scholarly journals SUMO orchestrates multiple alternative DNA-protein crosslink repair pathways

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nataliia Serbyn ◽  
Ivona Bagdiul ◽  
Agnès H. Michel ◽  
Raymond T. Suhandynata ◽  
Huilin Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Sumo Conjugation ◽  
Therapeutic Drugs ◽  
Sumo Ligase ◽  
Environmental Agents ◽  
Multiple Alternative ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Endogenous Metabolites ◽  
Protein Crosslinks

SUMMARYSeveral endogenous metabolites, environmental agents, and therapeutic drugs promote formation of covalent DNA-protein crosslinks (DPCs). Persistent DPCs pose a serious threat to genome integrity and are eliminated by multiple repair pathways. Aberrant Top1 crosslinks to DNA, or Top1ccs, are processed by Tdp1 and Wss1 functioning in parallel pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. It remains obscure how cells choose between these diverse mechanisms of DPC repair. Here we show that several SUMO biogenesis factors - Ulp1, Siz2, Slx5, Slx8 - control repair of Top1cc or an analogous DPC lesion. Genetic analysis reveals that SUMO promotes Top1cc processing in the absence of Tdp1 but has an inhibitory role if cells additionally lack Wss1. In the tdp1Δ wss1Δ mutant, the E3 SUMO ligase Siz2 stimulates sumoylation in the vicinity of the DPC, but not SUMO conjugation to Top1. This Siz2-dependent sumoylation delays DPC repair when cells progress through S and G2 phases. Our findings suggest that SUMO tunes available repair pathways to facilitate faithful DPC repair.

scholarly journals Numerical and Spatial Patterning of Yeast Meiotic DNA Breaks by Tel1

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neeman Mohibullah ◽  
Scott Keeney
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Deep Sequencing ◽  
Meiotic Recombination ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Spatial Patterning ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Context Dependent

AbstractThe Spo11-generated double-strand breaks (DSBs) that initiate meiotic recombination are dangerous lesions that can disrupt genome integrity, so meiotic cells regulate their number, timing, and distribution. Here, we use Spo11-oligonucleotide complexes, a byproduct of DSB formation, to examine the contribution of the DNA damage-responsive kinase Tel1 (ortholog of mammalian ATM) to this regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. A tel1Δ mutant had globally increased amounts of Spo11-oligonucleotide complexes and altered Spo11-oligonucleotide lengths, consistent with conserved roles for Tel1 in control of DSB number and processing. A kinase-dead tell mutation also increased Spo11-oligonucleotide levels, but mutating known Tel1 phosphotargets on Hop1 and Rec114 did not. Deep sequencing of Spo11 oligonucleotides from tel1Δ mutants demonstrated that Tel1 shapes the nonrandom DSB distribution in ways that are distinct but partially overlapping with previously described contributions of the recombination regulator Zip3. Finally, we uncover a context-dependent role for Tel1 in hotspot competition, in which an artificial DSB hotspot inhibits nearby hotspots. Evidence for Tel1-dependent competition involving strong natural hotspots is also provided.

scholarly journals RecQ helicases in DNA repair and cancer targets

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 819-830
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Newman ◽  
Opher Gileadi
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Small Molecules ◽  
Atp Hydrolysis ◽  
Cancer Therapeutics ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Mechanistic Study ◽  
Synthetic Lethal ◽  
Recq Helicases ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Higher Eukaryotes

Abstract Helicases are enzymes that use the energy derived from ATP hydrolysis to catalyze the unwinding of DNA or RNA. The RecQ family of helicases is conserved through evolution from prokaryotes to higher eukaryotes and plays important roles in various DNA repair pathways, contributing to the maintenance of genome integrity. Despite their roles as general tumor suppressors, there is now considerable interest in exploiting RecQ helicases as synthetic lethal targets for the development of new cancer therapeutics. In this review, we summarize the latest developments in the structural and mechanistic study of RecQ helicases and discuss their roles in various DNA repair pathways. Finally, we consider the potential to exploit RecQ helicases as therapeutic targets and review the recent progress towards the development of small molecules targeting RecQ helicases as cancer therapeutics.

scholarly journals TRIM28 Is an E3 Ligase for ARF-Mediated NPM1/B23 SUMOylation That Represses Centrosome Amplification

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (16) ◽  
pp. 2851-2863 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu Hui Neo ◽  
Yoko Itahana ◽  
Jennifer Alagu ◽  
Mayumi Kitagawa ◽  
Alvin Kunyao Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Suppressors ◽  
Physiological Function ◽  
E3 Ligase ◽  
Genomic Stability ◽  
Centrosome Amplification ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Centrosome Duplication ◽  
Oncogenic Ras ◽  
Sumo Ligase ◽  
Sumo E3 Ligase

The tumor suppressor ARF enhances the SUMOylation of target proteins; however, the physiological function of ARF-mediated SUMOylation has been unclear due to the lack of a known, associated E3 SUMO ligase. Here we uncover TRIM28/KAP1 as a novel ARF-binding protein and SUMO E3 ligase for NPM1/B23. ARF and TRIM28 cooperate to SUMOylate NPM1, a nucleolar protein that regulates centrosome duplication and genomic stability. ARF-mediated SUMOylation of NPM1 was attenuated by TRIM28 depletion and enhanced by TRIM28 overexpression. Coexpression of ARF and TRIM28 promoted NPM1 centrosomal localization by enhancing its SUMOylation and suppressed centrosome amplification; these functions required the E3 ligase activity of TRIM28. Conversely, depletion of ARF or TRIM28 increased centrosome amplification. ARF also counteracted oncogenic Ras-induced centrosome amplification. Centrosome amplification is often induced by oncogenic insults, leading to genomic instability. However, the mechanisms employed by tumor suppressors to protect the genome are poorly understood. Our findings suggest a novel role for ARF in maintaining genome integrity by facilitating TRIM28-mediated SUMOylation of NPM1, thus preventing centrosome amplification.

scholarly journals A non-canonical role for the DNA glycosylase NEIL3 in suppressing APE1 endonuclease-mediated ssDNA damage

2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (41) ◽  
pp. 14222-14235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anh Ha ◽  
Yunfeng Lin ◽  
Shan Yan
Keyword(s):  
Excision Repair ◽  
Dna Glycosylase ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Ap Endonuclease ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Egg Extracts ◽  
Lyase Activity ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Base Excision ◽  
Ap Lyase

The DNA glycosylase NEIL3 has been implicated in DNA repair pathways including the base excision repair and the interstrand cross-link repair pathways via its DNA glycosylase and/or AP lyase activity, which are considered canonical roles of NEIL3 in genome integrity. Compared with the other DNA glycosylases NEIL1 and NEIL2, Xenopus laevis NEIL3 C terminus has two highly conserved zinc finger motifs containing GRXF residues (designated as Zf-GRF). It has been demonstrated that the minor AP endonuclease APE2 contains only one Zf-GRF motif mediating interaction with single-strand DNA (ssDNA), whereas the major AP endonuclease APE1 does not. It appears that the two NEIL3 Zf-GRF motifs (designated as Zf-GRF repeat) are dispensable for its DNA glycosylase and AP lyase activity; however, the potential function of the NEIL3 Zf-GRF repeat in genome integrity remains unknown. Here, we demonstrate evidence that the NEIL3 Zf-GRF repeat was associated with a higher affinity for shorter ssDNA than one single Zf-GRF motif. Notably, our protein–protein interaction assays show that the NEIL3 Zf-GRF repeat but not one Zf-GRF motif interacted with APE1 but not APE2. We further reveal that APE1 endonuclease activity on ssDNA but not on dsDNA is compromised by a NEIL3 Zf-GRF repeat, whereas one Zf-GRF motif within NEIL3 is not sufficient to prevent such activity of APE1. In addition, COMET assays show that excess NEIL3 Zf-GRF repeat reduces DNA damage in oxidative stress in Xenopus egg extracts. Together, our results suggest a noncanonical role of NEIL3 in genome integrity via its distinct Zf-GRF repeat in suppressing APE1 endonuclease-mediated ssDNA breakage.

scholarly journals DNA polymerases δ and λ cooperate in repairing double-strand breaks by microhomology-mediated end-joining in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (50) ◽  
pp. E6907-E6916 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damon Meyer ◽  
Becky Xu Hua Fu ◽  
Wolf-Dietrich Heyer
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Polymerase Delta ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Repair Efficiency ◽  
Repair Pathways

Maintenance of genome stability is carried out by a suite of DNA repair pathways that ensure the repair of damaged DNA and faithful replication of the genome. Of particular importance are the repair pathways, which respond to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), and how the efficiency of repair is influenced by sequence homology. In this study, we developed a genetic assay in diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells to analyze DSBs requiring microhomologies for repair, known as microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ). MMEJ repair efficiency increased concomitant with microhomology length and decreased upon introduction of mismatches. The central proteins in homologous recombination (HR), Rad52 and Rad51, suppressed MMEJ in this system, suggesting a competition between HR and MMEJ for the repair of a DSB. Importantly, we found that DNA polymerase delta (Pol δ) is critical for MMEJ, independent of microhomology length and base-pairing continuity. MMEJ recombinants showed evidence that Pol δ proofreading function is active during MMEJ-mediated DSB repair. Furthermore, mutations in Pol δ and DNA polymerase 4 (Pol λ), the DNA polymerase previously implicated in MMEJ, cause a synergistic decrease in MMEJ repair. Pol λ showed faster kinetics associating with MMEJ substrates following DSB induction than Pol δ. The association of Pol δ depended on RAD1, which encodes the flap endonuclease needed to cleave MMEJ intermediates before DNA synthesis. Moreover, Pol δ recruitment was diminished in cells lacking Pol λ. These data suggest cooperative involvement of both polymerases in MMEJ.

scholarly journals Preface

1995 ◽  
Vol 347 (1319) ◽  
pp. 3-3
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Model Systems ◽  
Biochemical Pathways ◽  
Major Threat ◽  
Environmental Agents ◽  
Living Organisms ◽  
New Research ◽  
Micro Organisms

Genomic instability is a major threat to living organisms. To counteract the damaging effects posed by endogenous and environmental agents, such as chemicals or radiation, micro-organisms devote several percent of their genome to encode proteins that function in the repair and recombination of DNA. For many years, a relatively small group of scientists have carefully delineated the molecular mechanisms of these repair processes, using the simplest model systems available, namely Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae . These studies, which until recently had only moderate impact outside of the field, now provide the cornerstone for exciting new research into analogous processes in hum an cells. The reason for this is the revelation that the biochemical pathways for the accurate replication, repair and recombination of DNA have been conserved through evolution.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document