scholarly journals Ectomycorrhizal fungi induce systemic resistance against insects on a non-mycorrhizal plant in a CERK1-dependent manner

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kishore Vishwanathan ◽  
Krzysztof Zienkiewicz ◽  
Yang Liu ◽  
Dennis Janz ◽  
Ivo Feussner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Syringae ◽  
Trichoplusia Ni ◽  
Bacterial Pathogen ◽  
Systemic Resistance ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Induce Systemic Resistance ◽  
Mycorrhizal Plant ◽  
Plant Host ◽  
Mediated Effects ◽  
Ja Signaling

ABSTRACTBelow-ground microbes can induce systemic resistance (ISR) against foliar pests and pathogens on diverse plant hosts. The prevalence of ISR among plant-microbe-pest systems raises the question of host specificity in microbial induction of ISR. To test whether ISR is limited by plant host range, we tested the ISR-inducing ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungus Laccaria bicolor on the non-mycorrhizal plant Arabidopsis. We found that root inoculation with L. bicolor triggered ISR against the insect herbivore Trichoplusia ni and induced systemic susceptibility (ISS) against the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pto). We found that L. bicolor-triggered ISR against T. ni was dependent on jasmonic acid (JA) signaling and salicylic acid (SA) biosynthesis and signaling. We found that heat killed L. bicolor and chitin are sufficient to trigger ISR against T. ni and ISS against Pto and that the chitin receptor CERK1 is necessary for L. bicolor-mediated effects on systemic immunity. Collectively our findings suggest that some ISR responses might not require intimate co-evolution of host and microbe, but rather might be the result of root perception of conserved microbial signals.

scholarly journals Bacillus amyloliquefaciens MBI600 differentially induces tomato defense signaling pathways depending on plant part and dose of application

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasia Dimopoulou ◽  
Ioannis Theologidis ◽  
Burghard Liebmann ◽  
Kriton Kalantidis ◽  
Nikon Vassilakos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plant Defense ◽  
Stress Responses ◽  
Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens ◽  
Plant Pathogens ◽  
Biological Control Agent ◽  
Induced Defense ◽  
Systemic Resistance ◽  
Marker Genes ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Plant Host

AbstractThe success of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens as a biological control agent relies on its ability to outgrow plant pathogens. It is also thought to interact with its plant host by inducing systemic resistance. In this study, the ability of B. amyloliquefaciens MBI600 to elicit defense (or other) responses in tomato seedlings and plants was assessed upon the expression of marker genes and transcriptomic analysis. Spray application of Serifel, a commercial formulation of MBI600, induced responses in a dose-dependent manner. Low dosage primed plant defense by activation of SA-responsive genes. Suggested dosage induced defense by mediating synergistic cross-talk between JA/ET and SA-signaling. Saturation of tomato roots or leaves with MBI600 elicitors activated JA/ET signaling at the expense of SA-mediated responses. The complex signaling network that is implicated in MBI600-tomato seedling interactions was mapped. MBI600 and flg22 (a bacterial flagellin peptide) elicitors induced, in a similar manner, biotic and abiotic stress responses by the coordinated activation of genes involved in JA/ET biosynthesis as well as hormone and redox signaling. This is the first study to suggest the activation of plant defense following the application of a commercial microbial formulation under conditions of greenhouse crop production.

scholarly journals Ectomycorrhizal fungi induce systemic resistance against insects on a nonmycorrhizal plant in a CERK1‐dependent manner

2020 ◽  
Vol 228 (2) ◽  
pp. 728-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kishore Vishwanathan ◽  
Krzysztof Zienkiewicz ◽  
Yang Liu ◽  
Dennis Janz ◽  
Ivo Feussner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ectomycorrhizal Fungi ◽  
Systemic Resistance ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Induce Systemic Resistance

scholarly journals Comprehensive Identification of PTI Suppressors in Type III Effector Repertoire Reveals that Ralstonia solanacearum Activates Jasmonate Signaling at Two Different Steps

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (23) ◽  
pp. 5992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahito Nakano ◽  
Takafumi Mukaihara
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Syringae ◽  
Cysteine Protease ◽  
Ralstonia Solanacearum ◽  
Acid Synthesis ◽  
Defense Responses ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Jaz Proteins ◽  
Ros Burst ◽  
Ja Signaling ◽  
Activity Dependent

Ralstonia solanacearum is the causative agent of bacterial wilt in many plants. To identify R. solanacearum effectors that suppress pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) in plants, we transiently expressed R. solanacearum RS1000 effectors in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves and evaluated their ability to suppress the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) triggered by flg22. Out of the 61 effectors tested, 11 strongly and five moderately suppressed the flg22-triggered ROS burst. Among them, RipE1 shared homology with the Pseudomonas syringae cysteine protease effector HopX1. By yeast two-hybrid screening, we identified jasmonate-ZIM-domain (JAZ) proteins, which are transcriptional repressors of the jasmonic acid (JA) signaling pathway in plants, as RipE1 interactors. RipE1 promoted the degradation of JAZ repressors and induced the expressions of JA-responsive genes in a cysteine–protease-activity-dependent manner. Simultaneously, RipE1, similarly to the previously identified JA-producing effector RipAL, decreased the expression level of the salicylic acid synthesis gene that is required for the defense responses against R. solanacearum. The undecuple mutant that lacks 11 effectors with a strong PTI suppression activity showed reduced growth of R. solanacearum in Nicotiana plants. These results indicate that R. solanacearum subverts plant PTI responses using multiple effectors and manipulates JA signaling at two different steps to promote infection.

scholarly journals The Plant Growth–Promoting Rhizobacterium Bacillus cereus AR156 Induces Systemic Resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana by Simultaneously Activating Salicylate- and Jasmonate/Ethylene-Dependent Signaling Pathways

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 533-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-Dong Niu ◽  
Hong-Xia Liu ◽  
Chun-Hao Jiang ◽  
Yun-Peng Wang ◽  
Qing-Ya Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plant Growth ◽  
Bacillus Cereus ◽  
Signaling Pathways ◽  
Pseudomonas Syringae ◽  
Defense Responses ◽  
Systemic Resistance ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Challenge Inoculation ◽  
Plant Growth Promoting ◽  
Growth Promoting

Bacillus cereus AR156 is a plant growth–promoting rhizobacterium that induces resistance against a broad spectrum of pathogens including Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. This study analyzed AR156-induced systemic resistance (ISR) to DC3000 in Arabidopsis ecotype Col-0 plants. Compared with mock-treated plants, AR156-treated ones showed an increase in biomass and reductions in disease severity and pathogen density in the leaves. The defense-related genes PR1, PR2, PR5, and PDF1.2 were concurrently expressed in the leaves of AR156-treated plants, suggesting simultaneous activation of the salicylic acid (SA)- and the jasmonic acid (JA)- and ethylene (ET)-dependent signaling pathways by AR156. The above gene expression was faster and stronger in plants treated with AR156 and inoculated with DC3000 than that in plants only inoculated with DC3000. Moreover, the cellular defense responses hydrogen peroxide accumulation and callose deposition were induced upon challenge inoculation in the leaves of Col-0 plants primed by AR156. Also, pretreatment with AR156 led to a higher level of induced protection against DC3000 in Col-0 than that in the transgenic NahG, the mutant jar1 or etr1, but the protection was absent in the mutant npr1. Therefore, AR156 triggers ISR in Arabidopsis by simultaneously activating the SA- and JA/ET-signaling pathways in an NPR1-dependent manner that leads to an additive effect on the level of induced protection.

scholarly journals Hexanoic Acid-Induced Resistance Against Botrytis cinerea in Tomato Plants

2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 1455-1465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Begonya Vicedo ◽  
Víctor Flors ◽  
María de la O Leyva ◽  
Ivan Finiti ◽  
Zhana Kravchuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Botrytis Cinerea ◽  
Induced Resistance ◽  
Pseudomonas Syringae ◽  
Hexanoic Acid ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Deficient Mutant ◽  
Callose Deposition ◽  
Tomato Plants ◽  
In The Wild ◽  
Ja Signaling

We have demonstrated that root treatment with hexanoic acid protects tomato plants against Botrytis cinerea. Hexanoic acid-induced resistance (Hx-IR) was blocked in the jasmonic acid (JA)-insensitive mutant jai1 (a coi1 homolog) and in the abscisic acid (ABA)-deficient mutant flacca (flc). Upon infection, the LoxD gene as well as the oxylipin 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid and the bioactive molecule JA-Ile were clearly induced in treated plants. However, the basal ABA levels were not altered. Hexanoic acid primed callose deposition against B. cinerea in a cultivar-dependent manner. Treated plants from Ailsa Craig, Moneymaker, and Rheinlands Ruhm showed increased callose deposition but not from Castlemart. Hexanoic acid did not prime callose accumulation in flc plants upon B. cinerea infection; therefore, ABA could act as a positive regulator of Hx-IR by enhancing callose deposition. Furthermore, although hexanoic acid protected the JA-deficient mutant defensless1 (def1), the priming for callose was higher than in the wild type. This suggests a link between JA and callose deposition in tomato. Hence, the obtained results support the idea that callose, oxylipins, and the JA-signaling pathway are involved in Hx-IR against B. cinerea. Moreover our data support the relevance of JA-signaling for basal defense against this necrotroph in tomato. Hexanoic acid also protected against Pseudomonas syringae, indicating a broad-spectrum effect for this new inducer.

scholarly journals Arabidopsis UGT76B1 glycosylates N-hydroxy-pipecolic acid and inactivates systemic acquired resistance in tomato

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric C. Holmes ◽  
Yun-Chu Chen ◽  
Mary Beth Mudgett ◽  
Elizabeth S. Sattely
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Syringae ◽  
Systemic Acquired Resistance ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Bacterial Pathogen ◽  
Defense Responses ◽  
Pipecolic Acid ◽  
Systemic Resistance ◽  
Biosynthetic Genes ◽  
Solanaceous Plants

AbstractSystemic acquired resistance (SAR) is a mechanism that plants utilize to connect a local pathogen infection to global defense responses. N-hydroxy-pipecolic acid (NHP) and a glycosylated derivative are produced during SAR, yet their individual roles in the response have not yet been elucidated. Here we report that Arabidopsis thaliana UGT76B1 can generate glycosylated NHP (NHP-Glc) in vitro and when transiently expressed alongside Arabidopsis NHP biosynthetic genes in two Solanaceous plants. During infection, Arabidopsis ugt76b1 mutants do not accumulate NHP-Glc and accumulate less glycosylated salicylic acid (SA-Glc) than wild type plants. The metabolic changes in ugt76b1 mutant plants are accompanied by enhanced defense to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae, suggesting that glycosylation of SAR molecules NHP and SA by UGT76B1 plays an important role in defense modulation. Transient expression of Arabidopsis UGT76B1 with the Arabidopsis NHP biosynthesis genes ALD1 and FMO1 in tomato increases NHP-Glc production and reduces NHP accumulation in local tissue, and abolishes the systemic resistance seen when expressing NHP-biosynthetic genes alone. These findings reveal that the glycosylation of NHP by UGT76B1 alters defense priming in systemic tissue and provide further evidence for the role of the NHP aglycone as the active metabolite in SAR signaling.

scholarly journals Pseudomonas syringae Elicits Emission of the Terpenoid (E,E)-4,8,12-Trimethyl-1,3,7,11-Tridecatetraene in Arabidopsis Leaves Via Jasmonate Signaling and Expression of the Terpene Synthase TPS4

2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 1482-1497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elham Attaran ◽  
Michael Rostás ◽  
Jürgen Zeier
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Syringae ◽  
Systemic Acquired Resistance ◽  
Induced Defense ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Bacterial Pathogen ◽  
Microbial Pathogens ◽  
Terpene Synthase ◽  
Knockout Mutant ◽  
Direct Role ◽  
Ja Signaling

Volatile, low–molecular weight terpenoids have been implicated in plant defenses, but their direct role in resistance against microbial pathogens is not clearly defined. We have examined a possible role of terpenoid metabolism in the induced defense of Arabidopsis thaliana plants against leaf infection with the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae. Inoculation of plants with virulent or avirulent P. syringae strains induces the emission of the terpenoids (E,E)-4,8,12-trimethyl-1,3,7,11-tridecatetraene (TMTT), β-ionone and α-farnesene. While the most abundant volatile, the C16-homoterpene TMTT, is produced relatively early in compatible and incompatible interactions, emission of both β-ionone and α-farnesene only increases in later stages of the compatible interaction. Pathogen-induced synthesis of TMTT is controlled through jasmonic acid (JA)-dependent signaling but is independent of a functional salicylic acid (SA) pathway. We have identified Arabidopsis T-DNA insertion lines with defects in the terpene synthase gene TPS4, which is expressed in response to P. syringae inoculation. The tps4 knockout mutant completely lacks induced emission of TMTT but is capable of β-ionone and α-farnesene production, demonstrating that TPS4 is specifically involved in TMTT formation. The tps4 plants display at least wild type–like resistance against P. syringae, indicating that TMTT per se does not protect against the bacterial pathogen in Arabidopsis leaves. Similarly, the ability to mount SA-dependent defenses and systemic acquired resistance (SAR) is barely affected in tps4, which excludes a signaling function of TMTT during SAR. Besides P. syringae challenge, intoxication of Arabidopsis leaves with copper sulfate, a treatment that strongly activates JA biosynthesis, triggers production of TMTT, β-ionone, and α-farnesene. Taken together, our data suggest that induced TMTT production in Arabidopsis is a by-product of activated JA signaling, rather than an effective defense response that contributes to resistance against P. syringae.

scholarly journals Constitutive Activation of Jasmonate Signaling in an Arabidopsis Mutant Correlates with Enhanced Resistance to Erysiphe cichoracearum, Pseudomonas syringae, and Myzus persicae

2002 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 1025-1030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Ellis ◽  
Ioannis Karafyllidis ◽  
John G. Turner
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Syringae ◽  
Myzus Persicae ◽  
Green Peach Aphid ◽  
Bacterial Pathogen ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Defense Genes ◽  
Erysiphe Cichoracearum ◽  
Enhanced Resistance ◽  
Arabidopsis Mutant ◽  
Ja Signaling

In Arabidopsis spp., the jasmonate (JA) response pathway generally is required for defenses against necrotrophic pathogens and chewing insects, while the salicylic acid (SA) response pathway is generally required for specific, resistance (R) gene-mediated defenses against both biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. For example, SA-dependent defenses are required for resistance to the biotrophic fungal pathogen Erysiphe cichoracearum UCSC1 and the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola, and also are expressed during response to the green peach aphid Myzus persicae. However, recent evidence indicates that the expression of JA-dependent defenses also may confer resistance to E. cichoracearum. To confirm and to extend this observation, we have compared the disease and pest resistance of wild-type Arabidopsis plants with that of the mutants coi1, which is insensitive to JA, and cev1, which has constitutive JA signaling. Measurements of the colonization of these plants by E. cichoracearum, P. syringae pv. maculicola, and M. persicae indicated that activation of the JA signal pathway enhanced resistance, and was associated with the activation of JA-dependent defense genes and the suppression of SA-dependent defense genes. We conclude that JA and SA induce alternative defense pathways that can confer resistance to the same pathogens and pests.

scholarly journals Identifying the Compounds of the Metabolic Elicitors of Pseudomonas fluorescens N 21.4 Responsible for Their Ability to Induce Plant Resistance

Plants ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 1020
Author(s):  
Helena Martin-Rivilla ◽  
F. Javier Gutierrez-Mañero ◽  
Ana Gradillas ◽  
Miguel O. P. Navarro ◽  
Galdino Andrade ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Fluorescens ◽  
Pseudomonas Syringae ◽  
Systemic Resistance ◽  
Induce Systemic Resistance ◽  
Commercial Plant ◽  
Optimal Action ◽  
Vacuum Liquid Chromatography ◽  
The One ◽  
Diverse Plant Species ◽  
Diverse Plant

In this work, the metabolic elicitors extracted from the beneficial rhizobacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens N 21.4 were sequentially fragmented by vacuum liquid chromatography to isolate, purify and identify the compounds responsible for the extraordinary capacities of this strain to induce systemic resistance and to elicit secondary defensive metabolism in diverse plant species. To check if the fractions sequentially obtained were able to increase the synthesis of isoflavones and if, therefore, they still maintained the eliciting capacity of the live strain, rapid and controlled experiments were done with soybean seeds. The optimal action concentration of the fractions was established and all of them elicited isoflavone secondary metabolism—the fractions that had been extracted with n-hexane being more effective. The purest fraction was the one with the highest eliciting capacity and was also tested in Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings to induce systemic resistance against the pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC 3000. This fraction was then analyzed by UHPLC/ESI–QTOF–MS, and an alkaloid, two amino lipids, three arylalkylamines and a terpenoid were tentatively identified. These identified compounds could be part of commercial plant inoculants of biological and sustainable origin to be applied in crops, due to their potential to enhance the plant immune response and since many of them have putative antibiotic and/or antifungal potential.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document