scholarly journals Optimal and regulated transcription facilitates formation of damage-induced cohesion

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pei-Shang Wu ◽  
Donald P. Cameron ◽  
Jan Grosser ◽  
Laura Baranello ◽  
Lena Ström

AbstractThe SMC complex cohesin mediates sister chromatid cohesion established during replication, and damage-induced cohesion formed in response to DSBs post replication. The translesion synthesis polymerase Polη is required for damage-induced cohesion through a hitherto unknown mechanism. Since Polη is functionally associated with transcription, and transcription triggers de novo cohesion in S. pombe, we hypothesized that active transcription facilitates damage-induced cohesion in S. cerevisiae. Here, we found that expression of genes involved in chromatin assembly and positive transcription regulation were relatively enriched in WT compared to Polη-deficient cells (rad30Δ). The rad30Δ mutant showed a dysregulated transcriptional response and increased cohesin binding around transcription start sites. Perturbing histone exchange at promoters adversely affected damage-induced cohesion, similarly to deletion of RAD30. Conversely, altering chromatin accessibility or regulation of transcription elongation, suppressed the lack of damage-induced cohesion in rad30Δ cells. These results indicate that Polη promotes damage-induced cohesion through its role in transcription, and support the model that regulated transcription facilitates formation of damage-induced cohesion.

PLoS Genetics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. e1009763
Author(s):  
Pei-Shang Wu ◽  
Jan Grosser ◽  
Donald P. Cameron ◽  
Laura Baranello ◽  
Lena Ström

The structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) complex cohesin mediates sister chromatid cohesion established during replication, and damage-induced cohesion formed in response to DSBs post-replication. The translesion synthesis polymerase Polη is required for damage-induced cohesion through a hitherto unknown mechanism. Since Polη is functionally associated with transcription, and transcription triggers de novo cohesion in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, we hypothesized that transcription facilitates damage-induced cohesion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here, we show dysregulated transcriptional profiles in the Polη null mutant (rad30Δ), where genes involved in chromatin assembly and positive transcription regulation were downregulated. In addition, chromatin association of RNA polymerase II was reduced at promoters and coding regions in rad30Δ compared to WT cells, while occupancy of the H2A.Z variant (Htz1) at promoters was increased in rad30Δ cells. Perturbing histone exchange at promoters inactivated damage-induced cohesion, similarly to deletion of the RAD30 gene. Conversely, altering regulation of transcription elongation suppressed the deficient damage-induced cohesion in rad30Δ cells. Furthermore, transcription inhibition negatively affected formation of damage-induced cohesion. These results indicate that the transcriptional deregulation of the Polη null mutant is connected with its reduced capacity to establish damage-induced cohesion. This also suggests a linkage between regulation of transcription and formation of damage-induced cohesion after replication.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward J Banigan ◽  
Wen Tang ◽  
Aafke A van den Berg ◽  
Roman R Stocsits ◽  
Gordana Wutz ◽  
...  

Cohesin organizes mammalian interphase chromosomes by reeling chromatin fibers into dynamic loops (Banigan and Mirny, 2020; Davidson et al., 2019; Kim et al., 2019; Yatskevich et al., 2019). "Loop extrusion" is obstructed when cohesin encounters a properly oriented CTCF protein (Busslinger et al., 2017; de Wit et al., 2015; Fudenberg et al., 2016; Nora et al., 2017; Sanborn et al., 2015; Wutz et al., 2017), and recent work indicates that other factors, such as the replicative helicase MCM (Dequeker et al., 2020), can also act as barriers to loop extrusion. It has been proposed that transcription relocalizes (Busslinger et al., 2017; Glynn et al., 2004; Lengronne et al., 2004) or interferes with cohesin (Heinz et al., 2018; Jeppsson et al., 2020; Valton et al., 2021; S. Zhang et al., 2021), and that active transcription start sites function as cohesin loading sites (Busslinger et al., 2017; Kagey et al., 2010; Zhu et al., 2021; Zuin et al., 2014), but how these effects, and transcription in general, shape chromatin is unknown. To determine whether transcription can modulate loop extrusion, we studied cells in which the primary extrusion barriers could be removed by CTCF depletion and cohesin's residence time and abundance on chromatin could be increased by Wapl knockout. We found evidence that transcription directly interacts with loop extrusion through a novel "moving barrier" mechanism, but not by loading cohesin at active promoters. Hi-C experiments showed intricate, cohesin-dependent genomic contact patterns near actively transcribed genes, and in CTCF-Wapl double knockout (DKO) cells (Busslinger et al., 2017), genomic contacts were enriched between sites of transcription-driven cohesin localization ("cohesin islands"). Similar patterns also emerged in polymer simulations in which transcribing RNA polymerases (RNAPs) acted as "moving barriers" by impeding, slowing, or pushing loop-extruding cohesins. The model predicts that cohesin does not load preferentially at promoters and instead accumulates at TSSs due to the barrier function of RNAPs. We tested this prediction by new ChIP-seq experiments, which revealed that the "cohesin loader" Nipbl (Ciosk et al., 2000) co-localizes with cohesin, but, unlike in previous reports (Busslinger et al., 2017; Kagey et al., 2010; Zhu et al., 2021; Zuin et al., 2014), Nipbl did not accumulate at active promoters. We propose that RNAP acts as a new type of barrier to loop extrusion that, unlike CTCF, is not stationary in its precise genomic position, but is itself dynamically translocating and relocalizes cohesin along DNA. In this way, loop extrusion could enable translocating RNAPs to maintain contacts with distal regulatory elements, allowing transcriptional activity to shape genomic functional organization.


Cell ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 161 (4) ◽  
pp. 879-892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ye Fu ◽  
Guan-Zheng Luo ◽  
Kai Chen ◽  
Xin Deng ◽  
Miao Yu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi110-vi110
Author(s):  
Tathiane Malta ◽  
Thais Sarraf Sabedot ◽  
Carlos Carlotti jr ◽  
Houtan Noushmehr

Abstract Meningiomas are mostly benign brain tumors but have a substantial risk of recurrence, sometimes to more aggressive subtypes. Recently, a DNA methylation signature in meningioma was described as able to stratify patients by recurrence risk (favorable and unfavorable). It is well recognized that epigenetic deregulation at distinct genomic elements can affect changes in gene expression and contribute to cancer initiation and progression. Our goal for this study is to define genes that are actively expressed or repressed by both DNA methylation and chromatin histone modification (defined by H3K4me3). For this pilot study, we selected two favorable (grades I and II) and two unfavorable (grades II and III) meningioma primary tumor samples (N=4) and mapped H3K4me3 genome-wide and whole-genome DNA methylation, in an attempt to identify active transcription start sites at known promoters. After data alignment, preprocessing and peak calling, we identified 29,514 consensus peaks for H3K4me3. The differential binding analysis resulted in 5,752 H3K4me3 regions that distinguish favorable from unfavorable meningioma, mostly gain of peaks in the unfavorable group. We identified 1,505 peaks overlapping with known promoters, 51% associated with gain of peaks in the unfavorable group. Promoter-associated chromatin changes coincided with hypomethylation in 23 unique genes in the unfavorable group. Genes such as MET, PTEN, and the long non-coding RNA RP11-60L3.1 were identified as potential regulators of meningioma recurrence. Our preliminary results describe the identification of distinct genome-wide changes in chromatin associated with meningioma patient with high risk for recurrence. Identification of candidate genes will provide knowledge of the role of epigenomics in the development of malignant meningioma and of opportunities for targeted therapy.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3931-3931
Author(s):  
Michael Daskalakis ◽  
David Brocks ◽  
Christopher Schmidt ◽  
Daofeng Li ◽  
Jing Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Epigenetic drugs are currently used for the treatment of several hematologic malignancies, but their mechanism of action remains poorly understood. By using a previously described reporter cell line for epigenetic reactivation of the DAPK1 locus, we have shown that epigenetic treatment causes transcription from uncharacterized intronic transcription start sites (TSSs), thereby generating DAPK1 mRNA with novel first exons. Based on these findings, we analyzed whether inhibition of DNA-Methyltransferases (DNMTs), Histone deacetylases (HDACs), or both resulted in the genome-wide induction of non-canonical TSSs. While epigenetic treatment altered expression of known promoter sites, we observed that both HDAC- and DNMT-inhibitors predominantly induced de novo transcription from cryptic promoters encoded in long-terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons. These LTR-associated 'treatment induced, not-annotated TSS' (TINATs) are currently not annotated and normally silenced in almost all cell types with the exception of testicular und thymic tissue. In the majority of cases, these TINATs arose most commonly from LTR12 elements, particularly LTR12C (which apparently provides 50% of all TINATs). TINAT activation after DNMT-inhibitors (DNMTi) coincided with DNA hypomethylation and gain in H3K4me3, H3K9ac, and H3K27ac histone marks. In contrast, HDAC-inhibitors (HDACi) induced only canonical TSSs in association with histone acetylation, but TINATs via a yet unknown mechanism. Nevertheless, both inhibitors convergently induced unidirectional transcription from identical TINAT sites. Moreover, we found a consensus GATA2 binding motif which strongly distinguished LTR12Cs with TINATs from LTR12Cs without TINATs, supporting that GATA2 is likely the upstream transcription factor responsible for TINAT activation. TINATs originating from non-canonical TSSs located within introns of protein-coding genes frequently spliced into downstream exons thereby creating LTR/non-LTR fusion transcripts that harbor novel in place of canonical exon sequence at their 5' end. The resulting transcripts encode truncated or chimeric open reading frames which translated into currently uncharacterized protein isoforms with predicted abnormal functions or immunogenic potential, the last one based on their foreign sequence and capability of being presented on MHC-class I molecules. In summary, we could show that DNMTi and/or HDACi do not predominantly alter the expression of canonical genes, but induce de novo transcription of LTRs especially of the LTR12 family, resulting in numerous fusion transcripts that encode novel protein isoforms which might have the potential to influence cell proliferation or might be an elegant explanation for the priming effect of epigenetic therapy. Ongoing experiments are investigating the functional mechanisms of TINAT reactivation upon epigenetic drug treatment and future proteomic approaches combined with T-cell cytotoxicity assays will further shed light on the interaction between epigenetic and immune therapy and the role of ERV-derived antigen presentation. Disclosures Lübbert: Janssen-Cilag: Other: Travel Funding, Research Funding; Ratiopharm: Other: Study drug valproic acid; Celgene: Other: Travel Funding.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena D. Stavrovskaya ◽  
Tejasvi Niranjan ◽  
Elana J. Fertig ◽  
Sarah J. Wheelan ◽  
Alexander Favorov ◽  
...  

AbstractMotivationGenomics features with similar genomewide distributions are generally hypothesized to be functionally related, for example, co-localization of histones and transcription start sites indicate chromatin regulation of transcription factor activity. Therefore, statistical algorithms to perform spatial, genomewide correlation among genomic features are required.ResultsHere, we propose a method, StereoGene, that rapidly estimates genomewide correlation among pairs of genomic features. These features may represent high throughput data mapped to reference genome or sets of genomic annotations in that reference genome. StereoGene enables correlation of continuous data directly, avoiding the data binarization and subsequent data loss. Correlations are computed among neighboring genomic positions using kernel correlation. Representing the correlation as a function of the genome position, StereoGene outputs the local correlation track as part of the analysis. StereoGene also accounts for confounders such as input DNA by partial correlation. We apply our method to numerous comparisons of ChIP-Seq datasets from the Human Epigenome Atlas and FANTOM CAGE to demonstrate its wide applicability. We observe the changes in the correlation between epigenomic features across developmental trajectories of several tissue types consistent with known biology, and find a novel spatial correlation of CAGE clusters with donor splice sites and with poly(A) sites. These analyses provide examples for the broad applicability of StereoGene for regulatory genomics.AvailabilityThe StereoGene C++ source code, program documentation, Galaxy integration scripts and examples are available from the project homepage http://stereogene.bioinf.fbb.msu.ru/[email protected] informationSupplementary data are available online.


Biomolecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 827
Author(s):  
Gabriel Le Berre ◽  
Virginie Hossard ◽  
Jean-Francois Riou ◽  
Anne-Laure Guieysse-Peugeot

Alternative promoter usage involved in the regulation of transcription, splicing, and translation contributes to proteome diversity and is involved in a large number of diseases, in particular, cancer. Epigenetic mechanisms and cis regulatory elements are involved in alternative promoter activity. Multiple transcript isoforms can be produced from a gene, due to the initiation of transcription at different transcription start sites (TSS). These transcripts may not have regions that allow discrimination during RT-qPCR, making quantification technically challenging. This study presents a general method for the relative quantification of a transcript synthesized from a particular TSS that we called AP-TSS (analysis of particular TSS). AP-TSS is based on the specific elongation of the cDNA of interest, followed by its quantification by qPCR. As proof of principle, AP-TSS was applied to two non-coding RNA: telomeric repeat-containing RNAs (TERRA) from a particular subtelomeric TSS, and Alu transcripts. The treatment of cells with a DNA methylation inhibitor was associated with a global increase of the total TERRA level, but the TERRA expression from the TSS of interest did not change in HT1080 cells, and only modestly increased in HeLa cells. This result suggests that TERRA upregulation induced by global demethylation of the genome is mainly due to activation from sites other than this particular TSS. For Alu RNA, the signal obtained by AP-TSS is specific for the RNA Polymerase III-dependent Alu transcript. In summary, our method provides a tool to study regulation of gene expression from a given transcription start site, in different conditions that could be applied to many genes. In particular, AP-TSS can be used to investigate the epigenetic regulation of alternative TSS usage that is of importance for the development of epigenetic-targeted therapies.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgi K. Marinov ◽  
Xinyi Chen ◽  
Tong Wu ◽  
Chuan He ◽  
Arthur R. Grossman ◽  
...  

AbstractNucleomoprhs are remnants of secondary endosymbiotic events between two eukaryote cells wherein the endosymbiont has retained its eukaryotic nucleus. Nucleomorphs have evolved at least twice independently, in chlorarachniophytes and cryptophytes, yet they have converged on a remarkably similar genomic architecture, characterized by the most extreme compression and miniaturization among all known eukaryotic genomes. Previous computational studies have suggested that nucleomorph chromatin likely exhibits a number of divergent features. In this work, we provide the first maps of open chromatin, active transcription, and three-dimensional organization for the nucleomorph genome of the chlorarachniophyte Bigelowiella natans. We find that the B. natans nucleomorph genome exists in a highly accessible state, akin to that of ribosomal DNA in some other eukaryotes, and that it is highly transcribed over its entire length, with few signs of polymerase pausing at transcription start sites (TSSs). At the same time, most nucleomorph TSSs show very strong nucleosome positioning. Chromosome conformation (Hi-C) maps reveal that nucleomorph chromosomes interact with one other at their telomeric regions, and show the relative contact frequencies between the multiple genomic compartments of distinct origin that B. natans cells contain.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasios Liakos ◽  
Dimitris Konstantopoulos ◽  
Matthieu D. Lavigne ◽  
Maria Fousteri

ABSTRACTInhibition of RNA synthesis caused by DNA damage-impaired RNA polymerase II (Pol II) elongation is found to conceal a local increase in de novo transcription, slowly progressing from Transcription Start Sites (TSSs) to gene ends. Although associated with accelerated repair of Pol II-encountered lesions and limited mutagenesis, it is still unclear how this mechanism is maintained during recovery from genotoxic stress. Here we uncover a surprising widespread gain in chromatin accessibility and preservation of the active histone mark H3K27ac after UV-irradiation. We show that the concomitant increase in Pol II release from promoter-proximal pause (PPP) sites of most active genes, PROMoter uPstream Transcripts (PROMPTs) and enhancer RNAs (eRNAs) favors unrestrained initiation, as demonstrated by the synthesis of short nascent RNAs, including TSS-associated RNAs (start-RNAs). In accordance, drug-inhibition of the transition into elongation replenished the post-UV reduced levels of pre-initiating pol II at TSSs. Continuous engagement of new Pol II thus ensures maximal transcription-driven DNA repair of active genes and non-coding regulatory loci. Together, our results reveal an unanticipated layer regulating the UV-triggered transcriptional-response and provide physiologically relevant traction to the emerging concept that transcription initiation rate is determined by pol II pause-release dynamics.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitra Ansariola ◽  
Valerie N. Fraser ◽  
Sergei A. Filichkin ◽  
Maria G. Ivanchenko ◽  
Zachary A. Bright ◽  
...  

AbstractAcross tissues, gene expression is regulated by a combination of determinants, including the binding of transcription factors (TFs), along with other aspects of cellular state. Recent studies emphasize the importance of both genetic and epigenetic states – TF binding sites and binding site chromatin accessibility have emerged as potentially causal determinants of tissue specificity. To investigate the relative contributions of these determinants, we constructed three genome-scale datasets for both root and shoot tissues of the same Arabidopsis thaliana plants: TSS-seq data to identify Transcription Start Sites, OC-seq data to identify regions of Open Chromatin, and RNA-seq data to assess gene expression levels. For genes that are differentially expressed between root and shoot, we constructed a machine learning model predicting tissue of expression from chromatin accessibility and TF binding information upstream of TSS locations. The resulting model was highly accurate (over 90% auROC and auPRC), and our analysis of model contributions (feature weights) strongly suggests that patterns of TF binding sites within ∼500 nt TSS-proximal regions are predominant explainers of tissue of expression in most cases. Thus, in plants, cis-regulatory control of tissue-specific gene expression appears to be primarily determined by TSS-proximal sequences, and rarely by distal enhancer-like accessible chromatin regions. This study highlights the exciting future possibility of a native TF site-based design process for the tissue-specific targeting of plant gene promoters.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document