scholarly journals Institutional characteristics, signaling variables and IPO initial returns

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheela Devi D. Sundarasen
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offering ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Oecd Countries ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Institutional Characteristics ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Public Offering

Purpose This paper aims to provide empirical evidence on the extent of alteration institutional characteristics, i.e. legal origin and corruption levels, may have on the signaling effects of auditors’ reputation, underwriters’ reputation and ownership retention on initial public offering (IPO) initial returns in OECD countries. Design/methodology/approach Cross-sectional data composed of 6,182 IPOs from 30 OECD countries are used for 2003-2012. Ordinary least square with multiple linear regressions is used to test the hypotheses. Findings The findings indicate that the legal framework and corruption level of a country alters the signaling effects of underwriters’ reputation, auditors’ reputation and ownership retention in an IPO environment. These three variables mitigate information asymmetry, signal firm value to potential investors and ultimately decrease IPO initial returns. This relationship is more significant in the civil law countries. Corruption levels negatively moderate the relationship in the common law and Scandinavian civil law countries but have no significance in the German and French civil law countries, indicating the importance of the signaling variables in these two civil law countries. Originality/value This study examines the extent of the alterations that the legal framework and the corruption levels cause to the signaling relationship between auditors’ reputation, underwriters’ reputation and ownership retention on IPO initial returns in selected OECD countries.

Impact of investors’ protection, transparency level and legal origin on initial public offering (IPO) initial returns

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (7) ◽  
pp. 738-760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheela Sundarasen ◽  
Sanjay Goel ◽  
Fairuz Ahmad Zulaini
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offerings ◽  
Initial Public Offering ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Oecd Countries ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Litigation Risk ◽  
Managerial Control ◽  
Legal Origin ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Content Type

Purpose Managers may underprice initial public offerings (IPOs), leading to higher initial returns (IRs). The purpose of this paper is multi-fold: to compensate investors for risk, to reduce litigation risk, as well as to maintain control over the firm. The authors examine country-level contingencies (degree of investor protection, legal origin and degree of transparency) in OECD countries to explain IPO IRs. Design/methodology/approach Cross-sectional data comprising of 4,164 IPOs from 28 OECD countries are used for the period of 2005-2010. Ordinary least square using multiple linear regressions is used to test the hypotheses. Findings Investors’ protection is associated with higher IRs. This relationship is stronger in the non-common law countries. Degree of transparency negatively moderates the relationship in common law countries. Overall, the results show evidence of risk compensation, litigation risk reduction, and managerial control motives in underpricing. Originality/value IPO IRs in OECD countries is examined, within the boundaries of institutional characteristics, i.e., investors’ protection, legal origin and transparency level.

Does prospectus information matter in IPO pricing?

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 514-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rasidah Mohd-Rashid ◽  
Mansur Masih ◽  
Ruzita Abdul-Rahim ◽  
Norliza Che-Yahya
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offering ◽  
Institutional Investors ◽  
Ordinary Least Squares ◽  
Quadratic Model ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Ipo Pricing ◽  
The Government ◽  
Public Offering ◽  
Lower Uncertainty

Purpose The purpose of this study is to identify selected information from the prospectus that might signal the initial public offering (IPO) offer price. Design/methodology/approach This study uses cross-sectional data for a 14-year period from 2000 to 2014 in examining hypotheses relating to Shariah-compliant status, institutional investors, underwriter ranking and shareholder retention, with respect to their associations with the offer price of the IPOs. Further, this study uses ordinary least squares (OLS) for all models, including the models for both subsamples of Shariah- and non-Shariah-compliant IPOs. As for robustness, this study incorporates the quantile regression and quadratic model. Findings The results tend to provide support for the argument that firms with Shariah-compliant status reflect lower uncertainty and project better signalling of quality due to greater scrutiny by the government and thus are able to offer IPOs at higher prices. Similarly, firms with a higher proportion of shareholder retention indicate lower risks as insiders forego their options to diversify their portfolio, and hence could price their IPOs higher. Finally, the involvement of institutional investors and higher underwriter ranking could be used by firms to disregard information asymmetry, and therefore, the issuer might have to discount the IPO offer price. Research limitations/implications This study focuses solely on information in the prospectus that should not be disregarded by the investors in valuing the appropriateness of the IPO offer price. This study contributes in terms of providing a better understanding of the determinant factors of the IPO offer price of the firms which are Shariah-compliant. Originality/value This paper provides evidence for the determinants of the IPO offer price in a fixed pricing mechanism for both Shariah-and non-Shariah-compliant IPOs.

Relationship between prestige signals and over-subscription ratio

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 564-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Albada ◽  
Othman Yong ◽  
Soo-Wah Low
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offering ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Executive Board ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Underwriter Reputation ◽  
Reputational Capital ◽  
Public Offering ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Institutional Participation

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine whether initial public offering (IPO) over-subscription is a function of firm’s prestige signals conveyed by third parties with reputational capital such as underwriter, auditor and independent non-executive board member.Design/methodology/approachThe relationship between prestige signals and over-subscription ratio (OSR) of IPOs is analysed using a cross-sectional regression based on a sample of 393 IPOs issued between January 2000 and December 2015.FindingsThe results indicate that IPOs underwritten by reputable underwriters have lower OSR than those underwritten by non-reputable underwriters. While issuer engages reputable underwriter to certify firm quality to reduce information asymmetry, the action brings with it lower initial returns for its IPO. Investors interpret the signal conveyed by issuer’s choice of underwriter from under-pricing perspective and respond accordingly by reducing IPO demand. This implies that investors regard under-pricing as a more valuable signal than firm quality signal associated with underwriter reputation. The findings also indicate that over-subscription increases in IPOs that have above average initial returns and higher institutional participation. Issuing firms that go public in a period of high IPO volume are associated with low OSR.Originality/valueThis is the first paper to examine the relationship between the prestige signals and OSR of IPOs in the Malaysian context.

R&D investment decisions of IPO firms and long-term future performance

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana Fedyk ◽  
Natalya Khimich
Keyword(s):  
Stock Returns ◽  
Initial Public Offering ◽  
Investment Decision ◽  
Investment Decisions ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Net Income ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Public Offering ◽  
D Investment

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to link valuation of different accounting items to research and development (R&D) investment decisions and investigate how suboptimal R&D choices during initial public offering (IPO) are linked to future operating and market underperformance. Design/methodology/approach For firms with substantial growth opportunities, accounting net income is a poor measure of the firm’s performance (Smith and Watts, 1992). Therefore, other metrics such as R&D intensity are used by investors to evaluate firms’ performance. This leads to a coexistence of two strategies: if earnings are the main value driver, firms tend to underinvest in R&D; and if R&D expenditures are the main value driver, firms tend to overinvest in R&D. Findings The authors show that the R&D investment decision varies systematically with cross-sectional characteristics: firms that are at the growth stage, unprofitable or belong to science-driven industries are more likely to overinvest, while firms that are able to avoid losses by decreasing R&D expenditure are more likely to underinvest. Finally, they find that R&D overinvestment leads to future underperformance as evidenced by poor operating return on assets, lower product market share, higher frequency of delisting due to poor performance and negative abnormal stock returns. Originality/value While prior literature concentrates on R&D underinvestment as a tool of reporting higher net income, the authors demonstrate the existence of an alternative strategy used by many IPO firms – R&D overinvestment.

Impact of IPO grading on earnings management

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yogesh Maheshwari ◽  
Khushbu Agrawal
Keyword(s):  
Earnings Management ◽  
Initial Public Offering ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Discretionary Accruals ◽  
Alternative Measure ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Public Offering ◽  
The Impact ◽  
First Time

Purpose – This paper aims to examine the impact of initial public offering (IPO) grading on earnings management by Indian companies in their IPOs. Specifically, it investigates whether earnings management significantly differs in the pre-IPO grading regime and post-IPO grading regime. Further, it examines whether earnings management significantly differs between high-graded and low-graded IPOs. Design/methodology/approach – The cross-sectional modified Jones model is used to obtain the discretionary accruals, a proxy for earnings management. The impact of IPO grading on earnings management is assessed using multiple regression analysis. Findings – Earnings management is significantly lower in graded IPOs as compared to the ones that are not graded. Further, among the graded IPOs, the high-graded IPOs exhibit lower earnings management as compared to the low-graded IPOs. The findings are robust to the use of an alternative measure for discretionary accruals. Originality/value – IPO grading in India is a unique certification mechanism, introduced for the first time in any market. This paper establishes the efficacy of this mandatory certification mechanism in reducing earnings management. The findings could be valuable to issuer companies, investors and market regulators.

scholarly journals Investment funds and underpricing of shares

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-388
Author(s):  
Hitalo Alberto de Souza Faria Castilho ◽  
Matheus Souza De Resende ◽  
Eduardo Ramos de Oliveira Franco Montoro ◽  
Vinicius Akio De Almeida Shotoko ◽  
Michele Nascimento Jucá ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Capital Structure ◽  
Information Asymmetry ◽  
Initial Public Offering ◽  
Private Equity ◽  
Sampling Period ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Investment Funds ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Moment ◽  
Public Offering

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to assess whether greater participation of venture capital/private equity (VC/PE) funds in the companies’ capital structure at the moment of initial public offering (IPO) contributes to the reduction in the underpricing of their shares. Design/methodology/approach Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, mean difference test and cross-sectional regression were used. The final sample consisted of 89 companies making IPO in Brasil Bolsa Balcão between 2007 and 2017. Findings The participation of VC/PE funds was shown to mitigate the effect of information asymmetry on managers and shareholders, thus reducing the underpricing of companies at the moment of IPO (H1). However, the expectation that a greater participation of these funds promotes further reduction in a potential underpricing (H2) was not confirmed. Research limitations/implications One can highlight the small amount of IPOs during the sampling period due to the occurrence of international and national economic crises, as well as the difficulty in obtaining information on the participation of VC/PE funds in the companies’ capital structure. Practical implications It was observed that information asymmetry had a mitigating effect from the presence of these funds in the companies, which can improve the pricing of their shares, decrease the costs and make volume captions viable for investments, in addition to giving credibility to the market information effectiveness. Originality/value This study differs from others in that it assesses not only the influence of VC/PE funds on the reduction of the underpricing of IPO shares, but also the participation of these funds in the capital of these companies.

Determinants of heterogeneity in investors' opinions on IPO valuation: evidence from the Pakistan stock market

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Waqas Mehmood ◽  
Rasidah Mohd-Rashid ◽  
Norliza Che-Yahya ◽  
Chui Zi Ong
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offering ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Least Square Method ◽  
Political Stability ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Pricing Mechanism ◽  
Price Range ◽  
Public Offering ◽  
High Level

PurposeThis study investigated the effect of pricing mechanism and oversubscription on the heterogeneity of investors' opinions on initial public offering (IPO) valuation.Design/methodology/approachBesides the ordinary least square method, this study incorporated robust least square, stepwise least square and quantile regression methods to investigate the aftermarket behaviour of investors using the price range on the first day of trading of 82 IPOs listed on the Pakistan stock exchange.FindingsThe aftermarket behaviour of investors was found to be significantly influenced by the pricing mechanism, oversubscription, financial leverage, political stability and the risk of IPO, whereas control of corruption showed an insignificant impact. Concurrently, the findings showed that pricing mechanism and oversubscription played a crucial role in determining the intensity of investors' heterogeneous opinions at high levels of significance.Originality/valuePricing mechanism and oversubscription not only signal the quality of IPOs but also provide an important means for reducing the information asymmetry associated with new listings. Based on the literature review, it was found that both the pricing mechanism and oversubscription have yet to be explored in investigating the aftermarket behaviour of investors using the price range in the Pakistan IPO market. This study suggests that book building pricing mechanism and oversubscription are associated with lower heterogeneity in investors’ opinions at a high level of significance.

Does franchising matter on IPO performance?

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 2535-2555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozgur Ozdemir ◽  
Murat Kizildag
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offering ◽  
Abnormal Returns ◽  
Restaurant Industry ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Ipo Performance ◽  
Long Run ◽  
Ordinary Least Square Regression ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Public Offering

Purpose This paper has two main purposes. First, this paper aims to examine whether pre-initial public offering (IPO) franchising activity of issuing firms is priced in the financial markets and results in pricing differential between franchising and non-franchising firms at the time of IPO. Second, the paper aims to find out whether firms with pre-IPO franchising achieve better post-IPO stock performance compared to non-franchising firms. Design/methodology/approach To test research hypotheses, empirical models were developed and tested through ordinary least square regression analysis. Several data sources were used including Thomson One Banker’s SDC database, Compustat/CRSP and IPO prospectuses. Findings The paper provides further insights to the underpricing phenomenon surrounding IPOs and long-run performance of IPO shares subsequent to listing. Particularly, the study reveals that franchising firms underprice their issues to a higher degree compared to non-franchising firms, and franchising positively affects the post-IPO benchmark adjusted cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) over a three-year observation period. Research limitations/implications Because the study tests the proposed hypotheses using data only from the restaurant industry, the research results may lack generalizability. Therefore, researchers are encouraged to test similar hypotheses using larger sample sizes from other industries. Practical implications The study’s findings have important implications both for IPO issuers in positioning their offering and for IPO investors in comparing IPO stocks and forming long-run portfolios. Originality/value This paper contributes both to the IPO and franchising literatures by providing primary insights about how investors perceive pre-IPO franchising and incorporate their perception into their pricing at an IPO.

scholarly journals SPACs: post-merger survival

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 679-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milos Vulanovic
Keyword(s):  
Failure Rate ◽  
Initial Public Offering ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Institutional Characteristics ◽  
Private Company ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Sole Purpose ◽  
Foreign Companies ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Public Offering

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to study how institutional characteristics of specified purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) are related to their post-merger survival. SPACs are unique financial firms that conduct the initial public offering (IPO) with the sole purpose of using the proceeds to acquire another private company. The paper finds that institutional characteristics of SPACs are important in determining post-merger outcomes of new company, specifically when it comes to their survival/failure, i.e., increases in pre-merger commitment by SPAC stakeholders and initial positive market performance increase post-merger survival likelihood; on the contrary, mergers with higher transaction costs and focused on foreign companies exhibit increased likelihood of failure. Design/methodology/approach Using unique sample of companies conducting an IPO, namely, SPACs, with the sole purpose to execute an acquisition in the future date within limited time, this paper presents additional evidence on the survival and acquisition frequency of IPOs, and determinants of these choices. Findings Observing unique set of specified purpose companies, this paper documents that SPACs’ failure rate is at the level of 58.09 percent, higher than any previously reported failure rate in the post-IPO survival literature and comparable only to failure rates found by Hensler et al. (1997) at 55.10 percent for general companies. In addition, the paper documents similar findings to Bhabra and Pettway (2003) that prospectus and market characteristics of original companies have predictive power with respect to survival. Originality/value This study extends the literature on post-IPO survival in following ways. First, the paper documents survival rates for unique set of companies organized with the sole purpose to acquire another company. Second, the paper presents evidence on how institutional characteristics of SPAC determine their post-merged outcomes, specifically when it comes to their failures. Finally, paper contributes to the scant literature on SPACs providing new evidence on their post-merger outcomes and performance.

The impact of changes in regulations on Malaysian IPOs

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rasidah Mohd-Rashid ◽  
Ahmad Hakimi Tajuddin ◽  
Karren Lee-Hwei Khaw ◽  
Chui Zi Ong
Keyword(s):  
Initial Public Offering ◽  
Ordinary Least Squares ◽  
The Body ◽  
Quadratic Term ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Body Of Knowledge ◽  
Public Offering ◽  
Logit Regression Model ◽  
The Impact

Purpose This study aims to examine the changes in equity guidelines and initial returns in the Malaysian initial public offering (IPO) market. Design/methodology/approach The study uses cross-sectional data over 16 years from 2000 to 2016. It uses ordinary least squares for the baseline model and incorporates an interaction term, quantile regression, quadratic term, break test and logit regression model for further analysis. Findings The results support the propositions that lockup provisions signal commitment and demand increase initial returns. The revision in the Bumiputera equity requirement means that issuers no longer need to discount offer prices to entice investors. Finally, the revised Sharīʿah-compliance screening requirement ensures that stocks are better in quality and more transparent, leading to a higher demand that drives prices upwards. Research limitations/implications This study’s findings provide insights into how issuers can secure good subscriptions. Besides, policymakers should ensure that firms disclose the required information in their prospectuses. Originality/value This study adds to the body of knowledge on whether and how the regulatory requirements affect IPO initial returns.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document