Collaborative Forms and Strategies for Business Venturing in Tourism Industries

Author(s):  
Marios Sotiriadis
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuan Hau Doan ◽  
Trung Thanh Le ◽  
Cong Doanh Duong ◽  
Thi Phuong Linh Nguyen ◽  
Duc Dung Tran ◽  
...  

PurposeThis study aims to integrate predictions from clinical psychology and UPPS impulsivity with the theory of planned behaviors (TPB) to draw a conceptual framework and test the prediction that attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms, impulsivity would contribute to the prediction of the reasoned cognitive process of entrepreneurship over and above key predictors from an extended TPB model.Design/methodology/approachThis study utilized a sample of 2,482 students from 14 universities/institutes in Vietnam; confirmatory factor analysis was employed to test the validity and reliability. Then, regression analysis with PROCESS macro approach (5,000 bootstrap sample and 95% confidence interval) was employed to estimate the association paths and multiple mediators.FindingsThe study reveals that ADHD symptoms and impulsivity substantially contribute to the exploration of an entrepreneurial intention throughout TPB predictors, with those higher in ADHD symptoms and impulsivity having higher intentions to engage in business venturing. Moreover, UPPS impulsiveness might valuably be incorporated with TPB predictors while predicting behaviors that are often examined as the process of rational cognitive strategies business venturing.Practical implicationsThis study showed that a start-up business can be seen as a career choice for students who exhibit extensive ADHD symptoms to use their talents effectively, thus contributing to creating value for society and improving personal well-being.Originality/valueThis article stood to make contributions to entrepreneurship literature by investigating the effects of ADHD symptoms, four impulsivity traits on an entrepreneurial intention via three precursors in TPB, including attitude toward entrepreneurship, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control.


2021 ◽  
pp. 104225872110433
Author(s):  
Stratos Ramoglou ◽  
Stelios Zyglidopoulos ◽  
Foteini Papadopoulou

How can stakeholder theory contribute to opportunity theory? We suggest that stakeholder theory affords appropriate theoretical lenses for grounding the opportunity-actualization perspective more firmly within the real-world constraints of business venturing. Actualization departs from a strong focus on entrepreneurial agency to conceptualize how pre-existing environmental conditions determine what entrepreneurial action can achieve. We explain that stakeholder theory can strengthen the outward-looking orientation of actualization by (1) bringing the entirety of stakeholders centre-stage, beyond a narrow focus on market stakeholders, and (2) stressing the importance of noneconomic considerations for the actualization of economic opportunities. Our theorization culminates in the concept of ‘strategic opportunity thinking’ (SOT). We conceptualize SOT as a way of protecting entrepreneurs from the blind-to-stakeholders mindset that either sleepwalks them into the territory of non-opportunity or prevents them from the actualization of real yet difficult-to-actualize opportunities in the absence of stakeholder-centric thinking.


2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 1094-1123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffen Farny ◽  
Ewald Kibler ◽  
Solange Hai ◽  
Paolo Landoni

This study develops an understanding of the role of emotional connectivity for volunteer retention in prosocial business venturing. By embedding it in organizational ambivalence theory, our analysis of four volunteer-dependent community ventures reveals two mechanisms through which entrepreneurs strengthen volunteers’ emotional connectivity. We first identify emotion-focused practices that form volunteers’ emotional attachment to the venture, and then demonstrate how duality-focused practices, in the form of managing inherent organizational duality, complement emotion-focused practices to foster volunteers’ emotional loyalty to the venture. Theorizing from our findings, we introduce a model of managing volunteers’ emotional connectivity, and conclude by discussing its implications for prosocial venture research on volunteerism and affective commitment.


2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 292-305
Author(s):  
Noel Campbell ◽  
Adriana S. Cordis

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether public corruption influences entrepreneurial activity in the USA. Because the true underlying level of corruption is inherently unobservable, it cannot be factored into business venturing decisions. The authors hypothesize, therefore, that new business venturing should be related to the expected corruption level. Design/methodology/approach – The authors follow Cordis (2009) to calculate the expected rate of public corruption given observed levels of public corruption. The authors embed the expected level of corruption in a relatively standard model of business venturing, which the authors estimate using a cross section of the US states covering the period of 1986-2009. Findings – Using a relatively standard model of business venturing that accounts for variation in predicted corruption levels, the authors find that entrepreneurs launch more businesses in states with higher predicted corruption. Originality/value – To the knowledge, no one has previously tested the impact of expected corruption on entrepreneurial activity.


Author(s):  
Trinh Thu Thuy ◽  
Pham Thi Kim Ngoc ◽  
Pham Thi Thanh Hong

Drawing on the theory of planned behavior in entrepreneurship, the research proposes a model linking educational determinants, perceived entrepreneurial behavior control and entrepreneurial intentions. The model is tested with a sample of 163 students at National Economics University. The result shows that university education factors including “entrepreneurship inspiration”, “work integrated learning” and “extra curricular activities” have impact to “students’ entrepreneurial behavior control” and then “entrepreneurial behavior control” as a platform through which the educational factors have impact to “overall entrepreneurial intention”. The findings provide support to the Ajzen’s theory of planned behaviour and have wider implications for the practice of teaching in higher educational institutions. Keywords Education, entrepreneurship, university students, teaching methods, entrepreneurial intention References Becchard Béchard, J. P., and Grégoire, D., “Entrepreneurship Education Research Revisited: The Case of Higher Education”, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4 (2005) 1, 22-38.[2] Nguyen Thu Thuy and Nguyen Ngoc Huyen, “Determinants of university students’ entrepreuourship”, Journal of Economics and Development, 7/2014. [3] Fiet, J.O., “The theoretical side of teaching entrepreneurship”, Journal of Business Venturing, 16 (2000) 1, 1-24. [4] Wu, S., Wu, L., “The impact of higher education on entrepreneurial intention of university students in China”, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15 (2008), 752- 774.[5] Liñán, F., Chen, Y.W., “Development and Cross-Cultural Application of a Specific Instrument to Measure Entrepreneurial intentions”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33 (2009) 3, 593-617.[6] Krueger, N.F., Reilly, M.D., Carsrud, A.L., “Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions”, Journal of Business Venturing 15 (2000) 5/6, 411-432.[7] Ajzen, I., “The theory of planned behavior”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (1991) 2, 179211. [8] Verzat, C., and Bachelet, R., “Developing and Entrepreneurial Spirit among engineering college students: What are the educational factors?”, Entrepreneurship Education, Fayolle, A., and Klandt, H., Elgar, E., (eds) chapter 11, 2006.[9] Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S. & Al-Laham, A., “Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources”, Journal of Business Venturing, 22 (2007) 4, 566-591.[10] Balan, P., Metcalfe, M., “Identifying teaching methods that engage entrepreneurship students”, Education & Training, 54 (2012) 5, 368-384.[11] Vesa P. T., “Learning entrepreneurship in higher education”, Education and Training, 52 (2010) 1, 48-61.[12] El-Khasawneh, B., “Entrepreneurship Promotion at Educational Institutions: A Model Suitable for Emerging Economies”, WSEAS transactions on business and economics, 5 (2008) 2, 27-35. [13]Lüthje, C., and Franke, N., “Entrepreneurial Intentions of Business Students: A Benchmarking Study”, International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 1 (2004) 3, 269-288. [14] Florin, J., Karri, R., and Rossiter, N., “Fostering entrepreneurial drive in business education: An attitudinal approach”, Journal of Management Education, 31 (2007) 1, pp. 17-42.[15] Peterman, N.E. & Kennedy, J., “Enterprise Education: Influencing Students’ Perceptions of Entrepreneurship”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28 (2003) 9 2, 129-144.


2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Boudreaux

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document