scholarly journals Pax7 pioneer factor action requires both paired and homeo DNA binding domains

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Audrey Pelletier ◽  
Alexandre Mayran ◽  
Arthur Gouhier ◽  
James G Omichinski ◽  
Aurelio Balsalobre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Dna Sequence ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Paired Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Target Sites ◽  
Pioneer Factor ◽  
Chromatin Opening

AbstractThe pioneer transcription factor Pax7 contains two DNA binding domains (DBD), a paired and a homeo domain. Previous work on Pax7 and the related Pax3 had shown that each DBD can bind a cognate DNA sequence, thus defining two targets of binding and possibly modalities of action. Genomic targets of Pax7 pioneer action leading to chromatin opening are enriched for composite DNA target sites containing juxtaposed binding sites for both paired and homeo domains. The present work investigated the implication of both DBDs in pioneer action. We now show that the composite sequence is a higher affinity Pax7 binding site compared to either paired or homeo binding sites and that efficient binding to this site involves both DBDs. We also show that a Pax7 monomer binds composite sites and that methylation of cytosines within the binding site does not affect binding, which is consistent with pioneer action exerted at methylated DNA sites within nucleosomal heterochromatin. Finally, introduction of single amino acid mutations in either the paired or homeo domain that impair binding to cognate DNA sequences showed that both DBDs must be intact for pioneer action. In contrast, only the paired domain is required for low affinity binding of heterochromatin sites. Thus, Pax7 pioneer action on heterochromatin requires unique protein:DNA interactions that are more complex compared to its simpler DNA binding modalities at accessible enhancer target sites.Significance StatementPioneer transcription factors have the unique ability to recognize DNA target sites within closed heterochromatin and to trigger chromatin opening. Only a fraction of the heterochromatin recruitment sites of pioneers are subject to chromatin opening. The molecular basis for this selectivity is unknown and the present work addressed the importance of DNA sequence affinity for selection of sites to open. The pioneering ability of the pioneer factor Pax7 is not strictly determined by affinity or DNA sequence of binding sites, nor by number or methylation status of DNA sites. Mutation analyses showed that recruitment to heterochromatin is primarily dependent on the Pax7 paired domain whereas the ability to open chromatin requires both paired and homeo DNA binding domains.

scholarly journals Drosophila Paired regulates late even-skipped expression through a composite binding site for the paired domain and the homeodomain

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (9) ◽  
pp. 2697-2707 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Fujioka ◽  
P. Miskiewicz ◽  
L. Raj ◽  
A.A. Gulledge ◽  
M. Weir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Paired Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Two Phases ◽  
Pair Rule

The even-skipped (eve) pair-rule gene plays a key role in the establishment of the anterior-posterior segmental pattern of the Drosophila embryo. The continuously changing pattern of eve expression can be resolved into two phases. Early expression consists of seven broad stripes in the blastoderm embryo, while late expression, which occurs after cellularization, consists of narrow stripes with sharp anterior borders that coincide with the odd-numbered parasegment boundaries. Previous studies have shown that these two phases are controlled by separate classes of cis elements in the eve promoter. Early stripes are expressed by multiple stripe-specific elements under the control of maternal-effect genes and gap genes, while late stripes are expressed by a single regulatory element, the ‘late element’, under the control of pair-rule genes including eve itself. We report here that paired (prd), a pair-rule gene which had been considered to be below eve in the regulatory hierarchy of pair-rule genes, in fact plays a critical role in the regulation of late eve expression. Transgenic analysis shows that this regulation is largely mediated by an evolutionarily conserved sequence within the late element termed PTE (Paired Target Element). In vitro analysis shows that the Prd protein binds strongly to this sequence. Interestingly, PTE contains juxtaposed binding sites for the two DNA-binding domains of the Prd protein, the paired domain and the homeodomain. Mutagenesis of either binding site leads to significant reduction in the activity of the late element, indicating that both DNA-binding domains in the Paired protein are required for regulation.

In vivo requirement for the paired domain and homeodomain of the paired segmentation gene product

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (9) ◽  
pp. 2673-2685 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Bertuccioli ◽  
L. Fasano ◽  
S. Jun ◽  
S. Wang ◽  
G. Sheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Mode ◽  
Cooperative Interaction ◽  
Paired Domain ◽  
Conserved Motifs ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Functionally Impaired

The Drosophila pair-rule gene paired is required for the correct expression of the segment polarity genes wingless, engrailed and gooseberry. It encodes a protein containing three conserved motifs: a homeodomain (HD), a paired domain (PD) and a PRD (His/Pro) repeat. We use a rescue assay in which paired (or a mutated version of paired in which the functions of the conserved motifs have been altered) is expressed under the control of its own promoter, in the absence of endogenous paired, to dissect the Paired protein in vivo. We show that both the HD and the N- terminal subdomain of the PD (PAI domain) are absolutely required within the same molecule for normal paired function. In contrast, the conserved C-terminal subdomain of the PD (RED domain) appears to be dispensable. Furthermore, although a mutation abolishing the ability of the homeodomain to dimerize results in an impaired Paired molecule, this molecule is nonetheless able to mediate a high degree of rescue. Finally, a paired transgene lacking the PRD repeat is functionally impaired, but still able to rescue to viability. We conclude that, while Prd can use its DNA-binding domains combinatorially in order to achieve different DNA-binding specificities, its principal binding mode requires a cooperative interaction between the PAI domain and the homeodomain.

scholarly journals Characterization of quail Pax-6 (Pax-QNR) proteins expressed in the neuroretina.

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 7257-7266 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Carriere ◽  
S Plaza ◽  
P Martin ◽  
B Quatannens ◽  
M Bailly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Autosomal Dominant ◽  
Paired Domain ◽  
Terminal Part ◽  
Dominant Mutation ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Carboxyl Terminal

After differential screening of a cDNA library constructed from quail neuroretina cells (QNR) infected with the v-myc-containing avian retrovirus MC29, we have isolated a cDNA clone, Pax-QNR, homologous to the murine Pax-6, which is mutated in the autosomal dominant mutation small eye of mice and in the disorder aniridia in humans. Here we report the characterization of the Pax-QNR proteins expressed in the avian neuroretina. From bacterially expressed Pax-QNR peptides, we obtained rabbit antisera directed against different domains of the protein: paired domain (serum 11), domain between the paired domain and homeodomain (serum 12), homeodomain (serum 13), and carboxyl-terminal part (serum 14). Sera 12, 13, and 14 were able to specifically recognize five proteins (48, 46, 43, 33, and 32 kDa) in the neuroretina. In contrast to proteins of 48, 46, and 43 kDa, proteins of 33 and 32 kDa were not recognized by the paired antiserum (serum 11). Paired-less and paired-containing proteins exhibited the same half-life (6 h) and were phosphorylated mostly on serine residues. Immunoprecipitations performed with subcellular fractions of neuroretinas showed that the paired-containing proteins were located in the nucleus, whereas the 33- and 32-kDa proteins were found essentially in the cytoplasmic compartment. However, immunofluorescence experiments performed after transient transfections showed that p46 and p33/32 were also located in vivo into the nucleus. Thus, the Pax-QNR/Pax-6 gene can produce proteins with two DNA-binding domains as well as proteins containing only the DNA-binding homeodomain.

scholarly journals SelexGLM differentiates androgen and glucocorticoid receptor DNA-binding preference over an extended binding site

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liyang Zhang ◽  
Gabriella D. Martini ◽  
H. Tomas Rube ◽  
Judith F. Kribelbauer ◽  
Chaitanya Rastogi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Isothermal Calorimetry ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Relative Preference ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Two Factors ◽  
Prostate Cancers

ABSTRACTThe DNA-binding interfaces of the androgen (AR) and glucocorticoid (GR) receptors are virtually identical, yet these transcription factors share only about a third of their genomic binding sites and regulate similarly distinct sets of target genes. To address this paradox, we determined the intrinsic specificities of the AR and GR DNA binding domains using a refined version of SELEX-seq. We developed an algorithm, SelexGLM, that quantifies binding specificity over a large (31 bp) binding-site by iteratively fitting a feature-based generalized linear model to SELEX probe counts. This analysis revealed that the DNA binding preferences of AR and GR homodimers differ significantly, both within and outside the 15bp core binding site. The relative preference between the two factors can be tuned over a wide range by changing the DNA sequence, with AR more sensitive to sequence changes than GR. The specificity of AR extends to the regions flanking the core 15bp site, where isothermal calorimetry measurements reveal that affinity is augmented by enthalpy-driven readout of poly-A sequences associated with narrowed minor groove width. We conclude that the increased specificity of AR is correlated with more enthalpy-driven binding than GR. The binding models help explain differences in AR and GR genomic binding, and provide a biophysical rationale for how promiscuous binding by GR allows functional substitution for AR in some castration-resistant prostate cancers.

Characterization of quail Pax-6 (Pax-QNR) proteins expressed in the neuroretina

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 7257-7266
Author(s):  
C Carriere ◽  
S Plaza ◽  
P Martin ◽  
B Quatannens ◽  
M Bailly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Autosomal Dominant ◽  
Paired Domain ◽  
Terminal Part ◽  
Dominant Mutation ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Carboxyl Terminal

After differential screening of a cDNA library constructed from quail neuroretina cells (QNR) infected with the v-myc-containing avian retrovirus MC29, we have isolated a cDNA clone, Pax-QNR, homologous to the murine Pax-6, which is mutated in the autosomal dominant mutation small eye of mice and in the disorder aniridia in humans. Here we report the characterization of the Pax-QNR proteins expressed in the avian neuroretina. From bacterially expressed Pax-QNR peptides, we obtained rabbit antisera directed against different domains of the protein: paired domain (serum 11), domain between the paired domain and homeodomain (serum 12), homeodomain (serum 13), and carboxyl-terminal part (serum 14). Sera 12, 13, and 14 were able to specifically recognize five proteins (48, 46, 43, 33, and 32 kDa) in the neuroretina. In contrast to proteins of 48, 46, and 43 kDa, proteins of 33 and 32 kDa were not recognized by the paired antiserum (serum 11). Paired-less and paired-containing proteins exhibited the same half-life (6 h) and were phosphorylated mostly on serine residues. Immunoprecipitations performed with subcellular fractions of neuroretinas showed that the paired-containing proteins were located in the nucleus, whereas the 33- and 32-kDa proteins were found essentially in the cytoplasmic compartment. However, immunofluorescence experiments performed after transient transfections showed that p46 and p33/32 were also located in vivo into the nucleus. Thus, the Pax-QNR/Pax-6 gene can produce proteins with two DNA-binding domains as well as proteins containing only the DNA-binding homeodomain.

Cooperative interactions between paired domain and homeodomain

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (9) ◽  
pp. 2639-2650 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Jun ◽  
C. Desplan
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Cooperative Interaction ◽  
Paired Domain ◽  
Cooperative Interactions ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains

The Pax proteins are a family of transcriptional regulators involved in many developmental processes in all higher eukaryotes. They are characterized by the presence of a paired domain (PD), a bipartite DNA binding domain composed of two helix-turn-helix (HTH) motifs, the PAI and RED domains. The PD is also often associated with a homeodomain (HD) which is itself able to form homo- and hetero-dimers on DNA. Many of these proteins therefore contain three HTH motifs each able to recognize DNA. However, all PDs recognize highly related DNA sequences, and most HDs also recognize almost identical sites. We show here that different Pax proteins use multiple combinations of their HTHs to recognize several types of target sites. For instance, the Drosophila Paired protein can bind, in vitro, exclusively through its PAI domain, or through a dimer of its HD, or through cooperative interaction between PAI domain and HD. However, prd function in vivo requires the synergistic action of both the PAI domain and the HD. Pax proteins with only a PD appear to require both PAI and RED domains, while a Pax-6 isoform and a new Pax protein, Lune, may rely on the RED domain and HD. We propose a model by which Pax proteins recognize different target genes in vivo through various combinations of their DNA binding domains, thus expanding their recognition repertoire.

An interaction between the DNA-binding domains of RelA(p65) and Sp1 mediates human immunodeficiency virus gene activation

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 6570-6583 ◽  
Author(s):  
N D Perkins ◽  
A B Agranoff ◽  
E Pascal ◽  
G J Nabel
Keyword(s):  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Nf Kappa B ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Amino Terminal ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Hiv 1

Induction of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) gene expression in stimulated T cells has been attributed to the activation of the transcription factor NF-kappa B. The twice-repeated kappa B sites within the HIV-1 long terminal repeat are in close proximity to three binding sites for Sp1. We have previously shown that a cooperative interaction of NF-kappa B with Sp1 is required for the efficient stimulation of HIV-1 transcription. In this report, we define the domains of each protein responsible for this effect. Although the transactivation domains seemed likely to mediate this interaction, we find, surprisingly, that this interaction occurs through the putative DNA-binding domains of both proteins. Sp1 specifically interacted with the amino-terminal region of RelA(p65). Similarly, RelA bound directly to the zinc finger region of Sp1. This interaction was specific and resulted in cooperative DNA binding to the kappa B and Sp1 sites in the HIV-1 long terminal repeat. Furthermore, the amino-terminal region of RelA did not associate with several other transcription factors, including MyoD, E12, or Kox15, another zinc finger protein. These findings suggest that the juxtaposition of DNA-binding sites promotes a specific protein interaction between the DNA-binding regions of these transcription factors. This interaction is required for HIV transcriptional activation and may provide a mechanism to allow for selective activation of kappa B-regulated genes.

scholarly journals Identification of Position-Specific Correlations between DNA-Binding Domains and Their Binding Sites. Application to the MerR Family of Transcription Factors

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. e0162681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuriy D. Korostelev ◽  
Ilya A. Zharov ◽  
Andrey A. Mironov ◽  
Alexandra B. Rakhmaininova ◽  
Mikhail S. Gelfand
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains

scholarly journals An interaction between the DNA-binding domains of RelA(p65) and Sp1 mediates human immunodeficiency virus gene activation.

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 6570-6583 ◽  
Author(s):  
N D Perkins ◽  
A B Agranoff ◽  
E Pascal ◽  
G J Nabel
Keyword(s):  
Human Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Nf Kappa B ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Amino Terminal ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Hiv 1

Induction of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) gene expression in stimulated T cells has been attributed to the activation of the transcription factor NF-kappa B. The twice-repeated kappa B sites within the HIV-1 long terminal repeat are in close proximity to three binding sites for Sp1. We have previously shown that a cooperative interaction of NF-kappa B with Sp1 is required for the efficient stimulation of HIV-1 transcription. In this report, we define the domains of each protein responsible for this effect. Although the transactivation domains seemed likely to mediate this interaction, we find, surprisingly, that this interaction occurs through the putative DNA-binding domains of both proteins. Sp1 specifically interacted with the amino-terminal region of RelA(p65). Similarly, RelA bound directly to the zinc finger region of Sp1. This interaction was specific and resulted in cooperative DNA binding to the kappa B and Sp1 sites in the HIV-1 long terminal repeat. Furthermore, the amino-terminal region of RelA did not associate with several other transcription factors, including MyoD, E12, or Kox15, another zinc finger protein. These findings suggest that the juxtaposition of DNA-binding sites promotes a specific protein interaction between the DNA-binding regions of these transcription factors. This interaction is required for HIV transcriptional activation and may provide a mechanism to allow for selective activation of kappa B-regulated genes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document