scholarly journals Effects of high-intensity interval training in patients with coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinyue Zhang ◽  
Dongmei Xu ◽  
Guozhen Sun ◽  
Zhixin Jiang ◽  
Jinping Tian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
High Intensity Interval ◽  
Late Luminal Loss

BackgroundHigh-intensity interval training, for its characteristic of short-time high oxygen-consumption exercise interphase with periods of low-intensity training or rest for recovery, is easier to persist and execute in cardiac rehabilitation. However, it is little known whether HIIT program has an advantageous effect on patients after percutaneous coronary intervention or not.MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on HIIT program in patients after PCI were searched in Cochrane Library, Web of Science Core Collection, EMbase, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and SinoMed from the inception to March 24, 2020. Two reviewers conducted the literature retrieval, data extraction, and quality assessment independently. Standard Mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were performed to summarize the effect sizes.Results6 RCTs (247 patients) met the criteria. HIIT program had a statistically significant effect on raising left ventricular ejection function (LVEF) (SMD=0.38, 95%CI[0.03, 0.73], p=0.03), VO2peak (SMD=0.94, 95%CI[0.61, 1.28], p<0.01), as well as improving the serum level of high-density lipoprotein (SMD=0.55, 95%CI[0.06, 1.03], p=0.03) and late luminal loss (SMD=−0.65, 95%CI[−1.07, −0.23], p<0.01). But HIIT had no prominent effect on improving heart rate (SMD=−0.04, 95%CI[-0.29, 0.21], p=0.73).ConclusionsHIIT program might be favorable for CAD patients after PCI by improving cardiopulmonary function, such as LVEF and VO2peak, as well as reducing late luminal loss in per stented arteries. Nevertheless, HIIT had no advantage for adjusting heart rate. More researches with rigorous methods are warranted to explore the controversy about lipid profiles.

scholarly journals The Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training vs. Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Heart Rate Variability in Physically Inactive Adults

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 1508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdullah Alansare ◽  
Ken Alford ◽  
Sukho Lee ◽  
Tommie Church ◽  
Hyun Jung
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Heart Rate Variability ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
Moderate Intensity ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
Continuous Training ◽  
Significant Interaction Effect ◽  
High Intensity Interval ◽  
Physically Inactive

Physically inactive adults are prevalent worldwide. This study compared the effects of short-term high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on heart rate variability (HRV) in physically inactive adults as a preliminary study. Thirteen physically inactive male adults (27.5 ± 3.80 years) were randomly assigned to HIIT (N = 7) or MICT (N = 6). The HIIT program consisted of 20 min of interval training with cycling to rest ratio of 10/50 s at ≥90% HRpeak, while the MICT program consisted of 40 min of continuous cycling at 60–75% HRpeak. Both groups completed eight sessions of training within two weeks. Time and frequency domains of HRV were measured for 20 min with Actiwave-Cardio monitor (CamNtech, UK). The number of R-R interval and inter-beat interval (IBI) were significantly improved (p < 0.05) in both HIIT and MICT programs following eight sessions of training. A significant interaction effect for group by time was found in the lnLF/HF ratio (p < 0.05) where it was only improved in the HIIT group from pre- to post-test. The HIIT program is superior to MICT in improving HRV in physically inactive adults. The HIIT program can be applied as a time-efficient program for improving cardiac-autoregulation.

Comparison of different volumes of high intensity interval training on cardiac autonomic function in sedentary young women

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pooja Bhati ◽  
Vishal Bansal ◽  
Jamal Ali Moiz
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Body Composition ◽  
Muscle Strength ◽  
Young Women ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
Treadmill Running ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
High Intensity Interval

Abstract Purpose The present study was conducted to compare the effects of low volume of high intensity interval training (LVHIIT) and high volume of high intensity interval training (HVHIIT) on heart rate variability (HRV) as a primary outcome measure, and on maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max), body composition, and lower limb muscle strength as secondary outcome measures, in sedentary young women. Methods Thirty-six participants were recruited in this study. The LVHIIT group (n = 17) performed one 4-min bout of treadmill running at 85%–95% maximum heart rate (HRmax), followed by 3 min of recovery by running at 70% HRmax, three times per week for 6 weeks. The HVHIIT group (n = 15) performed four times 4-min bouts of treadmill running at 85%–95% HRmax, interspersed with 3-min of recovery by running at 70% HRmax, 3 times per week for 6 weeks. All criterion measures were measured before and after training in both the groups. Results Due to attrition of four cases, data of 32 participants was used for analysis. A significant increase in high frequency (HF) power (p < 0.001) and decrease in the ratio of low frequency to high frequency power (LF/HF) ratio (p < 0.001) in HRV parameters, was observed post-HVHIIT, whereas, these variables did not change significantly (HF: p = 0.92, LF/HF ratio: p = 0.52) in LVHIIT group. Nevertheless, both the interventions proved equally effective in improving aerobic capacity (VO2max), body composition, and muscle strength. Conclusion The study results suggest that both LVHIIT and HVHIIT are equally effective in improving VO2max, body composition, and muscle strength, in sedentary young women. However, HVHIIT induces parasympathetic dominance as well, as measured by HRV.

scholarly journals Effects of Heart Rate vs. Speed-Based High Intensity Interval Training on Aerobic and Anaerobic Capacity of Female Soccer Players

Sports ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamid Arazi ◽  
Abbas Keihaniyan ◽  
Amin EatemadyBoroujeni ◽  
Amir Oftade ◽  
Sheida Takhsha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Anaerobic Capacity ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
Soccer Players ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
High Intensity Interval ◽  
Aerobic And Anaerobic
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document