  
pp. 1359-1362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah L. Crittenden ◽  
Christian R. Eckmann ◽  
Liaoteng Wang ◽  
David S. Bernstein ◽  
Marvin Wickens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Germline Stem Cells ◽  
Puf Proteins ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Transcriptional Regulatory ◽  
Mitotic Proliferation ◽  
Multicellular Organisms

During the development of multicellular organisms, the processes of growth and differentiation are kept in balance to generate and maintain tissues and organs of the correct size, shape and cellular composition. We have investigated the molecular controls of growth and differentiation in the Caenorhabditis elegans germline. A single somatic cell, called the distal tip cell, promotes mitotic proliferation in the adjacent germline by GLP–1/Notch signalling. Within the germline, the decisions between mitosis and meiosis and between spermatogenesis and oogenesis are controlled by a group of conserved RNA regulators. FBF, a member of the PUF (for Pumilio and FBF) family of RNA–binding proteins, promotes mitosis by repressing gld–1 mRNA activity; the GLD–1, GLD–2, GLD–3 and NOS–3 proteins promote entry into meiosis by regulating mRNAs that remain unknown. The regulatory balance between opposing FBF and GLD activities is crucial for controlling the extent of germline proliferation. PUF proteins regulate germline stem cells in both Drosophila and C. elegans and are localized to germline stem cells of the mammalian testis. Therefore, this post–transcriptional regulatory switch may be an ancient mechanism for controlling maintenance of stem cells versus differentiation.

scholarly journals A PUF hub drives self-renewal in C. elegans germline stem cells

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly A. Haupt ◽  
Kimberley T. Law ◽  
Amy L. Enright ◽  
Charlotte R. Kanzler ◽  
Heaji Shin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Notch Signaling ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Germline Stem Cells ◽  
Null Mutant ◽  
Self Renewal ◽  
Puf Proteins ◽  
C Elegans

ABSTRACTStem cell regulation relies on extrinsic signaling from a niche plus intrinsic factors that respond and drive self-renewal within stem cells. A priori, loss of niche signaling and loss of the intrinsic self-renewal factors might be expected to have equivalent stem cell defects. Yet this simple prediction has not been borne out for most stem cells, including C. elegans germline stem cells (GSCs). The central regulators of C. elegans GSCs include extrinsically-acting GLP-1/Notch signaling from the niche, intrinsically-acting RNA binding proteins in the PUF family, termed FBF-1 and FBF-2 (collectively FBF), and intrinsically-acting PUF partner proteins that are direct Notch targets. Abrogation of either GLP-1/Notch signaling or its targets yields an earlier and more severe GSC defect than loss of FBF-1 and FBF-2, suggesting that additional intrinsic regulators must exist. Here, we report that those missing regulators are two additional PUF proteins, PUF-3 and PUF-11. Remarkably, an fbf-1 fbf-2; puf-3 puf-11 quadruple null mutant has a GSC defect virtually identical to that of a glp-1/Notch null mutant. PUF-3 and PUF-11 both affect GSC maintenance; both are expressed in GSCs; and epistasis experiments place them at the same position as FBF within the network. Therefore, action of PUF-3 and PUF-11 explains the milder GSC defect in fbf-1 fbf-2 mutants. We conclude that a “PUF hub”, comprising four PUF proteins and two PUF partners, constitutes the intrinsic self-renewal node of the C. elegans GSC RNA regulatory network. Discovery of this hub underscores the significance of PUF RNA-binding proteins as key regulators of stem cell maintenance.

A sensitized genetic screen to identify regulators of C. elegans germline stem cells

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Robinson-Thiewes ◽  
Aaron M. Kershner ◽  
Heaji Shin ◽  
Kimberly A. Haupt ◽  
Peggy Kroll-Connor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Gene Products ◽  
Germline Stem Cells ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Genetic Screens ◽  
Self Renewal ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Forward Genetic Screens

AbstractGermline stem cells (GSCs) in Caenorhabditis elegans are maintained by GLP-1/Notch signaling from the niche and by a downstream RNA regulatory network. Loss of the GLP-1 receptor causes GSCs to precociously undergo meiotic differentiation, the “Glp” phenotype, due to a failure to self-renew. lst-1 and sygl-1 are functionally redundant direct targets of GLP-1 signaling whose gene products work with PUF RNA binding proteins to promote GSC self-renewal. Whereas single loss-of-function mutants are fertile, lst-1 sygl-1 double mutants are sterile and Glp. We set out to identify genes that function redundantly with either lst-1 or sygl-1 to maintain GSCs. To this end, we conducted forward genetic screens for Glp mutants in genetic backgrounds lacking functional copies of either lst-1 or sygl-1. The screens generated nine glp-1 alleles, two lst-1 alleles, and one allele of pole-1, which encodes the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase ε. Three glp-1 alleles reside in Ankyrin (ANK) repeats not previously mutated. pole-1 single mutants have a low penetrance Glp that is enhanced by loss of either lst-1 or sygl-1. Thus, the screen uncovered one locus that interacts genetically with both lst-1 and sygl-1 and generated useful mutations for further studies of GSC regulation.

scholarly journals KH domain containing RNA-binding proteins coordinate with microRNAs to regulate Caenorhabditis elegans development

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dustin Haskell ◽  
Anna Zinovyeva
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Regulate Gene Expression ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Kh Domain ◽  
Regulate Gene

Abstract MicroRNAs (miRNAs) and RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level, but the extent to which these key regulators of gene expression coordinate their activities and the precise mechanisms of this coordination are not well understood. RBPs often have recognizable RNA binding domains that correlate with specific protein function. Recently, several RBPs containing K homology (KH) RNA binding domains were shown to work with miRNAs to regulate gene expression, raising the possibility that KH domains may be important for coordinating with miRNA pathways in gene expression regulation. To ascertain whether additional KH domain proteins functionally interact with miRNAs during Caenorhabditis elegans development, we knocked down twenty-four genes encoding KH-domain proteins in several miRNA sensitized genetic backgrounds. Here, we report that a majority of the KH domain-containing genes genetically interact with multiple miRNAs and Argonaute alg-1. Interestingly, two KH domain genes, predicted splicing factors sfa-1 and asd-2, genetically interacted with all of the miRNA mutants tested, whereas other KH domain genes showed genetic interactions only with specific miRNAs. Our domain architecture and phylogenetic relationship analyses of the C. elegans KH domain-containing proteins revealed potential groups that may share both structure and function. Collectively, we show that many C. elegans KH domain RBPs functionally interact with miRNAs, suggesting direct or indirect coordination between these two classes of post-transcriptional gene expression regulators.

scholarly journals mRNA localization is linked to translation regulation in the Caenorhabditis elegans germ lineage

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dylan M. Parker ◽  
Lindsay P. Winkenbach ◽  
Samuel P. Boyson ◽  
Matthew N. Saxton ◽  
Camryn Daidone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Regulatory Control ◽  
Translational Repression ◽  
Translation Regulation ◽  
Germline Development ◽  
P Granules ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Early Embryos

AbstractCaenorhabditis elegans early embryos generate cell-specific transcriptomes despite lacking active transcription. This presents an opportunity to study mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulatory control. In seeking the mechanisms behind this patterning, we discovered that some cell-specific mRNAs accumulate non-homogenously within cells, localizing to membranes, P granules (associated with progenitor germ cells in the P lineage), and P-bodies (associated with RNA processing). Transcripts differed in their dependence on 3’UTRs and RNA Binding Proteins, suggesting diverse regulatory mechanisms. Notably, we found strong but imperfect correlations between low translational status and P granule localization within the progenitor germ lineage. By uncoupling these, we untangled a long-standing question: Are mRNAs directed to P granules for translational repression or do they accumulate there as a downstream step? We found translational repression preceded P granule localization and could occur independent of it. Further, disruption of translation was sufficient to send homogenously distributed mRNAs to P granules. Overall, we show transcripts important for germline development are directed to P granules by translational repression, and this, in turn, directs their accumulation in the progenitor germ lineage where their repression can ultimately be relieved.SummaryMaternally loaded mRNAs localize non-homogeneously within C. elegans early embryos correlating with their translational status and lineage-specific fates.

nos-1 and nos-2, two genes related to Drosophila nanos, regulate primordial germ cell development and survival in Caenorhabditis elegans

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (21) ◽  
pp. 4861-4871 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Subramaniam ◽  
G. Seydoux
Keyword(s):  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Germ Cell ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Primordial Germ Cell ◽  
Gene Families ◽  
Cell Development ◽  
Embryonic Patterning ◽  
Germ Cell Development ◽  
C Elegans

In Drosophila, the posterior determinant nanos is required for embryonic patterning and for primordial germ cell (PGC) development. We have identified three genes in Caenorhabditis elegans that contain a putative zinc-binding domain similar to the one found in nanos, and show that two of these genes function during PGC development. Like Drosophila nanos, C. elegans nos-1 and nos-2 are not generally required for PGC fate specification, but instead regulate specific aspects of PGC development. nos-2 is expressed in PGCs around the time of gastrulation from a maternal RNA associated with P granules, and is required for the efficient incorporation of PGCs into the somatic gonad. nos-1 is expressed in PGCs after gastrulation, and is required redundantly with nos-2 to prevent PGCs from dividing in starved animals and to maintain germ cell viability during larval development. In the absence of nos-1 and nos-2, germ cells cease proliferation at the end of the second larval stage, and die in a manner that is partially dependent on the apoptosis gene ced-4. Our results also indicate that putative RNA-binding proteins related to Drosophila Pumilio are required for the same PGC processes as nos-1 and nos-2. These studies demonstrate that evolutionarily distant organisms utilize conserved factors to regulate early germ cell development and survival, and that these factors include members of the nanos and pumilio gene families.

A conserved RNA-binding protein controls germline stem cells in Caenorhabditis elegans

Nature ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 417 (6889) ◽  
pp. 660-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah L. Crittenden ◽  
David S. Bernstein ◽  
Jennifer L. Bachorik ◽  
Beth E. Thompson ◽  
Maria Gallegos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Rna Binding Protein ◽  
Germline Stem Cells

scholarly journals Ubiquitin ligases and a processive proteasome facilitate protein clearance during the oocyte-to-embryo transition in Caenorhabditis elegans

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline A. Spike ◽  
Tatsuya Tsukamoto ◽  
David Greenstein
Keyword(s):  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Regulatory Proteins ◽  
Critical Determinant ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Protein Clearance ◽  
M Phase ◽  
F Box Protein

The ubiquitin-mediated degradation of oocyte translational regulatory proteins is a conserved feature of the oocyte-to-embryo transition (OET). In the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, multiple translational regulatory proteins, including the TRIM-NHL RNA-binding protein LIN-41/Trim71 and the Pumilio-family RNA-binding proteins PUF-3 and PUF-11, are degraded during the OET. Degradation of each protein requires activation of the M-phase cyclin-dependent kinase CDK-1, is largely complete by the end of the first meiotic division and does not require the anaphase promoting complex (APC). However, only LIN-41 degradation requires the F-box protein SEL-10/FBW7/Cdc4p, the substrate recognition subunit of an SCF-type E3 ubiquitin ligase. This finding suggests that PUF-3 and PUF-11, which localize to LIN-41-containing ribonucleoprotein particles (RNPs), are independently degraded through the action of other factors and that the oocyte RNPs are disassembled in a concerted fashion during the OET. We develop and test the hypothesis that PUF-3 and PUF-11 are targeted for degradation by the proteasome-associated HECT-type ubiquitin ligase ETC-1/UBE3C/Hul5, which is broadly expressed in C. elegans. We find that several GFP-tagged fusion proteins that are degraded during the OET, including fusions with PUF-3, PUF-11, LIN-41, IFY-1/Securin and CYB-1/Cyclin B, are incompletely degraded when ETC-1 function is compromised. However, it is the fused GFP moiety that appears to be the critical determinant of this proteolysis defect. These findings are consistent with a conserved role for ETC-1 in promoting proteasome processivity and suggest that proteasomal processivity is an important element of the OET during which many key oocyte regulatory proteins are rapidly targeted for degradation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document