scholarly journals Quality of Life in Patients with Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ho Jin Jung ◽  
Ye-Soo Park ◽  
Hyoung-Yeon Seo ◽  
Jae-Chul Lee ◽  
Ki-Chan An ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Vertebral Compression Fractures ◽  
Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures ◽  
Compression Fractures

A Comparison of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Versus Conservative Treatment in Terms of Treatment Effect for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Zhang ◽  
Pei Zhai
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Vertebral Fracture ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Percutaneous Vertebroplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vertebral Compression Fractures ◽  
Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures ◽  
Compression Fractures

Background. Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are common in older patients, which can cause back pain and even increase morbidity. However, the optimal therapy for patients with OVCFs remains unknown. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP), a minimally invasive procedure, has been a therapy option that is known to be effective in the pain management. Aim. The meta-analysis aims to summarize current best evidence on the efficacy of PVP and conservative treatment (CT) for pain management and functional results among OVCFs patients. Methods. We searched the publications on comparison of the efficacy of PVP versus CT for OVCFs patients up to November 2018. After rigorous reviewing on the quality, the data were extracted from eligible trials. All trials analyzed the summary hazard ratios of the endpoints of interest. Results. Moderate-strong evidence indicated that PVP had benefits on pain relief at 1 week and 1 month, but not at 3 months. With regard to the quality of life, no significant differences were found in the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). However, there is significant difference in terms of EuroQol and Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis but not the RMDQ. Moreover, there were no any benefit in terms of vertebral fracture between groups. Conclusions. The meta-analysis showed that patients treated with vertebroplasty were associated with better pain relief and improved quality of life, without increasing the incidence of vertebral fracture compared with the CT group.

scholarly journals A Comparison of Kyphoplasty, Vertebroplasty, or Non-Surgical Treatment of Traumatic/Atraumatic Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Short Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy E. Epstein
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Body Height ◽  
Vertebral Compression Fractures ◽  
Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures ◽  
Vertebral Body Height ◽  
Compression Fractures ◽  
Non Surgical Treatment

Background:Although the majority of patients with traumatic/atraumatic osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) may be managed with non-surgical treatment (NST), a subset (e.g. 40%) with significant pain, loss of vertebral height, and other factors may warrant percutaneous vertebroplasty (V), or percutaneous kyphoplasty (K).Methods:We compared the impact of these three treatment modalities, V, K, or NST, for managing OVCFs.Results:In several studies, both V and K resulted in comparable improvement in pain relief, postoperative kyphotic angles, increased anterior vertebral heights, and frequency of leakage of bone cement. One study evaluating 16 RCT’s (Randomized Controlled Studies), however, observed K significantly; “decreased the kyphotic wedge angle, increased the postoperative vertebral body height, and decreased the risk of cement leakage vs. V”. Further, in some series, both V and K resulted in higher quality of life scores and better pain relief vs. NST, while other studies showed V was superior to K. Further, although the risk of adjacent level fractures (ALF) following V, K, and NST were comparable in most studies, one clearly demonstrated NST had the lowest incidence of ALF. Despite all these findings, most studies concluded outcomes were comparable for all 3 groups.Conclusions:Although most OVCFs are still managed with non-surgical treatment (NST), a subset (e.g. about 40%) may warrant V or K. Although both V and K have been shown to result in significantly better pain relief, higher quality of life scores, increased postoperative vertebral body height compared with NST, outcomes for all 3 groups remained the same.

scholarly journals Pain, Quality of Life, and Safety Outcomes of Kyphoplasty for Vertebral Compression Fractures: Report of a Task Force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 1935-1944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander J Rodriguez ◽  
Howard A Fink ◽  
Lynn Mirigian ◽  
Nuria Guañabens ◽  
Richard Eastell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Vertebral Compression Fractures ◽  
Mineral Research ◽  
Compression Fractures ◽  
Safety Outcomes ◽  
American Society

173 EVOLVE - Significant Improvements in Pain, Disability, Quality of Life and Overall Health with Use of Balloon Kyphoplasty for Vertebral Compression Fractures in Medicare-Eligible Patients Despite Minimal Improvements in Vertebral Body Height an

Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (CN_suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 244-245
Author(s):  
John Amburgy ◽  
Douglas Beall ◽  
Richard Easton ◽  
Douglas Linville ◽  
Sanjay Talati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Vertebral Body ◽  
Body Height ◽  
Balloon Kyphoplasty ◽  
Vertebral Compression Fractures ◽  
Vertebral Body Height ◽  
Compression Fractures ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Pain Disability

Abstract INTRODUCTION Osteoporotic and neoplastic vertebral compression fractures (VCF) are common and painful. In the U.S., there are more than 1.5 million vertebral fractures annually and 40% of those over the age of 80 will experience this pathology, threatening quality of life and increasing morbidity and mortality. Kyphoplasty is a minimally invasive surgery to stabilize the fracture and recent EVOLVE analysis demonstrated minimal improvement in kypohotic angulation or vertebral body height, however, patients demonstrated significant improvements in pain, disability, quality of life and overall health. METHODS Prospective, multicenter 12-month clinical study of outcomes pertaining to activities of daily living, pain, quality of life, and safety parameters in a Medicare-eligible population treated with kyphoplasty for painful acute or subacute VCFs associated with osteoporosis or cancer. RESULTS >NRS back pain improved from 8.7 (scale 0–10) by 5.2, 5.4, 6.0, 6.2 and 6.3 points, at the 7-day, and the 1, 3, 6 and 12-month time points, respectively. ODI improved from 63.4 (scale 0–100) by 30.5, 35.3, 36.3 and 36.2 points, at the 1, 3, 6 and 12-month time points, respectively. The SF-36 PCS was 24.2 at baseline (scale 0–100) and improved 10.7, 12.4, 13.4 and 13.8 points, at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. The EQ-5D was 0.383 points (scale 0–1) and improved 0.316, 0.351, 0.356 and 0.358 points, at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. All measures were statistically significant with P < 0.001 at every time point. Despite these significant improvements in pain, disability, qulity of life and overall health, there were only modest, but significant improvements in kyphotic angulation (1.1° improvement) and vertebral body height (4% improvement). CONCLUSION This large, prospective, multicenter study trial demonstrates that utilization of kyphoplasty for vertebral compression fractures provides significant improvements in pain, disability, quality of life, and overall health despite modest improvements in kyphotic angulation and vertebral body height in Medicare-eligible patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document