Genome-wide mapping and profiling of γH2AX binding hotspots in response to different replication stress inducers

AbstractBackgroundReplication stress (RS) gives rise to DNA damage that threatens genome stability. RS can originate from different sources that stall replication by diverse mechanisms. However, the mechanism underlying how different types of RS contribute to genome instability is unclear, in part due to the poor understanding of the distribution and characteristics of damage sites induced by different RS mechanisms.ResultsWe use ChIP-seq to map γH2AX binding sites genome-wide caused by aphidicolin (APH), hydroxyurea (HU), and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) treatments in human lymphocyte cells. Mapping of γH2AX ChIP-seq reveals that APH, HU, and MMS treatments induce non-random γH2AX chromatin binding at discrete regions, suggesting that there are γH2AX binding hotspots in the genome. Characterization of the distribution and sequence/epigenetic features of γH2AX binding sites reveals that the three treatments induce γH2AX binding at largely non-overlapping regions, suggesting that RS may cause damage at specific genomic loci in a manner dependent on the fork stalling mechanism. Nonetheless, γH2AX binding sites induced by the three treatments share common features including compact chromatin, coinciding with larger-than-average genes, and depletion of CpG islands and transcription start sites. Moreover, we observe significant enrichment of SINEs in γH2AX sites in all treatments, indicating that SINEs may be a common barrier for replication polymerases.ConclusionsOur results identify the location and common features of genome instability hotspots induced by different types of RS, and help in deciphering the mechanisms underlying RS-induced genetic diseases and carcinogenesis.

Download Full-text

Multi-BRCT Domain Protein Brc1 Links Rhp18/Rad18 and γH2A To Maintain Genome Stability during S Phase

Molecular and Cellular Biology ◽

10.1128/mcb.00260-17 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 37 (22) ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Michael C. Reubens ◽

Sophie Rozenzhak ◽

Paul Russell

Keyword(s):

Genome Stability ◽

Genome Instability ◽

Replication Stress ◽

S Phase ◽

Dna Lesions ◽

Brct Domain ◽

Replication Forks ◽

Content Type ◽

Domain Protein ◽

Chromosome Integrity

ABSTRACT DNA replication involves the inherent risk of genome instability, since replisomes invariably encounter DNA lesions or other structures that stall or collapse replication forks during the S phase. In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the multi-BRCT domain protein Brc1, which is related to budding yeast Rtt107 and mammalian PTIP, plays an important role in maintaining genome integrity and cell viability when cells experience replication stress. The C-terminal pair of BRCT domains in Brc1 were previously shown to bind phosphohistone H2A (γH2A) formed by Rad3/ATR checkpoint kinase at DNA lesions; however, the putative scaffold interactions involving the N-terminal BRCT domains 1 to 4 of Brc1 have remained obscure. Here, we show that these domains bind Rhp18/Rad18, which is an E3 ubiquitin protein ligase that has crucial functions in postreplication repair. A missense allele in BRCT domain 4 of Brc1 disrupts binding to Rhp18 and causes sensitivity to replication stress. Brc1 binding to Rhp18 and γH2A are required for the Brc1 overexpression suppression of smc6-74, a mutation that impairs the Smc5/6 structural maintenance of chromosomes complex required for chromosome integrity and repair of collapsed replication forks. From these findings, we propose that Brc1 provides scaffolding functions linking γH2A, Rhp18, and Smc5/6 complex at damaged replication forks.

Download Full-text

MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 activates Fanconi Anemia R-loop suppression at transcription-replication conflicts

10.1101/472654 ◽

2018 ◽

Author(s):

Emily Yun-chia Chang ◽

James P. Wells ◽

Shu-Huei Tsai ◽

Yan Coulombe ◽

Yujia A. Chan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Dna Replication ◽

Fanconi Anemia ◽

Replication Fork ◽

Genome Instability ◽

Human Cancer ◽

Replication Stress ◽

Maintenance Factors ◽

Genome Wide ◽

A Genome ◽

Dna Replication Stress

SUMMARYEctopic R-loop accumulation causes DNA replication stress and genome instability. To avoid these outcomes, cells possess a range of anti-R-loop mechanisms, including RNaseH that degrades the RNA moiety in R-loops. To comprehensively identify anti-R-loop mechanisms, we performed a genome-wide trigenic interaction screen in yeast lacking RNH1 and RNH201. We identified >100 genes critical for fitness in the absence of RNaseH, which were enriched for DNA replication fork maintenance factors such as RAD50. We show in yeast and human cells that R-loops accumulate during RAD50 depletion. In human cancer cell models, we find that RAD50 and its partners in the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 complex regulate R-loop-associated DNA damage and replication stress. We show that a non-nucleolytic function of MRE11 is important for R-loop suppression via activation of PCNA-ubiquitination by RAD18 and recruiting anti-R-loop helicases in the Fanconi Anemia pathway. This work establishes a novel role for MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 in directing tolerance mechanisms of transcription-replication conflicts.

Download Full-text

Histone dynamics during DNA replication stress

Journal of Biomedical Science ◽

10.1186/s12929-021-00743-5 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 28 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Chia-Ling Hsu ◽

Shin Yen Chong ◽

Chia-Yeh Lin ◽

Cheng-Fu Kao

Keyword(s):

Stress Responses ◽

Genome Stability ◽

Genome Instability ◽

Replication Stress ◽

Dna Lesions ◽

Protective Mechanisms ◽

Replication Process ◽

Dna Replication Stress ◽

External Sources

AbstractAccurate and complete replication of the genome is essential not only for genome stability but also for cell viability. However, cells face constant threats to the replication process, such as spontaneous DNA modifications and DNA lesions from endogenous and external sources. Any obstacle that slows down replication forks or perturbs replication dynamics is generally considered to be a form of replication stress, and the past decade has seen numerous advances in our understanding of how cells respond to and resolve such challenges. Furthermore, recent studies have also uncovered links between defects in replication stress responses and genome instability or various diseases, such as cancer. Because replication stress takes place in the context of chromatin, histone dynamics play key roles in modulating fork progression and replication stress responses. Here, we summarize the current understanding of histone dynamics in replication stress, highlighting recent advances in the characterization of fork-protective mechanisms.

Download Full-text

The impact of transcription-mediated replication stress on genome instability and human disease

Genome Instability & Disease ◽

10.1007/s42764-020-00021-y ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 1 (5) ◽

pp. 207-234

Author(s):

Stefano Gnan ◽

Yaqun Liu ◽

Manuela Spagnuolo ◽

Chun-Long Chen

Keyword(s):

Dna Replication ◽

Gene Transcription ◽

Human Disease ◽

Genome Stability ◽

Genome Instability ◽

Current Knowledge ◽

Replication Stress ◽

Genome Replication ◽

Living Organisms ◽

The Impact

Abstract DNA replication is a vital process in all living organisms. At each cell division, > 30,000 replication origins are activated in a coordinated manner to ensure the duplication of > 6 billion base pairs of the human genome. During differentiation and development, this program must adapt to changes in chromatin organization and gene transcription: its deregulation can challenge genome stability, which is a leading cause of many diseases including cancers and neurological disorders. Over the past decade, great progress has been made to better understand the mechanisms of DNA replication regulation and how its deregulation challenges genome integrity and leads to human disease. Growing evidence shows that gene transcription has an essential role in shaping the landscape of genome replication, while it is also a major source of endogenous replication stress inducing genome instability. In this review, we discuss the current knowledge on the various mechanisms by which gene transcription can impact on DNA replication, leading to genome instability and human disease.

Download Full-text

hnRNP U and DDX47 Are Novel FANCD2 Interactors That May Help to Resolve R-Loops during Mild Replication Stress

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-112364 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1301-1301

Author(s):

Yusuke Okamoto ◽

Masako Abe ◽

Akiko Itaya ◽

Junya Tomida ◽

Akifumi Takaori-Kondo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mass Spectrometry ◽

Cell Line ◽

Fanconi Anemia ◽

Rna Processing ◽

Genome Instability ◽

Replication Stress ◽

Mass Spectrometry Analysis ◽

Genome Wide ◽

Hnrnp U ◽

Processing Factors

Abstract Background: Fanconi anemia proteins, encoded by at least 22genes (FANCA-W), constitute the Interstrand Cross Link (ICL) repair pathway. While FANCD2 is a master regulator of ICL repair, it accumulates at common fragile sites (CFS) during mild replication stress stimulated by low-dose Aphidicolin (APH) treatment. A recent study indicated that FANCD2 is required for efficient genome replication across the CFS regions. FANCD2 is also implicated in the regulation of R-loops levels. R-loops, which consist of DNA: RNA hybrids and displaced single-stranded DNA, are physiologically relevant in the genome and associate with immunoglobulin class switching, replication of mitochondrial DNA as well as transcriptional promoters or terminators. However, in any case, untimely formation of R-loops is a major threat to genome instability. Furthermore, it has been reported that R-loops which are induced by common slicing factor mutations in cases with myelodysplastic syndrome are linked to compromised proliferation of hematopoietic progenitors. It is also interesting to note that a recent study shows an interaction of FANCD2 with splicing factor 3B1 (SF3B1) and proposes their role in organizing chromatin domains to ensure coordination of replication and co-transcriptional processes. Methods: To examine the genome-wide distribution of FANCD2 protein, we set out to create a derivative of human osteosarcoma cell line, U2OS, which incorporated a 3×FLAG tag into the FANCD2 termination codon by genome editing. We performed chromatin-immunoprecipitation and sequencing (ChIP-Seq) analysis, and provide a genome-wide landscape of replication stress response involving FANCD2 in this cell line. Moreover, we purified the FANCD2 complex and analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and confirmed this interaction by co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) and proximal ligation assay (PLA) with FANCD2-3xFLAG. R-loops levels were assayed as the number of S9.6 (anti DNA:RNA hybrid antibody) stained foci per nucleus. Results: FANCD2 accumulation mostly occurs in the central portion of large transcribed genes, including CFS, and its accumulation appeared to be dependent on R-loop formation induced by transcription-replication collisions during mild replication stress. Moreover, our mass spectrometry analysis identified that FANCD2 interacts with several RNA processing factors including heterogeneous nucleoprotein U (hnRNP U), or DEAD box protein 47 (DDX47). We confirmed the interaction of these factors with FANCD2 by Co-IP as well as PLA. It was previously reported that defects in RNA-processing factors result in R-loop accumulation associated genome instability. Indeed, we found that treatment with siRNA against hnRNP U or DDX47 resulted in the increased number of the S9.6 foci. Furthermore, FANCD2 and hnRNP U or DDX47 appeared to function in an epistatic manner in suppressing APH-induced transcription-replication collisions as detected by PLA between PCNA and RNA polymerase II. Conclusion: We suggest that FANCD2 protects genome stability by recruiting RNA processing enzymes, including hnRNP U or DDX47, to resolve or prevent accumulation of R-loops induced by transcription-replication collisions during mild replication stress. Thus, our study may provide a novel insight to understand the mechanism of bone marrow failure and leukemogenesis in Fanconi anemia patients. Disclosures Takaori-Kondo: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

A genome-wide screen identifies genes that suppress the accumulation of spontaneous mutations in young and aged yeast cells

10.1101/492587 ◽

2018 ◽

Author(s):

Daniele Novarina ◽

Georges Janssens ◽

Koen Bokern ◽

Tim Schut ◽

Noor van Oerle ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mutation Rate ◽

Genome Stability ◽

Genome Instability ◽

Spontaneous Mutation ◽

Yeast Cells ◽

Spontaneous Mutations ◽

Genome Maintenance ◽

Spontaneous Mutation Rate ◽

Genome Wide ◽

A Genome

To ensure proper transmission of genetic information, cells need to preserve and faithfully replicate their genome, and failure to do so leads to genome instability, a hallmark of both cancer and aging. Defects in genes involved in guarding genome stability cause several human progeroid syndromes, and an age-dependent accumulation of mutations has been observed in different organisms, from yeast to mammals. However, it is unclear if the spontaneous mutation rate changes during aging, and if specific pathways are important for genome maintenance in old cells. We developed a high-throughput replica-pinning approach to screen for genes important to suppress the accumulation of spontaneous mutations during yeast replicative aging. We found 13 known mutation suppression genes, and 31 genes that had no previous link to spontaneous mutagenesis, and all acted independently of age. Importantly, we identified PEX19, encoding an evolutionarily conserved peroxisome biogenesis factor, as an age-specific mutation suppression gene. While wild-type and pex19Δ young cells have similar spontaneous mutation rates, aged cells lacking PEX19 display an elevated mutation rate. This finding suggests that functional peroxisomes are important to preserve genome integrity specifically in old cells, possibly due to their role in reactive oxygen species metabolism.

Download Full-text

SMARCAD1 Mediated Active Replication Fork Stability Maintains Genome Integrity

10.1101/2020.10.05.326223 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Calvin Shun Yu Lo ◽

Marvin van Toorn ◽

Vincent Gaggioli ◽

Mariana Paes Dias ◽

Yifan Zhu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Replication Fork ◽

Genome Stability ◽

Cellular Proliferation ◽

Genome Instability ◽

Genome Integrity ◽

Replication Forks ◽

Chromatin Remodeler ◽

Active Replication ◽

Fork Stalling ◽

Stalled Fork

ABSTRACTStalled fork protection pathway mediated by BRCA1/2 proteins is critical for replication fork stability that has implications in tumorigenesis. However, it is unclear if additional mechanisms are required to maintain replication fork stability. We describe a novel mechanism by which the chromatin remodeler SMARCAD1 stabilizes active replication forks that is essential for resistance towards replication poisons. We find that loss of SMARCAD1 results in toxic enrichment of 53BP1 at replication forks which mediates untimely dissociation of PCNA via the PCNA-unloader, ATAD5. Faster dissociation of PCNA causes frequent fork stalling, inefficient fork restart and accumulation of single-stranded DNA resulting in genome instability. Although, loss of 53BP1 in SMARCAD1 mutants restore PCNA levels, fork restart efficiency, genome stability and tolerance to replication poisons; this requires BRCA1 mediated fork protection. Interestingly, fork protection challenged BRCA1-deficient naïve- or PARPi-resistant tumors require SMARCAD1 mediated active fork stabilization to maintain unperturbed fork progression and cellular proliferation.

Download Full-text

Multi-BRCT domain protein Brc1 links Rhp18/Rad18 and γH2A to maintain genome stability during S-phase

10.1101/150714 ◽

2017 ◽

Author(s):

Michael C. Reubens ◽

Sophie Rozenzhak ◽

Paul Russell

Keyword(s):

Genome Stability ◽

Genome Instability ◽

Replication Stress ◽

S Phase ◽

Dna Lesions ◽

Brct Domain ◽

Replication Forks ◽

Histone H2a ◽

Domain Protein ◽

Chromosome Integrity

ABSTRACTDNA replication involves the inherent risk of genome instability, as replisomes invariably encounter DNA lesions or other structures that stall or collapse replication forks during S-phase. In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the multi-BRCT domain protein Brc1, which is related to budding yeast Rtt107 and mammalian PTIP, plays an important role in maintaining genome integrity and cell viability when cells experience replication stress. The C-terminal pair of BRCT domains in Brc1 were previously shown to bind phospho-histone H2A (γH2A) formed by Rad3/ATR checkpoint kinase at DNA lesions; however, the putative scaffold interactions involving the N-terminal BRCT domains 1-4 of Brc1 have remained obscure. Here we show that these domains bind Rhp18/Rad18, which is an E3 ubiquitin protein ligase that has crucial functions in postreplication repair. A missense allele in BRCT domain 4 of Brc1 disrupts binding to Rhp18 and causes sensitivity to replication stress. Brc1 binding to Rhp18 and γH2A are required for the Brc1-overexpression suppression of smc6-74, which impairs the Smc5/6 structural maintenance of chromosomes complex required for chromosome integrity and repair of collapsed replication forks. From these findings we propose that Brc1 provides scaffolding functions linking γH2A, Rhp18, and Smc5/6 complex at damaged replication forks.

Download Full-text

Managing Single-Stranded DNA during Replication Stress in Fission Yeast

10.32920/14637963 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Sarah A. Sabatinos ◽

Susan L. Forsburg

Keyword(s):

Cellular Response ◽

Replication Fork ◽

Genome Instability ◽

Replication Stress ◽

S Phase ◽

Single Stranded Dna ◽

Replication Checkpoint ◽

Primary Signal ◽

Fork Stalling ◽

Chromosome Integrity

Replication fork stalling generates a variety of responses, most of which cause an increase in single-stranded DNA. ssDNA is a primary signal of replication distress that activates cellular checkpoints. It is also a potential source of genome instability and a substrate for mutation and recombination. Therefore, managing ssDNA levels is crucial to chromosome integrity. Limited ssDNA accumulation occurs in wild-type cells under stress. In contrast, cells lacking the replication checkpoint cannot arrest forks properly and accumulate large amounts of ssDNA. This likely occurs when the replication fork polymerase and helicase units are uncoupled. Some cells with mutations in the replication helicase (mcm-ts) mimic checkpoint-deficient cells, and accumulate extensive areas of ssDNA to trigger the G2-checkpoint. Another category of helicase mutant (mcm4-degron) causes fork stalling in early S-phase due to immediate loss of helicase function. Intriguingly, cells realize that ssDNA is present, but fail to detect that they accumulate ssDNA, and continue to divide. Thus, the cellular response to replication stalling depends on checkpoint activity and the time that replication stress occurs in S-phase. In this review we describe the signs, signals, and symptoms of replication arrest from an ssDNA perspective. We explore the possible mechanisms for these effects. We also advise the need for caution when detecting and interpreting data related to the accumulation of ssDNA.

Download Full-text