scholarly journals The genome-wide transcriptional response to varying RpoS levels inEscherichia coliK-12

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garrett T. Wong ◽  
Richard P. Bonocora ◽  
Alicia N. Schep ◽  
Suzannah M. Beeler ◽  
Anna J. Lee Fong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Stationary Phase ◽  
Stress Responses ◽  
Sigma Factor ◽  
Core Promoter ◽  
Transcriptional Response ◽  
Transcriptional Responses ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Functional Classes ◽  
Sigma Factor Rpos

AbstractThe alternative sigma factor RpoS is a central regulator of a many stress responses inEscherichia coli.The level of functional RpoS differs depending on the stress. The effect of these differing concentrations of RpoS on global transcriptional responses remains unclear. We investigated the effect of RpoS concentration on the transcriptome during stationary phase in rich media. We show that 23% of genes in theE. coligenome are regulated by RpoS level, and we identify many RpoS-transcribed genes and promoters. We observe three distinct classes of response to RpoS by genes in the regulon: genes whose expression changes linearly with increasing RpoS level, genes whose expression changes dramatically with the production of only a little RpoS (“sensitive” genes), and genes whose expression changes very little with the production of a little RpoS (“insensitive”). We show that sequences outside the core promoter region determine whether a RpoS-regulated gene in sensitive or insensitive. Moreover, we show that sensitive and insensitive genes are enriched for specific functional classes, and that the sensitivity of a gene to RpoS corresponds to the timing of induction as cells enter stationary phase. Thus, promoter sensitivity to RpoS is a mechanism to coordinate specific cellular processes with growth phase, and may also contribute to the diversity of stress responses directed by RpoS.ImportanceThe sigma factor RpoS is a global regulator that controls the response to many stresses inEscherichia coli.Different stresses result in different levels of RpoS production, but the consequences of this variation are unknown. We describe how changing the level of RpoS does not influence all RpoS-regulated genes equally. The cause of this variation is likely the action of transcription factors that bind the promoters of the genes. We show that the sensitivity of a gene to RpoS levels explains the timing of expression as cells enter stationary phase, and that genes with different RpoS sensitivities are enriched for specific functional groups. Thus, promoter sensitivity to RpoS is a mechanism to coordinate specific cellular processes in response to stresses.

scholarly journals Genome-Wide Transcriptional Response to Varying RpoS Levels in Escherichia coli K-12

2017 ◽  
Vol 199 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Garrett T. Wong ◽  
Richard P. Bonocora ◽  
Alicia N. Schep ◽  
Suzannah M. Beeler ◽  
Anna J. Lee Fong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Stationary Phase ◽  
Stress Responses ◽  
Sigma Factor ◽  
Core Promoter ◽  
Transcriptional Responses ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
K 12 ◽  
Sigma Factor Rpos

ABSTRACT The alternative sigma factor RpoS is a central regulator of many stress responses in Escherichia coli. The level of functional RpoS differs depending on the stress. The effect of these differing concentrations of RpoS on global transcriptional responses remains unclear. We investigated the effect of RpoS concentration on the transcriptome during stationary phase in rich media. We found that 23% of genes in the E. coli genome are regulated by RpoS, and we identified many RpoS-transcribed genes and promoters. We observed three distinct classes of response to RpoS by genes in the regulon: genes whose expression changes linearly with increasing RpoS level, genes whose expression changes dramatically with the production of only a little RpoS (“sensitive” genes), and genes whose expression changes very little with the production of a little RpoS (“insensitive”). We show that sequences outside the core promoter region determine whether an RpoS-regulated gene is sensitive or insensitive. Moreover, we show that sensitive and insensitive genes are enriched for specific functional classes and that the sensitivity of a gene to RpoS corresponds to the timing of induction as cells enter stationary phase. Thus, promoter sensitivity to RpoS is a mechanism to coordinate specific cellular processes with growth phase and may also contribute to the diversity of stress responses directed by RpoS. IMPORTANCE The sigma factor RpoS is a global regulator that controls the response to many stresses in Escherichia coli. Different stresses result in different levels of RpoS production, but the consequences of this variation are unknown. We describe how changing the level of RpoS does not influence all RpoS-regulated genes equally. The cause of this variation is likely the action of transcription factors that bind the promoters of the genes. We show that the sensitivity of a gene to RpoS levels explains the timing of expression as cells enter stationary phase and that genes with different RpoS sensitivities are enriched for specific functional groups. Thus, promoter sensitivity to RpoS is a mechanism that coordinates specific cellular processes in response to stresses.

scholarly journals Experimental Evolution ofEscherichia coliK-12 at High pH and with RpoS Induction

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (15) ◽  
Author(s):  
Issam Hamdallah ◽  
Nadia Torok ◽  
Katarina M. Bischof ◽  
Nadim Majdalani ◽  
Sriya Chadalavada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Stationary Phase ◽  
Experimental Evolution ◽  
Sigma Factor ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
Envelope Proteins ◽  
Content Type ◽  
High Ph ◽  
K 12 ◽  
Sigma Factor Rpos

ABSTRACTExperimental evolution ofEscherichia coliK-12 W3110 by serial dilutions for 2,200 generations at high pH extended the range of sustained growth from pH 9.0 to pH 9.3. pH 9.3-adapted isolates showed mutations in DNA-binding regulators and envelope proteins. One population showed an IS1knockout ofphoB(encoding the positive regulator of the phosphate regulon). AphoB::kanRknockout increased growth at high pH.phoBmutants are known to increase production of fermentation acids, which could enhance fitness at high pH. Mutations inpcnB[poly(A) polymerase] also increased growth at high pH. Three out of four populations showed deletions oftorI, an inhibitor of TorR, which activates expression oftorCAD(trimethylamineN-oxide respiration) at high pH. All populations showed point mutations affecting the stationary-phase sigma factor RpoS, either in the coding gene or in genes for regulators of RpoS expression. RpoS is required for survival at extremely high pH. In our microplate assay,rpoSdeletion slightly decreased growth at pH 9.1. RpoS protein accumulated faster at pH 9 than at pH 7. The RpoS accumulation at high pH required the presence of one or more antiadaptors that block degradation (IraM, IraD, and IraP). Other genes with mutations after high-pH evolution encode regulators, such as those encoded byyobG(mgrB) (PhoPQ regulator),rpoN(nitrogen starvation sigma factor),malI, andpurR, as well as envelope proteins, such as those encoded byompTandyahO. Overall,E. colievolution at high pH selects for mutations in key transcriptional regulators, includingphoBand the stationary-phase sigma factor RpoS.IMPORTANCEEscherichia coliin its native habitat encounters high-pH stress such as that of pancreatic secretions. Experimental evolution over 2,000 generations showed selection for mutations in regulatory factors, such as deletion of the phosphate regulator PhoB and mutations that alter the function of the global stress regulator RpoS. RpoS is induced at high pH via multiple mechanisms.

scholarly journals Variation in Resistance to High Hydrostatic Pressure andrpoS Heterogeneity in Natural Isolates ofEscherichia coli O157:H7

2001 ◽  
Vol 67 (10) ◽  
pp. 4901-4907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne Robey ◽  
Amparo Benito ◽  
Roger H. Hutson ◽  
Cristina Pascual ◽  
Simon F. Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Hydrostatic Pressure ◽  
Stationary Phase ◽  
Sigma Factor ◽  
High Hydrostatic Pressure ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Commensal Strain ◽  
Natural Isolates ◽  
Pressure Resistance ◽  
Sigma Factor Rpos

ABSTRACT Several natural isolates of Escherichia coliO157:H7 have previously been shown to exhibit stationary-phase-dependent variation in their resistance to inactivation by high hydrostatic pressure. In this report we demonstrate that loss of the stationary-phase-inducible sigma factor RpoS resulted in decreased resistance to pressure inE. coli O157:H7 and in a commensal strain. Furthermore, variation in the RpoS activity of the natural isolates of O157:H7 correlated with the pressure resistance of those strains. Heterogeneity was noted in the rpoS alleles of the natural isolates that may explain the differences in RpoS activity. These results are consistent with a role for rpoS in mediating resistance to high hydrostatic pressure in E. coliO157:H7.

scholarly journals Transcriptional Profiling of Colicin-Induced Cell Death of Escherichia coli MG1655 Identifies Potential Mechanisms by Which Bacteriocins Promote Bacterial Diversity

2004 ◽  
Vol 186 (3) ◽  
pp. 866-869 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Walker ◽  
Matthew Rolfe ◽  
Arthur Thompson ◽  
Geoffrey R. Moore ◽  
Richard James ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Transcriptional Profiling ◽  
Transcriptional Response ◽  
Chromosomal Dna ◽  
Transcriptional Responses ◽  
General Role ◽  
Bacterial Physiology ◽  
Translational Arrest ◽  
Colicin E3 ◽  
Colicin E9

ABSTRACT We report the transcriptional response of Escherichia coli MG1655 to damage induced by colicins E3 and E9, bacteriocins that kill cells through inactivation of the ribosome and degradation of chromosomal DNA, respectively. Colicin E9 strongly induced the LexA-regulated SOS response, while colicin E3 elicited a broad response that included the induction of cold shock genes, symptomatic of translational arrest. Colicin E3 also increased the transcription of cryptic prophage genes and other laterally acquired mobile elements. The transcriptional responses to both these toxins suggest mechanisms that may promote genetic diversity in E. coli populations, pointing to a more general role for colicins in adaptive bacterial physiology than has hitherto been realized.

scholarly journals Short- and Long-Term Transcriptomic Responses of Escherichia coli to Biocides: a Systems Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (14) ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatriz Merchel Piovesan Pereira ◽  
Xiaokang Wang ◽  
Ilias Tagkopoulos
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Stress Response ◽  
Stress Responses ◽  
Zinc Homeostasis ◽  
Cross Resistance ◽  
Transcriptional Responses ◽  
Systematic Analysis ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Short Term Exposure

ABSTRACT The mechanisms of the bacterial response to biocides are poorly understood, despite their broad application. To identify the genetic basis and pathways implicated in the biocide stress response, we exposed Escherichia coli populations to 10 ubiquitous biocides. By comparing the transcriptional responses between a short-term exposure (30 min) and a long-term exposure (8 to 12 h) to biocide stress, we established the common gene and pathway clusters that are implicated in general and biocide-specific stress responses. Our analysis revealed a temporal choreography, starting from the upregulation of chaperones to the subsequent repression of motility and chemotaxis pathways and the induction of an anaerobic pool of enzymes and biofilm regulators. A systematic analysis of the transcriptional data identified a zur-regulated gene cluster to be highly active in the stress response against sodium hypochlorite and peracetic acid, presenting a link between the biocide stress response and zinc homeostasis. Susceptibility assays with knockout mutants further validated our findings and provide clear targets for downstream investigation of the implicated mechanisms of action. IMPORTANCE Antiseptics and disinfectant products are of great importance to control and eliminate pathogens, especially in settings such as hospitals and the food industry. Such products are widely distributed and frequently poorly regulated. Occasional outbreaks have been associated with microbes resistant to such compounds, and researchers have indicated potential cross-resistance with antibiotics. Despite that, there are many gaps in knowledge about the bacterial stress response and the mechanisms of microbial resistance to antiseptics and disinfectants. We investigated the stress response of the bacterium Escherichia coli to 10 common disinfectant and antiseptic chemicals to shed light on the potential mechanisms of tolerance to such compounds.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document