scholarly journals Sequential in cis mutagenesis in vivo reveals various functions for CTCF sites at the mouse HoxD cluster

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Rita Amândio ◽  
Leonardo Beccari ◽  
Lucille Lopez-Delisle ◽  
Bénédicte Mascrez ◽  
Jozsef Zakany ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Target Genes ◽  
Gene Clusters ◽  
Ctcf Binding ◽  
Allelic Series ◽  
Hoxd Cluster ◽  
Insulator Elements ◽  
In Cis ◽  
Regulatory Landscapes ◽  
Selection Of

Mammalian Hox gene clusters contain a range of CTCF binding sites. In addition to their importance in organizing a TAD border, which isolates the most posterior genes from the rest of the cluster, the positions and orientations of these sites suggest that CTCF may be instrumental in the selection of various subsets of contiguous genes, which are targets of distinct remote enhancers located in the flanking regulatory landscapes. We examined this possibility by producing an allelic series of cumulative in cis mutations in these sites, up to the abrogation of CTCF binding in the five sites located on one side of the TAD border. In the most impactful alleles, the global chromatin architecture of the locus was modified, yet not drastically, illustrating that CTCF sites located on one side of a strong TAD border are sufficient to organize at least part of this insulation. Spatial colinearity in the expression of these genes along the major body axis was nevertheless maintained, despite abnormal expression boundaries. In contrast, strong effects were scored in the selection of target genes responding to particular enhancers, leading to the misregulation of Hoxd genes in specific structures. Altogether, while most enhancer–promoter interactions can occur in the absence of this series of CTCF sites, the binding of CTCF in the Hox cluster is required to properly transform a rather unprecise process into a highly discriminative mechanism of interactions, which is translated into various patterns of transcription accompanied by the distinctive chromatin topology found at this locus. Our allelic series also allowed us to reveal the distinct functional contributions for CTCF sites within this Hox cluster, some acting as insulator elements, others being necessary to anchor or stabilize enhancer–promoter interactions, and some doing both, whereas they all together contribute to the formation of a TAD border. This variety of tasks may explain the amazing evolutionary conservation in the distribution of these sites among paralogous Hox clusters or between various vertebrates.

scholarly journals Sequential in-cis mutagenesis in vivo reveals various functions for CTCF sites at the mouse HoxD cluster

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita Lhopitallier ◽  
Leonardo Beccari ◽  
Lucille Lopez-Delisle ◽  
Benedicte Mascrez ◽  
Jozsef Zakany ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Target Genes ◽  
Gene Clusters ◽  
Ctcf Binding ◽  
Allelic Series ◽  
Hox Cluster ◽  
Hoxd Cluster ◽  
Insulator Elements ◽  
In Cis ◽  
Selection Of

Mammalian Hox gene clusters contain a range of CTCF binding sites. In addition to their importance in organizing a TAD border, which isolates the most posterior genes from the rest of the cluster, the positions and orientations of these sites suggest that CTCF may be instrumental in the selection of various subsets of contiguous genes, which are targets of distinct remote enhancers located in the flanking regulatory landscapes. We examined this possibility by producing an allelic series of cumulative in-cis mutations in these sites, up to the abrogation of CTCF binding in the five sites located on one side of the TAD border. In the most impactful alleles, the global chromatin architecture of the locus was modified, yet not drastically, illustrating that CTCF sites located on one side of a strong TAD border are sufficient to organize at least part of this insulation. Spatial colinearity in the expression of these genes along the major body axis was nevertheless maintained, despite abnormal expression boundaries. In contrast, strong effects were scored in the selection of target genes responding to particular enhancers, leading to the mis-regulation of Hoxd genes in specific structures. Altogether, while most enhancer-promoter interactions can occur in the absence of this series of CTCF sites, it seems that the binding of CTCF in the Hox cluster is required to properly transform a rather unprecise process into a highly discriminative mechanism of interactions, which is translated into various patterns of transcription accompanied by the distinctive chromatin topology found at this locus. Our allelic series also allowed us to reveal the distinct functional contributions for CTCF sites within this Hox cluster, some acting as insulator elements, others being necessary to anchor or stabilize enhancer-promoter interactions and some doing both, whereas all together contribute to the formation of a TAD border. This variety of tasks may explain the amazing evolutionary conservation in the distribution of these sites amongst paralogous Hox clusters or between various vertebrates.

The role of CTCF in coordinating the expression of single gene loci

2011 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 489-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Austin E Gillen ◽  
Ann Harris
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Mhc Class Ii ◽  
Noncoding Rna ◽  
Single Gene ◽  
Functional Model ◽  
Gene Clusters ◽  
Ctcf Binding ◽  
Chromatin Interactions ◽  
Insulator Elements

The CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF), which binds insulator elements in vertebrates, also facilitates coordinated gene expression at several gene clusters, including the β-globin, Igf2/H19 (insulin like growth factor 2/H19 noncoding RNA), and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II loci. CTCF controls expression of these genes both by enabling insulator function and facilitating higher order chromatin interactions. While the role of CTCF in gene regulation is best studied at these multi-gene loci, there is also evidence that CTCF contributes to the regulated expression of single genes. Here, we discuss how CTCF participates in coordinating gene expression at the CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator) and IFNG (interferon-gamma) loci. We consider the structural similarities between the loci with regard to CTCF-binding elements, the possible interaction between nuclear receptors and CTCF, and the role of CTCF in chromatin looping at these genes. These comparisons reveal a functional model that may be applicable to other single-gene loci that require CTCF for coordinated gene expression.

scholarly journals Conserved CTCF Insulator Elements Flank the Mouse and Human β-Globin Loci

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 3820-3831 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine M. Farrell ◽  
Adam G. West ◽  
Gary Felsenfeld
Keyword(s):  
Gene Clusters ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Ctcf Binding ◽  
Functional Domain ◽  
Blocking Activity ◽  
Hypersensitive Sites ◽  
Enhancer Blocking ◽  
Olfactory Receptor Genes ◽  
Insulator Elements

ABSTRACT A binding site for the transcription factor CTCF is responsible for enhancer-blocking activity in a variety of vertebrate insulators, including the insulators at the 5′ and 3′ chromatin boundaries of the chicken β-globin locus. To date, no functional domain boundaries have been defined at mammalian β-globin loci, which are embedded within arrays of functional olfactory receptor genes. In an attempt to define boundary elements that could separate these gene clusters, CTCF-binding sites were searched for at the most distal DNase I-hypersensitive sites (HSs) of the mouse and human β-globin loci. Conserved CTCF sites were found at 5′HS5 and 3′HS1 of both loci. All of these sites could bind to CTCF in vitro. The sites also functioned as insulators in enhancer-blocking assays at levels correlating with CTCF-binding affinity, although enhancer-blocking activity was weak with the mouse 5′HS5 site. These results show that with respect to enhancer-blocking elements, the architecture of the mouse and human β-globin loci is similar to that found previously for the chicken β-globin locus. Unlike the chicken locus, the mouse and human β-globin loci do not have nearby transitions in chromatin structure but the data suggest that 3′HS1 and 5′HS5 may function as insulators that prevent inappropriate interactions between β-globin regulatory elements and those of neighboring domains or subdomains, many of which possess strong enhancers.

scholarly journals Boundaries support specific long-distance interactions between enhancers and promoters in Drosophila Bithorax complex

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolay Postika ◽  
Mario Metzler ◽  
Markus Affolter ◽  
Martin Müller ◽  
Paul Schedl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Target Genes ◽  
Model Systems ◽  
Homeotic Genes ◽  
Bithorax Complex ◽  
Long Distance ◽  
Gene Target ◽  
Regulatory Domains ◽  
Insulator Elements

AbstractDrosophila bithorax complex (BX-C) is one of the best model systems for studying the role of boundaries (insulators) in gene regulation. Expression of three homeotic genes, Ubx, abd-A, and Abd-B, is orchestrated by nine parasegment-specific regulatory domains. These domains are flanked by boundary elements, which function to block crosstalk between adjacent domains, ensuring that they can act autonomously. Paradoxically, seven of the BX-C regulatory domains are separated from their gene target by at least one boundary, and must “jump over” the intervening boundaries. To understand the jumping mechanism, the Mcp boundary was replaced with Fab-7 and Fab-8. Mcp is located between the iab-4 and iab-5 domains, and defines the border between the set of regulatory domains controlling abd-A and Abd-B. When Mcp is replaced by Fab-7 or Fab-8, they direct the iab-4 domain (which regulates abd-A) to inappropriately activate Abd-B in abdominal segment A4. For the Fab-8 replacement, ectopic induction was only observed when it was inserted in the same orientation as the endogenous Fab-8 boundary. A similar orientation dependence for bypass activity was observed when Fab-7 was replaced by Fab-8. Thus, boundaries perform two opposite functions in the context of BX-C – they block crosstalk between neighboring regulatory domains, but at the same time actively facilitate long distance communication between the regulatory domains and their respective target genes.Author SummaryDrosophila bithorax complex (BX-C) is one of a few examples demonstrating in vivo role of boundary/insulator elements in organization of independent chromatin domains. BX-C contains three HOX genes, whose parasegment-specific pattern is controlled by cis-regulatory domains flanked by boundary/insulator elements. Since the boundaries ensure autonomy of adjacent domains, the presence of these elements poses a paradox: how do the domains bypass the intervening boundaries and contact their proper regulatory targets? According to the textbook model, BX-C regulatory domains are able to bypass boundaries because they harbor special promoter targeting sequences. However, contrary to this model, we show here that the boundaries themselves play an active role in directing regulatory domains to their appropriate HOX gene promoter.

scholarly journals In vivo dissection of a clustered-CTCF domain boundary reveals developmental principles of regulatory insulation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Anania ◽  
Rafael D. Acemel ◽  
Johanna Jedamzick ◽  
Adriano Bolondi ◽  
Giulia Cova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Target Genes ◽  
Domain Boundary ◽  
Boundary Function ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Ctcf Binding ◽  
Chromatin Interactions ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Multiple Levels ◽  
Developmental Principles

Vertebrate genomes organize into topologically associating domains (TADs), delimited by boundaries that insulate regulatory elements from non-target genes. However, how boundary function is established is not well understood. Here, we combine genome-wide analyses and transgenic mouse assays to dissect the regulatory logic of clustered-CTCF boundaries in vivo, interrogating their function at multiple levels: chromatin interactions, transcription and phenotypes. Individual CTCF binding sites (CBS) deletions revealed that the characteristics of specific sites can outweigh other factors like CBS number and orientation. Combined deletions demonstrated that CBS cooperate redundantly and provide boundary robustness. We show that divergent CBS signatures are not strictly required for effective insulation and that chromatin loops formed by non-convergently oriented sites could be mediated by a loop interference mechanism. Further, we observe that insulation strength constitutes a quantitative modulator of gene expression and phenotypes. Our results highlight the modular nature of boundaries and their control over developmental processes.

scholarly journals Hottip Lncrna Reinforces CTCF Defined Chromatin Boundaries and Drives Wnt Target Gene Expression in AML Leukemogenesis

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 277-277
Author(s):  
Huacheng Luo ◽  
Ganqian Zhu ◽  
Tsz Kan Fung ◽  
Yi Qiu ◽  
Mingjiang Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Triple Helix ◽  
Target Gene ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Ctcf Binding ◽  
Target Gene Expression ◽  
Rna Immunoprecipitation

We reported recently that HOXA locus associated lncRNA, HOTTIP, is highly expressed in AML patients carrying MLL rearrangement and NPM1c+ mutations. The expression of HOTTIP positively correlates with posterior HOXA gene expression and poor patient survival. We further demonstrated that HOTTIP acts as an epigenetic regulator to define oncogenic HOXA topologically associated domain (TAD) and drive HOXA associated leukemic transcription program. However, it remains unclear whether and how HOTTIP lncRNA is involved in remodeling leukemic genome to facilitate AML leukemogenesis. Here, we showed that HOTTIP regulates a fraction of CTCF binding sites (CBSs) in the AML genome by directly interacting with CTCF and its binding motifs. We carried out CTCF ChIP-seq and HOTTIP ChIRP (chromatin isolation by RNA purification)-seq comparing WT and HOTTIP knockout (KO) MOLM13 cells. KO of HOTTIP in MLL-rearranged MOLM13 AML cells specifically impaired CTCF binding sites that were co-occupied by HOTTIP lncRNA, whereas loss of HOTTIP did not affect global CTCF binding. These target genes include posterior HOXA genes and Wnt target genes such as C-MYC, EVI1, AXIN, and TWIST1. Furthermore, we found that HOTTIP interacts with its putative target sites by formation of DNA: RNA hybridization structure triple helix and R-loop in vivo and in vitro. We then carried out DRIP (DNA-RNA immunoprecipitation)-seq and DRIPc(DNA-RNA immunoprecipitation followed by cDNA conversion)-Seq, which utilize a sequence independent but structure-specific S9.6 antibody for DRIP to capture global R-loops, by comparing WT and HOTTIP KO MOLM13 cells. The obtained DRIP-seq and DRIPc-seq data were then incorporated and integrated with the HOTTIP ChIRP-seq and CTCF ChIP-seq data to explore global collaboration between R-loop and HOTTIP associated CTCF binding sites. We found that HOTTIP interacts with CTCF binding motif that defines the TADs and the promoters of the HOTTIP target genes by formation of R-loop or triple helix structure. Loss of HOTTIP disrupted the R-loop formation at promoters and enhancers of the HOTTIP target genes to inhibit their expression. In MLL-rearranged AML genome, in addition to the HOXA locus, CTCF forms leukemic specific TADs that protect aberrant Wnt target genes. Depletion of HOTTIP lncRNA impaired CTCF defined TADs in the Wnt target gene loci and reduced Wnt target gene expression. In contrast, overexpression of Hottip lncRNA (Hottip-Tg) in the mice bone marrow hematopoietic compartment perturbs hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) self-renewal and differentiation leading to AML like disease by reinforcing CTCF defined TADs, enhancing chromatin accessibility within TADs, and upregulating gene transcription in the Wnt target loci. Finally, when we treated HOTTIP expressed primary patient AML cells carrying MLL-rearrangement and their derived PDX mouse model with a canonical Wnt inhibitor, ICG-001, ICG-001 inhibited AML LSC self-renewal in in vitro by LTC-IC assays and in vivo leukemogenesis in the PDX mouse models with an aberrant HOTTIP lncRNA expression, but not in HOTTIP negative/low non-MLL AML samples. Thus, HOTTIP lncRNA and CTCF cooperate to specifically reinforce CTCF defined WNT target locus TADs and drive Wnt target gene expression in the HOTTIP expressed AML. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Therapeutic liver repopulation by transient acetaminophen selection of gene-modified hepatocytes

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (597) ◽  
pp. eabg3047
Author(s):  
Anne Vonada ◽  
Amita Tiyaboonchai ◽  
Sean Nygaard ◽  
Jeffrey Posey ◽  
Alexander Mack Peters ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cytochrome P450 ◽  
Liver Diseases ◽  
Cytochrome P450 Reductase ◽  
Preclinical Models ◽  
Liver Repopulation ◽  
Episomal Vectors ◽  
The Common ◽  
In Cis ◽  
Selection Of

Gene therapy by integrating vectors is promising for monogenic liver diseases, especially in children where episomal vectors remain transient. However, reaching the therapeutic threshold with genome-integrating vectors is challenging. Therefore, we developed a method to expand hepatocytes bearing therapeutic transgenes. The common fever medicine acetaminophen becomes hepatotoxic via cytochrome p450 metabolism. Lentiviral vectors with transgenes linked in cis to a Cypor shRNA were administered to neonatal mice. Hepatocytes lacking the essential cofactor of Cyp enzymes, NADPH-cytochrome p450 reductase (Cypor), were selected in vivo by acetaminophen administration, replacing up to 50% of the hepatic mass. Acetaminophen treatment of the mice resulted in over 30-fold expansion of transgene-bearing hepatocytes and achieved therapeutic thresholds in hemophilia B and phenylketonuria. We conclude that therapeutically modified hepatocytes can be selected safely and efficiently in preclinical models with a transient regimen of moderately hepatotoxic acetaminophen.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document