scholarly journals Niche theory for mutualism: A graphical approach to plant-pollinator network dynamics

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernanda S. Valdovinos ◽  
Robert Marsland

AbstractContemporary Niche Theory is a useful framework for understanding how organisms interact with each other and with their shared environment. Its graphical representation, popularized by Tilman’s Resource Ratio Hypothesis, facilitates the analysis of the equilibrium structure of complex dynamical models including species coexistence. This theory has been applied primarily to resource competition since its early beginnings. Here, we integrate mutualism into niche theory by expanding Tilman’s graphical representation to the analysis of consumer-resource dynamics of plant-pollinator networks. We graphically explain the qualitative phenomena previously found by numerical simulations, including the effects on community dynamics of nestedness, adaptive foraging, and pollinator invasions. Our graphical approach promotes the unification of niche and network theories, and deepens the synthesis of different types of interactions within a consumer-resource framework.Secondary AbstractTeoría de Nicho para Mutualismos: Una aproximación gráfica a la dinámica de redes planta-polinizadorLa Teoría Contemporánea de Nicho es un marco útil para entender cómo los organismos interactúan entre ellos y con su ambiente compartido. Su representatión gráfica, popularizada por la Hipótesis de Razón de Recursos de Tilman, facilita el análisis de la estructura de equilibrio de modelos dinámicos complejos, incluyendo la coexistencia de especies. Esta teoría ha sido aplicada primariamente a competencia por recursos desde sus inicios. Aquí, integramos el mutualismo dentro de la teoría de nicho al expandir la representatión gráfica de Tilman al análisis de la dinámica consumidor-recurso de las redes planta-polinizador. Explicamos gráficamente fenómenos cualitativos encontrados previamente mediante simulaciones numéricas, incluyendo los efectos sobre la dinámica comunitaria del anidamiento, forrajeo adaptativo y de las invasiones por polinizadores. Nuestra aproximación gráfica promueve la unificatión de las teorías de nicho y de redes, y profundiza la síntesis de diferentes tipos de interacciones dentro de un marco de consumidor-recurso.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joey R. Bernhardt ◽  
Pavel Kratina ◽  
Aaron Pereira ◽  
Manu Tamminen ◽  
Mridul K. Thomas ◽  
...  

AbstractCompetition for limiting resources is among the most fundamental ecological interactions and has long been considered a key driver of species coexistence and biodiversity. Species’ minimum resource requirements, their R*s, are key traits that link individual physiological demands to the outcome of competition. However, a major question remains unanswered - to what extent are species’ competitive traits able to evolve in response to resource limitation? To address this knowledge gap, we performed an evolution experiment in which we exposed Chlamydomonas reinhardtii for approximately 285 generations to seven environments in chemostats which differed in resource supply ratios (including nitrogen, phosphorus and light limitation) and salt stress. We then grew the ancestors and descendants in common garden and quantified their competitive abilities for essential resources. We investigated constraints on trait evolution by testing whether changes in resource requirements for different resources were correlated. Competitive abilities for phosphorus improved in all populations, while competitive abilities for nitrogen and light increased in some populations and decreased in others. In contrast to the common assumption that there are trade-offs between competitive abilities for different resources, we found that improvements in competitive ability for a resource came at no detectable cost. Instead, improvements in competitive ability for multiple resources were either positively correlated or not significantly correlated. Using resource competition theory, we then demonstrated that rapid adaptation in competitive traits altered the predicted outcomes of competition. These results highlight the need to incorporate contemporary evolutionary change into predictions of competitive community dynamics over environmental gradients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 375 (1798) ◽  
pp. 20190247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joey R. Bernhardt ◽  
Pavel Kratina ◽  
Aaron Louis Pereira ◽  
Manu Tamminen ◽  
Mridul K. Thomas ◽  
...  

Competition for limiting resources is among the most fundamental ecological interactions and has long been considered a key driver of species coexistence and biodiversity. Species' minimum resource requirements, their R *s, are key traits that link individual physiological demands to the outcome of competition. However, a major question remains unanswered—to what extent are species’ competitive traits able to evolve in response to resource limitation? To address this knowledge gap, we performed an evolution experiment in which we exposed Chlamydomonas reinhardtii for approximately 285 generations to seven environments in chemostats that differed in resource supply ratios (including nitrogen, phosphorus and light limitation) and salt stress. We then grew the ancestors and descendants in a common garden and quantified their competitive abilities for essential resources. We investigated constraints on trait evolution by testing whether changes in resource requirements for different resources were correlated. Competitive abilities for phosphorus improved in all populations, while competitive abilities for nitrogen and light increased in some populations and decreased in others. In contrast to the common assumption that there are trade-offs between competitive abilities for different resources, we found that improvements in competitive ability for a resource came at no detectable cost. Instead, improvements in competitive ability for multiple resources were either positively correlated or not significantly correlated. Using resource competition theory, we then demonstrated that rapid adaptation in competitive traits altered the predicted outcomes of competition. These results highlight the need to incorporate contemporary evolutionary change into predictions of competitive community dynamics over environmental gradients. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Conceptual challenges in microbial community ecology’.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-221
Author(s):  
Ioannis Tsakalakis ◽  
Bernd Blasius ◽  
Alexey Ryabov

2020 ◽  
Vol 287 (1918) ◽  
pp. 20192211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annika Schirmer ◽  
Julia Hoffmann ◽  
Jana A. Eccard ◽  
Melanie Dammhahn

Intraspecific trait variation is an important determinant of fundamental ecological interactions. Many of these interactions are mediated by behaviour. Therefore, interindividual differences in behaviour should contribute to individual niche specialization. Comparable with variation in morphological traits, behavioural differentiation between individuals should limit similarity among competitors and thus act as a mechanism maintaining within-species variation in ecological niches and facilitating species coexistence. Here, we aimed to test whether interindividual differences in boldness covary with spatial interactions within and between two ecologically similar, co-occurring rodent species ( Myodes glareolus , Apodemus agrarius ). In five subpopulations in northeast Germany, we quantified individual differences in boldness via repeated standardized tests and spatial interaction patterns via capture–mark–recapture ( n = 126) and automated VHF telemetry ( n = 36). We found that boldness varied with space use in both species. Individuals of the same population occupied different spatial niches, which resulted in non-random patterns of within- and between-species spatial interactions. Behavioural types mainly differed in the relative importance of intra- versus interspecific competition. Within-species variation along this competition gradient could contribute to maintaining individual niche specialization. Moreover, behavioural differentiation between individuals limits similarity among competitors, which might facilitate the coexistence of functionally equivalent species and, thus, affect community dynamics and local biodiversity.


2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (9) ◽  
pp. e1500291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirokazu Toju ◽  
Paulo R. Guimarães ◽  
Jens M. Olesen ◽  
John N. Thompson

In nature, plants and their pollinating and/or seed-dispersing animals form complex interaction networks. The commonly observed pattern of links between specialists and generalists in these networks has been predicted to promote species coexistence. Plants also build highly species-rich mutualistic networks below ground with root-associated fungi, and the structure of these plant–fungus networks may also affect terrestrial community processes. By compiling high-throughput DNA sequencing data sets of the symbiosis of plants and their root-associated fungi from three localities along a latitudinal gradient, we uncovered the entire network architecture of these interactions under contrasting environmental conditions. Each network included more than 30 plant species and hundreds of mycorrhizal and endophytic fungi belonging to diverse phylogenetic groups. The results were consistent with the notion that processes shaping host-plant specialization of fungal species generate a unique linkage pattern that strongly contrasts with the pattern of above-ground plant–partner networks. Specifically, plant–fungus networks lacked a “nested” architecture, which has been considered to promote species coexistence in plant–partner networks. Rather, the below-ground networks had a conspicuous “antinested” topology. Our findings lead to the working hypothesis that terrestrial plant community dynamics are likely determined by the balance between above-ground and below-ground webs of interspecific interactions.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres Laan ◽  
Gonzalo G. de Polavieja

AbstractEcological models of community dynamics fall into two main categories. The neutral theory of biodiversity correctly predicts various large-scale ecosystem characteristics such as the species abundance distributions. On a smaller scale, the niche theory of species competition explains population dynamics and interactions between two to a dozen species. Despite the successes of the two theories, they rely on two contradictory assumptions. In the neutral theory each species is competitively equivalent while in the niche theory every species is specialized to exploit a specific part of its environment. Here we propose a resolution to this contradiction using a game theory model of competition with an attractor hyperplane as its equilibrium solution. When the population dynamics shifts within the hyperplane, it is selectively neutral. However, any movement perpendicular to the hyperplane is subject to restoring forces similar to what is predicted by the niche theory. We show that this model correctly reproduces empirical species abundance distributions and is also compatible with species removal experiments.


2005 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 1832-1843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J Papaik ◽  
Charles D Canham ◽  
Erika F Latty ◽  
Kerry D Woods

In forests of eastern North America, introduced pathogens have caused widespread declines in a number of important tree species, including dominant species such as American beech (Fagus grandifolia Ehrh.). Most studies have focused on changes in forest composition and structure as a direct result of mortality caused by a pathogen. Our field studies of windthrow resistance in forests of northern New York and northern Michigan demonstrate that resistance of beech trees to windthrow is severely reduced by beech bark disease (BBD). This reduced resistance was primarily due to the increase in the probability of stem breaks of moderately and highly infected beech trees. The severity of BBD infection on individual trees has a significant negative effect on resistance to windthrow. We tested potential consequences of this for long-term composition and structure in these forests by using a simulation model, SORTIE. We found that species such as yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis Britt.) and eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carr.) increased in basal area primarily because of the effect BBD had on the creation of new seedbed substrates. Our results highlight the indirect effects that host-specific pathogens can have on community dynamics and species coexistence in forests.


2020 ◽  
pp. 5-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Chesson

In most places on Earth, many similar species are found coexisting. This key observation is often explained in terms of ecological differences in how species interact with their shared environment, that is, in terms of their niche differences. Niche differences can to lead to stable coexistence in contrast to the ecological drift predicted by the neutral theory of community ecology. Coexistence becomes stabilized as density feedback within species is strengthened relative to density feedback between species. Coexistence is reflective of two distinct niche comparisons, niche overlap, and species relative average fitness. In general, low niche overlap (dissimilarity in use of the environment) and similar average fitnesses (similar average performance) favor coexistence. For a unified theory of species coexistence, it is shown how the Lotka–Volterra competition model can reflect and quantify several types of niche comparison, including comparisons of resource use, susceptibility to natural enemies, and temporal variation in activity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document