scholarly journals Primary Care Practitioners’ Response to 2019 Novel Coronavirus Outbreak in China

Author(s):  
Zhijie Xu ◽  
Yi Qian ◽  
Lizheng Fang ◽  
Mi Yao

The emerging outbreak of the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) originated from Wuhan poses a great challenge to healthcare system in China.1 Primary care practitioners (PCPs) have an important role in district communicable disease control.2 However, because primary health-care system in China still needs to be substantially strengthened,3,4 whether PCPs are proactive and capable in responding to the outbreak remains unclear. Using an electronic questionnaire, we surveyed a national sample of PCPs to assess their response to novel coronavirus outbreak.

Author(s):  
Mikaela Lopes de Caldas ◽  
Francisco Das Chagas Cardoso Filho

A tuberculose (TB) é uma doença infecciosa e transmissível, causada pelo Mycobacterium tuberculosis. A detecção de casos figura entre as principais medidas de controle da tuberculose, embora grandes avanços tenham ocorrido no que se relaciona ao diagnóstico, tratamento e prevenção da doença, a mesma ainda requer atenção especial, por parte dos profissionais da saúde (equipe multiprofissional) e da sociedade como um todo. A Atenção Básica se caracteriza como ferramenta primordial na suspeição e na detecção dos casos de tuberculose na comunidade. O objetivo geral do presente trabalho é identificar produções científicas que avaliem o desempenho da Atenção Básica no controle da tuberculose. Os objetivos específicos foram: ressaltar a importância da Atenção Básica na detecção dos casos suspeitos; expor a relevância da Atenção Básica como fator indispensável no controle da tuberculose. Caracteriza-se como uma pesquisa bibliográfica explicativa e explorativa, realizada no recorte histórico de 1998 a 2011, período esse definidor para a implementação de medidas de controle da tuberculose. Encontraram-se 29 referências, das quais 19 obedeciam aos critérios de inclusão. Portanto, a Atenção Básica caracterizada como principal porta de entrada ao acesso à saúde, proporciona a aproximação do cidadão às medidas de controle da tuberculose, assim como promove a educação em saúde, que visa a prevenção dos agravos e proporcionam autonomia e autoconhecimento que são indispensáveis para a manutenção da saúde frente às doenças preveníveis como a tuberculose, porém que se configuram como problemas de saúde pública. Palavras-chave: Tuberculose. Atenção Básica. Controle. AbstractTuberculosis (TB) is an infectious and communicable disease caused by mycobacterium tuberculosis. The case detection is one of the main control  measures of tuberculosis, although major advances have occurred regarding the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of the disease, the same still requires special attention on the part of health professionals (multidisciplinary team) and society as a whole. The primary care is characterized as a primary tool in suspicion and detection of tuberculosis cases in the community. The overall objective of this study is to identify scientific production to assess the performance of primary health care in tuberculosis control. The specific objectives were to highlight the importance of primary care in the detection of suspected cases; expose the relevance of primary health care as an essential factor in tuberculosis control. It is characterized as an explanatory and exploratory literature survey, conducted in historical period from 1998 to 2011, a period defined for the implementation of tb control measures. It was found 29 references, 19 of which obeyed the inclusion criteria. Therefore, the primary care characterized as the main gateway to access to health, provides the citizen’s approach to tuberculosis control measures and promotes health education aimed at prevention of injuries and provides autonomy and self-knowledge that are essential for maintenance health against preventable diseases such as tuberculosis, but which are seen as  the main  public health problems. Keywords: Tuberculosis. Primary Care. Control. 


2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn H. Cheong ◽  
Carol L. Armour ◽  
Sinthia Z. Bosnic-Anticevich

Managing chronic illness is highly complex and the pathways to access health care for the patient are unpredictable and often unknown. While multidisciplinary care (MDC) arrangements are promoted in the Australian primary health care system, there is a paucity of research on multidisciplinary collaboration from patients’ perspectives. This exploratory study is the first to gain an understanding of the experiences, perceptions, attitudes and potential role of people with chronic illness (asthma) on the delivery of MDC in the Australian primary health care setting. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with asthma patients from Sydney, Australia. Qualitative analysis of data indicates that patients are significant players in MDC and their perceptions of their chronic condition, perceived roles of health care professionals, and expectations of health care delivery, influence their participation and attitudes towards multidisciplinary services. Our research shows the challenges presented by patients in the delivery and establishment of multidisciplinary health care teams, and highlights the need to consider patients’ perspectives in the development of MDC models in primary care.


Author(s):  
Karen M. T. Turner ◽  
Carol W. Metzler

Primary care providers such as family doctors, pediatricians, and community child health nurses are a trusted first port of call for parents seeking advice on parenting issues, and routine well-child visits provide multiple opportunities for screening, support, and intervention. Pediatric practices and family-centered health settings are an ideal, nonstigmatized context for providing integrated care, including parenting support, as part of universal prevention and early intervention. This chapter describes how Triple P can be applied in brief interventions through the primary health care system to prevent and reduce social, emotional, and behavioral problems in children. Workforce development, clinic management support, and sustainable funding models are discussed as key implementation factors that require careful planning if there is to be widespread dissemination of evidence-based parenting support in pediatric primary care settings.


2018 ◽  
pp. 259-262
Author(s):  
TENGIZ VERULAVA TENGIZ VERULAVA

Primary health care has an important role in the organizational arrangement of health care system. Without a fundament of primary health care system it is impossible to build anything. The primary health care system reflects on the quality population health, the availability of health services and the cost of spending on the health care. The family doctor›s institute and primary health care system in Georgia have not been developed with regarding international standards. The lack of primary care system in Georgia indicates that the referral to outpatient medical facilities is considerably lower than the European countries. The reason for this is the lack of confidence in primary care institutions and the absence of comprehencive primary health care system in the country. It is nessesery to develop a family doctor›s institute in Georgia. This requires the promotion of continuous medical education of family doctors, optimal geographical distribution of primary health care institutions.


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abby Andrews ◽  
Katharine A. Wallis ◽  
Felicity Goodyear-Smith

Abstract INTRODUCTION The Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care at the University of Auckland is considering developing a Master of Primary Health Care (MPHC) programme. Masters level study entails considerable investment of both university and student time and money. AIM To explore the views of potential students and possible employers of future graduates to discover whether there is a market for such a programme and to inform the development of the programme. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 primary health care stakeholders. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed and analysed using a general inductive approach to identify themes. FINDINGS Primary care practitioners might embark on MPHC studies to develop health management and leadership skills, to develop and/or enhance clinical skills, to enhance teaching and research skills, or for reasons of personal interest. Barriers to MPHC study were identified as cost and a lack of funding, time constraints and clinical workload. Study participants favoured inter-professional learning and a flexible delivery format. Pre-existing courses may already satisfy the post-graduate educational needs of primary care practitioners. Masters level study may be superfluous to the needs of the primary care workforce. CONCLUSIONS Any successful MPHC programme would need to provide value for PHC practitioner students and be unique. The postgraduate educational needs of New Zealand primary care practitioners may be already catered for. The international market for a MPHC programme is yet to be explored.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamed Rahimi ◽  
Reza Goudarzi ◽  
Somayeh Noorihekmat ◽  
Aliakbar Haghdoost

Abstract Background: Managers need to measure and evaluate the performance of their subordinates in order to plan, organize, and improve the performance of their organizations. In this study, the performance and efficiency of the district's primary health care system in the southeast of Iran were evaluated using the data envelopment analysis (DEA) model.Methods: The quantitative non-parametric data envelopment analysis was used to evaluate the performance of the primary care system in the districts. On the hand, human forcess, physical facilities, and vehicles were the variables used as the inputs, and the number of services and service recipients was considered as the outputs to measure efficiency. The data were analyzed using the DEAP software, and performance and efficiency were calculated with the output maximization approach and the assumption of variable returns to scale. It was carried out as linear programming with nine scenarios for nine districts in 2018.Results: The mean efficiency of the studied districts with the assumption of variable returns to scale was 0.76, indicating at least 24% capacity to increase efficiency in the primary care system of Kerman University of Medical Sciences without any increase in production factors. According to the mean values, Kerman and Kuhbanan were efficient while the other 7 districts were inefficient. The districts were divided into three groups: efficient, moderately efficient, and inefficient. Accordingly, the most inefficient primary health care systems were those of Shahr-e Babak, Baft, and Orzooieh.Conclusion: The results of this study showed inefficiency in most primary health care systems of the studied districts, indicating that primary care managers can provide more health services to the community through proper management of available resources. Inefficient districts can compare themselves with successful and reference districts and eliminate their shortcomings in order to improve their performance.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 2171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taylor Raiche ◽  
Robert Pammett ◽  
Shelita Dattani ◽  
Lisa Dolovich ◽  
Kevin Hamilton ◽  
...  

Canada’s universal public health care system provides physician, diagnostic, and hospital services at no cost to all Canadians, accounting for approximately 70% of the 264 billion CAD spent in health expenditure yearly. Pharmacy-related services, including prescription drugs, however, are not universally publicly insured. Although this system underpins the Canadian identity, primary health care reform has long been desired by Canadians wanting better access to high quality, effective, patient-centred, and safe primary care services. A nationally coordinated approach to remodel the primary health care system was incited at the turn of the 21st century yet, twenty years later, evidence of widespread meaningful improvement remains underwhelming. As a provincial/territorial responsibility, the organization and provision of primary care remains discordant across the country. Canadian pharmacists are, now more than ever, poised and primed to provide care integrated with the rest of the primary health care system. However, the self-regulation of the profession of pharmacy is also a provincial/territorial mandate, making progress toward integration of pharmacists into the primary care system incongruent across jurisdictions. Among 11,000 pharmacies, Canada’s 28,000 community pharmacists possess varying authority to prescribe, administer, and monitor drug therapies as an extension to their traditional dispensing role. Expanded professional services offered at most community pharmacies include medication reviews, minor/common ailment management, pharmacist prescribing for existing prescriptions, smoking cessation counselling, and administration of injectable drugs and vaccinations. Barriers to widely offering these services include uncertainties around remuneration, perceived skepticism from other providers about pharmacists’ skills, and slow digital modernization including limited access by pharmacists to patient health records held by other professionals. Each province/territory enables pharmacists to offer these services under specific legislation, practice standards, and remuneration models unique to their jurisdiction. There is also a small, but growing, number of pharmacists across the country working within interdisciplinary primary care teams. To achieve meaningful, consistent, and seamless integration into the interdisciplinary model of Canadian primary health care reform, pharmacy advocacy groups across the country must coordinate and collaborate on a harmonized vision for innovation in primary care integration, and move toward implementing that vision with ongoing collaboration on primary health care initiatives, strategic plans, and policies. Canadians deserve to receive timely, equitable, and safe interdisciplinary care within a coordinated primary health care system, including from their pharmacy team.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anis Safura Ramli ◽  
Sri Wahyu Taher ◽  
Zainal Fitri Zakaria ◽  
Norsiah Ali ◽  
NurAinul Hana Shamsuddin ◽  
...  

A strong and robust Primary Health Care system is essential to achieving universal health coverage and to save lives. The Global Conference on Primary Health Care 2018: from Alma-Ata towards achieving Universal Health Coverage and the Sustainable Development Goals at Astana, Kazakhstan provided a platform for low‐ and middle‐ income countries to join the Primary Health Care Performance Initiative (PHCPI). At this Global Conference, Malaysia has declared to become a Trailblazer Country in the PHCPI and pledged to monitor her Vital Signs Profiles (VSP). However, the VSP project requires an honest and transparent data collection and monitoring of the Primary Health Care system, so as to identify gaps and guide policy in support of Primary Health Care reform. This is a huge commitment and can only be materialised if there is a collaborative partnership between Primary Care and Public Health providers. Fundamental to all of these, is the controversy concerning whether or not ‘Primary Care’ and ‘Primary Health Care’ represent the same entity. Confusion also occurs with regards to the role of ‘Primary Care’ and ‘Public Health’ providers in the Malaysian Primary Health Care system. This review aims to differentiate between Primary Care, Primary Health Care and Public Health, describe the relationships between the three entities and redefine the role of Primary Care and Public Health in the PHCPI-VSP in order to transform the Malaysian Primary Health Care system.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca L West ◽  
Sheri A Lippman ◽  
Rhian Twine ◽  
Meriam Maritze ◽  
Kathleen Kahn ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Facing a quadruple burden of disease (infectious disease, non-communicable disease, maternal and child mortality, high levels of violence and injury), South Africa requires high-quality primary health care to retain patients and optimize outcomes. National health policy is focused on strengthening primary care. While prior research has identified implementation challenges within the primary health care system, there is less understanding of how providers define quality, their perceptions of barriers to providing quality care, and how they overcome these barriers. This study assesses provider views on quality at primary care clinics in a rural region of Mpumalanga Province. Methods: We conducted in-depth interviews with providers in Bushbuckridge sub-district in early 2019 on the value of quality metrics for providers and patients, what indicators they would use to assess clinic performance, and barriers and facilitators of delivering care. Interviews were conducted in Shangaan, audio-recorded, translated, and transcribed into English. A deductive approach was used to develop a provisional coding schema based on study questions, which was refined using an inductive approach in response to patterns and themes emerging from the data.Results: 23 providers were interviewed (83% female, 65% professional nurses). Definitions of quality were focused on clinic structure and resources. Few providers identified patient outcomes as indicators of quality. Providers linked deficiencies in infrastructure and support to deficits in care delivery, such as long wait times due to limited staffing, privacy breaches due to insufficient space, and a chronic lack of medication and equipment. Providers identified mitigating strategies including informal coordination across clinics to address medication shortages in individual facilities. Interwoven throughout the providers’ discussion was the poor communication between the district, PHC supervisors, and implementers at the facility level. Conclusion: Providers connected deficits in quality of care to inadequate infrastructure and insufficient support from district and provincial authorities; mitigating strategies across clinics could only partially address these deficits. The existence of a national quality measurement program was not broadly reflected in providers’ views on quality care. These findings underscore the need for effective district and national approaches to support individual facilities, accompanied by feedback methods designed with input from frontline service providers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document