scholarly journals OViTAD: Optimized Vision Transformer to Predict Various Stages of Alzheimer's Disease Using Resting-State fMRI and Structural MRI Data

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saman Sarraf ◽  
Arman Sarraf ◽  
Danielle D. DeSouza ◽  
John A. E. Anderson ◽  
Milton Kabia ◽  
...  

Advances in applied machine learning techniques to neuroimaging have encouraged scientists to implement models to early diagnose brain disorders such as Alzheimer's Disease. Predicting various stages of Alzheimer's disease is challenging; however, existing deep learning complex techniques could perform such a prediction. Therefore, using novel architectures with less complexity but efficient pattern extraction capabilities such as transformers has been of interest to neuroscientists. This study introduced an optimized vision transformer architecture to predict the aging effect in healthy adults (>75 years), mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's' brains within the same age group using resting-state functional and anatomical magnetic resonance imaging data. Our optimized architecture known as OViTAD, which is currently the sole vision transformer-based end-to-end pipeline, outperformed the existing transformer models and most state-of-the-art solutions with F1-scores of 97%±0.0 and 0.9955%±0.0039 achieved from the testing sets for the two modalities in the triple-class prediction experiments where the number of trainable parameters decreased by 30% compared to a vanilla transformer. To ensure the robustness and reproducibility of our optimized vision transformer, we repeated the modeling process three times for all the experiments and reported the averaged evaluation metrics. Furthermore, we implemented a visualization technique to illustrate the effect of global attention on brain images. Also, we exhaustively implemented models to explore the impact of combining healthy brains with two other groups in the two modalities. This study could open a new avenue of adopting and optimizing vision transformers for neuroimaging applications, especially for Alzheimer's Disease prediction.

NeuroImage ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 215 ◽  
pp. 116795 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.R. Farina ◽  
D.D. Emek-Savaş ◽  
L. Rueda-Delgado ◽  
R. Boyle ◽  
H. Kiiski ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
FR Farina ◽  
DD Emek-Savaş ◽  
L Rueda-Delgado ◽  
R Boyle ◽  
H Kiiski ◽  
...  

AbstractAlzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterised by severe cognitive decline and loss of autonomy. AD is the leading cause of dementia. AD is preceded by mild cognitive impairment (MCI). By 2050, 68% of new dementia cases will occur in low- and middle-income countries. In the absence of objective biomarkers, psychological assessments are typically used to diagnose MCI and AD. However, these require specialist training and rely on subjective judgements. The need for low-cost, accessible and objective tools to aid AD and MCI diagnosis is therefore crucial. Electroencephalography (EEG) has potential as one such tool: it is relatively inexpensive (cf. magnetic resonance imaging; MRI) and is portable. In this study, we collected resting state EEG, structural MRI and rich neuropsychological data from older adults (55+ years) with AD, with MCI and from healthy controls (n~60 per group). Our goal was to evaluate the utility of EEG, relative to MRI, for the classification of MCI and AD. We also assessed the performance of combined EEG and behavioural (Mini-Mental State Examination; MMSE) and structural MRI classification models. Resting state EEG classified AD and HC participants with moderate accuracy (AROC=0.76), with lower accuracy when distinguishing MCI from HC participants (AROC=0.67). The addition of EEG data to MMSE scores had no additional value compared to MMSE alone. Structural MRI out-performed EEG (AD vs HC, AD vs MCI: AROCs=1.00; HC vs MCI: AROC=0.73). Resting state EEG does not appear to be a suitable tool for classifying AD. However, EEG classification accuracy was comparable to structural MRI when distinguishing MCI from healthy aging, although neither were sufficiently accurate to have clinical utility. This is the first direct comparison of EEG and MRI as classification tools in AD and MCI participants.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jafar Zamani ◽  
Ali Sadr ◽  
Amir-Homayoun Javadi

AbstractsIdentifying individuals with early mild cognitive impairment (EMCI) can be an effective strategy for early diagnosis and delay the progression of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Many approaches have been devised to discriminate those with EMCI from healthy control (HC) individuals. Selection of the most effective parameters has been one of the challenging aspects of these approaches. In this study we suggest an optimization method based on five evolutionary algorithms that can be used in optimization of neuroimaging data with a large number of parameters. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) measures, which measure functional connectivity, have been shown to be useful in prediction of cognitive decline. Analysis of functional connectivity data using graph measures is a common practice that results in a great number of parameters. Using graph measures we calculated 1155 parameters from the functional connectivity data of HC (n=36) and EMCI (n=34) extracted from the publicly available database of the Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative database (ADNI). These parameters were fed into the evolutionary algorithms to select a subset of parameters for classification of the data into two categories of EMCI and HC using a two-layer artificial neural network. All algorithms achieved classification accuracy of 94.55%, which is extremely high considering single-modality input and low number of data participants. These results highlight potential application of rs-fMRI and efficiency of such optimization methods in classification of images into HC and EMCI. This is of particular importance considering that MRI images of EMCI individuals cannot be easily identified by experts.


2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 921-931 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahtab Mohammadpoor Faskhodi ◽  
Zahra Einalou ◽  
Mehrdad Dadgostar

NeuroImage ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 167 ◽  
pp. 62-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank de Vos ◽  
Marisa Koini ◽  
Tijn M. Schouten ◽  
Stephan Seiler ◽  
Jeroen van der Grond ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document