scholarly journals Towards a Theory of Evolution as Multilevel Learning

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vitaly Vanchurin ◽  
Yuri I. Wolf ◽  
Mikhail Katsnelson ◽  
Eugene V. Koonin
Keyword(s):  
Origin Of Life ◽  
Back Propagation ◽  
Biological Evolution ◽  
Mathematical Framework ◽  
Major Transitions ◽  
Theory Of Evolution ◽  
The Origin Of Life ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient ◽  
Major Transitions In Evolution ◽  
Flow Of Information

We apply the theory of learning to physically renormalizable systems in an attempt to develop a theory of biological evolution, including the origin of life, as multilevel learning. We formulate seven fundamental principles of evolution that appear to be necessary and sufficient to render a universe observable and show that they entail the major features of biological evolution, including replication and natural selection. These principles also follow naturally from the theory of learning. We formulate the theory of evolution using the mathematical framework of neural networks, which provides for detailed analysis of evolutionary phenomena. To demonstrate the potential of the proposed theoretical framework, we derive a generalized version of the Central Dogma of molecular biology by analyzing the flow of information during learning (back-propagation) and predicting (forward-propagation) the environment by evolving organisms. The more complex evolutionary phenomena, such as major transitions in evolution, in particular, the origin of life, have to be analyzed in the thermodynamic limit, which is described in detail in the accompanying paper.

The Tempo and mode(S) of Prebiotic Evolution

1997 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. 419-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Lazcano
Keyword(s):  
Origin Of Life ◽  
Organic Compounds ◽  
Biological Evolution ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Early Diversification ◽  
Time Period ◽  
The Galaxy ◽  
History Of ◽  
Widespread Phenomenon ◽  
The Origin Of Life

AbstractDifferent current ideas on the origin of life are critically examined. Comparison of the now fashionable FeS/H2S pyrite-based autotrophic theory of the origin of life with the heterotrophic viewpoint suggest that the later is still the most fertile explanation for the emergence of life. However, the theory of chemical evolution and heterotrophic origins of life requires major updating, which should include the abandonment of the idea that the appearance of life was a slow process involving billions of years. Stability of organic compounds and the genetics of bacteria suggest that the origin and early diversification of life took place in a time period of the order of 10 million years. Current evidence suggest that the abiotic synthesis of organic compounds may be a widespread phenomenon in the Galaxy and may have a deterministic nature. However, the history of the biosphere does not exhibits any obvious trend towards greater complexity or «higher» forms of life. Therefore, the role of contingency in biological evolution should not be understimated in the discussions of the possibilities of life in the Universe.

Comparison of fundamental physical properties of the model cells (protocells) and the living cells reveals the need in protophysiology

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.V. Matveev
Keyword(s):  
Physical Properties ◽  
Origin Of Life ◽  
Sodium Pump ◽  
Molecular Model ◽  
Biological Evolution ◽  
Living Cells ◽  
Real Problem ◽  
The Origin Of Life ◽  
Physical Laws ◽  
Fundamental Physical

AbstractA hypothesis is proposed about potassium ponds being the cradles of life enriches the gamut of ideas about the possible conditions of pre-biological evolution on the primeval Earth, but does not bring us closer to solving the real problem of the origin of life. The gist of the matter lies in the mechanism of making a delimitation between two environments – the intracellular environment and the habitat of protocells. Since the sodium–potassium pump (Na+/K+-ATPase) was discovered, no molecular model has been proposed for a predecessor of the modern sodium pump. This has brought into life the idea of the potassium pond, wherein protocells would not need a sodium pump. However, current notions of the operation of living cells come into conflict with even physical laws when trying to use them to explain the origin and functioning of protocells. Thus, habitual explanations of the physical properties of living cells have become inapplicable to explain the corresponding properties of Sidney Fox's microspheres. Likewise, existing approaches to solving the problem of the origin of life do not see the need for the comparative study of living cells and cell models, assemblies of biological and artificial small molecules and macromolecules under physical conditions conducive to the origin of life. The time has come to conduct comprehensive research into the fundamental physical properties of protocells and create a new discipline – protocell physiology or protophysiology – which should bring us much closer to solving the problem of the origin of life.

scholarly journals Evidence for Phase Transitions in Replication Fidelity and Survival Probability at the Origin of Life

BioCosmos ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-10
Author(s):  
Sy Garte
Keyword(s):  
Origin Of Life ◽  
Survival Probability ◽  
Biological Evolution ◽  
Cellular Phenotype ◽  
Replication Fidelity ◽  
Chemical Complexity ◽  
The Origin Of Life ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Self Replication ◽  
Transition Approach

Abstract Highly accurate self-replication of cellular phenotype is a requirement for biological evolution. I previously investigated the degree of self-replication fidelity needed in a viable, evolving population of living cells. Here I present a phase transition approach from non-living chemical complexity to evolving living creatures and illustrate the necessary non-continuity of whatever process led to the origin of evolution. A theoretical approach to the relationship between replication fidelity, survival probability and the capacity to grow and evolve is presented consistent with previous data from experimental simulations. The implications for the origin of life to include explanations for non-continuity are discussed.

Protective effect of clay minerals on adsorbed nucleic acid against UV radiation: possible role in the origin of life

2004 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Scappini ◽  
F. Casadei ◽  
R. Zamboni ◽  
M. Franchi ◽  
E. Gallori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nucleic Acid ◽  
Protective Effect ◽  
Origin Of Life ◽  
Clay Minerals ◽  
Uv Radiation ◽  
Laboratory Experiments ◽  
Biological Evolution ◽  
The Earth ◽  
The Origin Of Life ◽  
Uv Photons

The effect of UV radiation on solutions of free and clay-adsorbed DNA has been investigated. It turns out that clay (montmorillonite/kaolinite) adsorbed nucleic acid undergoes less radiation damage than free nucleic acid. Our laboratory experiments have an astronomical counterpart in terms of solar irradiance on the Earth. An origin of life scenario is proposed where ubiquitous clay minerals lead the surface chemistry of the molecules relevant to the biological evolution and at the same time protect them from the deadly rainfall of UV photons.

scholarly journals The Theory of Evolution is Not an Explanation for the Origin of Life

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin W. Rice ◽  
Daniel A. Warner ◽  
Clint D. Kelly ◽  
Michael P. Clough ◽  
James T. Colbert
Keyword(s):  
Origin Of Life ◽  
Theory Of Evolution ◽  
The Origin Of Life

scholarly journals Astrochemistry as the basics of Astrobiology: from simplest molecules to bioindicatorsonexoplanets surfaces

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-64
Author(s):  
A.G. Yeghikyan ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Origin Of Life ◽  
Biological Evolution ◽  
Complex Compounds ◽  
Optically Active ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Heavy Hydrocarbons ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Other Substances ◽  
The Origin Of Life

The problem of the origin of Life is discussed from the astrophysical point of view. Most biologists and geologists up to the present time believe that Life was originated on the Earth in some initial natural chemical pre-reactors, where a mixture of water, ammonia, methane containing species and some other substances, under the influence of an energy source like, e.g. lightning, turned into quite complex compounds such as amino acids and complex hydrocarbons. In fact, under conditions of the primordial Earth, it is not possible to obtain such pre-biological molecules by not-bio-chemical methods, as discussed in this paper. Instead, an astrophysical view of the problem of the origin of Life on the Earth is proposed and it is recalled that the biological evolution on the Earth was preceded by the chemical evolution of complex chemical compounds, mostly under extraterrestrial conditions, where it is only possible to form optically active amino acids, sugars and heavy hydrocarbons necessary for constructing the first pre-biomolecules. Then, according to a widespread point of view, they were brought to Earth by comets and dust between 4.5 and 3.8 billion years ago. Some part of the matter of comets landed unchanged during grazing collisions. Prebiotic complexes on the surface of the planet participate in the formation of a specific cover with a reflective spectrum (or color index), whose characteristic details can be tried to reveal by observation. The most promising bio-indicators at present are optically active amino acids and their derivatives, however, the existing observational capabilities are insufficient to identify them. More promising as (pre)biomarkers are the heavy hydrocarbons discussed in this article, in particular bitumen and isoprene hydrocarbons.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document