A dual role for DNA-binding by Runt in activation and repression of sloppy paired transcription

This work investigates the role of DNA-binding by Runt in regulating the sloppy-paired-1 ( slp1) gene, and in particular two distinct cis-regulatory elements that mediate regulation by Runt and other pair-rule transcription factors during Drosophila segmentation. We find that a DNA-binding defective form of Runt is ineffective at repressing both the distal (DESE) and proximal (PESE) early stripe elements of slp1 and is also compromised for DESE-dependent activation. The function of Runt-binding sites in DESE is further investigated using site-specific transgenesis and quantitative imaging techniques. When DESE is tested as an autonomous enhancer, mutagenesis of the Runt sites results in a clear loss of Runt-dependent repression but has little to no effect on Runt-dependent activation. Notably, mutagenesis of these same sites in the context of a reporter gene construct that also contains the PESE enhancer results in a significant reduction of DESE-dependent activation as well as the loss of repression observed for the autonomous mutant DESE enhancer. These results provide strong evidence that DNA-binding by Runt directly contributes to the regulatory interplay of interactions between these two enhancers in the early embryo.

Modulating the bicoid gradient in space and time

Background The formation of the Bicoid (Bcd) gradient in the early Drosophila is one of the most fascinating observations in biology and serves as a paradigm for gradient formation, yet its mechanism is still not fully understood. Two distinct models were proposed in the past, the SDD and the ARTS model. Results We define novel cis- and trans-acting factors that are indispensable for gradient formation. The first one is the poly A tail length of the bcd mRNA where we demonstrate that it changes not only in time, but also in space. We show that posterior bcd mRNAs possess a longer poly tail than anterior ones and this elongation is likely mediated by wispy (wisp), a poly A polymerase. Consequently, modulating the activity of Wisp results in changes of the Bcd gradient, in controlling downstream targets such as the gap and pair-rule genes, and also in influencing the cuticular pattern. Attempts to modulate the Bcd gradient by subjecting the egg to an extra nuclear cycle, i.e. a 15th nuclear cycle by means of the maternal haploid (mh) mutation showed no effect, neither on the appearance of the gradient nor on the control of downstream target. This suggests that the segmental anlagen are determined during the first 14 nuclear cycles. Finally, we identify the Cyclin B (CycB) gene as a trans-acting factor that modulates the movement of Bcd such that Bcd movement is allowed to move through the interior of the egg. Conclusions Our analysis demonstrates that Bcd gradient formation is far more complex than previously thought requiring a revision of the models of how the gradient is formed.

Annotation of segmentation pathway genes in the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri

Insects have a segmented body plan that is established during embryogenesis when the anterior–posterior (A–P) axis is divided into repeated units by a cascade of gene expression. The cascade is initiated by protein gradients created by translation of maternally provided mRNAs, localized at the anterior and posterior poles of the embryo. Combinations of these proteins activate specific gap genes to divide the embryo into distinct regions along the anterior–posterior axis. Gap genes then activate pair-rule genes, which are usually expressed in parts of every other segment. The pair-rule genes, in turn, activate expression of segment polarity genes in a portion of each segment. The segmentation genes are generally conserved among insects, although there is considerable variation in how they are deployed. We annotated 25 segmentation gene homologs in the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri. Most of the genes expected to be present in D. citri based on their phylogenetic distribution in other insects were identified and annotated. Two exceptions were eagle and invected, which are present in at least some hemipterans, but were not found in D. citri. Many of the segmentation pathway genes are likely to be essential for D. citri development, and thus they may be useful targets for gene-based pest control methods.

Nasoniasegmentation is regulated by an ancestral insect segmentation regulatory network also present in flies

Insect segmentation is a well-studied and tractable system with which to investigate the genetic regulation of development. Though insects segment their germband using a variety of methods, modelling work implies that a single gene regulatory network can underpin the two main types of insect segmentation. This means limited genetic changes are required to explain significant differences in segmentation mode between different insects. Evidence for this idea is limited toDrosophila melanogaster, Tribolium castaneum, and the spiderParasteatoda tepidariorum, and the nature of the gene regulatory network (GRN) underlying this model has not been tested. Some insects, for exampleNasonia vitripennisandApis melliferasegment progressively, a pattern not examined in studies of this segmentation model, producing stripes at different times throughout the embryo, but not from a segment addition zone.Here we aim to understand the GRNs patterningNasoniausing a simulation-based approach. We found that an existing model ofDrosophilasegmentation (Clark, 2017) can be used to recapitulateNasonia’s progressive segmentation, if provided with altered inputs in the form of expression of the timer genesNν-caudalandNν-odd paired. We also predict limited topological changes to the pair rule network. Together this implies that very limited changes to theDrosophilanetwork are required to simulateNasoniasegmentation, despite the differences in segmentation modes, implying thatNasoniause a very similar version of an ancestral GRN also used byDrosophila.

Segmentation pathway genes in the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri

Insects have a segmented body plan that is established during embryogenesis when the anterior-posterior (A-P) axis is divided into repeated units by a cascade of gene expression. The cascade is initiated by protein gradients created by translation of maternally provided mRNAs, localized at the anterior and posterior poles of the embryo. Particular combinations of these proteins activate specific gap genes to divide the embryo into distinct regions along the A-P axis. Gap genes then activate pair-rule genes, which are usually expressed in part of every other segment. The pair-rule genes, in turn, activate expression of segment polarity genes in a portion of each segment. The segmentation genes are generally conserved among insects, although there is considerable variation in how they are deployed. We annotated 24 segmentation gene homologs in the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri. We identified most of the genes that were expected to be present based on known phylogenetic distribution. Two exceptions were eagle and invected, which are present in at least some hemipterans, but were not identified in D. citri. Many of these genes are likely to be essential for D. citri development and thus may be useful targets for pest control methods.

Dynamic regulation of anterior-posterior patterning genes in living Drosophila embryos

SummaryExpression of the gap and pair-rule genes plays an essential role in body segmentation during Drosophila embryogenesis [1–5]. However, it remains unclear how precise expression patterns of these key developmental genes arise from stochastic transcriptional activation at the single cell level. Here, I employed genome editing and live imaging approaches to comprehensively visualize regulation of the gap and pair-rule genes at the endogenous loci. Quantitative image analysis revealed that the total duration of active transcription (transcription period) is a major determinant of spatial patterning of gene expression in early embryos. The length of transcription period is regulated by the continuity of bursting activities in individual nuclei, with core expression domain producing more bursts than boundary region. Each gene exhibits distinct rate of nascent RNA production during transcriptional bursting, which contributes to gene-to-gene variability in the total output. I also provide evidence for “enhancer competition”, wherein a distal weak enhancer interferes with transcriptional activation by a strong proximal enhancer to downregulate the length of transcription period without changing the transcription rate. Analysis of endogenous hunchback (hb) locus revealed that the removal of distal shadow enhancer induces strong ectopic transcriptional activation, which suppresses refinement of broad expression domain into narrower stripe pattern at the anterior part of embryos. This study provides key insights into the link between transcriptional bursting, enhancer-promoter interaction and spatiotemporal patterning of gene expression during animal development.

Regulatory gene function handoff allows essential gene loss in mosquitoes

Regulatory genes are often multifunctional and constrained, which results in evolutionary conservation. It is difficult to understand how a regulatory gene could be lost from one species’ genome when it is essential for viability in closely related species. The gene paired is a classic Drosophila pair-rule gene, required for formation of alternate body segments in diverse insect species. Surprisingly, paired was lost in mosquitoes without disrupting body patterning. Here, we demonstrate that a paired family member, gooseberry, has acquired paired-like expression in the malaria mosquito Anopheles stephensi. Anopheles-gooseberry CRISPR-Cas9 knock-out mutants display pair-rule phenotypes and alteration of target gene expression similar to what is seen in Drosophila and beetle paired mutants. Thus, paired was functionally replaced by the related gene, gooseberry, in mosquitoes. Our findings document a rare example of a functional replacement of an essential regulatory gene and provide a mechanistic explanation of how such loss can occur.