scholarly journals Continuous positive airway pressure face-mask ventilation to manage massive influx of patients requiring respiratory support during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Alviset ◽  
Q. Riller ◽  
J. Aboab ◽  
K. Dilworth ◽  
PA. Billy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Airway Pressure ◽  
Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Face Mask ◽  
Respiratory Support ◽  
Mask Ventilation ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Massive Influx ◽  
High Flow Oxygen

AbstractBackgroundSince December 2019, a global outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is responsible for massive influx of patients with acute respiratory failure in hospitals. We describe the characteristics, clinical course, and outcomes of COVID-19 patients treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in a large public hospital in France.MethodIt is a single centre retrospective observational cohort. From 27th March to 23rd April, consecutive patients who had signs of respiratory failure or were unable to maintain an SpO2 > 90%, despite receiving 10 to 15 l/min of oxygen with a non-rebreather mask, were treated by CPAP with a face-mask unless the ICU physician judged that immediate intubation was indicated. The main outcomes under study were reasons for CPAP discontinuation and mortality.ResultsA total of 585 patients were admitted in Delafontaine hospital for severe COVID-19. ICU was quickly overwhelmed. Fifty-nine out of 159 (37%) patients requiring ICU care had to be referred to other hospitals. CPAP therapy was initiated in 49 patients and performed out of ICU in 41 (84%). SARS-CoV2 pneumonia was confirmed by PCR from respiratory tract in 39 (79%) patients and by thoracic CT scan in the remaining patients. CPAP was performed out of ICU in 41 (84%) cases. Median age was 65 years (IQR=54-71). Median duration of CPAP treatment was 3 days (IQR=1-5). Reasons for discontinuation of CPAP were intubation for invasive ventilation in 25 (51%) patients, improvement in 16 (33%), poor tolerance in 6 (12%) and death in 2 (4%). A decision not to intubate had been taken for the 2 patients who died while on CPAP.ConclusionsTreatment with CPAP is feasible and safe in a non-ICU environment in the context of a massive influx of patients. One third of these patients with high oxygen requirements did not eventually need invasive ventilation.Key messagesWhat is the key question?What is the best respiratory support strategy to manage a massive influx of patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure despite high-flow oxygen delivered with a non-rebreather mask?What is the bottom line?Continuous positive airway pressure face mask ventilation delivered in non-ICU wards to patients who do not require immediate intubation is feasible and safe.Why read on?Face mask ventilation with CPAP should be considered as an option of respiratory support in the context of the on-going COVID-19 pandemic and limited availability of ICU beds.

Bedeutung nicht-invasiver Verfahren in der Therapie des akuten hypoxämischen Versagens bei COVID-19

Pneumologie ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfram Windisch ◽  
Bernd Schönhofer ◽  
Daniel Sebastian Majorski ◽  
Maximilian Wollsching-Strobel ◽  
Carl-Peter Criée ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Airway Pressure ◽  
Oxygen Therapy ◽  
Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation ◽  
High Flow Oxygen ◽  
Invasive Verfahren

ZusammenfassungIn der Corona-Pandemie werden zunehmend nicht-invasive Verfahren zur Behandlung des akuten hypoxämischen Versagens bei COVID-19 eingesetzt. Hier stehen mit der HFOT (high-flow oxygen therapy), CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) und der NIV (non-invasive ventilation) unterschiedliche Verfahren zur Verfügung, die das Ziel einer Intubationsvermeidung verfolgen. Der aktuelle Übersichtsartikel fasst die heterogene Studienlage zusammen. Wesentlich ist die Erkenntnis, dass diese nicht-invasiven Verfahren durchaus auch bei einem schweren, akuten hypoxämischen Versagen erfolgreich sein können und damit die Intubation wie auch Tubus-assoziierte Komplikationen vermeiden können. Demgegenüber bleibt aber ebenso zu betonen, dass die prolongierte unterstützte Spontanatmung ebenfalls zu Komplikationen führt und dass demzufolge insbesondere ein spätes NIV-Versagen mit erheblich verschlechterter Prognose einhergeht, was vor dem Hintergrund weiterhin hoher NIV-Versagensraten in Deutschland bedeutsam ist. Der aktuelle Artikel verweist schließlich auch auf einen Parallelartikel in dieser Ausgabe, der die medial in der Öffentlichkeit in Deutschland geführte Debatte zu diesem Thema aufgreift und deren inhaltliche Fragwürdigkeit, aber auch die negativen Auswirkungen auf die Gesellschaft und die Fachwelt adressiert. Gleichzeitig wird die Bedeutung von regelmäßig zu überarbeitenden Leitlinien untermauert.

Comparison between Continuous positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) in Management of Bronchiolitis and community acquired pneumonia in Infants and Young Children

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarek Ahmed Abdel Gawad ◽  
Ahmad Mostafa Allam ◽  
Sarah Ali El Sayed
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Airway Pressure ◽  
Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Nasal Cannula ◽  
Respiratory Support ◽  
High Flow Nasal Cannula

Abstract Background Acute respiratory failure develops in infants with bronchiolitis and Community acquired pneumonia (CAP) because of hypoxemia, due to mismatch between ventilation and perfusion. Nasal continuous airway pressure (nCPAP) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) improve the work of breathing and oxygenation .High flow nasal cannula (HFNC), also called heated humidified high flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC), is a new non-invasive ventilation therapy that seems to be well tolerated in infants with hypoxemic respiratory failure. Aim To compare the effectiveness and the outcome of Heated Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP), as a primary mode of respiratory support, in patients with respiratory failure due to pneumonia or bronchiolitis at PICU regarding demographic data, length of admission, increasing of positive pressure and need of intubation. Patients and Methods observational study was conducted on 40 patients with acute respiratory failure due to either bronchiolitis or community acquired pneumonia (CAP), admitted to Paediatric ICU, Children Hospital, Ain Shams University, in the time period between February 2018 to July 2019. The patients, aged between 1 month to 5 years, were subjected to detailed clinical history and examination.All patients received continuous monitoring of electrocardiograph ,pulse oximetry and respiratory rate .The patients were treated either with (HFNC) Humidified high flow nasal cannula or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Studied groups were compared regarding demographic data, increasing in respiratory support ,need of intubation, fate and length of admission during PICU stay. Results HFNC was as efficient as CPAP in lowering RR(respiratory rate) and HR(heart rate) in infants with bronchiolitis and community acquired pneumonia. Thus HFNC group was as significant as NCPAP group in treatment of bronchiolitis and CAP regarding length of admission ,increasing of positive pressure and need of iintubation in PICU . Conclusion This study concluded that HFNC is as efficient as nCPAP for initial respiratory support in young infants, hospitalized in a PICU for moderate to severe acute respiratory failure.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in the Management of Patients with Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pneumonia who are not Suitable for Invasive Ventilation

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-27
Author(s):  
Hnin Aung ◽  
Eleni Avraam ◽  
Muhammad Ashraf ◽  
Nawazish Karim ◽  
Sidra Kiran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Airway Pressure ◽  
Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Control Group ◽  
British Thoracic Society ◽  
P Value ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Peripheral Oxygen Saturation

Background: The optimum management of respiratory failure in patients with coronavirus (COVID-19) infections has been a challenge for physicians across the globe. Many scientific societies have suggested the use of CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) in severe cases in an effort to reduce invasive ventilation. We investigated mortality outcomes in patients who needed CPAP but were not suitable for invasive ventilation. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the mortality outcomes of all consecutive COVID-19 cases with severe type 1 respiratory failure requiring FiO2 >0.6 who were admitted to our hospital between 12th March and 04th May’20. British Thoracic Society guidelines were followed for identifying patients needing CPAP. Their outcomes were recorded and compared with a similar group of patients who had oxygen as a ceiling of care. Prospectively collected data between 5th May and 7th June’20 in similar but smaller groups of patients was also analyzed. Results: A total of 104 COVID-19 patients with documented Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) decision required high fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) >0.6(to maintain peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2)> 92%(SpO2> 88% in COPD patients). Twenty-four patients received CPAP as the ceiling of care, with a mortality rate of 92.5%. The remaining 84 patients who were on oxygen as a ceiling of treatment had 91.7% mortality. Both population groups had a similar number of comorbidities but were less favorable in terms of age in the control group with standard O2 therapy than those who had CPAP support. Overall mortality outcomes from using CPAP therapy did not bring significant mortality benefit (p-value-0.89). Conclusion: CPAP did not appear to improve the survival of patients with severe respiratory failure due to COVID-19 related pneumonia and were not suitable for invasive ventilation. Further studies are warranted to adequately inform appropriate management strategies for this group of patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document