scholarly journals The Ephrin receptor A2 and Roundabout Guidance Receptor 1 heterodimer: A potential theranostic for squamous cell carcinomas

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ka M. Pang ◽  
Saumya Srivastava ◽  
Mari Iida ◽  
Michael Nelson ◽  
Jiayi Liu ◽  
...  

AbstractSquamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the lung (LSCC) and head and neck (HNSCC) are very prevalent with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. In both cancer types, Ephrin receptor A2 (EPHA2) is known to be overexpressed and exhibit opposing effects via two distinct signaling mechanisms. While it can inhibit cancer cell survival and migration by ligand-dependent signaling through tyrosine kinase phosphorylation at Y588 and Y772, it can promote tumor progression and cell migration in a ligand-independent manner via phosphorylation at S897. Variable ABnormal morphology (VAB-1) is the C. elegans ortholog of the human ephrin receptor (EPHR) that interacts genetically and biochemically in a dose-dependent manner with the axon guidance receptor, SAX3, the worm ortholog of ROBO. Double mutants of vab-1(EPHR)/sαx-3(ROBO) are synthetic lethal, underscoring the interaction between the two signaling pathways which prompted us to investigate their role in SCC. Using biochemical and biophysical techniques, we show that EPHA2 and ROBO1 reside in the same complex and interact physically to form a functional heterodimer in LSCC and HNSCC. Furthermore, we show that treating squamous cells with the SLIT2, ligand of ROBO1, hinders phosphorylation of EPHA2 at S897, and thereby, attenuates cell proliferation. Interestingly, SLIT2 can interact with EPHA2 and attenuate the proliferation of cells that have low ROBO1 expression. Additionally, SLIT2 can act synergistically with the EPHA2 inhibitor, Ensartinib to attenuate cell growth in LSCC and HNSCC cells. Taken together, the data suggest that SLIT2 may serve as a novel therapeutic for LSCC and HNSCC. Here, we propose to stratify patients for treatment with SLIT2 and/or Ensartinib, based on their EPHA2 and ROBO1 expression levels in the diseased tissue. Thus 85% of LSCC cases can be treated with combination of SLIT2+Ensartinib and 55% of HNSCC cases can be treated with either SLIT2 or Ensartinib. Furthermore, EPHA2 and ROBO1 may represent novel theranostics in these two diseases.One sentence summaryHeterodimerization of EPHA2 and ROBO1 receptors attenuates growth of squamous cell carcinomas of the lung and head and neck.

2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirley K. Knauer

Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas are among the most common neoplasms worldwide and characterized by local tumor aggressiveness, high rate of early recurrences, development of metastasis, and second primary cancers. Despite modern therapeutic strategies and sophisticated surgical management, overall survival-rates remained largely unchanged over the last decades. Thus, the need for novel treatment options for this tumor entity is undeniable. A key event in carcinogenesis is the uncontrolled modulation of genetic programs. Nuclear receptors belong to a large superfamily of transcription factors implicated in a broad spectrum of physiological and pathophysiological processes, including cancer. Several nuclear receptors have also been associated with head and neck cancer. This review will summarize their mode of action, prognostic/therapeutic relevance, as well as preclinical and clinical studies currently targeting nuclear receptors in this tumor entity.


1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 268-269
Author(s):  
Liloglou ◽  
Scholes ◽  
Spandidos ◽  
Jones ◽  
Vaughan ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 320-321
Author(s):  
Mehmet Gunduz ◽  
Esra Gunduz ◽  
Byung-Moo Min ◽  
Gene Lee ◽  
Ji-Jun Lim ◽  
...  

Oral Oncology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. S46
Author(s):  
F.K.J. Leusink ◽  
P.J. Slootweg ◽  
M.W.M. van den Brekel ◽  
R.J. Baatenburg de Jong ◽  
F.C.P. Holstege ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Grecula ◽  
David E. Schuller ◽  
Roy Smith ◽  
Chris A. Rhoades ◽  
Subir Nag ◽  
...  

Oral Oncology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 116 ◽  
pp. 105240
Author(s):  
Sebastian Zschaeck ◽  
Julian Weingärtner ◽  
Pirus Ghadjar ◽  
Peter Wust ◽  
Felix Mehrhof ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 154 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S22-S22
Author(s):  
H Laharwani ◽  
V Manucha ◽  
G Jefferson ◽  
L Jackson

Abstract Introduction/Objective HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma is biologically and clinically unique and has a survival advantage over other head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. In December 2017 College of American Pathologist published guidelines for testing HPV status in head and neck cancer. It was recommended that pathologists perform HR-HPV testing on head and neck squamous cell carcinomas from all patients with known oropharyngeal SCC not previously tested for HR-HPV, with suspected oropharyngeal SCC, or with metastatic SCC of unknown primary. The aim of this study was to determine the compliance of pathologists following the CAP guidelines. Methods Cases that underwent HPV testing using p16 immunohistochemistry for the years 2017 and 2019 were retrieved. Based on the guidelines, p16 testing was designated as “indicated” or “not indicated”. Results There were 196 cases in which p16 testing was performed in a period of 3 consecutive years. Of these, 175 were FNA/ biopsies and 21 were surgical resections. In 69 cases (56 FNAs and 13 biopsies) the biopsy was performed on neck masses with unknown primary. The compliance for p16 testing in OPC and Lymph nodes with metastatic SCC of unknown primary was 100%. In 34 (17.3%) cases p16 testing was not indicated, the most common reason being wrong site (85%) including the larynx, oral tongue, the floor of the mouth, buccal mucosa, and nasal mass. Of the unindicated p16s, 20 (58%) were received in consultation for continuity of care. Conclusion Not being clear about the site of the tumor is the most common reason for unindicated p16 testing. A clear designation of biopsy site and proper communication between pathologist and surgeon can improve utilization of p16 testing in head and neck carcinomas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document