scholarly journals Tripartite chromatin localization of budding yeast Shugoshin involves higher-ordered architecture of mitotic chromosomes

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiexiong Deng ◽  
Min-Hao Kuo
Keyword(s):  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Mitotic Chromosome ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Histone H3 ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Mitotic Spindles ◽  
Mitotic Chromosomes ◽  
Chromatin Architecture ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Segregation Of Chromosomes

ABSTRACTThe spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is key to faithful segregation of chromosomes. One requirement that satisfies SAC is appropriate tension between sister chromatids at the metaphase-anaphase juncture. Proper tension generated by poleward pulling of mitotic spindles signals biorientation of the underlying chromosome. In the budding yeast, the tension status is monitored by the conserved Shugoshin protein, Sgo1p, and the tension sensing motif (TSM) of histone H3. ChIP-seq reveals a unique TSM-dependent, tripartite domain of Sgo1p in each mitotic chromosome. This domain consists of one centromeric and two flanking peaks 3 – 4 kb away, and is present exclusively in mitosis. Strikingly, this trident motif coincides with cohesin localization, but only at the centromere and the two immediate adjacent loci, despite that cohesin is enriched at numerous regions throughout mitotic chromosomes. The TSM-Sgo1p-cohesin triad is at the center stage of higher-ordered chromatin architecture for error-free segregation.

scholarly journals Centromere-localized Aurora B kinase is required for the fidelity of chromosome segregation

2019 ◽  
Vol 219 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cai Liang ◽  
Zhenlei Zhang ◽  
Qinfu Chen ◽  
Haiyan Yan ◽  
Miao Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Essential Role ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Histone H3 ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Aurora B Kinase ◽  
Chromosome Missegregation ◽  
Proper Timing ◽  
Segregation Of Chromosomes

Aurora B kinase plays an essential role in chromosome bi-orientation, which is a prerequisite for equal segregation of chromosomes during mitosis. However, it remains largely unclear whether centromere-localized Aurora B is required for faithful chromosome segregation. Here we show that histone H3 Thr-3 phosphorylation (H3pT3) and H2A Thr-120 phosphorylation (H2ApT120) can independently recruit Aurora B. Disrupting H3pT3-mediated localization of Aurora B at the inner centromere impedes the decline in H2ApT120 during metaphase and causes H2ApT120-dependent accumulation of Aurora B at the kinetochore-proximal centromere. Consequently, silencing of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is delayed, whereas the fidelity of chromosome segregation is negligibly affected. Further eliminating an H2ApT120-dependent pool of Aurora B restores proper timing for SAC silencing but increases chromosome missegregation. Our data indicate that H2ApT120-mediated localization of Aurora B compensates for the loss of an H3pT3-dependent pool of Aurora B to correct improper kinetochore–microtubule attachments. This study provides important insights into how centromeric Aurora B regulates SAC and kinetochore attachment to microtubules to ensure error-free chromosome segregation.

scholarly journals Aurora B Tension Sensing Mechanisms in the Kinetochore Ensure Accurate Chromosome Segregation

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (16) ◽  
pp. 8818
Author(s):  
Shelby L. McVey ◽  
Jenna K. Cosby ◽  
Natalie J. Nannas
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Birth Defects ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Congenital Birth Defects ◽  
Biochemical Signals ◽  
Segregation Of Chromosomes

The accurate segregation of chromosomes is essential for the survival of organisms and cells. Mistakes can lead to aneuploidy, tumorigenesis and congenital birth defects. The spindle assembly checkpoint ensures that chromosomes properly align on the spindle, with sister chromatids attached to microtubules from opposite poles. Here, we review how tension is used to identify and selectively destabilize incorrect attachments, and thus serves as a trigger of the spindle assembly checkpoint to ensure fidelity in chromosome segregation. Tension is generated on properly attached chromosomes as sister chromatids are pulled in opposing directions but resisted by centromeric cohesin. We discuss the role of the Aurora B kinase in tension-sensing and explore the current models for translating mechanical force into Aurora B-mediated biochemical signals that regulate correction of chromosome attachments to the spindle.

Cohesin dependent compaction of mitotic chromosomes

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie A Schalbetter ◽  
Anton Goloborodko ◽  
Geoffrey Fudenberg ◽  
Jon M Belton ◽  
Catrina Miles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Mitotic Chromosome ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Mitotic Chromosomes ◽  
Chromosome Conformation ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Structural Maintenance Of Chromosomes

Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes (SMC) protein complexes are key determinants of chromosome conformation. Using Hi-C and polymer modelling, we study how cohesin and condensin, two deeply-conserved SMC complexes, organize chromosomes in budding yeast. The canonical role of cohesins is to co-align sister chromatids whilst condensins generally compact mitotic chromosomes. We find strikingly different roles in budding yeast mitosis. First, cohesin is responsible for compacting mitotic chromosomes arms, independent of and in addition to its role in sister-chromatid cohesion. Cohesin dependent mitotic chromosome compaction can be fully accounted for through cis-looping of chromatin by loop extrusion. Second, condensin is dispensable for compaction along chromosomal arms and instead plays a specialized role, structuring rDNA and peri-centromeric regions. Our results argue that the conserved mechanism of SMC complexes is to form chromatin loops and that SMC-dependent looping is readily deployed in a range of contexts to functionally organize chromosomes.

The mitosis-regulating and protein-protein interaction activities of Astrin are controlled by Aurora-A-induced phosphorylation

2014 ◽  
Vol 307 (5) ◽  
pp. C466-C478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shao-Chih Chiu ◽  
Jo-Mei Maureen Chen ◽  
Tong-You Wade Wei ◽  
Tai-Shan Cheng ◽  
Ya-Hui Candice Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Morphological Changes ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Aurora A ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Complicated Process ◽  
Spindle Stability

Cells display dramatic morphological changes in mitosis, where numerous factors form regulatory networks to orchestrate the complicated process, resulting in extreme fidelity of the segregation of duplicated chromosomes into two daughter cells. Astrin regulates several aspects of mitosis, such as maintaining the cohesion of sister chromatids by inactivating Separase and stabilizing spindle, aligning and segregating chromosomes, and silencing spindle assembly checkpoint by interacting with Src kinase-associated phosphoprotein (SKAP) and cytoplasmic linker-associated protein-1α (CLASP-1α). To understand how Astrin is regulated in mitosis, we report here that Astrin acts as a mitotic phosphoprotein, and Aurora-A phosphorylates Astrin at Ser115. The phosphorylation-deficient mutant Astrin S115A abnormally activates spindle assembly checkpoint and delays mitosis progression, decreases spindle stability, and induces chromosome misalignment. Mechanistic analyses reveal that Astrin phosphorylation mimicking mutant S115D, instead of S115A, binds and induces ubiquitination and degradation of securin, which sequentially activates Separase, an enzyme required for the separation of sister chromatids. Moreover, S115A fails to bind mitosis regulators, including SKAP and CLASP-1α, which results in the mitotic defects observed in Astrin S115A-transfected cells. In conclusion, Aurora-A phosphorylates Astrin and guides the binding of Astrin to its cellular partners, which ensures proper progression of mitosis.

scholarly journals Monitoring the fidelity of mitotic chromosome segregation by the spindle assembly checkpoint

2011 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 391-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Silva ◽  
J. Barbosa ◽  
A. V. Nascimento ◽  
J. Faria ◽  
R. Reis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Mitotic Chromosome ◽  
Spindle Assembly

scholarly journals Disruption of Astral Microtubule Contact with the Cell Cortex Activates a Bub1, Bub3, and Mad3-dependent Checkpoint in Fission Yeast

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 3345-3356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvie Tournier ◽  
Yannick Gachet ◽  
Vicky Buck ◽  
Jeremy S. Hyams ◽  
Jonathan B.A. Millar
Keyword(s):  
Actin Cytoskeleton ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Cell Cortex ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Astral Microtubule ◽  
Spindle Rotation

In animal and yeast cells, the mitotic spindle is aligned perpendicularly to the axis of cell division. This ensures that sister chromatids are separated to opposite sides of the cytokinetic actomyosin ring. In fission yeast, spindle rotation is dependent upon the interaction of astral microtubules with the cortical actin cytoskeleton. In this article, we show that addition of Latrunculin A, which prevents spindle rotation, delays the separation of sister chromatids and anaphase promoting complex-mediated destruction of spindle-associated Securin and Cyclin B. Moreover, we find that whereas sister kinetochore pairs normally congress to the spindle midzone before anaphase onset, this congression is disrupted when astral microtubule contact with the actin cytoskeleton is disturbed. By analyzing the timing of kinetochore separation, we find that this anaphase delay requires the Bub3, Mad3, and Bub1 but not the Mad1 or Mad2 spindle assembly checkpoint proteins. In agreement with this, we find that Bub1 remains associated with kinetochores when spindles are mispositioned. These data indicate that, in fission yeast, astral microtubule contact with the medial cell cortex is monitored by a subset of spindle assembly checkpoint proteins. We propose that this checkpoint ensures spindles are properly oriented before anaphase takes place.

scholarly journals Bub1, Sgo1, and Mps1 mediate a distinct pathway for chromosome biorientation in budding yeast

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 1473-1485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zuzana Storchová ◽  
Justin S. Becker ◽  
Nicolas Talarek ◽  
Sandra Kögelsberger ◽  
David Pellman
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Growth Defect ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Mitotic Kinase ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromosome Alignment ◽  
Chromosomal Passenger

The conserved mitotic kinase Bub1 performs multiple functions that are only partially characterized. Besides its role in the spindle assembly checkpoint and chromosome alignment, Bub1 is crucial for the kinetochore recruitment of multiple proteins, among them Sgo1. Both Bub1 and Sgo1 are dispensable for growth of haploid and diploid budding yeast, but they become essential in cells with higher ploidy. We find that overexpression of SGO1 partially corrects the chromosome segregation defect of bub1Δ haploid cells and restores viability to bub1Δ tetraploid cells. Using an unbiased high-copy suppressor screen, we identified two members of the chromosomal passenger complex (CPC), BIR1 (survivin) and SLI15 (INCENP, inner centromere protein), as suppressors of the growth defect of both bub1Δ and sgo1Δ tetraploids, suggesting that these mutants die due to defects in chromosome biorientation. Overexpression of BIR1 or SLI15 also complements the benomyl sensitivity of haploid bub1Δ and sgo1Δ cells. Mutants lacking SGO1 fail to biorient sister chromatids attached to the same spindle pole (syntelic attachment) after nocodazole treatment. Moreover, the sgo1Δ cells accumulate syntelic attachments in unperturbed mitoses, a defect that is partially corrected by BIR1 or SLI15 overexpression. We show that in budding yeast neither Bub1 nor Sgo1 is required for CPC localization or affects Aurora B activity. Instead we identify Sgo1 as a possible partner of Mps1, a mitotic kinase suggested to have an Aurora B–independent function in establishment of biorientation. We found that Sgo1 overexpression rescues defects caused by metaphase inactivation of Mps1 and that Mps1 is required for Sgo1 localization to the kinetochore. We propose that Bub1, Sgo1, and Mps1 facilitate chromosome biorientation independently of the Aurora B–mediated pathway at the budding yeast kinetochore and that both pathways are required for the efficient turnover of syntelic attachments.

scholarly journals The HECT E3 ligase Smurf2 is required for Mad2-dependent spindle assembly checkpoint

2008 ◽  
Vol 183 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan C. Osmundson ◽  
Dipankar Ray ◽  
Finola E. Moore ◽  
Qingshen Gao ◽  
Gerald H. Thomsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
E3 Ligase ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Cyclin B ◽  
Carboxyl Terminus ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Mitotic Spindles ◽  
Anaphase Onset

Activation of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) by Cdc20 is critical for the metaphase–anaphase transition. APC/C-Cdc20 is required for polyubiquitination and degradation of securin and cyclin B at anaphase onset. The spindle assembly checkpoint delays APC/C-Cdc20 activation until all kinetochores attach to mitotic spindles. In this study, we demonstrate that a HECT (homologous to the E6-AP carboxyl terminus) ubiquitin ligase, Smurf2, is required for the spindle checkpoint. Smurf2 localizes to the centrosome, mitotic midbody, and centromeres. Smurf2 depletion or the expression of a catalytically inactive Smurf2 results in misaligned and lagging chromosomes, premature anaphase onset, and defective cytokinesis. Smurf2 inactivation prevents nocodazole-treated cells from accumulating cyclin B and securin and prometaphase arrest. The silencing of Cdc20 in Smurf2-depleted cells restores mitotic accumulation of cyclin B and securin. Smurf2 depletion results in enhanced polyubiquitination and degradation of Mad2, a critical checkpoint effector. Mad2 is mislocalized in Smurf2-depleted cells, suggesting that Smurf2 regulates the localization and stability of Mad2. These data indicate that Smurf2 is a novel mitotic regulator.

scholarly journals Cell Cycle-dependent Expression and Nucleolar Localization of hCAP-H

2001 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 3527-3537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga A. Cabello ◽  
Elena Eliseeva ◽  
WeiGong He ◽  
Hagop Youssoufian ◽  
Sharon E. Plon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Histone H3 ◽  
Chromosome Condensation ◽  
Nucleolar Localization ◽  
Mitotic Chromosomes ◽  
Proliferating Cells ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
H3 Phosphorylation ◽  
Histone H3 Phosphorylation

Condensin is a conserved 13S heteropentamer composed of two nonidentical structural maintenance of chromosome (SMC) family proteins, in Xenopus XCAP-C and XCAP-E, and three regulatory subunits, XCAP-D2, XCAP-G, and XCAP-H. Both biochemical and genetic analyses have demonstrated an essential role for the 13S condensin complex in mitotic chromosome condensation. Further, a potential requirement for condensin in completion of chromatid arm separation in early anaphase is demonstrated by the mutational phenotypes of the Drosophila homologues ofXCAP-H, barren and XCAP-C,DmSMC4. In this study we have investigated the expression and subcellular distribution of hCAP-H, the human homolog of XCAP-H, in order to better understand its cellular functions. Transcription of hCAP-H was restricted to proliferating cells with highest expression during the G2 phase of the cell cycle. In contrast, cellular hCAP-H protein levels were constant throughout the cell cycle. hCAP-H was found to be associated with mitotic chromosomes exhibiting a nonuniform but symmetric distribution along sister chromatids. The symmetry of hCAP-H association with sister chromatids suggests that there are sequence-dependent domains of condensin aggregation. During interphase hCAP-H, -C, and -E, have distinct punctate nucleolar localization, suggesting that condensin may associate with and modulate the conformation and function of rDNA. hCAP-H association with condensed chromatin was not observed in the early phase of chromosome condensation when histone H3 phosphorylation has already taken place. This finding is consistent with the hypothesis that histone H3 phosphorylation precedes condensin-mediated condensation.

scholarly journals Contribution of hCAP-D2, a Non-SMC Subunit of Condensin I, to Chromosome and Chromosomal Protein Dynamics during Mitosis

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 740-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erwan Watrin ◽  
Vincent Legagneux
Keyword(s):  
Rna Interference ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Topoisomerase Ii ◽  
Mitotic Chromosome ◽  
Chromosomal Protein ◽  
Structural Components ◽  
Mitotic Chromosomes ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromosome Alignment ◽  
Structural Maintenance Of Chromosomes

ABSTRACT Condensins are heteropentameric complexes that were first identified as structural components of mitotic chromosomes. They are composed of two SMC (structural maintenance of chromosomes) and three non-SMC subunits. Condensins play a role in the resolution and segregation of sister chromatids during mitosis, as well as in some aspects of mitotic chromosome assembly. Two distinct condensin complexes, condensin I and condensin II, which differ only in their non-SMC subunits, exist. Here, we used an RNA interference approach to deplete hCAP-D2, a non-SMC subunit of condensin I, in HeLa cells. We found that the association of hCAP-H, another non-SMC subunit of condensin I, with mitotic chromosomes depends on the presence of hCAP-D2. Moreover, chromatid axes, as defined by topoisomerase II and hCAP-E localization, are disorganized in the absence of hCAP-D2, and the resolution and segregation of sister chromatids are impaired. In addition, hCAP-D2 depletion affects chromosome alignment in metaphase and delays entry into anaphase. This suggests that condensin I is involved in the correct attachment between chromosome kinetochores and microtubules of the mitotic spindle. These results are discussed relative to the effects of depleting both condensin complexes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document