Sense-antisense gene overlap causes evolutionary retention of the few introns in Giardia genome and the implications
AbstractBackgroundIt is widely accepted that the last eukaryotic common ancestor (LECA) and early eukaryotes were intron-rich and intron loss dominated subsequent evolution, thus the presence of only very few introns in some modern eukaryotes must be the consequence of massive loss. But it is striking that few eukaryotes were found to have completely lost introns. Despite extensive research, the causes of massive intron losses remain elusive, and actually the reverse question – how the few introns are retained under the pressure of loss is equally significant but was rarely studied, except that it was conjectured that the essential functions of some introns prevent their loss. The extremely few (eight) spliceosome-mediated cis-spliced introns in the relatively simple genome of Giardia lamblia provide an excellent opportunity to explore this question.ResultsOur investigation of the intron-containing genes and introns in Giardia found three types of intron distribution patterns: ancient intron in ancient gene, relatively new intron in ancient gene, and relatively new intron in relatively new gene, which can reflect to some extent the dynamic evolution of introns in Giardia. Not finding any special features or functional importance of these introns responsible for the retention, we noticed and experimentally verified that some intron-containing genes form sense-antisense gene pairs with functional genes on their complementary strands, and that the introns just reside in the overlapping regions.ConclusionsIn Giardia’s evolution, despite constant pressure of intron loss, intron gain can still occur in both ancient and newly-evolved genes, but only a few introns have been retained; the evolutionary retention of introns is most likely not due to the functional constraint of the introns themselves but the causes outside of introns, such as the constraints imposed by other genomic functional elements overlapping with the introns. These findings can not only provide some clues to find new genomic functional elements -- in the areas overlapping with introngs, but suggest that “functional constraint” of introns may not be necessarily directly associated with intron loss and gain, or that the real functions or the way of functioning of introns are probably still outside of our current knowledge.
